Articles | Volume 12, issue 8
Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 3805–3834, 2019
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-3805-2019
© Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 3805–3834, 2019
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-3805-2019
© Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Methods for assessment of models 30 Aug 2019
Methods for assessment of models | 30 Aug 2019
TheDiaTo (v1.0) – a new diagnostic tool for water, energy and entropy budgets in climate models
Valerio Lembo et al.
Related authors
Veronika Eyring, Lisa Bock, Axel Lauer, Mattia Righi, Manuel Schlund, Bouwe Andela, Enrico Arnone, Omar Bellprat, Björn Brötz, Louis-Philippe Caron, Nuno Carvalhais, Irene Cionni, Nicola Cortesi, Bas Crezee, Edouard L. Davin, Paolo Davini, Kevin Debeire, Lee de Mora, Clara Deser, David Docquier, Paul Earnshaw, Carsten Ehbrecht, Bettina K. Gier, Nube Gonzalez-Reviriego, Paul Goodman, Stefan Hagemann, Steven Hardiman, Birgit Hassler, Alasdair Hunter, Christopher Kadow, Stephan Kindermann, Sujan Koirala, Nikolay Koldunov, Quentin Lejeune, Valerio Lembo, Tomas Lovato, Valerio Lucarini, François Massonnet, Benjamin Müller, Amarjiit Pandde, Núria Pérez-Zanón, Adam Phillips, Valeriu Predoi, Joellen Russell, Alistair Sellar, Federico Serva, Tobias Stacke, Ranjini Swaminathan, Verónica Torralba, Javier Vegas-Regidor, Jost von Hardenberg, Katja Weigel, and Klaus Zimmermann
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 3383–3438, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-3383-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-3383-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
The Earth System Model Evaluation Tool (ESMValTool) is a community diagnostics and performance metrics tool designed to improve comprehensive and routine evaluation of earth system models (ESMs) participating in the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP). It has undergone rapid development since the first release in 2016 and is now a well-tested tool that provides end-to-end provenance tracking to ensure reproducibility.
Valerio Lembo, Isabella Bordi, and Antonio Speranza
Earth Syst. Dynam., 8, 295–312, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-8-295-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-8-295-2017, 2017
Short summary
Short summary
The study wishes to better characterize the annual and semiannual cycles of surface temperature and baroclinicity at midlatitudes as observed in ERA-Interim reanalysis data and AOGCM simulations. Results show that at the semiannual frequency model phases between surface temperature and baroclinicity have wide dispersion in both hemispheres with large errors in the estimates, denoting uncertainty and a degree of disagreement among models.
Miriam D'Errico, Pascal Yiou, Cesare Nardini, Frank Lunkeit, and Davide Faranda
Earth Syst. Dynam. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-2020-61, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-2020-61, 2020
Preprint under review for ESD
Short summary
Short summary
Climate change is already affecting weather extreme. In a warming climate, we will expect the intensity of cold spells to decrease in frequency and intensity. However, our analysis shows that the intensity of snowy cold spells events over Italy is not decreasing and that most of the extreme snowfalls occur in the very recent past. Using climate simulations, we show a key mechanism in modulating snowfall in a warming climate: the convective feedback of the Mediterranean Sea.
Veronika Eyring, Lisa Bock, Axel Lauer, Mattia Righi, Manuel Schlund, Bouwe Andela, Enrico Arnone, Omar Bellprat, Björn Brötz, Louis-Philippe Caron, Nuno Carvalhais, Irene Cionni, Nicola Cortesi, Bas Crezee, Edouard L. Davin, Paolo Davini, Kevin Debeire, Lee de Mora, Clara Deser, David Docquier, Paul Earnshaw, Carsten Ehbrecht, Bettina K. Gier, Nube Gonzalez-Reviriego, Paul Goodman, Stefan Hagemann, Steven Hardiman, Birgit Hassler, Alasdair Hunter, Christopher Kadow, Stephan Kindermann, Sujan Koirala, Nikolay Koldunov, Quentin Lejeune, Valerio Lembo, Tomas Lovato, Valerio Lucarini, François Massonnet, Benjamin Müller, Amarjiit Pandde, Núria Pérez-Zanón, Adam Phillips, Valeriu Predoi, Joellen Russell, Alistair Sellar, Federico Serva, Tobias Stacke, Ranjini Swaminathan, Verónica Torralba, Javier Vegas-Regidor, Jost von Hardenberg, Katja Weigel, and Klaus Zimmermann
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 3383–3438, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-3383-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-3383-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
The Earth System Model Evaluation Tool (ESMValTool) is a community diagnostics and performance metrics tool designed to improve comprehensive and routine evaluation of earth system models (ESMs) participating in the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP). It has undergone rapid development since the first release in 2016 and is now a well-tested tool that provides end-to-end provenance tracking to ensure reproducibility.
Mallory Carlu, Francesco Ginelli, Valerio Lucarini, and Antonio Politi
Nonlin. Processes Geophys., 26, 73–89, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-26-73-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-26-73-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
We explore the nature of instabilities in a well-known meteorological toy model, the Lorenz 96, to unravel key mechanisms of interaction between scales of different resolutions and time scales. To do so, we use a mathematical machinery known as Lyapunov analysis, allowing us to capture the degrees of chaoticity associated with fundamental directions of instability. We find a non-trivial group of such directions projecting significantly on slow variables, associated with long term dynamics.
Gabriele Vissio and Valerio Lucarini
Nonlin. Processes Geophys., 25, 413–427, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-25-413-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-25-413-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
Constructing good parametrizations is key when studying multi-scale systems. We consider a low-order model and derive a parametrization via a recently developed statistical mechanical approach. We show how the method allows for seamlessly treating the case when the unresolved dynamics is both faster and slower than the resolved one. We test the skill of the parametrization by using the formalism of the Wasserstein distance, which allows for measuring how different two probability measures are.
Lesley De Cruz, Sebastian Schubert, Jonathan Demaeyer, Valerio Lucarini, and Stéphane Vannitsem
Nonlin. Processes Geophys., 25, 387–412, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-25-387-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-25-387-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
The predictability of weather models is limited largely by the initial state error growth or decay rates. We have computed these rates for PUMA, a global model for the atmosphere, and MAOOAM, a more simplified, coupled model which includes the ocean. MAOOAM has processes at distinct timescales, whereas PUMA surprisingly does not. We propose a new programme to compute the natural directions along the flow that correspond to the growth or decay rates, to learn which components play a role.
Tamás Bódai, Valerio Lucarini, and Frank Lunkeit
Earth Syst. Dynam. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-2018-30, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-2018-30, 2018
Revised manuscript not accepted
Short summary
Short summary
We establish a framework to conduct a scenario analysis of the best possible outcomes under geoengineering. The scenarios may consist of scenarios of greenhouse gas emission the choice of the quantity that we want to keep under control. The motivation is the desire of an efficient way of assessing the side-effects of geoengineering, concerning the unwanted and uncontrolled changes. Countering CO2 emission by modulating insolation, we find considerable changes in local temperatures or rainfall.
Valerio Lembo, Isabella Bordi, and Antonio Speranza
Earth Syst. Dynam., 8, 295–312, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-8-295-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-8-295-2017, 2017
Short summary
Short summary
The study wishes to better characterize the annual and semiannual cycles of surface temperature and baroclinicity at midlatitudes as observed in ERA-Interim reanalysis data and AOGCM simulations. Results show that at the semiannual frequency model phases between surface temperature and baroclinicity have wide dispersion in both hemispheres with large errors in the estimates, denoting uncertainty and a degree of disagreement among models.
M.-A. Knietzsch, A. Schröder, V. Lucarini, and F. Lunkeit
Earth Syst. Dynam., 6, 591–615, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-6-591-2015, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-6-591-2015, 2015
Short summary
Short summary
A general circulation model with an aquaplanet setup is used to study the impact of changes in the oceanic heat transport (OHT) on the atmospheric circulation. The atmosphere counterbalances the imposed changes in OHT. A stronger OHT leads to a decline in the intensity and a poleward shift of the maxima of both the Hadley and Ferrel cells. The efficiency of the climate machine, the intensity of the Lorenz energy cycle and the material entropy production of the system decline with increased OHT.
S. Hasson, V. Lucarini, M. R. Khan, M. Petitta, T. Bolch, and G. Gioli
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 4077–4100, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-4077-2014, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-4077-2014, 2014
P. B. Holden, N. R. Edwards, P. H. Garthwaite, K. Fraedrich, F. Lunkeit, E. Kirk, M. Labriet, A. Kanudia, and F. Babonneau
Geosci. Model Dev., 7, 433–451, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-7-433-2014, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-7-433-2014, 2014
S. Hasson, V. Lucarini, S. Pascale, and J. Böhner
Earth Syst. Dynam., 5, 67–87, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-5-67-2014, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-5-67-2014, 2014
R. Deidda, M. Marrocu, G. Caroletti, G. Pusceddu, A. Langousis, V. Lucarini, M. Puliga, and A. Speranza
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 5041–5059, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-5041-2013, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-5041-2013, 2013
S. Hasson, V. Lucarini, and S. Pascale
Earth Syst. Dynam., 4, 199–217, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-4-199-2013, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-4-199-2013, 2013
Related subject area
Climate and Earth System Modeling
FORTE 2.0: a fast, parallel and flexible coupled climate model
Optimization of the sulfate aerosol hygroscopicity parameter in WRF-Chem
Updated European hydraulic pedotransfer functions with communicated uncertainties in the predicted variables (euptfv2)
Spin-up characteristics with three types of initial fields and the restart effects on forecast accuracy in the GRAPES global forecast system
GTS v1.0: a macrophysics scheme for climate models based on a probability density function
Calibration of temperature-dependent ocean microbial processes in the cGENIE.muffin (v0.9.13) Earth system model
Description and evaluation of aerosol in UKESM1 and HadGEM3-GC3.1 CMIP6 historical simulations
DiRong1.0: a distributed implementation for improving routing network generation in model coupling
Overview of the Norwegian Earth System Model (NorESM2) and key climate response of CMIP6 DECK, historical, and scenario simulations
Geospatial input data for the PALM model system 6.0: model requirements, data sources and processing
Exploring the parameter space of the COSMO-CLM v5.0 regional climate model for the Central Asia CORDEX domain
The benefits of increasing resolution in global and regional climate simulations for European climate extremes
European daily precipitation according to EURO-CORDEX regional climate models (RCMs) and high-resolution global climate models (GCMs) from the High-Resolution Model Intercomparison Project (HighResMIP)
Harmonization of global land use change and management for the period 850–2100 (LUH2) for CMIP6
A computationally efficient method for probabilistic local warming projections constrained by history matching and pattern scaling, demonstrated by WASP–LGRTC-1.0
R2D2 v2.0: accounting for temporal dependences in multivariate bias correction via analogue rank resampling
Extending the Modular Earth Submodel System (MESSy v2.54) model hierarchy: the ECHAM/MESSy IdeaLized (EMIL) model setup
Boreal summer intraseasonal oscillation in a superparameterized general circulation model: effects of air–sea coupling and ocean mean state
Reduced Complexity Model Intercomparison Project Phase 1: introduction and evaluation of global-mean temperature response
Modeling land surface processes over a mountainous rainforest in Costa Rica using CLM4.5 and CLM5
A new bias-correction method for precipitation over complex terrain suitable for different climate states: a case study using WRF (version 3.8.1)
ISSM-SLPS: geodetically compliant Sea-Level Projection System for the Ice-sheet and Sea-level System Model v4.17
Newly developed aircraft routing options for air traffic simulation in the chemistry–climate model EMAC 2.53: AirTraf 2.0
Quantifying CanESM5 and EAMv1 sensitivities to Mt. Pinatubo volcanic forcing for the CMIP6 historical experiment
Optimizing high-resolution Community Earth System Model on a heterogeneous many-core supercomputing platform
Understanding the development of systematic errors in the Asian Summer Monsoon
MIROC-INTEG-LAND version 1: a global biogeochemical land surface model with human water management, crop growth, and land-use change
Optimality-based non-Redfield plankton–ecosystem model (OPEM v1.1) in UVic-ESCM 2.9 – Part 2: Sensitivity analysis and model calibration
Optimality-based non-Redfield plankton–ecosystem model (OPEM v1.1) in UVic-ESCM 2.9 – Part 1: Implementation and model behaviour
The E3SM version 1 single-column model
RadNet 1.0: exploring deep learning architectures for longwave radiative transfer
Efficient ensemble data assimilation for coupled models with the Parallel Data Assimilation Framework: example of AWI-CM (AWI-CM-PDAF 1.0)
Modelling mineral dust emissions and atmospheric dispersion with MADE3 in EMAC v2.54
Evaluation of the University of Victoria Earth System Climate Model version 2.10 (UVic ESCM 2.10)
Earth System Model Evaluation Tool (ESMValTool) v2.0 – diagnostics for emergent constraints and future projections from Earth system models in CMIP
Evaluating the land-surface energy partitioning in ERA5
Robust Ecosystem Demography (RED version 1.0): a parsimonious approach to modelling vegetation dynamics in Earth system models
The GGCMI Phase 2 emulators: global gridded crop model responses to changes in CO2, temperature, water, and nitrogen (version 1.0)
Role of vegetation in representing land surface temperature in the CHTESSEL (CY45R1) and SURFEX-ISBA (v8.1) land surface models: a case study over Iberia
Simulating the mid-Holocene, Last Interglacial and mid-Pliocene climate with EC-Earth3-LR
Taiwan Earth System Model Version 1: description and evaluation of mean state
Using the anomaly forcing Community Land Model (CLM 4.5) for crop yield projections
Evaluating simulated climate patterns from the CMIP archives using satellite and reanalysis datasets using the Climate Model Assessment Tool (CMATv1)
An offline framework for high-dimensional ensemble Kalman filters to reduce the time to solution
The shared socio-economic pathway (SSP) greenhouse gas concentrations and their extensions to 2500
CLIMADA v1.4.1: Towards a globally consistent adaptation options appraisal tool
HighResMIP versions of EC-Earth: EC-Earth3P and EC-Earth3P-HR – description, model computational performance and basic validation
Numerical study of the seasonal thermal and gas regimes of the largest artificial reservoir in western Europe using the LAKE 2.0 model
On the increased climate sensitivity in the EC-Earth model from CMIP5 to CMIP6
Earth System Model Evaluation Tool (ESMValTool) v2.0 – an extended set of large-scale diagnostics for quasi-operational and comprehensive evaluation of Earth system models in CMIP
Adam T. Blaker, Manoj Joshi, Bablu Sinha, David P. Stevens, Robin S. Smith, and Joël J.-M. Hirschi
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 275–293, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-275-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-275-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
FORTE 2.0 is a flexible coupled atmosphere–ocean general circulation model that can be run on modest hardware. We present two 2000-year simulations which show that FORTE 2.0 is capable of producing a stable climate. Earlier versions of FORTE were used for a wide range of studies, ranging from aquaplanet configurations to investigating the cold European winters of 2009–2010. This paper introduces the updated model for which the code and configuration are now publicly available.
Ah-Hyun Kim, Seong Soo Yum, Dong Yeong Chang, and Minsu Park
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 259–273, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-259-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-259-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
A new method to estimate the sulfate aerosol hygroscopicity parameter (κSO4) is suggested that can consider κSO4 for two different sulfate species instead of prescribing a single κSO4 value, as in most previous studies. The new method simulates more realistic cloud droplet concentrations and, thus, a more realistic cloud albedo effect than the original method. The new method is simple and readily applicable to modeling studies investigating sulfate aerosols’ effect in aerosol–cloud interactions.
Brigitta Szabó, Melanie Weynants, and Tobias K. D. Weber
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 151–175, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-151-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-151-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
This paper presents updated European prediction algorithms (euptf2) to compute soil hydraulic parameters from easily available soil properties. The new algorithms lead to significantly better predictions and provide a built-in prediction uncertainty computation. The influence of predictor variables on predicted soil hydraulic properties is explored and practical guidance on how to use the derived PTFs is provided. A website and an R package facilitate easy application of the updated predictions.
Zhanshan Ma, Chuanfeng Zhao, Jiandong Gong, Jin Zhang, Zhe Li, Jian Sun, Yongzhu Liu, Jiong Chen, and Qingu Jiang
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 205–221, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-205-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-205-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
The spin-up in GRAPES_GFS, under different initial fields, goes through a dramatic adjustment in the first half-hour of integration and slow dynamic and thermal adjustments afterwards. It lasts for at least 6 h, with model adjustment gradually completed from lower to upper layers in the model. Thus, the forecast results, at least in the first 6 h, should be avoided when used. In addition, the spin-up process should repeat when the model simulation is interrupted.
Chein-Jung Shiu, Yi-Chi Wang, Huang-Hsiung Hsu, Wei-Ting Chen, Hua-Lu Pan, Ruiyu Sun, Yi-Hsuan Chen, and Cheng-An Chen
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 177–204, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-177-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-177-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
A cloud macrophysics scheme utilizing grid-mean hydrometeor information is developed and evaluated for climate models. The GFS–TaiESM–Sundqvist (GTS) scheme can simulate variations of cloud fraction associated with relative humidity (RH) in a more consistent way than the default scheme of CAM5.3. Through better cloud–RH distributions, the GTS scheme helps to better represent cloud fraction, cloud radiative forcing, and thermodynamic-related climatic fields in climate simulations.
Katherine A. Crichton, Jamie D. Wilson, Andy Ridgwell, and Paul N. Pearson
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 125–149, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-125-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-125-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Temperature is a controller of metabolic processes and therefore also a controller of the ocean's biological carbon pump (BCP). We calibrate a temperature-dependent version of the BCP in the cGENIE Earth system model. Since the pre-industrial period, warming has intensified near-surface nutrient recycling, supporting production and largely offsetting stratification-induced surface nutrient limitation. But at the same time less carbon that sinks out of the surface then reaches the deep ocean.
Jane P. Mulcahy, Colin Johnson, Colin G. Jones, Adam C. Povey, Catherine E. Scott, Alistair Sellar, Steven T. Turnock, Matthew T. Woodhouse, Nathan Luke Abraham, Martin B. Andrews, Nicolas Bellouin, Jo Browse, Ken S. Carslaw, Mohit Dalvi, Gerd A. Folberth, Matthew Glover, Daniel P. Grosvenor, Catherine Hardacre, Richard Hill, Ben Johnson, Andy Jones, Zak Kipling, Graham Mann, James Mollard, Fiona M. O'Connor, Julien Palmiéri, Carly Reddington, Steven T. Rumbold, Mark Richardson, Nick A. J. Schutgens, Philip Stier, Marc Stringer, Yongming Tang, Jeremy Walton, Stephanie Woodward, and Andrew Yool
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 6383–6423, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-6383-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-6383-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Aerosols are an important component of the Earth system. Here, we comprehensively document and evaluate the aerosol schemes as implemented in the physical and Earth system models, HadGEM3-GC3.1 and UKESM1. This study provides a useful characterisation of the aerosol climatology in both models, facilitating the understanding of the numerous aerosol–climate interaction studies that will be conducted for CMIP6 and beyond.
Hao Yu, Li Liu, Chao Sun, Ruizhe Li, Xinzhu Yu, Cheng Zhang, Zhiyuan Zhang, and Bin Wang
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 6253–6263, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-6253-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-6253-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Routing network generation is a major step for initializing the data transfer functionality for model coupling. The distributed implementation for routing network generation (DiRong1.0) proposed in this paper can significantly improve the global implementation of routing network generation used in some existing coupling software, because it does not introduce any gather–broadcast communications and achieves much lower complexity in terms of time, memory, and communication.
Øyvind Seland, Mats Bentsen, Dirk Olivié, Thomas Toniazzo, Ada Gjermundsen, Lise Seland Graff, Jens Boldingh Debernard, Alok Kumar Gupta, Yan-Chun He, Alf Kirkevåg, Jörg Schwinger, Jerry Tjiputra, Kjetil Schanke Aas, Ingo Bethke, Yuanchao Fan, Jan Griesfeller, Alf Grini, Chuncheng Guo, Mehmet Ilicak, Inger Helene Hafsahl Karset, Oskar Landgren, Johan Liakka, Kine Onsum Moseid, Aleksi Nummelin, Clemens Spensberger, Hui Tang, Zhongshi Zhang, Christoph Heinze, Trond Iversen, and Michael Schulz
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 6165–6200, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-6165-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-6165-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
The second version of the coupled Norwegian Earth System Model (NorESM2) is presented and evaluated. The temperature and precipitation patterns has improved compared to NorESM1. The model reaches present-day warming levels to within 0.2 °C of observed temperature but with a delayed warming during the late 20th century. Under the four scenarios (SSP1-2.6, SSP2-4.5, SSP3-7.0, and SSP5-8.5), the warming in the period of 2090–2099 compared to 1850–1879 reaches 1.3, 2.2, 3.1, and 3.9 K.
Wieke Heldens, Cornelia Burmeister, Farah Kanani-Sühring, Björn Maronga, Dirk Pavlik, Matthias Sühring, Julian Zeidler, and Thomas Esch
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 5833–5873, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-5833-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-5833-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
For realistic microclimate simulations in urban areas with PALM 6.0, detailed description of surface types, buildings and vegetation is required. This paper shows how such input data sets can be derived with the example of three German cities. Various data sources are used, including remote sensing, municipal data collections and open data such as OpenStreetMap. The collection and preparation of input data sets is tedious. Future research aims therefore at semi-automated tools to support users.
Emmanuele Russo, Silje Lund Sørland, Ingo Kirchner, Martijn Schaap, Christoph C. Raible, and Ulrich Cubasch
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 5779–5797, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-5779-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-5779-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
The parameter space of the COSMO-CLM RCM is investigated for the Central Asia CORDEX domain using a perturbed physics ensemble (PPE) with different parameter values. Results show that only a subset of model parameters presents relevant changes in model performance and these changes depend on the considered region and variable: objective calibration methods are highly necessary in this case. Additionally, the results suggest the need for calibrating an RCM when targeting different domains.
Carley E. Iles, Robert Vautard, Jane Strachan, Sylvie Joussaume, Bernd R. Eggen, and Chris D. Hewitt
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 5583–5607, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-5583-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-5583-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
We investigate how increased resolution affects the simulation of European climate extremes for global and regional climate models to inform modelling strategies. Precipitation extremes become heavier with higher resolution, especially over mountains, wind extremes become somewhat stronger, and for temperature extremes warm biases are reduced over mountains. Differences with resolution for the global model appear to come from downscaling effects rather than improved large-scale circulation.
Marie-Estelle Demory, Ségolène Berthou, Jesús Fernández, Silje L. Sørland, Roman Brogli, Malcolm J. Roberts, Urs Beyerle, Jon Seddon, Rein Haarsma, Christoph Schär, Erasmo Buonomo, Ole B. Christensen, James M. Ciarlo ̀, Rowan Fealy, Grigory Nikulin, Daniele Peano, Dian Putrasahan, Christopher D. Roberts, Retish Senan, Christian Steger, Claas Teichmann, and Robert Vautard
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 5485–5506, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-5485-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-5485-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Now that global climate models (GCMs) can run at similar resolutions to regional climate models (RCMs), one may wonder whether GCMs and RCMs provide similar regional climate information. We perform an evaluation for daily precipitation distribution in PRIMAVERA GCMs (25–50 km resolution) and CORDEX RCMs (12–50 km resolution) over Europe. We show that PRIMAVERA and CORDEX simulate similar distributions. Considering both datasets at such a resolution results in large benefits for impact studies.
George C. Hurtt, Louise Chini, Ritvik Sahajpal, Steve Frolking, Benjamin L. Bodirsky, Katherine Calvin, Jonathan C. Doelman, Justin Fisk, Shinichiro Fujimori, Kees Klein Goldewijk, Tomoko Hasegawa, Peter Havlik, Andreas Heinimann, Florian Humpenöder, Johan Jungclaus, Jed O. Kaplan, Jennifer Kennedy, Tamás Krisztin, David Lawrence, Peter Lawrence, Lei Ma, Ole Mertz, Julia Pongratz, Alexander Popp, Benjamin Poulter, Keywan Riahi, Elena Shevliakova, Elke Stehfest, Peter Thornton, Francesco N. Tubiello, Detlef P. van Vuuren, and Xin Zhang
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 5425–5464, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-5425-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-5425-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
To estimate the effects of human land use activities on the carbon–climate system, a new set of global gridded land use forcing datasets was developed to link historical land use data to eight future scenarios in a standard format required by climate models. This new generation of land use harmonization (LUH2) includes updated inputs, higher spatial resolution, more detailed land use transitions, and the addition of important agricultural management layers; it will be used for CMIP6 simulations.
Philip Goodwin, Martin Leduc, Antti-Ilari Partanen, H. Damon Matthews, and Alex Rogers
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 5389–5399, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-5389-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-5389-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Numerical climate models are used to make projections of future surface warming for different pathways of future greenhouse gas emissions, where future surface warming will vary from place to place. However, it is so expensive to run complex models using supercomputers that future projections can only be produced for a small number of possible future emissions pathways. This study presents an efficient climate model to make projections of local surface warming using a desktop computer.
Mathieu Vrac and Soulivanh Thao
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 5367–5387, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-5367-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-5367-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
We propose a multivariate bias correction (MBC) method to adjust the spatial and/or inter-variable properties of climate simulations, while also accounting for their temporal dependences (e.g., autocorrelations).
It consists on a method reordering the ranks of the time series according to their multivariate distance to a reference time series.
Results show that temporal correlations are improved while spatial and inter-variable correlations are still satisfactorily corrected.
Hella Garny, Roland Walz, Matthias Nützel, and Thomas Birner
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 5229–5257, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-5229-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-5229-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Numerical models of Earth's climate system have been gaining more and more complexity over the last decades. Therefore, it is important to establish simplified models to improve process understanding. In our study, we present and document the development of a new simplified model setup within the framework of a complex climate model system that uses the same routines to calculate atmospheric dynamics as the complex model but is simplified in the representation of clouds and radiation.
Yingxia Gao, Nicholas P. Klingaman, Charlotte A. DeMott, and Pang-Chi Hsu
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 5191–5209, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-5191-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-5191-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Both the air–sea coupling and ocean mean state affect the fidelity of simulated boreal summer intraseasonal oscillation (BSISO). To elucidate their relative effects on the simulated BSISO, a set of experiments was conducted using a superparameterized AGCM and its coupled version. Both air–sea coupling and cold ocean mean state improve the BSISO amplitude due to the suppression of the overestimated variance, while the former (latter) could further upgrade (degrade) the BSISO propagation.
Zebedee R. J. Nicholls, Malte Meinshausen, Jared Lewis, Robert Gieseke, Dietmar Dommenget, Kalyn Dorheim, Chen-Shuo Fan, Jan S. Fuglestvedt, Thomas Gasser, Ulrich Golüke, Philip Goodwin, Corinne Hartin, Austin P. Hope, Elmar Kriegler, Nicholas J. Leach, Davide Marchegiani, Laura A. McBride, Yann Quilcaille, Joeri Rogelj, Ross J. Salawitch, Bjørn H. Samset, Marit Sandstad, Alexey N. Shiklomanov, Ragnhild B. Skeie, Christopher J. Smith, Steve Smith, Katsumasa Tanaka, Junichi Tsutsui, and Zhiang Xie
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 5175–5190, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-5175-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-5175-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Computational limits mean that we cannot run our most comprehensive climate models for all applications of interest. In such cases, reduced complexity models (RCMs) are used. Here, researchers working on 15 different models present the first systematic community effort to evaluate and compare RCMs: the Reduced Complexity Model Intercomparison Project (RCMIP). Our research ensures that users of RCMs can more easily evaluate the strengths, weaknesses and limitations of their tools.
Jaeyoung Song, Gretchen R. Miller, Anthony T. Cahill, Luiza Maria T. Aparecido, and Georgianne W. Moore
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 5147–5173, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-5147-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-5147-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
The performance of a land surface model (CLM4.5 and 5.0) was examined against a suite of measurements from a tropical montane rainforest in Costa Rica. Both versions failed to capture the effects of frequent rainfall events and mountainous terrain on temperature, leaf wetness, photosynthesis, and transpiration. While the new model version eliminated some errors, it still cannot precisely simulate a number of processes. This suggests that two key components of the model need modification.
Patricio Velasquez, Martina Messmer, and Christoph C. Raible
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 5007–5027, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-5007-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-5007-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
This work presents a new bias-correction method for precipitation that considers orographic characteristics, which can be used in studies where the latter strongly changes. The three-step correction method consists of a separation into orographic features, correction of low-intensity precipitation, and application of empirical quantile mapping. Seasonal bias induced by the global climate model is fully corrected. Rigorous cross-validations illustrate the method's applicability and robustness.
Eric Larour, Lambert Caron, Mathieu Morlighem, Surendra Adhikari, Thomas Frederikse, Nicole-Jeanne Schlegel, Erik Ivins, Benjamin Hamlington, Robert Kopp, and Sophie Nowicki
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 4925–4941, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-4925-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-4925-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
ISSM-SLPS is a new projection system for future sea level that increases the resolution and accuracy of current projection systems and improves the way uncertainty is treated in such projections. This will pave the way for better inclusion of state-of-the-art results from existing intercomparison efforts carried out by the scientific community, such as GlacierMIP2 or ISMIP6, into sea-level projections.
Hiroshi Yamashita, Feijia Yin, Volker Grewe, Patrick Jöckel, Sigrun Matthes, Bastian Kern, Katrin Dahlmann, and Christine Frömming
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 4869–4890, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-4869-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-4869-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
This paper describes the updated submodel AirTraf 2.0 which simulates global air traffic in the ECHAM/MESSy Atmospheric Chemistry (EMAC) model. Nine aircraft routing options have been integrated, including contrail avoidance, minimum economic costs, and minimum climate impact. Example simulations reveal characteristics of different routing options on air traffic performances. The consistency of the AirTraf simulations is verified with literature data.
Landon A. Rieger, Jason N. S. Cole, John C. Fyfe, Stephen Po-Chedley, Philip J. Cameron-Smith, Paul J. Durack, Nathan P. Gillett, and Qi Tang
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 4831–4843, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-4831-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-4831-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Recently, the stratospheric aerosol forcing dataset used as an input to the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project phase 6 was updated. This work explores the impact of those changes on the modelled historical climates in the CanESM5 and EAMv1 models. Temperature differences in the stratosphere shortly after the Pinatubo eruption are found to be significant, but surface temperatures and precipitation do not show a significant change.
Shaoqing Zhang, Haohuan Fu, Lixin Wu, Yuxuan Li, Hong Wang, Yunhui Zeng, Xiaohui Duan, Wubing Wan, Li Wang, Yuan Zhuang, Hongsong Meng, Kai Xu, Ping Xu, Lin Gan, Zhao Liu, Sihai Wu, Yuhu Chen, Haining Yu, Shupeng Shi, Lanning Wang, Shiming Xu, Wei Xue, Weiguo Liu, Qiang Guo, Jie Zhang, Guanghui Zhu, Yang Tu, Jim Edwards, Allison Baker, Jianlin Yong, Man Yuan, Yangyang Yu, Qiuying Zhang, Zedong Liu, Mingkui Li, Dongning Jia, Guangwen Yang, Zhiqiang Wei, Jingshan Pan, Ping Chang, Gokhan Danabasoglu, Stephen Yeager, Nan Rosenbloom, and Ying Guo
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 4809–4829, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-4809-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-4809-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Science advancement and societal needs require Earth system modelling with higher resolutions that demand tremendous computing power. We successfully scale the 10 km ocean and 25 km atmosphere high-resolution Earth system model to a new leading-edge heterogeneous supercomputer using state-of-the-art optimizing methods, promising the solution of high spatial resolution and time-varying frequency. Corresponding technical breakthroughs are of significance in modelling and HPC design communities.
Gill M. Martin, Richard C. Levine, José M. Rodriguez, and Michael Vellinga
Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2020-268, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2020-268, 2020
Revised manuscript accepted for GMD
Short summary
Short summary
Our study highlights a number of different techniques that can be employed to investigate the sources of model error. We demonstrate how this methodology can be used to identify the regions and model components responsible for the development of long-standing errors in the Asian Summer Monsoon. Once these are known, further work can be done to explore the local processes contributing to this behaviour and their sensitivity to changes in physical parameterizations and/or model resolution.
Tokuta Yokohata, Tsuguki Kinoshita, Gen Sakurai, Yadu Pokhrel, Akihiko Ito, Masashi Okada, Yusuke Satoh, Etsushi Kato, Tomoko Nitta, Shinichiro Fujimori, Farshid Felfelani, Yoshimitsu Masaki, Toshichika Iizumi, Motoki Nishimori, Naota Hanasaki, Kiyoshi Takahashi, Yoshiki Yamagata, and Seita Emori
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 4713–4747, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-4713-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-4713-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
The most significant feature of MIROC-INTEG-LAND is that the land surface model that describes the processes of the energy and water balances, human water management, and crop growth incorporates a land-use decision-making model based on economic activities. The future simulations indicate that changes in climate have significant impacts on crop yields, land use, and irrigation water demand.
Chia-Te Chien, Markus Pahlow, Markus Schartau, and Andreas Oschlies
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 4691–4712, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-4691-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-4691-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
We demonstrate sensitivities of tracers to parameters of a new optimality-based plankton–ecosystem model (OPEM) in the UVic-ESCM. We find that changes in phytoplankton subsistence nitrogen quota strongly impact the nitrogen inventory, nitrogen fixation, and elemental stoichiometry of ordinary phytoplankton and diazotrophs. We introduce a new likelihood-based metric for model calibration, and it shows the capability of constraining globally averaged oxygen, nitrate, and DIC concentrations.
Markus Pahlow, Chia-Te Chien, Lionel A. Arteaga, and Andreas Oschlies
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 4663–4690, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-4663-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-4663-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
The stoichiometry of marine biotic processes is important for the regulation of atmospheric CO2 and hence the global climate. We replace a simplistic, fixed-stoichiometry plankton module in an Earth system model with an optimal-regulation model with variable stoichiometry. Our model compares better to the observed carbon transfer from the surface to depth and surface nutrient distributions. This work could aid our ability to describe and project the role of marine ecosystems in the Earth system.
Peter A. Bogenschutz, Shuaiqi Tang, Peter M. Caldwell, Shaocheng Xie, Wuyin Lin, and Yao-Sheng Chen
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 4443–4458, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-4443-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-4443-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
This paper documents a tool that has been developed that can be used to accelerate the development and understanding of climate models. This version of the model, known as a the single-column model, is much faster to run than the full climate model, and we demonstrate that this tool can be used to quickly exploit model biases that arise due to physical processes. We show examples of how this single-column model can directly benefit the field.
Ying Liu, Rodrigo Caballero, and Joy Merwin Monteiro
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 4399–4412, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-4399-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-4399-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
The calculation of atmospheric radiative transfer is the most computationally expensive part of climate models. Reducing this computational burden could potentially improve our ability to simulate the earth's climate at finer scales. We propose using a statistical model – a deep neural network – to compute approximate radiative transfer in the earth's atmosphere. We demonstrate a significant reduction in computational burden as compared to a traditional scheme, especially when using GPUs.
Lars Nerger, Qi Tang, and Longjiang Mu
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 4305–4321, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-4305-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-4305-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Data assimilation combines observations with numerical models to get an improved estimate of the model state. This work discusses the technical aspects of how a coupled model that simulates the ocean and the atmosphere can be augmented by data assimilation functionality provided in generic form by the open-source software PDAF (Parallel Data Assimilation Framework). A very efficient program is obtained that can be executed on high-performance computers.
Christof G. Beer, Johannes Hendricks, Mattia Righi, Bernd Heinold, Ina Tegen, Silke Groß, Daniel Sauer, Adrian Walser, and Bernadett Weinzierl
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 4287–4303, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-4287-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-4287-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Mineral dust aerosol plays an important role in the climate system. Previously, dust emissions have often been represented in global models by prescribed monthly-mean emission fields representative of a specific year. We now apply an online calculation of wind-driven dust emissions. This results in an improved agreement with observations, due to a better representation of the highly variable dust emissions. Increasing the model resolution led to an additional performance gain.
Nadine Mengis, David P. Keller, Andrew H. MacDougall, Michael Eby, Nesha Wright, Katrin J. Meissner, Andreas Oschlies, Andreas Schmittner, Alexander J. MacIsaac, H. Damon Matthews, and Kirsten Zickfeld
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 4183–4204, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-4183-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-4183-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
In this paper, we evaluate the newest version of the University of Victoria Earth System Climate Model (UVic ESCM 2.10). Combining recent model developments as a joint effort, this version is to be used in the next phase of model intercomparison and climate change studies. The UVic ESCM 2.10 is capable of reproducing changes in historical temperature and carbon fluxes well. Additionally, the model is able to reproduce the three-dimensional distribution of many ocean tracers.
Axel Lauer, Veronika Eyring, Omar Bellprat, Lisa Bock, Bettina K. Gier, Alasdair Hunter, Ruth Lorenz, Núria Pérez-Zanón, Mattia Righi, Manuel Schlund, Daniel Senftleben, Katja Weigel, and Sabrina Zechlau
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 4205–4228, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-4205-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-4205-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
The Earth System Model Evaluation Tool is a community software tool designed for evaluation and analysis of climate models. New features of version 2.0 include analysis scripts for important large-scale features in climate models, diagnostics for extreme events, regional model and impact evaluation. In this paper, newly implemented climate metrics, emergent constraints for climate-relevant feedbacks and diagnostics for future model projections are described and illustrated with examples.
Brecht Martens, Dominik L. Schumacher, Hendrik Wouters, Joaquín Muñoz-Sabater, Niko E. C. Verhoest, and Diego G. Miralles
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 4159–4181, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-4159-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-4159-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Climate reanalyses are widely used in different fields and an in-depth evaluation of the different variables provided by reanalyses is a necessary means to provide feedback on the quality to their users and the operational centres producing these data sets. In this study, we show the improvements of ECMWF's latest climate reanalysis (ERA5) upon its predecessor (ERA-Interim) in partitioning the available energy at the land surface.
Arthur P. K. Argles, Jonathan R. Moore, Chris Huntingford, Andrew J. Wiltshire, Anna B. Harper, Chris D. Jones, and Peter M. Cox
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 4067–4089, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-4067-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-4067-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
The Robust Ecosystem Demography (RED) model simulates cohorts of vegetation through mass classes. RED establishes a framework for representing demographic changes through competition, growth, and mortality across the size distribution of a forest. The steady state of the model can be solved analytically, enabling initialization. When driven by mean growth rates from a land-surface model, RED is able to fit the observed global vegetation map, giving a map of implicit mortality rates.
James A. Franke, Christoph Müller, Joshua Elliott, Alex C. Ruane, Jonas Jägermeyr, Abigail Snyder, Marie Dury, Pete D. Falloon, Christian Folberth, Louis François, Tobias Hank, R. Cesar Izaurralde, Ingrid Jacquemin, Curtis Jones, Michelle Li, Wenfeng Liu, Stefan Olin, Meridel Phillips, Thomas A. M. Pugh, Ashwan Reddy, Karina Williams, Ziwei Wang, Florian Zabel, and Elisabeth J. Moyer
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 3995–4018, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-3995-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-3995-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Improving our understanding of the impacts of climate change on crop yields will be critical for global food security in the next century. The models often used to study the how climate change may impact agriculture are complex and costly to run. In this work, we describe a set of global crop model emulators (simplified models) developed under the Agricultural Model Intercomparison Project. Crop model emulators make agricultural simulations more accessible to policy or decision makers.
Miguel Nogueira, Clément Albergel, Souhail Boussetta, Frederico Johannsen, Isabel F. Trigo, Sofia L. Ermida, João P. A. Martins, and Emanuel Dutra
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 3975–3993, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-3975-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-3975-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
We used earth observations to evaluate and improve the representation of land surface temperature (LST) and vegetation coverage over Iberia in CHTESSEL and SURFEX land surface models. We demonstrate the added value of updating the vegetation types and fractions together with the representation of vegetation coverage seasonality. Results show a large reduction in daily maximum LST systematic error during warm months, with neutral impacts in other seasons.
Qiong Zhang, Qiang Li, Qiang Zhang, Ellen Berntell, Josefine Axelsson, Jie Chen, Zixuan Han, Wesley de Nooijer, Zhengyao Lu, Klaus Wyser, and Shuting Yang
Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2020-208, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2020-208, 2020
Revised manuscript accepted for GMD
Short summary
Short summary
Paleoclimate modelling has long been regarded as a strong out-of-sample test-bed of the climate models that are used for the projection of future climate changes. Here, we document the model experiments setup for the three past warm periods with EC-Earth3-LR and present the results on the large-scale features from the completed production simulations. The simulations demonstrate the good performance of the model to capture the climate response under different climate forcings.
Wei-Liang Lee, Yi-Chi Wang, Chein-Jung Shiu, I-chun Tsai, Chia-Ying Tu, Yung-Yao Lan, Jen-Ping Chen, Hua-Lu Pan, and Huang-Hsiung Hsu
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 3887–3904, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-3887-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-3887-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
The Taiwan Earth System Model (TaiESM) is a new climate model developed in Taiwan. It includes several new features, and therefore it can better simulate the occurrence of convective rainfall, solar energy received by mountainous surfaces, and more detail chemical processes in aerosols. TaiESM can capture the trend of global warming after 1950 well, and its overall performance in most meteorological quantities is better than the average of global models used in IPCC AR5.
Yaqiong Lu and Xianyu Yang
Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2020-186, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2020-186, 2020
Revised manuscript accepted for GMD
Short summary
Short summary
Crop growth in land surface models normally requires high temporal resolution climate data, but such high temporal resolution climate data are not provided by many climate model simulations due to expensive storage, which limits modeling choice if there is an interest in a particular climate simulation that only saved monthly outputs. Our work provides an alternative way to use the monthly climate for crop yield projections. Such approach could be easily adopted by other crop models.
John T. Fasullo
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 3627–3642, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-3627-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-3627-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
The fidelity of climate model simulations included in the WCRP Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Versions 3 through 6 is evaluated using best estimates of fields considered by the community to be critical for climate change projections. The analysis benchmarks patterns of the mean state and variability (seasonal/interannual) both within and across model generations, highlighting progress and quantifying persisting biases across models.
Yongjun Zheng, Clément Albergel, Simon Munier, Bertrand Bonan, and Jean-Christophe Calvet
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 3607–3625, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-3607-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-3607-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
This study proposes a sophisticated dynamically running job scheme as well as an innovative parallel IO algorithm to reduce the time to solution of an offline framework for high-dimensional ensemble Kalman filters. The offline and online modes of ensemble Kalman filters are built to comprehensively assess their time to solution efficiencies. The offline mode is substantially faster than the online mode in terms of time to solution, especially for large-scale assimilation problems.
Malte Meinshausen, Zebedee R. J. Nicholls, Jared Lewis, Matthew J. Gidden, Elisabeth Vogel, Mandy Freund, Urs Beyerle, Claudia Gessner, Alexander Nauels, Nico Bauer, Josep G. Canadell, John S. Daniel, Andrew John, Paul B. Krummel, Gunnar Luderer, Nicolai Meinshausen, Stephen A. Montzka, Peter J. Rayner, Stefan Reimann, Steven J. Smith, Marten van den Berg, Guus J. M. Velders, Martin K. Vollmer, and Ray H. J. Wang
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 3571–3605, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-3571-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-3571-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
This study provides the future greenhouse gas (GHG) concentrations under the new set of so-called SSP scenarios (the successors of the IPCC SRES and previous representative concentration pathway (RCP) scenarios). The projected CO2 concentrations range from 350 ppm for low-emission scenarios by 2150 to more than 2000 ppm under the high-emission scenarios. We also provide concentrations, latitudinal gradients, and seasonality for most of the other 42 considered GHGs.
David N. Bresch and Gabriela Aznar-Siguan
Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2020-151, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2020-151, 2020
Revised manuscript accepted for GMD
Short summary
Short summary
Climate change is a fact and adaptation a necessity. The Economics of Climate Adaptation methodology provides a framework to integrate risk and reward perspectives of different stakeholders, underpinned by the CLIMADA impact modelling platform. This extended version of CLIMADA enables risk assessment and options appraisal in a modular form and occasionally bespoke fashion yet with high reusability of functionalities to foster usage in interdisciplinary studies and international collaboration.
Rein Haarsma, Mario Acosta, Rena Bakhshi, Pierre-Antoine Bretonnière, Louis-Philippe Caron, Miguel Castrillo, Susanna Corti, Paolo Davini, Eleftheria Exarchou, Federico Fabiano, Uwe Fladrich, Ramon Fuentes Franco, Javier García-Serrano, Jost von Hardenberg, Torben Koenigk, Xavier Levine, Virna Loana Meccia, Twan van Noije, Gijs van den Oord, Froila M. Palmeiro, Mario Rodrigo, Yohan Ruprich-Robert, Philippe Le Sager, Etienne Tourigny, Shiyu Wang, Michiel van Weele, and Klaus Wyser
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 3507–3527, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-3507-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-3507-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
HighResMIP is an international coordinated CMIP6 effort to investigate the improvement in climate modeling caused by an increase in horizontal resolution. This paper describes EC-Earth3P-(HR), which has been developed for HighResMIP. First analyses reveal that increasing resolution does improve certain aspects of the simulated climate but that many other biases still continue, possibly related to phenomena that are still not yet resolved and need to be parameterized.
Maksim Iakunin, Victor Stepanenko, Rui Salgado, Miguel Potes, Alexandra Penha, Maria Helena Novais, and Gonçalo Rodrigues
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 3475–3488, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-3475-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-3475-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
The Alqueva reservoir, located in the southeast of Portugal, is the largest artificial reservoir in western Europe. It was established in 2002 to provide water and electrical resources to meet regional needs. Complex research of this reservoir is an essential scientific task in the scope of meteorology, hydrology, biology, and ecology. Two numerical models (namely, LAKE 2.0 and FLake) were used to assess the thermodynamic and biogeochemical regimes of the reservoir over 2 years of observations.
Klaus Wyser, Twan van Noije, Shuting Yang, Jost von Hardenberg, Declan O'Donnell, and Ralf Döscher
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 3465–3474, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-3465-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-3465-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
The EC-Earth model used for CMIP6 is found to have a higher equilibrium climate sensitivity (ECS) than its predecessor used for CMIP5. In a series of sensitivity experiments, we investigate which model updates since CMIP5 have contributed to the increase in ECS. The main reason for the higher sensitivity in the EC-Earth model is the improved representation of the aerosol–radiation and aerosol–cloud interactions.
Veronika Eyring, Lisa Bock, Axel Lauer, Mattia Righi, Manuel Schlund, Bouwe Andela, Enrico Arnone, Omar Bellprat, Björn Brötz, Louis-Philippe Caron, Nuno Carvalhais, Irene Cionni, Nicola Cortesi, Bas Crezee, Edouard L. Davin, Paolo Davini, Kevin Debeire, Lee de Mora, Clara Deser, David Docquier, Paul Earnshaw, Carsten Ehbrecht, Bettina K. Gier, Nube Gonzalez-Reviriego, Paul Goodman, Stefan Hagemann, Steven Hardiman, Birgit Hassler, Alasdair Hunter, Christopher Kadow, Stephan Kindermann, Sujan Koirala, Nikolay Koldunov, Quentin Lejeune, Valerio Lembo, Tomas Lovato, Valerio Lucarini, François Massonnet, Benjamin Müller, Amarjiit Pandde, Núria Pérez-Zanón, Adam Phillips, Valeriu Predoi, Joellen Russell, Alistair Sellar, Federico Serva, Tobias Stacke, Ranjini Swaminathan, Verónica Torralba, Javier Vegas-Regidor, Jost von Hardenberg, Katja Weigel, and Klaus Zimmermann
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 3383–3438, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-3383-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-3383-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
The Earth System Model Evaluation Tool (ESMValTool) is a community diagnostics and performance metrics tool designed to improve comprehensive and routine evaluation of earth system models (ESMs) participating in the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP). It has undergone rapid development since the first release in 2016 and is now a well-tested tool that provides end-to-end provenance tracking to ensure reproducibility.
Cited articles
Adam, O., Schneider, T., Brient, F., and Bischoff, T.: Relation of the
double-ITCZ bias to the atmospheric energy budget in climate models,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 43, 7670–7677, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL069465,
2016. a
Allan, R. P., Liu, C., Loeb, N. G., Palmer, M. D., Roberts, M., Smith, D. M.,
and Vidale, P. L.: Changes in global net radiative imbalance 1985-2012,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 41, 5588–5598, https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GL060962,
2014. a
Ambaum, M. H. P.: Thermal Physics of the Atmosphere, Wiley-Blackwell,
https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470710364, 2010. a, b
Awad, M. M.: The science and the history of the two Bejan numbers,
Int. J. Heat Mass Tran., 94, 101–103,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2015.11.073, 2016. a
Bannon, P. R.: Entropy Production and Climate Efficiency, J.
Atmos. Sci., 72, 3268–3280, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-14-0361.1, 2015. a, b
Bannon, P. R. and Lee, S.: Toward Quantifying the Climate Heat Engine: Solar
Absorption and Terrestrial Emission Temperatures and Material Entropy
Production, J. Atmos. Sci., 74, 1721–1734,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-16-0240.1, 2017. a, b, c
Barry, L., Craig, G. C., and Thuburn, J.: Poleward heat transport by the
atmospheric heat engine, Nature, 415, 774–777, https://doi.org/10.1038/415774a, 2002. a
Bjerknes, J.: Atmospheric Teleconnections from the Equatorial Pacific,
Mon. Weather Rev., 97, 163–172,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1969)097<0163:ATFTEP>2.3.CO;2, 1969. a, b
Boer, G. J. and Lambert, S.: The energy cycle in atmospheric models, Clim. Dynam., 30, 371–390, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-007-0303-4, 2008. a
Boschi, R., Lucarini, V., and Pascale, S.: Bistability of the climate around
the habitable zone: A thermodynamic investigation, Icarus, 226, 1724–1742,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icarus.2013.03.017, 2013. a, b
Buck, A. L.: New Equations for Computing Vapor Pressure and Enhancement
Factor, J. Appl. Meteorol., 20, 1527–1532,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(1981)020<1527:NEFCVP>2.0.CO;2, 1981. a
Caballero, R. and Langen, P. L.: The dynamic range of poleward energy
transport in an atmospheric general circulation model, Geophys. Res.
Lett., 32, L02705, https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GL021581, 2005. a
Carissimo, B. C., Oort, A. H., and Vonder Haar, T. H.: Estimating the
Meridional Energy Transports in the Atmosphere and Ocean, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 15, 82–91,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0485(1985)015<0082:ETMETI>2.0.CO;2, 1985. a, b
CDO: Climate Data Operators, available at: http://www.mpimet.mpg.de/cdo (last access: 26 August 2019), 2015. a
Cohen, J. L., Salstein, D. A., and Rosen, R. D.: Interannual Variability in
the Meridional Transport of Water Vapor, J. Hydrometeorology, 1,
547–553, https://doi.org/10.1175/1525-7541(2000)001<0547:IVITMT>2.0.CO;2, 2000. a
Demory, M.-E., Vidale, P. L., Roberts, M. J., Berrisford, P., Strachan, J.,
Schiemann, R., and Mizielinski, M. S.: The role of horizontal resolution in
simulating drivers of the global hydrological cycle, Clim. Dynam., 42,
2201–2225, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-013-1924-4, 2014. a
Enderton, D. and Marshall, J.: Explorations of Atmosphere–Ocean–Ice
Climates on an Aquaplanet and Their Meridional Energy Transports, J.
Atmos. Sci., 66, 1593–1611, https://doi.org/10.1175/2008JAS2680.1, 2009. a
Exarchou, E., Kuhlbrodt, T., Gregory, J. M., and Smith, R. S.: Ocean Heat
Uptake Processes: A Model Intercomparison, J. Climate, 28, 887–908,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-14-00235.1, 2015. a
Eyring, V., Bony, S., Meehl, G. A., Senior, C. A., Stevens, B., Stouffer, R. J., and Taylor, K. E.: Overview of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) experimental design and organization, Geosci. Model Dev., 9, 1937–1958, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-1937-2016, 2016a. a, b
Eyring, V., Righi, M., Lauer, A., Evaldsson, M., Wenzel, S., Jones, C., Anav, A., Andrews, O., Cionni, I., Davin, E. L., Deser, C., Ehbrecht, C., Friedlingstein, P., Gleckler, P., Gottschaldt, K.-D., Hagemann, S., Juckes, M., Kindermann, S., Krasting, J., Kunert, D., Levine, R., Loew, A., Mäkelä, J., Martin, G., Mason, E., Phillips, A. S., Read, S., Rio, C., Roehrig, R., Senftleben, D., Sterl, A., van Ulft, L. H., Walton, J., Wang, S., and Williams, K. D.: ESMValTool (v1.0) – a community diagnostic and performance metrics tool for routine evaluation of Earth system models in CMIP, Geosci. Model Dev., 9, 1747–1802, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-1747-2016, 2016b. a, b
Eyring, V., Andela, B., Broetz, B., de Mora, L., Drost, N., Koldunov, N., Lauer, A., Mueller, B., Predoi, V., Righi, M., Schlund, M., and Vegas-Regidor, J.: ESMValTool User's and Developer's Guide, Release 2.0.0b0, 260 pp., available at: https://buildmedia.readthedocs.org/media/pdf/esmvaltool/latest/esmvaltool.pdf, last access: 27 August 2019. a
Fischer, N. and Jungclaus, J. H.: Effects of orbital forcing on atmosphere and ocean heat transports in Holocene and Eemian climate simulations with a comprehensive Earth system model, Clim. Past, 6, 155–168, https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-6-155-2010, 2010. a
Fraedrich, K. and Lunkeit, F.: Diagnosing the entropy budget of a climate
model, Tellus A, 60, 921–931, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0870.2008.00338.x, 2008. a, b, c
Frigg, R., Thompson, E., and Werndl, C.: Philosophy of Climate Science Part
II: Modelling Climate Change, Philosophy Compass, 10, 965–977,
https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.12297, 2015. a
Gassmann, A.: A global hexagonal C-grid non-hydrostatic dynamical core
(ICON-IAP) designed for energetic consistency, Q. J.
Roy. Meteorol. Soc., 139, 152–175, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.1960, 2013. a
Gassmann, A. and Herzog, H. J.: How is local material entropy production
represented in a numerical model?, Q. J.
Roy. Meteorol. Soc., 141, 854–869, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2404, 2015. a, b
Goff, A. J.: Saturation pressure of water on the new Kelvin temperature
scale, Transactions of the American Society of Heating and Ventilating
Engineers, 347–354, 1957. a
Goody, R.: Sources and sinks of climate entropy, Q. J.
Roy. Meteorol. Soc., 126, 1953–1970, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49712656619, 2000. a, b
Gupta, A. S., Jourdain, N. C., Brown, J. N., and Monselesan, D.: Climate drift
in the CMIP5 models, J. Climate, 26, 8597–8615,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI_D_12_00521.1, 2013. a, b
Hansen, J., Sato, M., Kharecha, P., and von Schuckmann, K.: Earth's energy imbalance and implications, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 13421–13449, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-13421-2011, 2011. a
Hartmann, D. L.: Global Physical Climatology, Academic Press, 1994. a
Held, I. M. and Soden, B. J.: Robust Responses of the Hydrological Cycle to
Global Warming, J. Climate, 19, 5686–5699,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI3990.1, 2006. a
Herbert, C., Paillard, D., and Dubrulle, B.: Entropy production and multiple equilibria: the case of the ice-albedo feedback, Earth Syst. Dynam., 2, 13-23, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-2-13-2011, 2011. a
Hernández-Deckers, D. and von Storch, J.-S.: Energetics Responses to
Increases in Greenhouse Gas Concentration, J. Climate, 23,
3874–3887, https://doi.org/10.1175/2010JCLI3176.1, 2010. a, b
Hobbs, W., Palmer, M. D., and Monselesan, D.: An Energy Conservation Analysis
of Ocean Drift in the CMIP5 Global Coupled Models, J. Climate, 29,
1639–1653, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-15-0477.1, 2016. a
Hourdin, F., Mauritsen, T., Gettelman, A., Golaz, J.-C., Balaji, V., Duan, Q.,
Folini, D., Ji, D., Klocke, D., Qian, Y., Rauser, F., Rio, C., Tomassini, L.,
Watanabe, M., and Williamson, D.: The Art and Science of Climate Model
Tuning, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 98, 589–602,
https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-15-00135.1, 2017. a, b
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change: Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis, Press, Cambridge University, Cambridge,
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324, 2013. a, b, c
Irving, D. B., Wijffels, S., and Church, J. A.: Anthropogenic Aerosols,
Greenhouse Gases, and the Uptake, Transport, and Storage of Excess Heat in
the Climate System, Geophys. Res. Lett., 46, 4894–4903,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL082015, 2019. a
Johnson, D. R.: General Coldness of Climate Models and the Second Law:
Implications for Modeling the Earth System, J. Climate, 10,
2826–2846, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(1997)010<2826:GCOCMA>2.0.CO;2, 1997. a
Kiehl, J. T. and Trenberth, K. E.: Earth's Annual Global Mean Energy Budget,
B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 78, 197–208,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477(1997)078<0197:EAGMEB>2.0.CO;2, 1997. a
Kim, Y. H. and Kim, M. K.: Examination of the global lorenz energy cycle using
MERRA and NCEP-reanalysis 2, Clim. Dynam., 40, 1499–1513,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-012-1358-4, 2013. a, b, c
Kjellsson, J.: Weakening of the global atmospheric circulation with global
warming, Clim. Dynam., 45, 975–988, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-014-2337-8,
2015. a
Kleidon, A.: Nonequilibrium thermodynamics and maximum entropy production in
the Earth system: applications and implications, Naturwissenschaften,
96, 653–677, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-009-0509-x, 2009. a, b
Kleidon, A. and Lorenz, R.: Non-equilibrium Thermodynamics and the Production
of Entropy, Springer-Verlag, Berlin/Heidelberg, 1 edn.,
https://doi.org/10.1007/11672906_1, 2004. a
Knietzsch, M.-A., Schröder, A., Lucarini, V., and Lunkeit, F.: The impact of oceanic heat transport on the atmospheric circulation, Earth Syst. Dynam., 6, 591–615, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-6-591-2015, 2015. a
Kunz, T., Fraedrich, K., and Kirk, E.: Optimisation of simplified GCMs using
circulation indices and maximum entropy production, Clim. Dynam., 30,
803–813, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-007-0325-y, 2008. a
Laliberté, F. and Pauluis, O.: Winter intensification of the moist
branch of the circulation in simulations of 21st century climate,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 37, 1–6, https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GL045007, 2010. a, b
Laliberté, F., Zika, J., Mudryk, L., Kushner, P. J., Kjellsson, J., and
Doos, K.: Constrained work output of the moist atmospheric heat engine in a
warming climate, Science, 347, 540–543, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1257103,
2015. a, b, c, d
Lawrence, M. G.: The Relationship between Relative Humidity and the Dewpoint
Temperature in Moist Air: A Simple Conversion and Applications, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 86, 225–234,
https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-86-2-225, 2005. a
L'Ecuyer, T. S., Beaudoing, H. K., Rodell, M., Olson, W., Lin, B., Kato, S.,
Clayson, C. A., Wood, E., Sheffield, J., Adler, R., Huffman, G., Bosilovich,
M., Gu, G., Robertson, F., Houser, P. R., Chambers, D., Famiglietti, J. S.,
Fetzer, E., Liu, W. T., Gao, X., Schlosser, C. A., Clark, E., Lettenmaier,
D. P., Hilburn, K., L'Ecuyer, T. S., Beaudoing, H. K., Rodell, M., Olson, W.,
Lin, B., Kato, S., Clayson, C. A., Wood, E., Sheffield, J., Adler, R.,
Huffman, G., Bosilovich, M., Gu, G., Robertson, F., Houser, P. R.,Chambers,
D., Famiglietti, J. S., Fetzer, E., Liu, W. T., Gao, X., Schlosser, C. A.,
Clark, E., Lettenmaier, D. P., and Hilburn, K.: The Observed State of the
Energy Budget in the Early Twenty-First Century, J. Climate, 28,
8319–8346, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-14-00556.1, 2015. a
Lembo, V., Folini, D., Wild, M., and Lionello, P.: Energy budgets and
transports : global evolution and spatial patterns during the 20th Century as
estimated in two AMIP-like experiments, Clim. Dynam., 48, 1793–1812,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-016-3173-9, 2016. a, b
Lembo, V., Folini, D., Wild, M., and Lionello, P.: Inter-hemispheric
differences in energy budgets and cross-equatorial transport anomalies during
the 20th century, Clim. Dynam., 53, 115–135,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-018-4572-x, 2019a. a, b
Lembo, V., Messori, G., Graversen, R., and Lucarini, V.: Spectral
Decomposition and Extremes of Atmospheric Meridional Energy Transport in the
Northern Hemisphere Midlatitudes, Geophys. Res. Lett., 46,
7602–7613, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL082105, 2019b. a
Levang, S. J. and Schmitt, R. W.: Centennial changes of the global water cycle
in CMIP5 models, J. Climate, 28, 6489–6502,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-15-0143.1, 2015. a
Levitus, S., Antonov, J. I., Boyer, T. P., Baranova, O. K., Garcia, H. E.,
Locarnini, R. A., Mishonov, A. V., Reagan, J. R., Seidov, D., Yarosh, E. S.,
and Zweng, M. M.: World ocean heat content and thermosteric sea level change
(0–2000 m), 1955–2010, Geophys. Res. Lett., 39, L10603,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL051106, 2012. a
Liepert, B. G. and Previdi, M.: Inter-model variability and biases of the
global water cycle in CMIP3 coupled climate models, Environ. Res.
Lett., 7, 014006, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/7/1/014006, 2012. a, b
Lin, P., Paynter, D., Ming, Y., and Ramaswamy, V.: Changes of the Tropical
Tropopause Layer under Global Warming, J. Climate, 30, 1245–1258,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0457.1, 2017. a
Loeb, N. G., Wielicki, B. a., Doelling, D. R., Smith, G. L., Keyes, D. F.,
Kato, S., Manalo-Smith, N., and Wong, T.: Toward optimal closure of the
Earth's top-of-atmosphere radiation budget, J. Climate, 22,
748–766, https://doi.org/10.1175/2008JCLI2637.1, 2009. a
Loeb, N. G., Lyman, J. M., Johnson, G. C., Allan, R. P., Doelling, D. R., Wong,
T., Soden, B. J., and Stephens, G. L.: Observed changes in
top-of-the-atmosphere radiation and upper-ocean heating consistent within
uncertainty, Nat. Geosci., 5, 1–4, https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo1375, 2012. a
Loeb, N. G., Wang, H., Cheng, A., Kato, S., Fasullo, J. T., Xu, K.-M., and
Allan, R. P.: Observational constraints on atmospheric and oceanic
cross-equatorial heat transports: revisiting the precipitation asymmetry
problem in climate models, Clim. Dynam., 46, 3239–3257,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-015-2766-z, 2015. a, b, c, d, e
Lorenz, E. N.: Available Potential Energy and the Maintenance of the General
Circulation, Tellus, 7, 157–167,https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2153-3490.1955.tb01148.x,
1955. a, b, c
Lucarini, V.: Thermodynamic efficiency and entropy production in the climate
system, Physical Review E – Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics,
80, 1–5, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.80.021118, 2009. a, b, c
Lucarini, V.: Modeling Complexity: The Case of Climate Science, in: Models,
Simulations, and the Reduction of Complexity, edited by: Gähde, U.,
Hartmann, S., and Wolf, J. H., De Gruyter, Berlin, Boston, 229–254,
https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110313680.229, 2013. a
Lucarini, V. and Fraedrich, K.: Symmetry breaking, mixing, instability, and
low-frequency variability in a minimal Lorenz-like system, Phys. Rev. E, 80, 026313, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.80.026313, 2009. a
Lucarini, V., Fraedrich, K., and Lunkeit, F.: Thermodynamics of climate change: generalized sensitivities, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 9729–9737, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-9729-2010, 2010a. a, b, c, d
Lucarini, V., Fraedrich, K., and Lunkeit, F.: Thermodynamic analysis of
snowball earth hysteresis experiment: Efficiency, entropy production and
irreversibility, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 136,
2–11, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.543, 2010b. a, b
Manabe, S. and Wetherald, R. T.: Thermal Equilibrium of the Atmosphere with a
Given Distribution of Relative Humidity, J. Atmos.
Sci., 24, 241–259,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1967)024<0241:TEOTAW>2.0.CO;2, 1967. a
Marques, C. A. F., Rocha, A., and Corte-Real, J.: Global diagnostic energetics
of five state-of-the-art climate models, Clim. Dynam., 36, 1767–1794,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-010-0828-9, 2011. a, b
Mauritsen, T., Stevens, B., Roeckner, E., Crueger, T., Esch, M., Giorgetta, M.,
Haak, H., Jungclaus, J., Klocke, D., Matei, D., Mikolajewicz, U., Notz, D.,
Pincus, R., Schmidt, H., and Tomassini, L.: Tuning the climate of a global
model, J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst., 4, M00A01,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2012MS000154, 2012. a, b, c
Novak, L. and Tailleux, R.: On the Local View of Atmospheric Available
Potential Energy, J. Atmos. Sci., 75, 1891–1907,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-17-0330.1, 2018. a
Ozawa, H., Ohmura, A., Lorenz, R. D., and Pujol, T.: The second law of
thermodynamics and the global climate system: A review of the maximum entropy
production principle, Rev. Geophys., 41, 1018,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2002RG000113, 2003. a
Paltridge, G. W.: Global dynamics and climate – a system of minimum entropy
exchange, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 101,
475–484, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49710142906, 1975. a
Pan, Y., Li, L., Jiang, X., Li, G., Zhang, W., Wang, X., and Ingersoll, A. P.:
Earth's changing global atmospheric energy cycle in response to climate
change, Nat. Commun., 8, 14367, https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms14367, 2017. a, b, c
Pauluis, O.: Water Vapor and Mechanical Work: A Comparison of Carnot and Steam Cycles, J. Atmos. Sci., 68, 91–102,
https://doi.org/10.1175/2010JAS3530.1, 2011. a, b
Pauluis, O. and Dias, J.: Satellite estimates of precipitation-induced
dissipation in the atmosphere, Science, 335, 953–956,
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1215869, 2012. a
Pauluis, O. and Held, I. M.: Entropy Budget of an Atmosphere in
Radiative–Convective Equilibrium. Part I: Maximum Work and Frictional
Dissipation, J. Atmos. Sci., 59, 125–139,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(2002)059<0125:EBOAAI>2.0.CO;2, 2002. a, b, c, d
Prigogine, I.: Non-equilibrium statistical mechanics, Wiley, New York, 1962. a
Raymond, D. J.: Sources and sinks of entropy in the atmosphere, J.
Adv. Model. Earth Syst., 5, 755–763, https://doi.org/10.1002/jame.20050,
2013. a, b, c
Rodell, M., Beaudoing, H. K., L'Ecuyer, T. S., Olson, W. S., Famiglietti,
J. S., Houser, P. R., Adler, R., Bosilovich, M. G., Clayson, C. A., Chambers,
D., Clark, E., Fetzer, E. J., Gao, X., Gu, G., Hilburn, K., Huffman, G. J.,
Lettenmaier, D. P., Liu, W. T., Robertson, F. R., Schlosser, C. A.,
Sheffield, J., Wood, E. F., Rodell, M., Beaudoing, H. K., L'Ecuyer, T. S.,
Olson, W. S., Famiglietti, J. S., Houser, P. R., Adler, R., Bosilovich,
M. G., Clayson, C. A., Chambers, D., Clark, E., Fetzer, E. J., Gao, X., Gu,
G., Hilburn, K., Huffman, G. J., Lettenmaier, D. P., Liu, W. T., Robertson,
F. R., Schlosser, C. A., Sheffield, J., and Wood, E. F.: The Observed State
of the Water Cycle in the Early Twenty-First Century, J. Climate,
28, 8289–8318, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-14-00555.1, 2015. a
Rose, B. E. J. and Ferreira, D.: Ocean Heat Transport and Water Vapor
Greenhouse in a Warm Equable Climate: A New Look at the Low Gradient
Paradox, J. Climate, 26, 2117–2136,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00547.1, 2013. a, b
Schneider, T., Bischoff, T., and Haug, G. H.: Migrations and dynamics of the
Intertropical Convergence Zone, Nature, 513, 45–53,
https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13636, 2014. a
Smith, D. M., Allan, R. P., Coward, A. C., Eade, R., Hyder, P., Liu, C., Loeb,
N. G., Palmer, M. D., Roberts, C. D., and Scaife, A. a.: Earth's energy
imbalance since 1960 in observations and CMIP5 models, Geophys. Res.
Lett., 42, 1205–1213, https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GL062669, 2015. a, b
Stone, P. H.: Constraints on dynamical transports of energy on a spherical
planet, Dynam. Atmos. Ocean., 2, 123–139,
https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-0265(78)90006-4, 1978. a, b
Tailleux, R.: Available Potential Energy and Exergy in Stratified Fluids,
Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech., 45, 35–58,
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-fluid-011212-140620, 2013. a
Taylor, K. E., Stouffer, R. J., and Meehl, G. A.: An overview of CMIP5 and the
experiment design, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 93,
485–498, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-11-00094.1, 2012. a, b
Terai, C. R., Caldwell, P. M., Klein, S. A., Tang, Q., and Branstetter, M. L.:
The atmospheric hydrologic cycle in the ACME v0.3 model, Clim. Dynam.,
50, 3251–3279, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-017-3803-x, 2018. a
Trenberth, K. E. and Fasullo, J. T.: Simulation of present-day and
twenty-first-century energy budgets of the southern oceans, J. Climate, 23, 440–454, https://doi.org/10.1175/2009JCLI3152.1, 2010. a
Trenberth, K. E. and Solomon, A.: The Global Heat-Balance – Heat Transports in
the Atmosphere and Ocean, Clim. Dynam., 10, 107–134, https://doi.org/10.1007/Bf00210625, 1994. a
Trenberth, K. E., Caron, J. M., and Stepaniak, D. P.: The atmospheric energy
budget and implications for surface fluxes and ocean heat transports,
Clim. Dynam., 17, 259–276, https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00007927, 2001. a, b
Vannière, B., Demory, M.-E., Vidale, P. L., Schiemann, R., Roberts,
M. J., Roberts, C. D., Matsueda, M., Terray, L., Koenigk, T., and Senan, R.:
Multi-model evaluation of the sensitivity of the global energy budget and
hydrological cycle to resolution, Clim. Dynam., 52, 6817–6846,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-018-4547-y, 2019. a
Veiga, J. A. P. and Ambrizzi, T.: A global and Hemispherical Analysis of the
Lorenz Energetics Based on the Representative Concentration Pathways Used in
CMIP5, Adv. Meteorol., 2013, 1–13, https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/485047, 2013. a
von Schuckmann, K., Palmer, M. D., Trenberth, K. E., Cazenave, A., Chambers,
D., Champollion, N., Hansen, J., Josey, S. A., Loeb, N. G., Mathieu, P.-P.,
Meyssignac, B., and Wild, M.: An imperative to monitor Earth's energy
imbalance, Nat. Clim. Change, 6, 138–144, 2016. a
Wilcox, L. J., Charlton-Perez, A. J., and Gray, L. J.: Trends in Austral jet
position in ensembles of high- and low-top CMIP5 models, J.
Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 117, D13115, https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JD017597,
2012. a
Wild, M. and Liepert, B. G.: The Earth radiation balance as driver of the
global hydrological cycle, Environ. Res. Lett., 5, 025203,
https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/5/2/025203, 2010. a
Wild, M., Long, C. N., and Ohmura, A.: Evaluation of clear-sky solar fluxes in GCMs participating in AMIP and IPCC-AR4 from a surface perspective, J. Geophys. Res., 111, D01104, https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006118, 2006. a
Wild, M., Folini, D., Schär, C., Loeb, N. G., Dutton, E. G., and
König-Langlo, G.: The global energy balance from a surface
perspective, Clim. Dynam., 40, 3107–3134,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-012-1569-8, 2013. a
Wild, M., Folini, D., Hakuba, M. Z., Schär, C., Seneviratne, S. I., Kato,
S., Rutan, D., Ammann, C., Wood, E. F., and König-Langlo, G.: The
energy balance over land and oceans: an assessment based on direct
observations and CMIP5 climate models, Clim. Dynam., 44, 3393–3429,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-014-2430-z, 2015. a, b
Zhang, Y., Gao, Z., Li, D., Li, Y., Zhang, N., Zhao, X., and Chen, J.: On the computation of planetary boundary-layer height using the bulk Richardson number method, Geosci. Model Dev., 7, 2599–2611, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-7-2599-2014, 2014. a
Short summary
The Thermodynamic Diagnostic Tool (TheDiaTo v1.0) is a collection of diagnostics for the study of the thermodynamics of the climate system in climate models. This is fundamental in order to understand where the imbalances affecting climate projections come from and also to allow for easy comparison of different scenarios and atmospheric regimes. The tool is currently being developed for the assessment of models that are part of the next phase of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP).
The Thermodynamic Diagnostic Tool (TheDiaTo v1.0) is a collection of diagnostics for the study...
