Articles | Volume 12, issue 7
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-2797-2019
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-2797-2019
Development and technical paper
 | 
10 Jul 2019
Development and technical paper |  | 10 Jul 2019

Weather and climate forecasting with neural networks: using general circulation models (GCMs) with different complexity as a study ground

Sebastian Scher and Gabriele Messori

Related authors

Observed changes in the temperature and height of the globally resolved lapserate tropopause
Florian Ladstädter, Matthias Stocker, Sebastian Scher, and Andrea K. Steiner
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2100,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2100, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP).
Short summary
The role of atmospheric large-scale patterns for recent warming periods in Greenland
Florina Roana Schalamon, Sebastian Scher, Andreas Trügler, Lea Hartl, Wolfgang Schöner, and Jakob Abermann
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-4060,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-4060, 2025
Short summary
Technical Note: Temporal disaggregation of spatial rainfall fields with generative adversarial networks
Sebastian Scher and Stefanie Peßenteiner
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 3207–3225, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-3207-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-3207-2021, 2021
Short summary
A new view of heat wave dynamics and predictability over the eastern Mediterranean
Assaf Hochman, Sebastian Scher, Julian Quinting, Joaquim G. Pinto, and Gabriele Messori
Earth Syst. Dynam., 12, 133–149, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-12-133-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-12-133-2021, 2021
Short summary
Generalization properties of feed-forward neural networks trained on Lorenz systems
Sebastian Scher and Gabriele Messori
Nonlin. Processes Geophys., 26, 381–399, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-26-381-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-26-381-2019, 2019
Short summary

Related subject area

Atmospheric sciences
Impact of multiple radar wind profiler data assimilation on convective-scale short-term rainfall forecasts: OSSE studies over the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei region
Juan Zhao, Jianping Guo, and Xiaohui Zheng
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 4075–4101, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-4075-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-4075-2025, 2025
Short summary
New submodel for emissions from Explosive Volcanic ERuptions (EVER v1.1) within the Modular Earth Submodel System (MESSy, version 2.55.1)
Matthias Kohl, Christoph Brühl, Jennifer Schallock, Holger Tost, Patrick Jöckel, Adrian Jost, Steffen Beirle, Michael Höpfner, and Andrea Pozzer
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 3985–4007, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-3985-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-3985-2025, 2025
Short summary
Quantifying the oscillatory evolution of simulated boundary-layer cloud fields using Gaussian process regression
Gunho Loren Oh and Philip H. Austin
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 3921–3940, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-3921-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-3921-2025, 2025
Short summary
Numerical investigations on the modelling of ultrafine particles in SSH-aerosol-v1.3a: size resolution and redistribution
Oscar Jacquot and Karine Sartelet
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 3965–3984, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-3965-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-3965-2025, 2025
Short summary
The third Met Office Unified Model–JULES Regional Atmosphere and Land Configuration, RAL3
Mike Bush, David L. A. Flack, Huw W. Lewis, Sylvia I. Bohnenstengel, Chris J. Short, Charmaine Franklin, Adrian P. Lock, Martin Best, Paul Field, Anne McCabe, Kwinten Van Weverberg, Segolene Berthou, Ian Boutle, Jennifer K. Brooke, Seb Cole, Shaun Cooper, Gareth Dow, John Edwards, Anke Finnenkoetter, Kalli Furtado, Kate Halladay, Kirsty Hanley, Margaret A. Hendry, Adrian Hill, Aravindakshan Jayakumar, Richard W. Jones, Humphrey Lean, Joshua C. K. Lee, Andy Malcolm, Marion Mittermaier, Saji Mohandas, Stuart Moore, Cyril Morcrette, Rachel North, Aurore Porson, Susan Rennie, Nigel Roberts, Belinda Roux, Claudio Sanchez, Chun-Hsu Su, Simon Tucker, Simon Vosper, David Walters, James Warner, Stuart Webster, Mark Weeks, Jonathan Wilkinson, Michael Whitall, Keith D. Williams, and Hugh Zhang
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 3819–3855, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-3819-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-3819-2025, 2025
Short summary

Cited articles

Bauer, P., Thorpe, A., and Brunet, G.: The quiet revolution of numerical weather prediction, Nature, 525, 47–55, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14956, 2015. a
Buschow, S. and Friederichs, P.: Local dimension and recurrent circulation patterns in long-term climate simulations, arXiv preprint arXiv:1803.11255, 2018. a
C3S: ERA5: Fifth generation of ECMWF atmospheric reanalyses of the global climate, Copernicus Climate Change Service Climate Data Store (CDS), available at: https://cds.climate.copernicus.eu/cdsapp#!/home (last access: 7 June 2019), 2017. a, b
Coors, B., Paul Condurache, A., and Geiger, A.: Spherenet: Learning spherical representations for detection and classification in omnidirectional images, in: Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV), September 2018, Munich, Germany, 518–533, 2018. a
Download
Short summary
Currently, weather forecasts are mainly produced by using computer models based on physical equations. It is an appealing idea to use neural networks and “deep learning” for weather forecasting instead. We successfully test the possibility of using deep learning for weather forecasting by considering climate models as simplified versions of reality. Our work therefore is a step towards potentially using deep learning to replace or accompany current weather forecasting models.
Share