Modular Assessment of Rainfall–Runoff Models Toolbox (MARRMoT) v1.2: an open-source, extendable framework providing implementations of 46 conceptual hydrologic models as continuous state-space formulations

Knoben, Wouter J. M.; Freer, Jim E.; Fowler, Keirnan J. A.; Peel, Murray C.; Woods, Ross A.

doi:https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-2463-2019

Articles | Volume 12, issue 6

https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-2463-2019

© Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-2463-2019

© Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Articles | Volume 12, issue 6

Model description paper

|

25 Jun 2019

Model description paper |

| 25 Jun 2019

Modular Assessment of Rainfall–Runoff Models Toolbox (MARRMoT) v1.2: an open-source, extendable framework providing implementations of 46 conceptual hydrologic models as continuous state-space formulations

Wouter J. M. Knoben, Jim E. Freer, Keirnan J. A. Fowler, Murray C. Peel, and Ross A. Woods

Download

Final revised paper (published on 25 Jun 2019)
Supplement to the final revised paper
Preprint (discussion started on 01 Feb 2019)
Supplement to the preprint

Interactive discussion

Status: closed

AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment

- Printer-friendly version

- Supplement

RC1: 'Review by Philipp Kraft for gmd-2018-332', P. Kraft, 06 Mar 2019
RC2: 'Review of the paper by Knoben et al.', Anonymous Referee #2, 02 Apr 2019
AC1: 'Response to reviewers 1 and 2', Wouter Knoben, 13 May 2019

Peer-review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision

AR by Wouter Knoben on behalf of the Authors (13 May 2019) Author's response Manuscript

ED: Publish subject to minor revisions (review by editor) (30 May 2019) by Leena Järvi

AR by Wouter Knoben on behalf of the Authors (31 May 2019) Author's response Manuscript

ED: Publish as is (06 Jun 2019) by Leena Järvi

Short summary

Computer models are used to predict river flows. A good model should represent the river basin to which it is applied so that flow predictions are as realistic as possible. However, many different computer models exist, and selecting the most appropriate model for a given river basin is not always easy. This study combines computer code for 46 different hydrological models into a single coding framework so that models can be compared in an objective way and we can learn about model differences.