Articles | Volume 11, issue 8
Model evaluation paper
21 Aug 2018
Model evaluation paper |  | 21 Aug 2018

Baseline evaluation of the impact of updates to the MIT Earth System Model on its model parameter estimates

Alex G. Libardoni, Chris E. Forest, Andrei P. Sokolov, and Erwan Monier

Related authors

Estimates of climate system properties incorporating recent climate change
Alex G. Libardoni, Chris E. Forest, Andrei P. Sokolov, and Erwan Monier
Adv. Stat. Clim. Meteorol. Oceanogr., 4, 19–36,,, 2018
Short summary

Related subject area

Climate and Earth system modeling
Accurate assessment of land–atmosphere coupling in climate models requires high-frequency data output
Kirsten L. Findell, Zun Yin, Eunkyo Seo, Paul A. Dirmeyer, Nathan P. Arnold, Nathaniel Chaney, Megan D. Fowler, Meng Huang, David M. Lawrence, Po-Lun Ma, and Joseph A. Santanello Jr.
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 1869–1883,,, 2024
Short summary
Towards variance-conserving reconstructions of climate indices with Gaussian process regression in an embedding space
Marlene Klockmann, Udo von Toussaint, and Eduardo Zorita
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 1765–1787,,, 2024
Short summary
A diatom extension to the cGEnIE Earth system model – EcoGEnIE 1.1
Aaron A. Naidoo-Bagwell, Fanny M. Monteiro, Katharine R. Hendry, Scott Burgan, Jamie D. Wilson, Ben A. Ward, Andy Ridgwell, and Daniel J. Conley
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 1729–1748,,, 2024
Short summary
Carbon isotopes in the marine biogeochemistry model FESOM2.1-REcoM3
Martin Butzin, Ying Ye, Christoph Völker, Özgür Gürses, Judith Hauck, and Peter Köhler
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 1709–1727,,, 2024
Short summary
Flux coupling approach on an exchange grid for the IOW Earth System Model (version 1.04.00) of the Baltic Sea region
Sven Karsten, Hagen Radtke, Matthias Gröger, Ha T. M. Ho-Hagemann, Hossein Mashayekh, Thomas Neumann, and H. E. Markus Meier
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 1689–1708,,, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Allen, M. R. and Frame, D. J.: Call off the quest, Science, 318, 582–583, 2007. a
Andrews, D. G. and Allen, M. R.: Diagnosis of climate models in terms of transient climate response and feedback response time, Atmos. Sci. Lett., 9, 7–12, 2008. a
Brohan, P., Kennedy, J. J., Harris, I., Tett, S. F. B., and Jones, P. D.: Uncertainty estimates in regional and global observed temperature changes: A new data set from 1850, J. Geophys. Res., 111, D12106,, 2006. a, b
Cionni, I., Eyring, V., Lamarque, J. F., Randel, W. J., Stevenson, D. S., Wu, F., Bodeker, G. E., Shepherd, T. G., Shindell, D. T., and Waugh, D. W.: Ozone database in support of CMIP5 simulations: results and corresponding radiative forcing, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 11267–11292,, 2011. a, b
Short summary
We present a transparent method for evaluating how changes to the MIT Earth System Model impact its response to anthropogenic and natural forcings. We tested the effects that changes to both model components and forcings have on the estimates of model parameters that agree with historical observations. Overall, changes to model forcings are more important than the new components, while the long-term model response is unchanged. The methodology serves as a guide for documenting model development.