Articles | Volume 10, issue 2
Model evaluation paper
03 Mar 2017
Model evaluation paper |  | 03 Mar 2017

Influence of bulk microphysics schemes upon Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) version 3.6.1 nor'easter simulations

Stephen D. Nicholls, Steven G. Decker, Wei-Kuo Tao, Stephen E. Lang, Jainn J. Shi, and Karen I. Mohr

Related authors

Derivation of aerosol profiles for MC3E convection studies and use in simulations of the 20 May squall line case
Ann M. Fridlind, Xiaowen Li, Di Wu, Marcus van Lier-Walqui, Andrew S. Ackerman, Wei-Kuo Tao, Greg M. McFarquhar, Wei Wu, Xiquan Dong, Jingyu Wang, Alexander Ryzhkov, Pengfei Zhang, Michael R. Poellot, Andrea Neumann, and Jason M. Tomlinson
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 5947–5972,,, 2017
Short summary

Related subject area

Atmospheric sciences
Forecasting tropical cyclone tracks in the northwestern Pacific based on a deep-learning model
Liang Wang, Bingcheng Wan, Shaohui Zhou, Haofei Sun, and Zhiqiu Gao
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 2167–2179,,, 2023
Short summary
Accelerating models for multiphase chemical kinetics through machine learning with polynomial chaos expansion and neural networks
Thomas Berkemeier, Matteo Krüger, Aryeh Feinberg, Marcel Müller, Ulrich Pöschl, and Ulrich K. Krieger
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 2037–2054,,, 2023
Short summary
A machine learning emulator for Lagrangian particle dispersion model footprints: a case study using NAME
Elena Fillola, Raul Santos-Rodriguez, Alistair Manning, Simon O'Doherty, and Matt Rigby
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 1997–2009,,, 2023
Short summary
Improving the representation of shallow cumulus convection with the simplified-higher-order-closure–mass-flux (SHOC+MF v1.0) approach
Maria J. Chinita, Mikael Witte, Marcin J. Kurowski, Joao Teixeira, Kay Suselj, Georgios Matheou, and Peter Bogenschutz
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 1909–1924,,, 2023
Short summary
ISAT v2.0: an integrated tool for nested-domain configurations and model-ready emission inventories for WRF-AQM
Kun Wang, Chao Gao, Kai Wu, Kaiyun Liu, Haofan Wang, Mo Dan, Xiaohui Ji, and Qingqing Tong
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 1961–1973,,, 2023
Short summary

Cited articles

Ashton, A. D., Donnely, J. P., and Evans, R. L.: A discussion of the potential impacts of climate change on the shorelines of the Northeastern U.S.A., Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 13, 719–743, 2008.
Bosart, L. F.: The Presidents' Day Snowstorm of 18–19 February 1979: A subsynoptic-scale event, Mon. Weather Rev., 109, 1542–1566, 1981.
Chen, F. and Dudhia, J.: Coupling an advanced land-surface/ hydrology model with the Penn State/ NCAR MM5 modeling system. Part I: Model description and implementation, Mon. Weather Rev., 129, 569–585, 2001.
Chern, J.-D., Tao, W.-K., Lang, S. E., Matsui, T., Li, J.-L. F., Mohr, K. I., Skofronick-Jackson, G. M., and Peters-Lidard, C. D.: Performance of the Goddard multiscale modeling framework with Goddard ice microphysical schemes, J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst., 7, 66–95,, 2016.
Chou, M.-D. and Suarez, M. J.: A solar radiation parameterization for atmospheric research studies, NASA Tech, Memo NASA/TM-1999-104606, 40 pp., 1999.
Short summary
This study evaluated the impact of five hydrometeor species physics schemes during seven intense winter storm events in the northeastern United States. Model simulations were evaluated against gridded analysis data, precipitation, and weather radar derived products. Results show minor differences in simulated precipitation and large-scale regional patterns, yet simulated weather radar fields were more accurate in physics schemes with less ice pellet content above the melting layer.