Geoscientific Model Development
Geoscientific Model Development
GMD
Articles | Volume 10, issue 2
Articles | Volume 10, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-1033-2017
© Author(s) 2017. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-1033-2017
© Author(s) 2017. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Articles | Volume 10, issue 2
Model evaluation paper
 | 
03 Mar 2017
Model evaluation paper |  | 03 Mar 2017

Influence of bulk microphysics schemes upon Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) version 3.6.1 nor'easter simulations

Stephen D. Nicholls, Steven G. Decker, Wei-Kuo Tao, Stephen E. Lang, Jainn J. Shi, and Karen I. Mohr

Viewed

Total article views: 3,132 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
2,026 961 145 3,132 164 168
  • HTML: 2,026
  • PDF: 961
  • XML: 145
  • Total: 3,132
  • BibTeX: 164
  • EndNote: 168
Views and downloads (calculated since 24 Jun 2016)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 24 Jun 2016)

Cited

Latest update: 23 Nov 2024
Download
Short summary
This study evaluated the impact of five hydrometeor species physics schemes during seven intense winter storm events in the northeastern United States. Model simulations were evaluated against gridded analysis data, precipitation, and weather radar derived products. Results show minor differences in simulated precipitation and large-scale regional patterns, yet simulated weather radar fields were more accurate in physics schemes with less ice pellet content above the melting layer.
Read more