Articles | Volume 8, issue 1
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-87-2015
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-87-2015
Methods for assessment of models
 | 
23 Jan 2015
Methods for assessment of models |  | 23 Jan 2015

The impact of periodization methods on the kinetic energy spectra for limited-area numerical weather prediction models

V. Blažica, N. Gustafsson, and N. Žagar

Related authors

Mean state and day-to-day variability of tropospheric circulation in planetary-scale barotropic Rossby waves during Eurasian heat extremes in CMIP models
Iana Strigunova, Frank Lunkeit, Nedjeljka Žagar, and Damjan Jelić
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-892,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-892, 2025
Short summary
Atmospheric bias teleconnections in boreal winter associated with systematic sea surface temperature errors in the tropical Indian Ocean
Yuan-Bing Zhao, Nedjeljka Žagar, Frank Lunkeit, and Richard Blender
Weather Clim. Dynam., 4, 833–852, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-4-833-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-4-833-2023, 2023
Short summary
Signatures of Eurasian heat waves in global Rossby wave spectra
Iana Strigunova, Richard Blender, Frank Lunkeit, and Nedjeljka Žagar
Weather Clim. Dynam., 3, 1399–1414, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-3-1399-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-3-1399-2022, 2022
Short summary
Metrics of the Hadley circulation strength and associated circulation trends
Matic Pikovnik, Žiga Zaplotnik, Lina Boljka, and Nedjeljka Žagar
Weather Clim. Dynam., 3, 625–644, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-3-625-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-3-625-2022, 2022
Short summary
Equality of opportunities for next generation researchers in Europe: a snapshot discussion motivated by the ERC statistics
Nedjeljka Žagar and Thomas Schäfer
Adv. Geosci., 53, 65–72, https://doi.org/10.5194/adgeo-53-65-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/adgeo-53-65-2020, 2020
Short summary

Related subject area

Atmospheric sciences
ClimKern v1.2: a new Python package and kernel repository for calculating radiative feedbacks
Tyler P. Janoski, Ivan Mitevski, Ryan J. Kramer, Michael Previdi, and Lorenzo M. Polvani
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 3065–3079, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-3065-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-3065-2025, 2025
Short summary
Accounting for effects of coagulation and model uncertainties in particle number concentration estimates based on measurements from sampling lines – a Bayesian inversion approach with SLIC v1.0
Matti Niskanen, Aku Seppänen, Henri Oikarinen, Miska Olin, Panu Karjalainen, Santtu Mikkonen, and Kari Lehtinen
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 2983–3001, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2983-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2983-2025, 2025
Short summary
Top-down CO emission estimates using TROPOMI CO data in the TM5-4DVAR (r1258) inverse modeling suit
Johann Rasmus Nüß, Nikos Daskalakis, Fabian Günther Piwowarczyk, Angelos Gkouvousis, Oliver Schneising, Michael Buchwitz, Maria Kanakidou, Maarten C. Krol, and Mihalis Vrekoussis
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 2861–2890, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2861-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2861-2025, 2025
Short summary
The Multi-Compartment Hg Modeling and Analysis Project (MCHgMAP): mercury modeling to support international environmental policy
Ashu Dastoor, Hélène Angot, Johannes Bieser, Flora Brocza, Brock Edwards, Aryeh Feinberg, Xinbin Feng, Benjamin Geyman, Charikleia Gournia, Yipeng He, Ian M. Hedgecock, Ilia Ilyin, Jane Kirk, Che-Jen Lin, Igor Lehnherr, Robert Mason, David McLagan, Marilena Muntean, Peter Rafaj, Eric M. Roy, Andrei Ryjkov, Noelle E. Selin, Francesco De Simone, Anne L. Soerensen, Frits Steenhuisen, Oleg Travnikov, Shuxiao Wang, Xun Wang, Simon Wilson, Rosa Wu, Qingru Wu, Yanxu Zhang, Jun Zhou, Wei Zhu, and Scott Zolkos
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 2747–2860, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2747-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2747-2025, 2025
Short summary
Similarity-based analysis of atmospheric organic compounds for machine learning applications
Hilda Sandström and Patrick Rinke
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 2701–2724, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2701-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2701-2025, 2025
Short summary

Cited articles

Ahmed, N., Natarajan, T., and Rao, K. R.: Discrete cosine transform, IEEE T. Comput., C-23, 90–93, 1974.
Bengtsson, L., Tijm, S., Váňa, F., and Svensson, G.: Impact of flow-dependent horizontal diffusion on resolved convection in AROME, J. Appl. Meteorol. Clim., 51, 54–67, 2012.
Bierdel, L., Friederichs, P., and Bentzien, S.: Spatial kinetic energy spectra in the convection-permitting limited area NWP model COSMO-DE, Meteorol. Z., 21, 245–258, 2012.
Blažica, V., Žagar, N., Strajnar, B., and Cedilnik, J.: Rotational and divergent kinetic energy in the mesoscale model ALADIN, Tellus A, 65, 18918, https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusa.v65i0.18918, 2013.
Boyd, J. P.: Limited-area Fourier spectral models and data analysis schemes: windows, Fourier extension, Davies relaxation, and all that, Mon. Weather Rev., 133, 2030–2042, 2005.
Download
Short summary
The paper deals with the comparison of the common periodization methods used to obtain spectral fields of limited-area models for numerical weather prediction. The focus is on the impact the methods have on the spectra of the fields. The results show that detrending and DCT have little impact on the spectra, as does the Boyd method for extension zone. For the ALADIN and HIRLAM methods, the impact depends on the width of the extension zone - the wider the zone, the larger impact on the spectra.
Share