Geoscientific Model Development
Geoscientific Model Development
GMD
Articles | Volume 8, issue 1
Articles | Volume 8, issue 1
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-87-2015
© Author(s) 2015. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-87-2015
© Author(s) 2015. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Articles | Volume 8, issue 1
Methods for assessment of models
 | 
23 Jan 2015
Methods for assessment of models |  | 23 Jan 2015

The impact of periodization methods on the kinetic energy spectra for limited-area numerical weather prediction models

V. Blažica, N. Gustafsson, and N. Žagar

Viewed

Total article views: 3,290 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
2,164 967 159 3,290 179 182
  • HTML: 2,164
  • PDF: 967
  • XML: 159
  • Total: 3,290
  • BibTeX: 179
  • EndNote: 182
Views and downloads (calculated since 29 Sep 2014)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 29 Sep 2014)

Cited

Saved (final revised paper)

Saved (preprint)

Latest update: 23 Nov 2024
Download
Short summary
The paper deals with the comparison of the common periodization methods used to obtain spectral fields of limited-area models for numerical weather prediction. The focus is on the impact the methods have on the spectra of the fields. The results show that detrending and DCT have little impact on the spectra, as does the Boyd method for extension zone. For the ALADIN and HIRLAM methods, the impact depends on the width of the extension zone - the wider the zone, the larger impact on the spectra.
Read more