Articles | Volume 8, issue 12
Geosci. Model Dev., 8, 3823–3835, 2015
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-3823-2015
Geosci. Model Dev., 8, 3823–3835, 2015
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-3823-2015

Development and technical paper 01 Dec 2015

Development and technical paper | 01 Dec 2015

On the relationships between the Michaelis–Menten kinetics, reverse Michaelis–Menten kinetics, equilibrium chemistry approximation kinetics, and quadratic kinetics

J. Y. Tang

Download

Interactive discussion

Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement

Peer-review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision
AR by Jinyun Tang on behalf of the Authors (16 Nov 2015)  Author's response    Manuscript
ED: Publish subject to technical corrections (18 Nov 2015) by Carlos Sierra
Download
Short summary
Neither the Michaelis-Menten kinetics nor the reverse Michaelis-Menten kinetics is a consistent approximation to the formulation of law of mass action. The ECA kinetics better approximates the exact solution obtained from the law of mass action and the total quasi-steady-state approximation. The ECA kinetics outperformed the MM kinetics and RMM kinetics in predicting the kinetic parametric sensitivity. The ECA kinetics is therefore expected to improve all soil biogeochemical models.