Articles | Volume 8, issue 7
Geosci. Model Dev., 8, 2231–2262, 2015
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-2231-2015
© Author(s) 2015. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Geosci. Model Dev., 8, 2231–2262, 2015
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-2231-2015
© Author(s) 2015. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Model description paper 24 Jul 2015
Model description paper | 24 Jul 2015
EMPOWER-1.0: an Efficient Model of Planktonic ecOsystems WrittEn in R
T. R. Anderson et al.
Related authors
Claudie Beaulieu, Harriet Cole, Stephanie Henson, Andrew Yool, Thomas R. Anderson, Lee de Mora, Erik T. Buitenhuis, Momme Butenschön, Ian J. Totterdell, and J. Icarus Allen
Biogeosciences, 13, 4533–4553, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-13-4533-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-13-4533-2016, 2016
Short summary
Short summary
Regime shifts have been suggested in the late 1970s and late 1980s in the Gulf of Alaska with important consequences for fisheries. Here we investigate the ability of a suite of ocean biogeochemical models of varying complexity to simulate these regime shifts. Our results demonstrate that ocean models can successfully simulate regime shifts in the Gulf of Alaska region, thereby improving our understanding of how changes in physical conditions are propagated from lower to upper trophic levels.
L. Kwiatkowski, A. Yool, J. I. Allen, T. R. Anderson, R. Barciela, E. T. Buitenhuis, M. Butenschön, C. Enright, P. R. Halloran, C. Le Quéré, L. de Mora, M.-F. Racault, B. Sinha, I. J. Totterdell, and P. M. Cox
Biogeosciences, 11, 7291–7304, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-11-7291-2014, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-11-7291-2014, 2014
B. A. Kelly-Gerreyn, A. P. Martin, B. J. Bett, T. R. Anderson, J. I. Kaariainen, C. E. Main, C. J. Marcinko, and A. Yool
Biogeosciences, 11, 6401–6416, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-11-6401-2014, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-11-6401-2014, 2014
E. E. Popova, A. Yool, Y. Aksenov, A. C. Coward, and T. R. Anderson
Biogeosciences, 11, 293–308, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-11-293-2014, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-11-293-2014, 2014
A. Yool, E. E. Popova, and T. R. Anderson
Geosci. Model Dev., 6, 1767–1811, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-6-1767-2013, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-6-1767-2013, 2013
A. Yool, E. E. Popova, A. C. Coward, D. Bernie, and T. R. Anderson
Biogeosciences, 10, 5831–5854, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-5831-2013, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-5831-2013, 2013
Josué Bock, Martine Michou, Pierre Nabat, Manabu Abe, Jane P. Mulcahy, Dirk J. L. Olivié, Jörg Schwinger, Parvadha Suntharalingam, Jerry Tjiputra, Marco van Hulten, Michio Watanabe, Andrew Yool, and Roland Séférian
Biogeosciences Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-2020-463, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-2020-463, 2021
Revised manuscript accepted for BG
Short summary
Short summary
In this study we analyse surface ocean dimethylsulfide (DMS) concentration and flux to the atmosphere from four CMIP6 Earth System Models over the historical and ssp585 simulations.
Our analysis of contemporary (1980–2009) climatologies shows that models better reproduce observations in mid to high latitudes. The models disagree on the sign of the trend of the global DMS flux from 1980 onwards. The models agree on a positive trend of DMS over polar latitudes following sea-ice retreat dynamics.
Jane P. Mulcahy, Colin Johnson, Colin G. Jones, Adam C. Povey, Catherine E. Scott, Alistair Sellar, Steven T. Turnock, Matthew T. Woodhouse, Nathan Luke Abraham, Martin B. Andrews, Nicolas Bellouin, Jo Browse, Ken S. Carslaw, Mohit Dalvi, Gerd A. Folberth, Matthew Glover, Daniel P. Grosvenor, Catherine Hardacre, Richard Hill, Ben Johnson, Andy Jones, Zak Kipling, Graham Mann, James Mollard, Fiona M. O'Connor, Julien Palmiéri, Carly Reddington, Steven T. Rumbold, Mark Richardson, Nick A. J. Schutgens, Philip Stier, Marc Stringer, Yongming Tang, Jeremy Walton, Stephanie Woodward, and Andrew Yool
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 6383–6423, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-6383-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-6383-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Aerosols are an important component of the Earth system. Here, we comprehensively document and evaluate the aerosol schemes as implemented in the physical and Earth system models, HadGEM3-GC3.1 and UKESM1. This study provides a useful characterisation of the aerosol climatology in both models, facilitating the understanding of the numerous aerosol–climate interaction studies that will be conducted for CMIP6 and beyond.
Andrew Yool, Julien Palmiéri, Colin G. Jones, Lee de Mora, Till Kuhlbrodt, Ekatarina E. Popova, A. J. George Nurser, Joel Hirschi, Adam T. Blaker, Andrew C. Coward, Edward W. Blockley, and Alistair A. Sellar
Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2020-333, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2020-333, 2020
Revised manuscript accepted for GMD
Short summary
Short summary
The ocean plays a key role in modulating the Earth’s climate. Understanding this role is critical when using models to project future change. Consequently, it is necessary to evaluate their realism against the observed state of the ocean. Here we validate UKESM1, a new Earth system model, focusing on the realism of its ocean physics and circulation, as well as its biological cycles and productivity. While we identify biases, generally the model performs well over a wide range of properties.
Lee de Mora, Alistair A. Sellar, Andrew Yool, Julien Palmieri, Robin S. Smith, Till Kuhlbrodt, Robert J. Parker, Jeremy Walton, Jeremy C. Blackford, and Colin G. Jones
Geosci. Commun., 3, 263–278, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-3-263-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-3-263-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
We use time series data from the first United Kingdom Earth System Model (UKESM1) to create six procedurally generated musical pieces for piano. Each of the six pieces help to explain either a scientific principle or a practical aspect of Earth system modelling. We describe the methods that were used to create these pieces, discuss the limitations of this pilot study and list several approaches to extend and expand upon this work.
Lester Kwiatkowski, Olivier Torres, Laurent Bopp, Olivier Aumont, Matthew Chamberlain, James R. Christian, John P. Dunne, Marion Gehlen, Tatiana Ilyina, Jasmin G. John, Andrew Lenton, Hongmei Li, Nicole S. Lovenduski, James C. Orr, Julien Palmieri, Yeray Santana-Falcón, Jörg Schwinger, Roland Séférian, Charles A. Stock, Alessandro Tagliabue, Yohei Takano, Jerry Tjiputra, Katsuya Toyama, Hiroyuki Tsujino, Michio Watanabe, Akitomo Yamamoto, Andrew Yool, and Tilo Ziehn
Biogeosciences, 17, 3439–3470, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-3439-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-3439-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
We assess 21st century projections of marine biogeochemistry in the CMIP6 Earth system models. These models represent the most up-to-date understanding of climate change. The models generally project greater surface ocean warming, acidification, subsurface deoxygenation, and euphotic nitrate reductions but lesser primary production declines than the previous generation of models. This has major implications for the impact of anthropogenic climate change on marine ecosystems.
Matthew P. Couldrey, Kevin I. C. Oliver, Andrew Yool, Paul R. Halloran, and Eric P. Achterberg
Biogeosciences Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-2019-16, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-2019-16, 2019
Revised manuscript not accepted
Short summary
Short summary
Determining how much carbon dioxide (CO2) the oceans absorb is key to predicting human-caused climate change. A computer model of the ocean shows how the North Atlantic will change up to the end of the century. Year-to-year variations are mostly caused by changes in ocean temperature and seawater chemistry, altering CO2 solubility. By 2100, human emissions cause the biggest changes. The near term changes are physically driven, which may be more predictable than biological changes.
Ben A. Ward, Jamie D. Wilson, Ros M. Death, Fanny M. Monteiro, Andrew Yool, and Andy Ridgwell
Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 4241–4267, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-4241-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-4241-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
A novel configuration of an Earth system model includes a diverse plankton community. The model – EcoGEnIE – is sufficiently complex to reproduce a realistic, size-structured plankton community, while at the same time retaining the efficiency to run to a global steady state (~ 10k years). The increased capabilities of EcoGEnIE will allow future exploration of ecological communities on much longer timescales than have so far been examined in global ocean models and particularly for past climate.
Lee de Mora, Andrew Yool, Julien Palmieri, Alistair Sellar, Till Kuhlbrodt, Ekaterina Popova, Colin Jones, and J. Icarus Allen
Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 4215–4240, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-4215-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-4215-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
Climate change is expected to have a significant impact on the Earth's weather, ice caps, land surface, and ocean. Computer models of the Earth system are the only tools available to make predictions about how the climate may change in the future. However, in order to trust the model predictions, we must first demonstrate that the models have a realistic description of the past. The BGC-val toolkit was built to rapidly and simply evaluate the behaviour of models of the Earth's oceans.
Claudie Beaulieu, Harriet Cole, Stephanie Henson, Andrew Yool, Thomas R. Anderson, Lee de Mora, Erik T. Buitenhuis, Momme Butenschön, Ian J. Totterdell, and J. Icarus Allen
Biogeosciences, 13, 4533–4553, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-13-4533-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-13-4533-2016, 2016
Short summary
Short summary
Regime shifts have been suggested in the late 1970s and late 1980s in the Gulf of Alaska with important consequences for fisheries. Here we investigate the ability of a suite of ocean biogeochemical models of varying complexity to simulate these regime shifts. Our results demonstrate that ocean models can successfully simulate regime shifts in the Gulf of Alaska region, thereby improving our understanding of how changes in physical conditions are propagated from lower to upper trophic levels.
J. C. P. Hemmings, P. G. Challenor, and A. Yool
Geosci. Model Dev., 8, 697–731, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-697-2015, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-697-2015, 2015
Short summary
Short summary
Effective calibration of global models is inhibited by the computational demands of 3-D simulations. As a solution for the NEMO-MEDUSA model, we present an efficient emulator of surface chlorophyll as a function of MEDUSA’s biogeochemical parameters. The emulator comprises an array of site-based 1-D simulators and a quantification of uncertainty in their predictions. It is able to produce robust probabilistic estimates of 3-D model output rapidly for comparison with satellite chlorophyll.
L. Kwiatkowski, A. Yool, J. I. Allen, T. R. Anderson, R. Barciela, E. T. Buitenhuis, M. Butenschön, C. Enright, P. R. Halloran, C. Le Quéré, L. de Mora, M.-F. Racault, B. Sinha, I. J. Totterdell, and P. M. Cox
Biogeosciences, 11, 7291–7304, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-11-7291-2014, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-11-7291-2014, 2014
B. A. Kelly-Gerreyn, A. P. Martin, B. J. Bett, T. R. Anderson, J. I. Kaariainen, C. E. Main, C. J. Marcinko, and A. Yool
Biogeosciences, 11, 6401–6416, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-11-6401-2014, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-11-6401-2014, 2014
E. E. Popova, A. Yool, Y. Aksenov, A. C. Coward, and T. R. Anderson
Biogeosciences, 11, 293–308, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-11-293-2014, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-11-293-2014, 2014
A. Yool, E. E. Popova, and T. R. Anderson
Geosci. Model Dev., 6, 1767–1811, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-6-1767-2013, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-6-1767-2013, 2013
A. Yool, E. E. Popova, A. C. Coward, D. Bernie, and T. R. Anderson
Biogeosciences, 10, 5831–5854, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-5831-2013, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-5831-2013, 2013
S. Henson, H. Cole, C. Beaulieu, and A. Yool
Biogeosciences, 10, 4357–4369, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-4357-2013, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-4357-2013, 2013
Related subject area
Biogeosciences
CLASSIC v1.0: the open-source community successor to the Canadian Land Surface Scheme (CLASS) and the Canadian Terrestrial Ecosystem Model (CTEM) – Part 2: Global benchmarking
How to reconstruct aerosol-induced diffuse radiation scenario for simulating GPP in land surface models? An evaluation of reconstruction methods with ORCHIDEE_DFv1.0_DFforc
SPEAD 1.0 – Simulating Plankton Evolution with Adaptive Dynamics in a two-trait continuous fitness landscape applied to the Sargasso Sea
Rapid development of fast and flexible environmental models: the Mobius framework v1.0
Potential yield simulated by global gridded crop models: using a process-based emulator to explain their differences
Integrated modeling of canopy photosynthesis, fluorescence, and the transfer of energy, mass, and momentum in the soil–plant–atmosphere continuum (STEMMUS–SCOPE v1.0.0)
CoupModel (v6.0): an ecosystem model for coupled phosphorus, nitrogen, and carbon dynamics – evaluated against empirical data from a climatic and fertility gradient in Sweden
Improving the representation of cropland sites in the Community Land Model (CLM) version 5.0
Numerical model to simulate long-term soil organic carbon and ground ice budget with permafrost and ice sheets (SOC-ICE-v1.0)
Addressing Biases in Arctic-Boreal Carbon Cycling in the Community Land Model Version 5
Calibrating soybean parameters in JULES 5.0 from the US-Ne2/3 FLUXNET sites and the SoyFACE-O3 experiment
Modeling long-term fire impact on ecosystem characteristics and surface energy using a process-based vegetation–fire model SSiB4/TRIFFID-Fire v1.0
Energy, water and carbon exchanges in managed forest ecosystems: description, sensitivity analysis and evaluation of the INRAE GO+ model, version 3.0
Improving Yasso15 soil carbon model estimates with ensemble adjustment Kalman filter state data assimilation
Oceanic and atmospheric methane cycling in the cGENIE Earth system model – release v0.9.14
Modeling the impacts of diffuse light fraction on photosynthesis in ORCHIDEE (v5453) land surface model
Description and evaluation of the process-based forest model 4C v2.2 at four European forest sites
A multi-isotope model for simulating soil organic carbon cycling in eroding landscapes (WATEM_C v1.0)
Cutting out the middleman: Calibrating and validating a dynamic vegetation model (ED2-PROSPECT5) using remotely sensed surface reflectance
One-dimensional models of radiation transfer in heterogeneous canopies: a review, re-evaluation, and improved model
An improved mechanistic model for ammonia volatilization in Earth system models: Flow of Agricultural Nitrogen version 2 (FANv2)
Stoichiometrically coupled carbon and nitrogen cycling in the MIcrobial-MIneral Carbon Stabilization model version 1.0 (MIMICS-CN v1.0)
Ecosystem age-class dynamics and distribution in the LPJ-wsl v2.0 global ecosystem model
Short-term forecasting of regional biospheric CO2 fluxes in Europe using a light-use-efficiency model (VPRM, MPI-BGC version 1.2)
FLiES-SIF version 1.0: three-dimensional radiative transfer model for estimating solar induced fluorescence
The importance of management information and soil moisture representation for simulating tillage effects on N2O emissions in LPJmL5.0-tillage
Evaluation of CH4MODwetland and Terrestrial Ecosystem Model (TEM) used to estimate global CH4 emissions from natural wetlands
Simulating stable carbon isotopes in the ocean component of the FAMOUS general circulation model with MOSES1 (XOAVI)
Quantitative assessment of fire and vegetation properties in simulations with fire-enabled vegetation models from the Fire Model Intercomparison Project
Marine biogeochemical cycling and oceanic CO2 uptake simulated by the NUIST Earth System Model version 3 (NESM v3)
CLASSIC v1.0: the open-source community successor to the Canadian Land Surface Scheme (CLASS) and the Canadian Terrestrial Ecosystem Model (CTEM) – Part 1: Model framework and site-level performance
HR3DHG version 1: modeling the spatiotemporal dynamics of mercury in the Augusta Bay (southern Italy)
BPOP-v1 model: exploring the impact of changes in the biological pump on the shelf sea and ocean nutrient and redox state
P-model v1.0: an optimality-based light use efficiency model for simulating ecosystem gross primary production
HETEROFOR 1.0: a spatially explicit model for exploring the response of structurally complex forests to uncertain future conditions – Part 2: Phenology and water cycle
Dynamic upscaling of decomposition kinetics for carbon cycling models
CE-DYNAM (v1): a spatially explicit process-based carbon erosion scheme for use in Earth system models
A coupled pelagic–benthic–sympagic biogeochemical model for the Bering Sea: documentation and validation of the BESTNPZ model (v2019.08.23) within a high-resolution regional ocean model
FORests and HYdrology under Climate Change in Switzerland v1.0: a spatially distributed model combining hydrology and forest dynamics
ORCHIDEE MICT-LEAK (r5459), a global model for the production, transport, and transformation of dissolved organic carbon from Arctic permafrost regions – Part 2: Model evaluation over the Lena River basin
GLOBAL-FATE (version 1.0.0): A geographical information system (GIS)-based model for assessing contaminants fate in the global river network
A comparative assessment of the uncertainties of global surface ocean CO2 estimates using a machine-learning ensemble (CSIR-ML6 version 2019a) – have we hit the wall?
Improving the LPJmL4-SPITFIRE vegetation–fire model for South America using satellite data
Accounting for carbon and nitrogen interactions in the global terrestrial ecosystem model ORCHIDEE (trunk version, rev 4999): multi-scale evaluation of gross primary production
A new model of the coupled carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus cycles in the terrestrial biosphere (QUINCY v1.0; revision 1996)
Modelling biomass burning emissions and the effect of spatial resolution: a case study for Africa based on the Global Fire Emissions Database (GFED)
A lattice-automaton bioturbation simulator with coupled physics, chemistry, and biology in marine sediments (eLABS v0.2)
The biophysics, ecology, and biogeochemistry of functionally diverse, vertically and horizontally heterogeneous ecosystems: the Ecosystem Demography model, version 2.2 – Part 1: Model description
The biophysics, ecology, and biogeochemistry of functionally diverse, vertically and horizontally heterogeneous ecosystems: the Ecosystem Demography model, version 2.2 – Part 2: Model evaluation for tropical South America
Identification of key parameters controlling demographically structured vegetation dynamics in a land surface model: CLM4.5(FATES)
Christian Seiler, Joe R. Melton, Vivek K. Arora, and Libo Wang
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 2371–2417, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-2371-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-2371-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
This study evaluates how well the CLASSIC land surface model reproduces the energy, water, and carbon cycle when compared against a wide range of global observations. Special attention is paid to how uncertainties in the data used to drive and evaluate the model affect model skill. Our results show the importance of incorporating uncertainties when evaluating land surface models and that failing to do so may potentially misguide future model development.
Yuan Zhang, Olivier Boucher, Philippe Ciais, Laurent Li, and Nicolas Bellouin
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 2029–2039, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-2029-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-2029-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
We investigated different methods to reconstruct spatiotemporal distribution of the fraction of diffuse radiation (Fdf) to qualify the aerosol impacts on GPP using the ORCHIDEE_DF land surface model. We find that climatological-averaging methods which dampen the variability of Fdf can cause significant bias in the modeled diffuse radiation impacts on GPP. Better methods to reconstruct Fdf are recommended.
Guillaume Le Gland, Sergio M. Vallina, S. Lan Smith, and Pedro Cermeño
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 1949–1985, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-1949-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-1949-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
We present an ecological model called SPEAD wherein various phytoplankton compete for nutrients. Phytoplankton in SPEAD are characterized by two continuously distributed traits: optimal temperature and nutrient half-saturation. Trait diversity is sustained by allowing the traits to mutate at each generation. We show that SPEAD agrees well with a more classical discrete model for only a fraction of the cost. We also identify realistic values for the mutation rates to be used in future models.
Magnus Dahler Norling, Leah Amber Jackson-Blake, José-Luis Guerrero Calidonio, and James Edward Sample
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 1885–1897, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-1885-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-1885-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
In order to allow researchers to quickly prototype and build models of natural systems, we have created the Mobius framework. Such models can, for instance, be used to ask questions about what the impacts of land-use changes are to water quality in a river or lake, or the response of biogeochemical systems to climate change. The Mobius framework makes it quick to build models that run fast, which enables the user to explore many different scenarios and model formulations.
Bruno Ringeval, Christoph Müller, Thomas A. M. Pugh, Nathaniel D. Mueller, Philippe Ciais, Christian Folberth, Wenfeng Liu, Philippe Debaeke, and Sylvain Pellerin
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 1639–1656, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-1639-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-1639-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
We assess how and why global gridded crop models (GGCMs) differ in their simulation of potential yield. We build a GCCM emulator based on generic formalism and fit its parameters against aboveground biomass and yield at harvest simulated by eight GGCMs. Despite huge differences between GGCMs, we show that the calibration of a few key parameters allows the emulator to reproduce the GGCM simulations. Our simple but mechanistic model could help to improve the global simulation of potential yield.
Yunfei Wang, Yijian Zeng, Lianyu Yu, Peiqi Yang, Christiaan Van der Tol, Qiang Yu, Xiaoliang Lü, Huanjie Cai, and Zhongbo Su
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 1379–1407, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-1379-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-1379-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
This study integrates photosynthesis and transfer of energy, mass, and momentum in the soil–plant–atmosphere continuum system, via a simplified 1D root growth model. The results indicated that the simulation of land surface fluxes was significantly improved by considering the root water uptake, especially when vegetation was experiencing severe water stress. This finding highlights the importance of enhanced soil heat and moisture transfer in simulating ecosystem functioning.
Hongxing He, Per-Erik Jansson, and Annemieke I. Gärdenäs
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 735–761, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-735-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-735-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
This study presents the integration of the phosphorus (P) cycle into CoupModel (v6.0, Coup-CNP). The extended Coup-CNP, which explicitly considers the symbiosis between soil microbes and plant roots, enables simulations of coupled C, N, and P dynamics for terrestrial ecosystems. Simulations from the new Coup-CNP model provide strong evidence that P fluxes need to be further considered in studies of how ecosystems and C turnover react to climate change.
Theresa Boas, Heye Bogena, Thomas Grünwald, Bernard Heinesch, Dongryeol Ryu, Marius Schmidt, Harry Vereecken, Andrew Western, and Harrie-Jan Hendricks Franssen
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 573–601, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-573-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-573-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
In this study we were able to significantly improve CLM5 model performance for European cropland sites by adding a winter wheat representation, specific plant parameterizations for important cash crops, and a cover-cropping and crop rotation subroutine to its crop module. Our modifications should be applied in future studies of CLM5 to improve regional yield predictions and to better understand large-scale impacts of agricultural management on carbon, water, and energy fluxes.
Kazuyuki Saito, Hirokazu Machiya, Go Iwahana, Tokuta Yokohata, and Hiroshi Ohno
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 521–542, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-521-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-521-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Soil organic carbon (SOC) and ground ice (ICE) are essential but under-documented information to assess the circum-Arctic permafrost degradation impacts. A simple numerical model of essential SOC and ICE dynamics, developed and integrated north of 50° N for 125,000 years since the last interglacial, reconstructed the history and 1° distribution of SOC and ICE consistent with current knowledge, together with successful demonstration of climatic and topographical controls on SOC evolution.
Leah Birch, Christopher R. Schwalm, Sue Natali, Danica Lombardozzi, Gretchen Keppel-Aleks, Jennifer Watts, Xin Lin, Donatella Zona, Walter Oechel, Torsten Sachs, Thomas Andrew Black, and Brendan M. Rogers
Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2020-365, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2020-365, 2020
Revised manuscript accepted for GMD
Short summary
Short summary
The high latitude landscape or Arctic-Boreal Zone has been warming rapidly, impacting the carbon balance, both regionally and globally. Given the possible global effects of climate change, it is important to have accurate climate model simulations. We assess the simulation of the Arctic-Boreal carbon cycle in the Community Land Model (CLM 5.0). We find biases in both the timing and magnitude photosynthesis. We then use observational data to improve the simulation of the carbon cycle.
Felix Leung, Karina Williams, Stephen Sitch, Amos P. K. Tai, Andy Wiltshire, Jemma Gornall, Elizabeth A. Ainsworth, Timothy Arkebauer, and David Scoby
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 6201–6213, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-6201-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-6201-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Ground-level ozone (O3) is detrimental to plant productivity and crop yield. Currently, the Joint UK Land Environment Simulator (JULES) includes a representation of crops (JULES-crop). The parameters for O3 damage in soybean in JULES-crop were calibrated against photosynthesis measurements from the Soybean Free Air Concentration Enrichment (SoyFACE). The result shows good performance for yield, and it helps contribute to understanding of the impacts of climate and air pollution on food security.
Huilin Huang, Yongkang Xue, Fang Li, and Ye Liu
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 6029–6050, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-6029-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-6029-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
We developed a fire-coupled dynamic vegetation model that captures the spatial distribution, temporal variability, and especially the seasonal variability of fire regimes. The fire model is applied to assess the long-term fire impact on ecosystems and surface energy. We find that fire is an important determinant of the structure and function of the tropical savanna. By changing the vegetation composition and ecosystem characteristics, fire significantly alters surface energy balance.
Virginie Moreaux, Simon Martel, Alexandre Bosc, Delphine Picart, David Achat, Christophe Moisy, Raphael Aussenac, Christophe Chipeaux, Jean-Marc Bonnefond, Soisick Figuères, Pierre Trichet, Rémi Vezy, Vincent Badeau, Bernard Longdoz, André Granier, Olivier Roupsard, Manuel Nicolas, Kim Pilegaard, Giorgio Matteucci, Claudy Jolivet, Andrew T. Black, Olivier Picard, and Denis Loustau
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 5973–6009, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-5973-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-5973-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
The model GO+ describes the functioning of managed forests based upon biophysical and biogeochemical processes. It accounts for the impacts of forest operations on energy, water and carbon exchanges within the soil–vegetation–atmosphere continuum. It includes versatile descriptions of management operations. Its sensitivity and uncertainty are detailed and predictions are compared with observations about mass and energy exchanges, hydrological data, and tree growth variables from different sites.
Toni Viskari, Maisa Laine, Liisa Kulmala, Jarmo Mäkelä, Istem Fer, and Jari Liski
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 5959–5971, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-5959-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-5959-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
The research here established whether a Bayesian statistical method called state data assimilation could be used to improve soil organic carbon (SOC) forecasts. Our test case was a fallow experiment where SOC content was measured over several decades from a plot where all vegetation was removed. Our results showed that state data assimilation improved projections and allowed for the detailed model state be updated with coarse total carbon measurements.
Christopher T. Reinhard, Stephanie L. Olson, Sandra Kirtland Turner, Cecily Pälike, Yoshiki Kanzaki, and Andy Ridgwell
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 5687–5706, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-5687-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-5687-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
We provide documentation and testing of new developments for the oceanic and atmospheric methane cycles in the cGENIE Earth system model. The model is designed to explore Earth's methane cycle across a wide range of timescales and scenarios, in particular assessing the mean climate state and climate perturbations in Earth's deep past. We further document the impact of atmospheric oxygen levels and ocean chemistry on fluxes of methane to the atmosphere from the ocean biosphere.
Yuan Zhang, Ana Bastos, Fabienne Maignan, Daniel Goll, Olivier Boucher, Laurent Li, Alessandro Cescatti, Nicolas Vuichard, Xiuzhi Chen, Christof Ammann, M. Altaf Arain, T. Andrew Black, Bogdan Chojnicki, Tomomichi Kato, Ivan Mammarella, Leonardo Montagnani, Olivier Roupsard, Maria J. Sanz, Lukas Siebicke, Marek Urbaniak, Francesco Primo Vaccari, Georg Wohlfahrt, Will Woodgate, and Philippe Ciais
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 5401–5423, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-5401-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-5401-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
We improved the ORCHIDEE LSM by distinguishing diffuse and direct light in canopy and evaluated the new model with observations from 159 sites. Compared with the old model, the new model has better sunny GPP and reproduced the diffuse light fertilization effect observed at flux sites. Our simulations also indicate different mechanisms causing the observed GPP enhancement under cloudy conditions at different times. The new model has the potential to study large-scale impacts of aerosol changes.
Petra Lasch-Born, Felicitas Suckow, Christopher P. O. Reyer, Martin Gutsch, Chris Kollas, Franz-Werner Badeck, Harald K. M. Bugmann, Rüdiger Grote, Cornelia Fürstenau, Marcus Lindner, and Jörg Schaber
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 5311–5343, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-5311-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-5311-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
The process-based model 4C has been developed to study climate impacts on forests and is now freely available as an open-source tool. This paper provides a comprehensive description of the 4C version (v2.2) for scientific users of the model and presents an evaluation of 4C. The evaluation focused on forest growth, carbon water, and heat fluxes. We conclude that 4C is widely applicable, reliable, and ready to be released to the scientific community to use and further develop the model.
Zhengang Wang, Jianxiu Qiu, and Kristof Van Oost
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 4977–4992, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-4977-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-4977-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
This study developed a spatially distributed carbon cycling model applicable in an eroding landscape. It includes all three carbon isotopes so that it is able to represent the carbon isotopic compositions. The model is able to represent the observations that eroding area is enriched in 13C and depleted of 14C compared to depositional area. Our simulations show that the spatial variability of carbon isotopic properties in an eroding landscape is mainly caused by the soil redistribution.
Alexey N. Shiklomanov, Michael C. Dietze, Istem Fer, Toni Viskari, and Shawn P. Serbin
Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2020-324, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2020-324, 2020
Revised manuscript accepted for GMD
Short summary
Short summary
Airborne and satellite images are a great resource for calibrating and evaluating computer models of ecosystems. Typically, researchers derive ecosystem properties from these images and then compare model against these derived properties. Here, we present an alternative approach where we modify a model to predict what the satellite would see more directly. We then show how this approach can be used to calibrate model parameters using airborne data from forest sites in the northeast US.
Brian N. Bailey, María A. Ponce de León, and E. Scott Krayenhoff
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 4789–4808, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-4789-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-4789-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Numerous models of plant radiation interception based on a range of assumptions are available in the literature, but the importance of each assumption is not well understood. In this work, we evaluate several assumptions common in simple models of radiation interception in canopies with widely spaced plants by comparing against a detailed 3-D model. This yielded a simple model based on readily measurable parameters that could accurately predict interception for a wide range of architectures.
Julius Vira, Peter Hess, Jeff Melkonian, and William R. Wieder
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 4459–4490, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-4459-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-4459-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Mostly emitted by the agricultural sector, ammonia has an important role in atmospheric chemistry. We developed a model to simulate how ammonia emissions respond to changes in temperature and soil moisture, and we evaluated agricultural ammonia emissions globally. The simulated emissions agree with earlier estimates over many regions, but the results highlight the variability of ammonia emissions and suggest that emissions in warm climates may be higher than previously thought.
Emily Kyker-Snowman, William R. Wieder, Serita D. Frey, and A. Stuart Grandy
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 4413–4434, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-4413-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-4413-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Microbes drive carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) transformations in soil, and soil models have started to include explicit microbial physiology and functioning to try to reduce uncertainty in soil–climate feedbacks. Here, we add N cycling to a microbially explicit soil C model and reproduce C and N dynamics in soil during litter decomposition across a range of sites. We discuss model-generated hypotheses about soil C and N cycling and highlight the need for landscape-scale model evaluation data.
Leonardo Calle and Benjamin Poulter
Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2020-258, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2020-258, 2020
Revised manuscript accepted for GMD
Short summary
Short summary
We developed a model to simulate and track the age of ecosystems on Earth. We found that the effect of ecosystem age on net primary production and ecosystem respiration is as important as climate in large areas of every vegetated continent. The LPJ-wsl v2.0 age-class model simulates the upper limit of age-class distributions on Earth and represents another step forward towards understanding the role of demography in global ecosystems.
Jinxuan Chen, Christoph Gerbig, Julia Marshall, and Kai Uwe Totsche
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 4091–4106, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-4091-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-4091-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
One of the essential challenge for atmospheric CO2 forecasting is predicting CO2 flux variation on synoptic timescale. For CAMS CO2 forecast, a process-based vegetation model is used.
In this research we evaluate another type of model (i.e., the light-use-efficiency model VPRM), which is a data-driven approach and thus ideal for realistic estimation, on its ability of flux prediction. Errors from different sources are assessed, and overall the model is capable of CO2 flux prediction.
Yuma Sakai, Hideki Kobayashi, and Tomomichi Kato
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 4041–4066, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-4041-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-4041-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Chlorophyll fluorescence is one of the energy release pathways of excess incident light in the photosynthetic process. The canopy-scale Sun-induced chlorophyll fluorescence (SIF), which potentially provides a direct pathway to link leaf-level photosynthesis to global GPP, can be observed from satellites. We develop the three-dimensional Monte Carlo plant canopy radiative transfer model to understand the biological and physical mechanisms behind SIF emission from complex forest canopies.
Femke Lutz, Stephen Del Grosso, Stephen Ogle, Stephen Williams, Sara Minoli, Susanne Rolinski, Jens Heinke, Jetse J. Stoorvogel, and Christoph Müller
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 3905–3923, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-3905-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-3905-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Previous findings have shown deviations between the LPJmL5.0-tillage model and results from meta-analyses on global estimates of tillage effects on N2O emissions. By comparing model results with observational data of four experimental sites and outputs from field-scale DayCent model simulations, we show that advancing information on agricultural management, as well as the representation of soil moisture dynamics, improves LPJmL5.0-tillage and the estimates of tillage effects on N2O emissions.
Tingting Li, Yanyu Lu, Lingfei Yu, Wenjuan Sun, Qing Zhang, Wen Zhang, Guocheng Wang, Zhangcai Qin, Lijun Yu, Hailing Li, and Ran Zhang
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 3769–3788, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-3769-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-3769-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Reliable models are required to estimate global wetland CH4 emissions, which are the largest and most uncertain source of atmospheric CH4. This paper evaluated CH4MODwetland and TEM models against CH4 measurements from different continents and wetland types. Based on best-model performance, we estimated 117–125 Tg yr−1 of global CH4 emissions from wetlands for the period 2000–2010. Efforts should be made to reduce estimate uncertainties for different wetland types and regions.
Jennifer E. Dentith, Ruza F. Ivanovic, Lauren J. Gregoire, Julia C. Tindall, and Laura F. Robinson
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 3529–3552, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-3529-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-3529-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
We have added a new tracer (13C) into the ocean of the FAMOUS climate model to study large-scale circulation and the marine carbon cycle. The model captures the large-scale spatial pattern of observations but the simulated values are consistently higher than observed. In the first instance, our new tracer is therefore useful for recalibrating the physical and biogeochemical components of the model.
Stijn Hantson, Douglas I. Kelley, Almut Arneth, Sandy P. Harrison, Sally Archibald, Dominique Bachelet, Matthew Forrest, Thomas Hickler, Gitta Lasslop, Fang Li, Stephane Mangeon, Joe R. Melton, Lars Nieradzik, Sam S. Rabin, I. Colin Prentice, Tim Sheehan, Stephen Sitch, Lina Teckentrup, Apostolos Voulgarakis, and Chao Yue
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 3299–3318, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-3299-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-3299-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Global fire–vegetation models are widely used, but there has been limited evaluation of how well they represent various aspects of fire regimes. Here we perform a systematic evaluation of simulations made by nine FireMIP models in order to quantify their ability to reproduce a range of fire and vegetation benchmarks. While some FireMIP models are better at representing certain aspects of the fire regime, no model clearly outperforms all other models across the full range of variables assessed.
Yifei Dai, Long Cao, and Bin Wang
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 3119–3144, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-3119-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-3119-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
NESM v3 is one of the CMIP6 registered Earth system models. We evaluate its ocean carbon cycle component and present its present-day and future oceanic CO2 uptake based on the CMIP6 historical and SSP5–8.5 scenarios. We hope that this paper can serve as a documentation of the marine biogeochemical cycle in NESM v3. Also, the model defects found and their underlying causes analyzed in this paper could help users and further model development.
Joe R. Melton, Vivek K. Arora, Eduard Wisernig-Cojoc, Christian Seiler, Matthew Fortier, Ed Chan, and Lina Teckentrup
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 2825–2850, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-2825-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-2825-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
We transitioned the CLASS-CTEM land surface model to an open-source community model format by modernizing the code base to make the model easier to use and understand, providing a complete software environment to run the model within, developing a benchmarking suite for model evaluation, and creating an infrastructure to support community involvement. The new model, the Canadian Land Surface Scheme including Biogeochemical Cycles (CLASSIC), is now available for the community to use and develop.
Giovanni Denaro, Daniela Salvagio Manta, Alessandro Borri, Maria Bonsignore, Davide Valenti, Enza Quinci, Andrea Cucco, Bernardo Spagnolo, Mario Sprovieri, and Andrea De Gaetano
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 2073–2093, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-2073-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-2073-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
The HR3DHG (high-resolution 3D mercury model) investigates the spatiotemporal behavior, in seawater and marine sediments, of three mercury species (elemental, inorganic, and organic mercury) in a highly polluted marine environment (Augusta Bay, southern Italy). The model shows fair agreement with the experimental data collected during six different oceanographic cruises and can possibly be used for a detailed exploration of the effects of climate change on mercury distribution.
Elisa Lovecchio and Timothy M. Lenton
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 1865–1883, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-1865-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-1865-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
We present here the newly developed BPOP box model. BPOP is aimed at studying the impact of large-scale changes in the biological pump, i.e. the cycle of production, export and remineralization of the marine organic matter, on the nutrient and oxygen concentrations in the shelf and open ocean. This model has been developed to investigate the global consequences of the evolution of larger and heavier phytoplankton cells but can be applied to a variety of past and future case studies.
Benjamin D. Stocker, Han Wang, Nicholas G. Smith, Sandy P. Harrison, Trevor F. Keenan, David Sandoval, Tyler Davis, and I. Colin Prentice
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 1545–1581, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-1545-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-1545-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Estimating terrestrial photosynthesis relies on satellite data of vegetation cover and models simulating the efficiency by which light absorbed by vegetation is used for CO2 assimilation. This paper presents the P-model, a light use efficiency model derived from a carbon–water optimality principle, and evaluates its predictions of ecosystem-level photosynthesis against globally distributed observations. The model is implemented and openly accessible as an R package (rpmodel).
Louis de Wergifosse, Frédéric André, Nicolas Beudez, François de Coligny, Hugues Goosse, François Jonard, Quentin Ponette, Hugues Titeux, Caroline Vincke, and Mathieu Jonard
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 1459–1498, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-1459-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-1459-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Given their key role in the simulation of climate impacts on tree growth, phenological and water balance processes must be integrated in models simulating forest dynamics under a changing environment. Here, we describe these processes integrated in HETEROFOR, a model accounting simultaneously for the functional, structural and spatial complexity to explore the forest response to forestry practices. The model evaluation using phenological and soil water content observations is quite promising.
Arjun Chakrawal, Anke M. Herrmann, John Koestel, Jerker Jarsjö, Naoise Nunan, Thomas Kätterer, and Stefano Manzoni
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 1399–1429, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-1399-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-1399-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Soils are heterogeneous, which results in a nonuniform spatial distribution of substrates and the microorganisms feeding on them. Our results show that the variability in the spatial distribution of substrates and microorganisms at the pore scale is crucial because it affects how fast substrates are used by microorganisms and thus the decomposition rate observed at the soil core scale. This work provides a methodology to include microscale heterogeneity in soil carbon cycling models.
Victoria Naipal, Ronny Lauerwald, Philippe Ciais, Bertrand Guenet, and Yilong Wang
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 1201–1222, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-1201-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-1201-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
In this study we present the Carbon Erosion DYNAMics model (CE-DYNAM) that links sediment dynamics resulting from water erosion with the soil carbon cycle along a cascade of hillslopes, floodplains, and rivers. The model can simulate the removal of soil and carbon from eroding areas and their destination at regional scale. We calibrated and validated the model for the Rhine catchment, and we show that soil erosion is a potential large net carbon sink over the period 1850–2005.
Kelly Kearney, Albert Hermann, Wei Cheng, Ivonne Ortiz, and Kerim Aydin
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 597–650, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-597-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-597-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
We describe an ecosystem model for the Bering Sea. Biological components in the Bering Sea can be found in the water column, on and within the bottom sediments, and within the porous lower layer of seasonal sea ice. This model simulates the exchange of material between nutrients and plankton within all three environments. Here, we thoroughly document the model and assess its skill in capturing key biophysical features across the Bering Sea.
Matthias J. R. Speich, Massimiliano Zappa, Marc Scherstjanoi, and Heike Lischke
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 537–564, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-537-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-537-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Climate change is expected to substantially affect natural processes, and simulation models are a valuable tool to anticipate these changes. In this study, we combine two existing models that each describe one aspect of the environment: forest dynamics and the terrestrial water cycle. The coupled model better described observed patterns in vegetation structure. We also found that including the effect of water availability on tree height and rooting depth improved the model.
Simon P. K. Bowring, Ronny Lauerwald, Bertrand Guenet, Dan Zhu, Matthieu Guimberteau, Pierre Regnier, Ardalan Tootchi, Agnès Ducharne, and Philippe Ciais
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 507–520, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-507-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-507-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
In this second part of the study, we performed simulations of the carbon and water budget of the Lena catchment with the land surface model ORCHIDEE MICT-LEAK, enabled to simulate dissolved organic carbon (DOC) production in soils and its transport and fate in high-latitude inland waters. We compare simulations using this model to existing data sources to show that it is capable of reproducing dissolved carbon fluxes of potentially great importance for the future of the global permafrost.
Carme Font, Francesco Bregoli, Vicenç Acuña, Sergi Sabater, and Rafael Marcé
Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 5213–5228, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-5213-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-5213-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
GLOBAL-FATE is an open-source, multiplatform, and flexible model that simulates the fate of pharmaceutical-like compounds in the global river network. The model considers the consumption of pharmaceuticals by humans, differentiates between pharmaceutical load treated in wastewater treatment plants from that directly delivered to streams and rivers, and integrates lakes and reservoirs in calculations. GLOBAL-FATE is a powerful tool for pollutant impact studies at the global scale.
Luke Gregor, Alice D. Lebehot, Schalk Kok, and Pedro M. Scheel Monteiro
Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 5113–5136, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-5113-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-5113-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
The ocean plays a vital role in mitigating climate change by taking up atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2). Historically sparse ship-based measurements of surface ocean CO2 make direct estimates of CO2 exchange changes unreliable. We introduce a machine-learning ensemble approach to fill these observational gaps. Our method performs incrementally better relative to past methods, leading to our hypothesis that we are perhaps reaching the limitation of machine-learning algorithms' capability.
Markus Drüke, Matthias Forkel, Werner von Bloh, Boris Sakschewski, Manoel Cardoso, Mercedes Bustamante, Jürgen Kurths, and Kirsten Thonicke
Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 5029–5054, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-5029-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-5029-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
This work shows the successful application of a systematic model–data integration setup, as well as the implementation of a new fire danger formulation, in order to optimize a process-based fire-enabled dynamic global vegetation model. We have demonstrated a major improvement in the fire representation within LPJmL4-SPITFIRE in terms of the spatial pattern and the interannual variability of burned area in South America as well as in the modelling of biomass and the distribution of plant types.
Nicolas Vuichard, Palmira Messina, Sebastiaan Luyssaert, Bertrand Guenet, Sönke Zaehle, Josefine Ghattas, Vladislav Bastrikov, and Philippe Peylin
Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 4751–4779, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-4751-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-4751-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
In this research, we present a new version of the global terrestrial ecosystem model ORCHIDEE in which carbon and nitrogen cycles are coupled. We evaluate its skills at simulating primary production at 78 sites and at a global scale. Based on a set of additional simulations in which carbon and nitrogen cycles are coupled and uncoupled, we show that the functional responses of the model with carbon–nitrogen interactions better agree with our current understanding of photosynthesis.
Tea Thum, Silvia Caldararu, Jan Engel, Melanie Kern, Marleen Pallandt, Reiner Schnur, Lin Yu, and Sönke Zaehle
Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 4781–4802, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-4781-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-4781-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
To predict the response of the vegetation to climate change, we need global models that describe the relevant processes taking place in the vegetation. Recently, we have obtained more in-depth understanding of vegetation processes and the role of nutrients in the biogeochemical cycles. We have developed a new global vegetation model that includes carbon, water, nitrogen, and phosphorus cycles. We show that the model is successful in evaluation against a wide range of observations.
Dave van Wees and Guido R. van der Werf
Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 4681–4703, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-4681-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-4681-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
For this paper, a novel high spatial-resolution fire emission model based on the Global Fire Emissions Database (GFED) modelling framework was developed and compared to a coarser-resolution version of the same model. Our findings highlight the importance of fine spatial resolution when modelling global-scale fire emissions, especially considering the comparison of model pixels to individual field measurements and the model representation of heterogeneity in the landscape.
Yoshiki Kanzaki, Bernard P. Boudreau, Sandra Kirtland Turner, and Andy Ridgwell
Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 4469–4496, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-4469-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-4469-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
This paper provides eLABS, an extension of the lattice-automaton bioturbation simulator LABS. In our new model, the benthic animal behavior interacts and changes dynamically with oxygen and organic matter concentrations and the water flows caused by benthic animals themselves, in a 2-D marine-sediment grid. The model can address the mechanisms behind empirical observations of bioturbation based on the interactions between physical, chemical and biological aspects of marine sediment.
Marcos Longo, Ryan G. Knox, David M. Medvigy, Naomi M. Levine, Michael C. Dietze, Yeonjoo Kim, Abigail L. S. Swann, Ke Zhang, Christine R. Rollinson, Rafael L. Bras, Steven C. Wofsy, and Paul R. Moorcroft
Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 4309–4346, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-4309-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-4309-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
Our paper describes the Ecosystem Demography model. This computer program calculates how plants and ground exchange heat, water, and carbon with the air, and how plants grow, reproduce and die in different climates. Most models simplify forests to an average big tree. We consider that tall, deep-rooted trees get more light and water than small plants, and that some plants can with shade and drought. This diversity helps us to better explain how plants live and interact with the atmosphere.
Marcos Longo, Ryan G. Knox, Naomi M. Levine, Abigail L. S. Swann, David M. Medvigy, Michael C. Dietze, Yeonjoo Kim, Ke Zhang, Damien Bonal, Benoit Burban, Plínio B. Camargo, Matthew N. Hayek, Scott R. Saleska, Rodrigo da Silva, Rafael L. Bras, Steven C. Wofsy, and Paul R. Moorcroft
Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 4347–4374, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-4347-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-4347-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
The Ecosystem Demography model calculates the fluxes of heat, water, and carbon between plants and ground and the air, and the life cycle of plants in different climates. To test if our calculations were reasonable, we compared our results with field and satellite measurements. Our model predicts well the extent of the Amazon forest, how much light forests absorb, and how much water forests release to the air. However, it must improve the tree growth rates and how fast dead plants decompose.
Elias C. Massoud, Chonggang Xu, Rosie A. Fisher, Ryan G. Knox, Anthony P. Walker, Shawn P. Serbin, Bradley O. Christoffersen, Jennifer A. Holm, Lara M. Kueppers, Daniel M. Ricciuto, Liang Wei, Daniel J. Johnson, Jeffrey Q. Chambers, Charlie D. Koven, Nate G. McDowell, and Jasper A. Vrugt
Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 4133–4164, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-4133-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-4133-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
We conducted a comprehensive sensitivity analysis to understand behaviors of a demographic vegetation model within a land surface model. By running the model 5000 times with changing input parameter values, we found that (1) the photosynthetic capacity controls carbon fluxes, (2) the allometry is important for tree growth, and (3) the targeted carbon storage is important for tree survival. These results can provide guidance on improved model parameterization for a better fit to observations.
Cited articles
Alderkamp, A.-C., Kulk, G., Buma, G. J., Visser, R. J. W., Van Dijken, G. L., Mills, M. M., and Arrigo, K. R.: The effect of iron limitation on photophysiology of Phaeocycstis Antarctica (Prymnesiophyceae) and Flagiariopsis cylindrus (Bacillariophyceae) under dynamic irradiance, J. Phycol., 8, 45–59, 2012.
Anderson, T. R.: A spectrally averaged model of light penetration and photosynthesis, Limnol. Oceanogr., 38, 1403–1419, 1993.
Anderson, T. R.: Relating C:N ratios in zooplankton food and faecal pellets using a biochemical model, J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol., 184, 183–199, 1994.
Anderson, T. R.: Plankton functional type modelling: running before we can walk?, J. Plankton Res., 27, 1073–1081, 2005.
Anderson, T. R.: Progress in marine ecosystem modelling and the "unreasonable effectiveness of mathematics", J. Mar. Syst., 81, 4–11, 2010.
Anderson, T. R. and Gentleman, W. C.: The legacy of Gordon Arthur Riley (1911–1985) and the development of mathematical models in biological oceanography, J. Mar. Res., 70, 1–30, 2012.
Anderson, T. R. and Hessen, D. O.: Carbon or nitrogen limitation in marine copepods?, J. Plankton Res., 17, 317–331, 1995.
Anderson, T. R. and Mitra, A.: Dysfunctionality in ecosystem models: an underrated pitfall?, Prog. Oceanogr., 84, 66–68, 2010.
Anderson, T. R. and Pondaven, P.: Non-Redfield carbon and nitrogen cycling in the Sargasso Sea: pelagic imbalances and export flux, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. I, 50, 573–591, 2003.
Anderson, T. R., Gentleman, W. C., and Sinha, B.: Influence of grazing formulations on the emergent properties of a complex ecosystem model in a global general circulation model, Prog. Oceanogr., 87, 201–213, 2010.
Anderson, T. R., Hessen, D. O., Mitra, A., Mayor, D. J., and Yool, A.: Sensitivity of secondary production and export flux to choice of trophic transfer formulation in marine ecosystem models, J. Mar. Syst., 125, 41–53, 2013.
Anderson, T. R., Christian, J. R., and Flynn, K. J.: Modeling DOM biogeochemistry, in: Biogeochemistry of marine dissolved organic matter, 2nd Edn., edited by: Hansell, D. A. and Carlson, C. A., Academic Press, 635–667, 2014.
Antonov, J. I., Seidov, D., Boyer, T. P., Locarnini, R. A., Mishonov, A. V., Garcia, H. E., Baranova, O.K., Zweng, M. M., and Johnson, D. R.: World Ocean Atlas 2009, Volume 2: Salinity, edited by: Levitus, S., NOAA Atlas NESDIS 69, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, 184 pp., 2010.
Arhonditsis, G. B., Adams-Vanharn, B. A., Nielsen, L., Stow, C. A., and Reckhow, K. H.: Evaluation of the current state of mechanistic aquatic biogeochemical modeling: Citation analysis and future perspectives, Environ. Sci. Technol., 40, 6547–6554, 2006.
Backhaus, J. O., Hegseth, E. N., Wehde, H., Irigoien, X., Hatten, K., and Logemann, K.: Convection and primary production in winter, Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser., 251, 1–14, 2003.
Bar-Yam, U.: Dynamics of Complex Systems, Addison-Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts, 848 pp., 1997.
Boushaba, K. and Pascual, M.: Dynamics of the "echo" effect in a phytoplankton system with nitrogen fixers, Bull. Math. Biol., 67, 487–507, 2005.
Blackford, J. C., Allen, J. I., and Gilbert, F. J.: Ecosystem dynamics at six contrasting sites: a generic modelling study, J. Mar. Syst., 52, 191–215, 2004.
Bouman, H. A., Platt, T., Kraay, G. W., Sathyendranath, S., and Irwin, B. D.: Bio-optical properties of the subtropical North Atlantic. I. Vertical variability, Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser., 200, 3–18, 2000.
Bratbak, G., Egge, J. K., and Heldal, M.: Viral mortality of the marine alga Emiliania huxleyi (Haptophyceae) and termination of algal blooms, Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser., 93, 39–48, 1993.
Bratbak, G., Willson, W., and Heldal, M.: Viral control of Emiliania huxleyi blooms?, J. Mar. Syst., 9, 75–81, 1996.
Brock, T. D.: Calculating solar radiation for ecological studies, Ecol. Modell., 14, 1–19, 1981.
Chai, F., Lindley, S. T., Toggweiler, J. R., and Barber, R. T.: Testing the importance of iron and grazing in the maintenance of the high nitrate condition in the equatorial Pacific Ocean, a physical-biological model study, in: The Changing Ocean Carbon Cycle, edited by: Hanson, R. B., Ducklow, H. W., and Field, J. G., International Geosphere–Biosphere Programme (IGBP) Book Series 5. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 156–186, 2000.
Chuck, A., Tyrrell, T., Totterdell, I. J., and Holligan, P. M.: The oceanic response to carbon emissions over the next century: investigation using three ocean carbon cycle models, Tellus, 57B, 70–86, 2005.
Coale, K. H., Johnson, K.S., Fitzwater, S. E., Gordon, R. M., Tanner, S., Chavez, F. P., Ferioli, L., Sakamoto, C., Rogers, P., Millero, F., Steinberg, P., Nightingale, P., Cooper, D., Cochlan, W. P., Landry, M. R., Constantinou, J., Rollwagen, G., Trasvina, A., and Kudela, R.: A massive phytoplankton bloom induced by an ecosystem-scale iron fertilization experiment in the equatorial Pacific Ocean, Nature, 838, 495–501, 1996.
Cullen, J. J.: On models of growth and photosynthesis in phytoplankton, Deep-Sea Res., 37, 667–683, 1990.
Danovaro, R., Corinaldesi, C., Dell'Anno, A., Fuhrman, J. A., Middelburg, J. J., Noble, R. T. and Suttle, C. A.: Marine viruses and global climate change. FEMS Microbiol. Rev., 35, 933–1034, 2011.
Ducklow, H. W. and Harris, R. P.: Introduction to the JGOFS North Atlantic Bloom Experiment, Deep Sea Res. Pt. II, 40, 1–8, 1993.
Edwards, A. M. and Yool, A.: The role of higher predation in plankton population models, J. Plankton Res., 22, 1085–1112, 2000.
Eppley, R. W.: Temperature and phytoplankton growth in the sea, Fish. Bull. Nat. Ocean Atmos. Adm., 70, 1063–1085, 1972.
Eppley, R. W. and Peterson, B. J.: Particulate organic matter flux and planktonic new production in the deep ocean, Nature, 282, 677–680, 1979.
Evans, G. T. and Parslow, J. S.: A model of annual plankton cycles, Biol. Oceanogr., 3, 327–347, 1985.
Fasham, M. J. R.: Modelling the marine biota, in: The Global Carbon Cycle, NATO ASI Series Vol. I15, edited by: Heimann, M., 457–504, 1993.
Fasham, M. J. R.: Variations in the seasonal cycle of biological production in subarctic oceans: A model sensitivity analysis, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. I, 42, 1111–1149, 1995.
Fasham, M. J. R. and Evans, G. T.: The use of optimization techniques to model marine ecosystem dynamics at the JGOFS station at 47° N 20° W, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B, 348, 203–209, 1995.
Fasham, M. J. R., Ducklow, H. W., and McKelvie, S. M.: A nitrogen-based model of plankton dynamics in the oceanic mixed layer, J. Mar. Res., 48, 591–639, 1990.
Fennel, K., Losch, M., Schröter, J., and Wenzel, M.: Testing a marine ecosystem model: sensitivity analysis and parameter optimization, J. Mar. Syst., 28, 45–63, 2001.
Findlay, H. S., Yool, A., Nodale, M., and Pitchford, J. W.: Modelling of autumn plankton bloom dynamics, J. Plankton Res., 28, 209–220, 2006.
Fleming, R. H.: The control of diatom populations by grazing, J. Cons. Int. Expl. Mer., 14, 210–227, 1939.
Follows, M. J., Dutkiewicz, S., Grant, S., and Chisholm, S. W.: Emergent biogeography of microbial communities in a model ocean. Science, 315, 1843–1846, 2007.
Friedrichs, M. A. M., Dusenberry, J. A., Anderson, L. A., Armstrong, R. A., Chai, F., Christian, J. R., Doney, S. C., Dunne, J., Fujii, M., Hood, R., McGillicuddy, D. J., Moore, K. J., Schartau, M., Spitz and Y. H., Wiggert, J. D.: Assessment of skill and portability in regional marine biogeochemical models: Role of multiple planktonic groups, J. Geophys. Res., 112, C08001, https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JC003852, 2007.
Frost, B. W.: Grazing control of phytoplankton stock in the open subarctic Pacific Ocean: a model assessing the role of mesozooplankton, particularly the large calanoid copepods Neocalanus spp., Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser., 39, 49–68, 1987.
Fulton, E. A., Smith, A. D. M., and Johnson, C. R.: Mortality and predation in ecosystem models: is it important how these are expressed?, Ecol. Model., 169, 157–178, 2003a.
Fulton, E. A., Smith, A. D. M., and Johnson, C. R.: Effect of complexity on marine ecosystem models, Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser., 253, 1–16, 2003b.
Fulton, E. A., Parslow, J. S., Smith, A. D. M., and Johnson, C. R.: Biogeochemical marine ecosystem models II: the effect of physiological detail on model performance, Ecol. Model., 173, 371–406, 2004.
Fussmann, G. F. and Blasius, B.: Community response to enrichment is highly sensitive to model structure, Biol. Lett., 1, 9–12, 2005.
Garcia, H. E., Locarnini, R. A., Boyer, T. P., Antonov, J. I., Zweng, M. M., Baranova, O. K., and Johnson, D. R.: World ocean atlas 2009, volume 4: nutrients (phosphate, nitrate, silicate), in: NOAA Atlas NESDIS 71, edited by: Levitus, S., US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, 398 pp., 2010.
Gentleman, W.: A chronology of plankton dynamics in silico: how computer models have been used to study marine ecosystems, Hydrobiologia, 480, 69–85, 2002.
Gentleman, W., Leising, A., Frost, B., Strom, S., and Murray, J.: Functional responses for zooplankton feeding on multiple resources: a review of assumptions and biological dynamics, Deep Sea Res. Pt. II, 50, 2847–2875, 2003.
Gilbert, P. M., Allen, J. I., Artioli, Y., Beusen, A., Bouwman, L., Harle, J., Holmes, R., and Holt, J.: Vulnerability of coastal ecosystems to changes in harmful algal bloom distribution in response to climate change: projections based on model analysis, Global Change Biol., 20, 3845–3858, 2014.
Gran, H. H.: Phytoplankton. Methods and problems, J. Conseil Int. Expl. Mer., 7, 343–358, 1932.
Gran, H. H. and Braarud, T.: A quantitative study of the phytoplankton in the Bay of Fundy and the Gulf of Maine (including observations on hydrography, chemistry and turbidity), J. Biological Bd. Canada, 1, 279–433, 1935.
Grotzer, T. A. and Basca, B. B.: How does grasping the underlying causal structures of ecosystems impact students' understanding?, J. Biol. Educat., 38, 16–29, 2003.
Harrison, W. G. and Platt, T.: Photosynthesis-irradiance relationships in polar and temperate phytoplankton populations, Polar Biol., 5, 153–164, 1986.
Hashioka, T., Vogt, M., Yamanaka, Y., Le Quéré, C., Buitenhuis, E. T., Aita, M. N., Alvain, S., Bopp, L., Hirata, T., Lima, I., Sailley, S., and Doney, S. C.: Phytoplankton competition during the spring bloom in four plankton functional type models, Biogeosciences, 10, 6833–6850, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-6833-2013, 2013.
Hemmings, J. C. P., Srokosz, M. A., Challenor, P., and Fasham, M. J. R.: Split-domain calibration of an ecosystem model using satellite ocean colour data, J. Mar. Syst., 50, 141–179, 2004.
Hinckley, S., Coyle, K. O., Gibson, G., Hermann, A. J., and Dobbins, E. L.: A biophysical NPZ model with iron for the Gulf of Alaska: Reproducing the differences between an oceanic HNLC ecosystem and a classical northern temperate shelf ecosystem, Deep Sea Res. Pt. II, 56, 2520–2536, 2009.
Holt, J., Allen, J. I., Anderson, T. R., Brewin, R., Butenschön, M., Harle, J., Huse, G., Lehodey, P., Lindemann, C., Memery, L., Salihoglu, B., Senina, I., and Yool, A.: Challenges in integrative approaches to modelling the marine ecosystems of the North Atlantic: Physics to fish and coasts to ocean. Prog. Oceanogr., 129, 285–313, 2014.
Huisman, J., Arrayas, M., Ebert, U., and Sommeijer, B.: How do sinking phytoplankton species manage to persist?, Am. Nat., 159, 245–254, 2002.
Huot, Y., Babin, M., and Bruyant, F.: Photosynthetic parameters in the Beaufort Sea in relation to the phytoplankton community structure, Biogeosciences, 10, 3445–3454, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-3445-2013, 2013.
Hurtt, G. C. and Armstrong, R. A.: A pelagic ecosystem model calibrated with BATS data, Deep-Sea Res., 43, 653–683, 1996.
Iqbal, M.: An Introduction to Solar Radiation. Academic Press, Toronto, 390 pp., 1983.
Josey, S. A., Pascal, R. W., Taylor, P. K., and Yelland, M. J.: A new formula for determining the atmospheric longwave flux at the ocean surface at mid-high latitudes, J. Geophys. Res., 108, 3108, https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JC001418, 2003.
Kawamiya, M., Kishi, M., Yamanaka, Y., and Suginohara, N.: An ecological-physical coupled model applied to Station Papa, J. Oceanogr., 51, 635–664, 1995.
Kearney, K. A., Stock, C., Aydin, K., and Sarmiento, J. L.: Coupling planktonic ecosystem and fisheries food web models for a pelagic ecosystem: Description and validation for the subarctic Pacific, Ecol. Modell., 237–238, 43–62, 2012.
Kidston, M., Matear, R., and Baird, M. E.: Phytoplankton growth in the Australian sector of the Southern Ocean, examined by optimising ecosystem model parameters, J. Mar. Syst., 128, 123–137, 2013.
Kimball, H. H.: Amount of solar radiation that reaches the surface of the earth on the land and on the sea, and methods by which it is measured, Mon. Weather Rev., 56, 393–398, 1928.
Knapp, A. K. and D'Avanzo, C.: Teaching with principles: toward more effective pedagogy in ecology, Ecosphere, 1, 1–10, 2010.
Kwiatkowski, L., Yool, A., Allen, J. I., Anderson, T. R., Barciela, R., Buitenhuis, E. T., Butenschön, M., Enright, C., Halloran, P. R., Le Quéré, C., de Mora, L., Racault, M.-F., Sinha, B., Totterdell, I. J., and Cox, P. M.: iMarNet: an ocean biogeochemistry model intercomparison project within a common physical ocean modelling framework, Biogeosciences, 11, 7291–7304, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-11-7291-2014, 2014.
Landry, M. R., Barber, R. T., Bidigare, R. R., Chai, F., Coale, K. H., Dam, H. G., Lewis, M. R., Lindley, S. T., McCarthy, J. J., Roman, M. R., Stoecker, D. K., Verity, P. G., and White, J. R.: Iron and grazing constraints on primary production in the central equatorial Pacific: An EqPac synthesis, Limnol. Oceanogr., 42, 405–418, 1997.
Landry, M. R., Selph, K. E., Taylor, A. G., Décima, M., Balch, W. M., and Bidigare, R. R.: Phytoplankton growth, grazing and production balances in the HNLC equatorial Pacific, Deep Sea Res. Pt. II, 58, 524–535, 2011.
Le Quéré, C., Harrison, S. P., Prentice, I. C., Buitenhuis, E. T., Aumont, O., Bopp, L., Claustre, H., Cotrim Da Cunha, L., Geider, R., Giraud, X., Klaas, C., Kohfeld, K. E., Legendre, L., Manizza, M., Platt, T., Rivkin, R. B., Sathyendranath, S., Uitz, J., Watson, A. J., and Wolf-Gladrow, D.: Ecosystem dynamics based on plankton functional types for global ocean biogeochemistry models, Global Change Biol., 11, 2016–2040, 2005.
Levy, M., Klein, P., and Treguier, A.-M.: Impacts of sub-mesoscale physics on phytoplankton production and subduction, J. Mar. Res., 59, 535–565, 2001.
Lewis, K. and Allen, J. I.: Validation of a hydrodynamic–ecosystem model simulation with time-series data collected in the western English Channel, J. Mar. Syst., 77, 296–311, 2009.
Lewis, K., Allen, J. I., Richardson, A. J., and Holt, J. T.: Error quantification of a high resolution coupled hydrodynamic-ecosystem coastal-ocean model: Part3, validation with continuous plankton recorder data, J. Mar. Syst., 63, 209–224, 2006.
Llebot, C., Spitz, Y. H., Solé, J., and Estrada, M.: The role of inorganic nutrients and dissolved organic phosphorus in the phytoplankton dynamics of a Mediterranean bay. A modeling study, J. Mar. Syst., 83, 192–208, 2010.
Locarnini, R. A., Mishonov, A. V., Antonov, J. I., Boyer, T. P., Garcia, H. E., Baranova, O. K., Zweng, M. M., and Johnson, D. R.: World Ocean Atlas 2009, Volume 1: Temperature, edited by: Levitus, S., NOAA Atlas NESDIS 68, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, 184 pp., 2010.
Lochte, K., Ducklow, H. W., Fasham, M. J. R., and Stienen, C.: Plankton succession and carbon cycling at 47° N 20° W during the JGOFS North Atlantic Bloom Experiment, Deep Sea. Res. Pt. II, 40, 91–114, 1993.
Mayor, D. J., Cook, K., Thornton, B., Walsham, P., Witte, U. F. M., Zuur, A. F., and Anderson, T. R.: Absorption efficiencies and basal turnover of C, N and fatty acids in a marine Calanoid copepod, Funct. Ecol., 25, 509–518, 2011.
Marañón, E. and Holligan, P.M.: Photosynthetic parameters of phytoplankton from 50° N to 50° S in the Atlantic Ocean. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser., 176, 191-203, 1999.
Martin, J. H. and IronEx team: Testing the iron hypothesis in ecosystems of the equatorial Pacific Ocean, Nature, 371, 123–129, 1994.
Matear, R. J.: Parameter optimization and analysis of ecosystem models using simulated annealing: A case study at Station P, J. Mar. Res., 53, 571–607, 1995.
Mitra, A.: Are closure terms appropriate or necessary descriptors of zooplankton loss in nutrient–phytoplankton–zooplankton type models?, Ecol. Model., 220, 611–620, 2009.
Mitra, A., Flynn, K. J., and Fasham, M. J. R.: Accounting for grazing dynamics in nitrogen-phytoplankton-zooplankton models, Limnol. Oceanogr., 52, 649–661, 2007.
Mitra, A., Castellani, C., Gentleman, W. C., Jónasdóttir, S. H., Flynn, K. J., Bode, A., Halsband, C., Kuhn, P., Licandro, P., Agersted, M. D., Calbet, A., Lindeque, P. K., Koppelmann, R., Møller, E. F., Gislason, A., Nielsen, T. G., and St John, M.: Bridging the gap between marine biogeochemical and fisheries sciences; configuring the zooplankton link, Prog. Oceanogr., 129, 176–199, 2014.
Mongin, M., Nelson, D. M., Pondaven, P., and Tréguer, P.: Simulation of upper-ocean biogeochemistry with a flexible-composition phytoplankton model: C, N and Si cycling and Fe limitation in the Southern Ocean, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. II, 53, 601–619, 2006.
Moore, K. J., Doney, S. C., and Lindsay, K.: Upper ocean ecosystem dynamics and iron cycling in a global three-dimensional model, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 18, GB4028, https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GB002220, 2004.
Morel, A.: Optical modelling of the upper ocean in relation to its biogenous matter content (case 1 waters), J. Geophys. Res., 93, 10749–10768, 1988.
Morel, A.: Light and marine photosynthesis: a spectral model with geochemical and climatological implications, Prog. Oceanogr., 26, 263–306, 1991.
Murray, A. G. and Parslow, J. S.: The analysis of alternative formulations in a simple model of a coastal ecosystem, Ecol. Model., 119, 149–166, 1999.
Natvik, L.-J., Eknes, M., and Evensen, G.: A weak constraint inverse for a zero-dimensional marine ecosystem model, J. Mar. Syst., 28, 19–44, 2001.
Neubert, M. G., Klanjscek, T., and Caswell, H.: Reactivity and transient dynamics of predator-prey and food web models, Ecol. Model., 179, 29–38, 2004.
Onitsuka, G. and Yanagi, T.: Differences in ecosystem dynamics between the northern and southern parts of the Japan Sea: Analyses with two ecosystem models, J. Oceanogr., 61, 415–433, 2005.
O'Reilly, J. E., Maritorena, S., Mitchell, B. G., Siegal, D. A., Carder, K. L., Garver, S. A., Kahru, M., and McClain, C.: Ocean color chlorophyll algorithms for SeaWiFS, J. Geophys. Res., 103, 24937–24953, 1998.
Oschlies, A. and Garçon, V.: An eddy-permitting coupled physical-biological model of the North Atlantic 1. Sensitivity to advection numerics and mixed layer physics, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 13, 135–160, 1999.
Oschlies, A. and Schartau, M.: Basin-scale performance of a locally optimized marine ecosystem model, J. Mar. Res., 63, 335–358, 2005.
Platt, T.: Primary production of the ocean water column as a function of surface light intensity algorithms for remote sensing, Deep-Sea Res., 33, 149–163, 1986.
Platt, T. and Jassby, A. D.: The relationship between photosynthesis and light for natural assemblages of coastal marine phytoplankton, J. Phycol., 12, 421–430, 1976.
Platt, T., Gallegos, C. L., and Harrison, W. G.: Photoinhibition of photosynthesis in natural assemblages in marine phytoplankton, J. Mar. Res., 38, 687–701, 1980.
Platt, T., Sathyendranath, S., and Ravindran, P.: Primary production by phytoplankton: Analytic solutions for daily rates per unit area of water surface, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B, 241, 101–111, 1990.
Popova, E. E., Fasham, M. J. R., Osipov, A. V., and Ryabchenko, V. A.: Chaotic behaviour of an ocean ecosystem model under seasonal external forcing, J. Plankton Res., 19, 1495–1515, 1997.
Price, N. M., Ahner, B. A., and Morel, F. M. M.: The equatorial Pacific: Grazer controlled phytoplankton populations in an iron-limited ecosystem, Limnol. Oceanogr., 39, 520–534, 1994.
Record, N. R., Pershing, A. J., Runge, J. A., Mayo, C. A., Monger, B. C., and Chen, C.: Improving ecological forecasts of copepod community dynamics using genetic algorithms, J. Mar. Syst., 82, 96–110, 2010.
Reed, R. K.: On estimating insolation over the ocean, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 7, 482–485, 1977.
Rey, F.: Photosynthesis-irradiance relationships in natural phytoplankton populations of the Barents Sea, Polar Res., 10, 105–116, 1991.
Riley, G. A.: Factors controlling phytoplankton populations on Georges Bank, J. Mar. Res., 6, 54–73, 1946.
Riley, G. A., Stommel, H., and Bumpus, D. F.: Quantitative ecology of the plankton of the western North Atlantic, Bull. Bingham Oceanogr. Coll., 12, 1–169, 1949.
Riley, J. S., Sanders, R., Marsay, C., Le Moigne, F. A. C., Achterberg, E. P., and Poulton, A. J.: The relative contribution of fast and slow sinking particles to ocean carbon export, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 26, GB1026, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GB004085, 2012.
Robinson, C. L. K., Ware, D. M., and Parsons, T. R.: Simulated annual plankton production in the northeastern Pacific coastal upwelling domain, J. Plankton Res., 15, 161–183, 1993.
Rykiel Jr., E. J.: Testing ecological models: the meaning of validation, Ecol. Modell., 90, 229–244, 1996.
Salihoglu, B., Garçon, V., Oschlies, A., and Lomas, M. W.: Influence of nutrient utilization and remineralization stoichiometry on phytoplankton species and carbon export: A modeling study at BATS. Deep-Sea Res. Pt. I, 55, 73–107, 2008.
Sathyendranath, S., Stuart, V., Nair, A., Oka, K., Nakane, T., Bouman, H., Forget, M.-H., Maass, H., and Platt, T.: Carbon-to-chlorophyll ratio and growth rate of phytoplankton in the sea, Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser., 383, 73–84, 2009.
Schartau, M., Oschlies, A., and Willebrand, J.: Parameter estimates of a zero-dimensional ecosystem model applying the adjoint method, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. II, 48, 1769–1800, 2001.
Shine, K. P.: Parametrization of the shortwave flux over high albedo surfaces as a function of cloud thickness and surface albedo, Q. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc., 110, 747–764, 1984.
Slezak, D. F., Suárez, C., Cecchi, G. A., Marshall, G., and Stolovitzky, G.: When the optimal is not the best: Parameter estimation in complex biological models, Plos ONE, 5, 1–10, 2010.
Smith, S. D. and Dobson, F. E.: The heat budget at Ocean Weather Ship Bravo, Atmos.-Ocean., 22, 1–22, 1984.
Smith Jr., W. O. and Lancelot, C.: Bottom-up versus top-down control in phytoplankton of the Southern Ocean, Antarctic Sci., 16, 531–539, 2004.
Soetaert, K., Petzoldt, T., and Woodrow, S.: Solving differential equations in R, The R Journal, 2, 5–15, 2010.
Spitz, Y. H., Moisan, J. R., Abbott, M. R., and Richman, J. G.: Data assimilation and a pelagic ecosystem model: parameterization using time series observations, J. Mar. Syst., 16, 51–68, 1998.
Spitz, Y. H., Moisan, J. R., and Abbott, M. R.: Configuring an ecosystem model using data from the Bermuda Atlantic Time Series (BATS), Deep-Sea Res. Pt. II, 48, 1733–1768, 2001.
Steele, J. H.: Plant production on the Fladen Ground, J. Mar. Biol. Ass. UK, 35, 1–33, 1956.
Steele, J. H.: Plant production in the northern North Sea, Scottish Home Dept., Mar. Res., 1958, 1–36, 1958.
Steele, J. H.: Environmental control of photosynthesis in the sea, Limnol. Oceanogr., 7, 137–150, 1962.
Steele, J. H.: The Structure of Marine Ecosystems, Harvard Univ. Press, 128 pp., 1974.
Steele, J. H.: Prediction, scenarios and insight: The uses of an end-to-end model, Prog. Oceanogr., 102, 67–73, 2012.
Steele, J. H. and Henderson, E. W.: A simple plankton model, Am. Nat., 117, 676–691, 1981.
Steele, J. H. and Henderson, E. W.: The role of predation in plankton models, J. Plankton Res., 14, 157–172, 1992.
Steele, J. H. and Henderson, E. W.: The significance of interannual variability. In: Towards a Model of Ocean Biogeochemical Processes, edited by: Evans, G. T. and Fasham, M. J. R., Springer Verlag, Heidelberg, 237–360, 1993.
Steele, J. H. and Henderson, E. W.: Predation control of plankton demography, ICES J. Mar. Sci., 52, 565–573, 1995.
Straile, D.: Gross growth efficiencies of protozoan and metazoan zooplankton and their dependence on food concentration, predator-prey weight ratio, and taxonomic group, Limnol. Oceanogr., 42, 1375–1385, 1997.
Thekaekara, M. P. and Drummond, A. J.: Standard values for the solar constant and its spectral components, Nature, 229, 6–9, 1971.
Tsang, C.-F.: The modeling process and model validation, Ground Water, 29, 825–831, 1991.
Tyrrell, T.: The relative influences of nitrogen and phosphorus on oceanic primary production, Nature, 400, 525–531, 1999.
Vallina, S. M., Simó, R., Anderson, T. R., Gabric, A., Cropp, R., and Pacheco, J. M.: A dynamic model of oceanic sulfur (DMOS) applied to the Sargasso Sea: Simulating the dimethylsulfide (DMS) summer paradox, J. Geophys. Res., 113, G01009, https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JG000415, 2008.
Vallina, S. M., Ward, B. A., Dutkiewicz, S., and Follows, M. J.: Maximal feeding with active prey-switching: A kill-the-winner functional response and its effect on global diversity and biogeography, Prog. Oceanogr., 120, 93–109, 2014.
Ward, B. A. and Waniek, J. J.: Phytoplankton growth conditions during autumn and winter in the Irminger Sea, North Atlantic, Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser., 334, 47–61, 2007.
Ward, B. A., Friedrichs, M. A. M., Anderson, T. R., and Oschlies, A: Parameter optimisation techniques and the problem of underdetermination in marine biogeochemical models, J. Mar. Syst., 81, 34–43, 2010.
Ward, B. A., Schartau, M., Oschlies, A., Martin, A. P., Follows, M. J., and Anderson, T. R.: When is a biogeochemical model too complex? Objective model reduction and selection for North Atlantic time-series sites, Prog. Oceanogr., 116, 49–65, 2013.
Weinbauer, M. G.: Ecology of prokaryotic viruses, FEMS Microb. Rev., 28, 127–181, 2004.
Wiggert, J. D., Murtugudde, R. G., and Christian, J. R.: Annual ecosystem variability in the tropical Indian Ocean: Results of a coupled bio-physical ocean general circulation model. Deep-Sea Res. Pt. II, 53, 644–676, 2006.
Wilson, S. E., Steinberg, D. K., and Buesseler, K. O.: Changes in fecal pellet characteristics with depth as indicators of zooplankton repackaging of particles in the mesopelagic zone of the subtropical and subarctic North Pacific Ocean, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. II, 55, 1636–1647, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr2.2008.04.019, 2008.
Wollrab, S. and Diehl, S.: Bottom-up responses of the lower oceanic food web are sensitive to copepod mortality and feeding behaviour, Limnol. Oceanogr., 60, 641–656, 2015.
Wood, S. N. and Thomas, M. B.: Super-sensitivity to structure in biological models. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B, 266, 565–570, 1999.
Xiao, Y. and Friedrichs, M. A. M.: Using biogeochemical data assimilation to assess the relative skill of multiple ecosystem models in the Mid-Atlantic Bight: effects of increasing the complexity of the planktonic food web, Biogeosciences, 11, 3015–3030, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-11-3015-2014, 2014.
Ye, Y., Völker, C., Bracher, A., Taylor, B., and Wolf-Gladrwo, D. A.: Environmental controls on N2 fixation by Trichodesmium in the tropical eastern North Atlantic Ocean – A model-based study, Deep Sea Res. Pt. I, 64, 104–117, 2012.
Yool, A., Popova, E. E., and Anderson, T. R.: Medusa-1.0: a new intermediate complexity plankton ecosystem model for the global domain, Geosci. Model Dev., 4, 381–417, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-4-381-2011, 2011.
Yool, A., Popova, E. E., and Anderson, T. R.: MEDUSA-2.0: an intermediate complexity biogeochemical model of the marine carbon cycle for climate change and ocean acidification studies, Geosci. Model Dev., 6, 1767–1811, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-6-1767-2013, 2013a.
Yool, A., Popova, E. E., Coward, A. C., Bernie, D., and Anderson, T. R.: Climate change and ocean acidification impacts on lower trophic levels and the export of organic carbon to the deep ocean, Biogeosciences, 10, 5831–5854, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-5831-2013, 2013b.
Short summary
Ecosystem models provide a powerful tool for simulating ocean biology. Care must be exercised when selecting appropriate equations and parameter values to represent chosen marine ecosystems. Here, we present an efficient plankton model testbed, using simplified physics and coded in the freely available language R. Multiple runs can be undertaken for different ocean sites, permitting thorough evaluation of ecosystem model performance. The testbed also serves as an excellent resource for teaching.
Ecosystem models provide a powerful tool for simulating ocean biology. Care must be exercised...
