Dear Dr. Guimberteau
Thank you very much for submitting a revised version of your manuscript. I am happy to see that your new version address most reviewer's concerns and you provided now a much improved version, specially resolving misunderstandings about the parameterizations between your 2-layer and 11-layer versions. I also agree with the reviewers in that the original version was too long, and you have done a good job reducing its length. However, I feel that the conclusion sections of the revised version is still too long. In its current form your conclusions look more like a summary and you do not briefly describe what the main outcomes of your study are. So, I encourage you to reduce the length of your conclusions section and go more directly to the point of what you found.
I also found a number of grammar issues in your new version. Although the manuscript will go automatically to copy-editing after acceptance, the time required for this may be reduced if you more carefully review grammar and spelling.
Regards,
Carlos A. Sierra