Articles | Volume 6, issue 5
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-6-1517-2013
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-6-1517-2013
Model description paper
 | 
12 Sep 2013
Model description paper |  | 12 Sep 2013

GAPPARD: a computationally efficient method of approximating gap-scale disturbance in vegetation models

M. Scherstjanoi, J. O. Kaplan, E. Thürig, and H. Lischke

Related authors

Application of a computationally efficient method to approximate gap model results with a probabilistic approach
M. Scherstjanoi, J. O. Kaplan, and H. Lischke
Geosci. Model Dev., 7, 1543–1571, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-7-1543-2014,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-7-1543-2014, 2014

Related subject area

Biogeosciences
Including the phosphorus cycle into the LPJ-GUESS dynamic global vegetation model (v4.1, r10994) – global patterns and temporal trends of N and P primary production limitation
Mateus Dantas de Paula, Matthew Forrest, David Warlind, João Paulo Darela Filho, Katrin Fleischer, Anja Rammig, and Thomas Hickler
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 2249–2274, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2249-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2249-2025, 2025
Short summary
A comprehensive land-surface vegetation model for multi-stream data assimilation, D&B v1.0
Wolfgang Knorr, Matthew Williams, Tea Thum, Thomas Kaminski, Michael Voßbeck, Marko Scholze, Tristan Quaife, T. Luke Smallman, Susan C. Steele-Dunne, Mariette Vreugdenhil, Tim Green, Sönke Zaehle, Mika Aurela, Alexandre Bouvet, Emanuel Bueechi, Wouter Dorigo, Tarek S. El-Madany, Mirco Migliavacca, Marika Honkanen, Yann H. Kerr, Anna Kontu, Juha Lemmetyinen, Hannakaisa Lindqvist, Arnaud Mialon, Tuuli Miinalainen, Gaétan Pique, Amanda Ojasalo, Shaun Quegan, Peter J. Rayner, Pablo Reyes-Muñoz, Nemesio Rodríguez-Fernández, Mike Schwank, Jochem Verrelst, Songyan Zhu, Dirk Schüttemeyer, and Matthias Drusch
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 2137–2159, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2137-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2137-2025, 2025
Short summary
Sources of uncertainty in the SPITFIRE global fire model: development of LPJmL-SPITFIRE1.9 and directions for future improvements
Luke Oberhagemann, Maik Billing, Werner von Bloh, Markus Drüke, Matthew Forrest, Simon P. K. Bowring, Jessica Hetzer, Jaime Ribalaygua Batalla, and Kirsten Thonicke
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 2021–2050, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2021-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2021-2025, 2025
Short summary
The unicellular NUM v.0.91: a trait-based plankton model evaluated in two contrasting biogeographic provinces
Trine Frisbæk Hansen, Donald Eugene Canfield, Ken Haste Andersen, and Christian Jannik Bjerrum
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 1895–1916, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1895-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1895-2025, 2025
Short summary
FESOM2.1-REcoM3-MEDUSA2: an ocean–sea ice–biogeochemistry model coupled to a sediment model
Ying Ye, Guy Munhoven, Peter Köhler, Martin Butzin, Judith Hauck, Özgür Gürses, and Christoph Völker
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 977–1000, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-977-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-977-2025, 2025
Short summary

Cited articles

Anfodillo, T., Rento, S., Carraro, V., Furlanetto, L., Urbinati, C., and Carrer, M.: Tree water relations and climatic variations at the alpine timberline: seasonal changes of sap flux and xylem water potential in Larix decidua Miller, Picea abies (L.) Karst, and Pinus cembra L, Ann. Des Sci. Forest., 55, 159–172, 1998.
Assmann, E.: Waldertragskunde, BLV, München, Bonn, Wien, 1962.
Bigler, C., Braker, O. U., Bugmann, H., Dobbertin, M., and Rigling, A.: Drought as an inciting mortality factor in Scots pine stands of the Valais, Switzerland, Ecosystems, 9, 330–343, 2006.
Bonan, G. B.: Forests and climate change: Forcings, feedbacks, and the climate benefits of forests, Science, 320, 1444–1449, 2008.
Brändli, U.-B. (Ed.): Schweizerisches Landesforstinventar. Ergebnisse der dritten Erhebung 2004–2006, Birmensdorf, Eidgenössische Forschungsanstalt für Wald, Schnee und Landschaft, Bern, Bundesamt für Umwelt, Wald und Landschaft, 2009.
Download
Share