Articles | Volume 19, issue 20
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-9879-2026
© Author(s) 2026. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Methods for assessment of models
| 
15 Oct 2026
Methods for assessment of models |
| 15 Oct 2026
| 15 Oct 2026
A performance-based multivariable weighting framework for WRF parameterization-scheme selection
Cited articles
Baker, N. C. and Taylor, P. C.: A framework for evaluating climate model performance metrics, J. Climate, 29, 1773–1782, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-15-0114.1, 2016.
Borge, R., Alexandrov, V., Del Vas, J. J., Lumbreras, J., and Rodríguez, E.: A comprehensive sensitivity analysis of the WRF model for air quality applications over the Iberian Peninsula, Atmos. Environ., 42, 8560–8574, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.08.032, 2008.
Chen, F. and Dudhia, J.: Coupling an advanced land surface-hydrology model with the Penn State-NCAR MM5 modeling system. Part I: Model implementation and sensitivity, Mon. Weather Rev., 129, 569–585, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(2001)129<0569:CAALSH>2.0.CO;2, 2001.
Chen, F., Liu, C., Dudhia, J., and Chen, M.: A sensitivity study of high-resolution regional climate simulations to three land surface models over the western United States, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 119, 7271–7291, https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD021827, 2014.
Dai, D., Chen, L., Ma, Z., and Xu, Z.: Evaluation of the WRF physics ensemble using a multivariable integrated evaluation approach over the Haihe river basin in northern China, Clim. Dynam., 57, 557–575, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-021-05723-x, 2021.
