Geoscientific Model Development
Geoscientific Model Development
GMD
Articles | Volume 19, issue 20
Articles | Volume 19, issue 20
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-9879-2026
© Author(s) 2026. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-9879-2026
© Author(s) 2026. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Articles | Volume 19, issue 20
Methods for assessment of models
 | 
15 Oct 2026
Methods for assessment of models |  | 15 Oct 2026

A performance-based multivariable weighting framework for WRF parameterization-scheme selection

Tianyu Gou, Yaoyang Deng, Jun Niu, and Shaozhong Kang

Viewed

Total article views: 2,085 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
1,242 635 208 2,085 210 246 241
  • HTML: 1,242
  • PDF: 635
  • XML: 208
  • Total: 2,085
  • Supplement: 210
  • BibTeX: 246
  • EndNote: 241
Views and downloads (calculated since 19 Dec 2025)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 19 Dec 2025)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 2,085 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 2,066 with geography defined and 19 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 15 Oct 2026
Download
Short summary
This study proposes a performance-based method to improve WRF climate simulation evaluation by addressing uncertainty in selecting scheme combinations. The method gives greater importance to difficult-to-simulate variables, such as precipitation and wind speed. Tested in two contrasting climate regions, it identified interpretable and well-performing model settings compared with equal weighting and established statistical weighting methods, including in the independent extreme-year test.
Read more
Share