Articles | Volume 19, issue 8
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-3395-2026
© Author(s) 2026. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-3395-2026
© Author(s) 2026. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Model evaluation paper
| 
27 Apr 2026
Model evaluation paper |
| 27 Apr 2026
| 27 Apr 2026
Assessing resolution sensitivity in coupled climate simulations with AWI-CM3
Martina Zapponini
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Alfred Wegener Institute, Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research, Bremerhaven, Germany
Tido Semmler
Met Éireann, 65–67 Glasnevin Hill, D09 Y921, Dublin, Ireland
Jan Streffing
Alfred Wegener Institute, Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research, Bremerhaven, Germany
Thomas Rackow
European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF), Bonn, Germany
Lettie A. Roach
Alfred Wegener Institute, Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research, Bremerhaven, Germany
Thomas Jung
Alfred Wegener Institute, Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research, Bremerhaven, Germany
Department of Physics and Electrical Engineering, University of Bremen, 28359 Bremen, Germany
Related authors
Ja-Yeon Moon, Jan Streffing, Sun-Seon Lee, Tido Semmler, Miguel Andrés-Martínez, Jiao Chen, Eun-Byeoul Cho, Jung-Eun Chu, Christian L. E. Franzke, Jan P. Gärtner, Rohit Ghosh, Jan Hegewald, Songyee Hong, Dae-Won Kim, Nikolay Koldunov, June-Yi Lee, Zihao Lin, Chao Liu, Svetlana N. Loza, Wonsun Park, Woncheol Roh, Dmitry V. Sein, Sahil Sharma, Dmitry Sidorenko, Jun-Hyeok Son, Malte F. Stuecker, Qiang Wang, Gyuseok Yi, Martina Zapponini, Thomas Jung, and Axel Timmermann
Earth Syst. Dynam., 16, 1103–1134, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-16-1103-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-16-1103-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Based on a series of storm-resolving greenhouse warming simulations conducted with the AWI-CM3 model at 9 km global atmosphere and 4–25 km ocean resolution, we present new projections of regional climate change, modes of climate variability, and extreme events. The 10-year-long high-resolution simulations for the 2000s, 2030s, 2060s, and 2090s were initialized from a coarser-resolution transient run (31 km atmosphere) which follows the SSP5-8.5 greenhouse gas emission scenario from 1950–2100 CE.
Francisco J. Doblas-Reyes, Jenni Kontkanen, Irina Sandu, Mario Acosta, Mohammed Hussam Al Turjmam, Ivan Alsina-Ferrer, Miguel Andrés-Martínez, Costanza Anerdi, Leo Arriola, Marvin Axness, Marc Batlle Martín, Peter Bauer, Tobias Becker, Daniel Beltrán, Sebastian Beyer, Hendryk Bockelmann, Pierre-Antoine Bretonnière, Sebastien Cabaniols, Silvia Caprioli, Miguel Castrillo, Aparna Chandrasekar, Suvarchal Cheedela, Victor Correal, Emanuele Danovaro, Paolo Davini, Jussi Enkovaara, Claudia Frauen, Barbara Früh, Aina Gaya Àvila, Paolo Ghinassi, Rohit Ghosh, Supriyo Ghosh, Iker González, Katherine Grayson, Matthew Griffith, Ioan Hadade, Christopher Haine, Carl Hartick, Utz-Uwe Haus, Shane Hearne, Heikki Järvinen, Bernat Jiménez, Amal John, Marlin Juchem, Thomas Jung, Jessica Kegel, Matthias Kelbling, Kai Keller, Bruno Kinoshita, Theresa Kiszler, Daniel Klocke, Lukas Kluft, Nikolay Koldunov, Tobias Kölling, Joonas Kolstela, Luis Kornblueh, Sergey Kosukhin, Aleksander Lacima-Nadolnik, Jeisson Javier Leal Rojas, Jonni Lehtiranta, Tuomas Lunttila, Anna Luoma, Pekka Manninen, Alexey Medvedev, Sebastian Milinski, Ali Mohammed, Sebastian Müller, Devaraju Naryanappa, Natalia Nazarova, Sami Niemelä, Bimochan Niraula, Henrik Nortamo, Aleksi Nummelin, Matteo Nurisso, Pablo Ortega, Stella Paronuzzi, Xabier Pedruzo-Bagazgoitia, Charles Pelletier, Carlos Peña, Suraj Polade, Himansu Kesari Pradhan, Rommel Quintanilla, Tiago Quintino, Thomas Rackow, Jouni Räisänen, Maqsood Mubarak Rajput, René Redler, Balthasar Reuter, Nuno Rocha Monteiro, Francesc Roura-Adserias, Silva Ruppert, Susan Sayed, Reiner Schnur, Tanvi Sharma, Dmitry Sidorenko, Outi Sievi-Korte, Albert Soret, Christian Steger, Bjorn Stevens, Jan Streffing, Jaleena Sunny, Luiggi Tenorio, Stephan Thober, Ulf Tigerstedt, Oriol Tinto, Juha Tonttila, Heikki Tuomenvirta, Lauri Tuppi, Ginka Van Thielen, Emanuele Vitali, Jost von Hardenberg, Ingo Wagner, Nils Wedi, Jan Wehner, Sven Willner, Xavier Yepes-Arbós, Florian Ziemen, and Janos Zimmermann
Geosci. Model Dev., 19, 2821–2848, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-2821-2026, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-2821-2026, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
The Climate Change Adaptation Digital Twin (Climate DT) pioneers the operationalisation of global climate projections. It produces global simulations with local granularity for adaptation decision-making. Applications are embedded to generate tailored indicators. A unified workflow orchestrates all components in several supercomputers. Data management ensures consistency and streaming enables real-time use. It is a complementary innovation to initiatives like CMIP, CORDEX, and climate services.
Gavin A. Schmidt, Kenneth D. Mankoff, Jonathan L. Bamber, Clara Burgard, Dustin Carroll, David M. Chandler, Violaine Coulon, Benjamin J. Davison, Matthew H. England, Paul R. Holland, Nicolas C. Jourdain, Qian Li, Juliana M. Marson, Pierre Mathiot, Clive R. McMahon, Twila A. Moon, Ruth Mottram, Sophie Nowicki, Anna Olivé Abelló, Andrew G. Pauling, Thomas Rackow, and Damien Ringeisen
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 8333–8361, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-8333-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-8333-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
The impact of increasing mass loss from the Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets has not so far been included in historical climate model simulations. This paper describes the protocols and data available for modeling groups to add this anomalous freshwater to their ocean modules to better represent the impacts of these fluxes on ocean circulation, sea ice, salinity and sea level.
Hans Segura, Xabier Pedruzo-Bagazgoitia, Philipp Weiss, Sebastian K. Müller, Thomas Rackow, Junhong Lee, Edgar Dolores-Tesillos, Imme Benedict, Matthias Aengenheyster, Razvan Aguridan, Gabriele Arduini, Alexander J. Baker, Jiawei Bao, Swantje Bastin, Eulàlia Baulenas, Tobias Becker, Sebastian Beyer, Hendryk Bockelmann, Nils Brüggemann, Lukas Brunner, Suvarchal K. Cheedela, Sushant Das, Jasper Denissen, Ian Dragaud, Piotr Dziekan, Madeleine Ekblom, Jan Frederik Engels, Monika Esch, Richard Forbes, Claudia Frauen, Lilli Freischem, Diego García-Maroto, Philipp Geier, Paul Gierz, Álvaro González-Cervera, Katherine Grayson, Matthew Griffith, Oliver Gutjahr, Helmuth Haak, Ioan Hadade, Kerstin Haslehner, Shabeh ul Hasson, Jan Hegewald, Lukas Kluft, Aleksei Koldunov, Nikolay Koldunov, Tobias Kölling, Shunya Koseki, Sergey Kosukhin, Josh Kousal, Peter Kuma, Arjun U. Kumar, Rumeng Li, Nicolas Maury, Maximilian Meindl, Sebastian Milinski, Kristian Mogensen, Bimochan Niraula, Jakub Nowak, Divya Sri Praturi, Ulrike Proske, Dian Putrasahan, René Redler, David Santuy, Domokos Sármány, Reiner Schnur, Patrick Scholz, Dmitry Sidorenko, Dorian Spät, Birgit Sützl, Daisuke Takasuka, Adrian Tompkins, Alejandro Uribe, Mirco Valentini, Menno Veerman, Aiko Voigt, Sarah Warnau, Fabian Wachsmann, Marta Wacławczyk, Nils Wedi, Karl-Hermann Wieners, Jonathan Wille, Marius Winkler, Yuting Wu, Florian Ziemen, Janos Zimmermann, Frida A.-M. Bender, Dragana Bojovic, Sandrine Bony, Simona Bordoni, Patrice Brehmer, Marcus Dengler, Emanuel Dutra, Saliou Faye, Erich Fischer, Chiel van Heerwaarden, Cathy Hohenegger, Heikki Järvinen, Markus Jochum, Thomas Jung, Johann H. Jungclaus, Noel S. Keenlyside, Daniel Klocke, Heike Konow, Martina Klose, Szymon Malinowski, Olivia Martius, Thorsten Mauritsen, Juan Pedro Mellado, Theresa Mieslinger, Elsa Mohino, Hanna Pawłowska, Karsten Peters-von Gehlen, Abdoulaye Sarré, Pajam Sobhani, Philip Stier, Lauri Tuppi, Pier Luigi Vidale, Irina Sandu, and Bjorn Stevens
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 7735–7761, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-7735-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-7735-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
The Next Generation of Earth Modeling Systems project (nextGEMS) developed two Earth system models that use horizontal grid spacing of 10 km and finer, giving more fidelity to the representation of local phenomena, globally. In its fourth cycle, nextGEMS simulated the Earth System climate over the 2020–2049 period under the SSP3-7.0 scenario. Here, we provide an overview of nextGEMS, insights into the model development, and the realism of multi-decadal, kilometer-scale simulations.
Ja-Yeon Moon, Jan Streffing, Sun-Seon Lee, Tido Semmler, Miguel Andrés-Martínez, Jiao Chen, Eun-Byeoul Cho, Jung-Eun Chu, Christian L. E. Franzke, Jan P. Gärtner, Rohit Ghosh, Jan Hegewald, Songyee Hong, Dae-Won Kim, Nikolay Koldunov, June-Yi Lee, Zihao Lin, Chao Liu, Svetlana N. Loza, Wonsun Park, Woncheol Roh, Dmitry V. Sein, Sahil Sharma, Dmitry Sidorenko, Jun-Hyeok Son, Malte F. Stuecker, Qiang Wang, Gyuseok Yi, Martina Zapponini, Thomas Jung, and Axel Timmermann
Earth Syst. Dynam., 16, 1103–1134, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-16-1103-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-16-1103-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Based on a series of storm-resolving greenhouse warming simulations conducted with the AWI-CM3 model at 9 km global atmosphere and 4–25 km ocean resolution, we present new projections of regional climate change, modes of climate variability, and extreme events. The 10-year-long high-resolution simulations for the 2000s, 2030s, 2060s, and 2090s were initialized from a coarser-resolution transient run (31 km atmosphere) which follows the SSP5-8.5 greenhouse gas emission scenario from 1950–2100 CE.
Vanessa Teske, Ralph Timmermann, Cara Nissen, Rolf Zentek, Tido Semmler, and Günther Heinemann
Ocean Sci., 21, 1205–1221, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-21-1205-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-21-1205-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We investigate the structural changes the Antarctic Slope Front in the southern Weddell Sea experiences in a warming climate by conducting two ocean simulations driven by atmospheric data of different horizontal resolutions. Cross-slope currents associated with a regime shift from a cold to a warm Filchner Trough on the continental shelf temporarily disturb the structure of the slope front and reduce its depth, but the primary reason for a regime shift is the cross-slope density gradient.
Thomas Rackow, Xabier Pedruzo-Bagazgoitia, Tobias Becker, Sebastian Milinski, Irina Sandu, Razvan Aguridan, Peter Bechtold, Sebastian Beyer, Jean Bidlot, Souhail Boussetta, Willem Deconinck, Michail Diamantakis, Peter Dueben, Emanuel Dutra, Richard Forbes, Rohit Ghosh, Helge F. Goessling, Ioan Hadade, Jan Hegewald, Thomas Jung, Sarah Keeley, Lukas Kluft, Nikolay Koldunov, Aleksei Koldunov, Tobias Kölling, Josh Kousal, Christian Kühnlein, Pedro Maciel, Kristian Mogensen, Tiago Quintino, Inna Polichtchouk, Balthasar Reuter, Domokos Sármány, Patrick Scholz, Dmitry Sidorenko, Jan Streffing, Birgit Sützl, Daisuke Takasuka, Steffen Tietsche, Mirco Valentini, Benoît Vannière, Nils Wedi, Lorenzo Zampieri, and Florian Ziemen
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 33–69, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-33-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-33-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Detailed global climate model simulations have been created based on a numerical weather prediction model, offering more accurate spatial detail down to the scale of individual cities ("kilometre-scale") and a better understanding of climate phenomena such as atmospheric storms, whirls in the ocean, and cracks in sea ice. The new model aims to provide globally consistent information on local climate change with greater precision, benefiting environmental planning and local impact modelling.
Shreya Trivedi, Imke Sievers, Marylou Athanase, Antonio Sánchez Benítez, and Tido Semmler
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-2214, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-2214, 2024
Preprint archived
Short summary
Short summary
Our study introduces a new method to compare CMIP6 models' sea ice and snow simulations with in-situ (MOSAiC) measurements. We assessed models for their accuracy in replicating Arctic sea ice and snow thicknesses, using two sea-ice and atmosphere-based methods to select "proxy years." We show that the models often overestimate snow thickness and mistime sea ice cycles. Despite limitations, this approach provides a valuable tool for evaluating climate models in localized time and space.
Bjorn Stevens, Stefan Adami, Tariq Ali, Hartwig Anzt, Zafer Aslan, Sabine Attinger, Jaana Bäck, Johanna Baehr, Peter Bauer, Natacha Bernier, Bob Bishop, Hendryk Bockelmann, Sandrine Bony, Guy Brasseur, David N. Bresch, Sean Breyer, Gilbert Brunet, Pier Luigi Buttigieg, Junji Cao, Christelle Castet, Yafang Cheng, Ayantika Dey Choudhury, Deborah Coen, Susanne Crewell, Atish Dabholkar, Qing Dai, Francisco Doblas-Reyes, Dale Durran, Ayoub El Gaidi, Charlie Ewen, Eleftheria Exarchou, Veronika Eyring, Florencia Falkinhoff, David Farrell, Piers M. Forster, Ariane Frassoni, Claudia Frauen, Oliver Fuhrer, Shahzad Gani, Edwin Gerber, Debra Goldfarb, Jens Grieger, Nicolas Gruber, Wilco Hazeleger, Rolf Herken, Chris Hewitt, Torsten Hoefler, Huang-Hsiung Hsu, Daniela Jacob, Alexandra Jahn, Christian Jakob, Thomas Jung, Christopher Kadow, In-Sik Kang, Sarah Kang, Karthik Kashinath, Katharina Kleinen-von Königslöw, Daniel Klocke, Uta Kloenne, Milan Klöwer, Chihiro Kodama, Stefan Kollet, Tobias Kölling, Jenni Kontkanen, Steve Kopp, Michal Koran, Markku Kulmala, Hanna Lappalainen, Fakhria Latifi, Bryan Lawrence, June Yi Lee, Quentin Lejeun, Christian Lessig, Chao Li, Thomas Lippert, Jürg Luterbacher, Pekka Manninen, Jochem Marotzke, Satoshi Matsouoka, Charlotte Merchant, Peter Messmer, Gero Michel, Kristel Michielsen, Tomoki Miyakawa, Jens Müller, Ramsha Munir, Sandeep Narayanasetti, Ousmane Ndiaye, Carlos Nobre, Achim Oberg, Riko Oki, Tuba Özkan-Haller, Tim Palmer, Stan Posey, Andreas Prein, Odessa Primus, Mike Pritchard, Julie Pullen, Dian Putrasahan, Johannes Quaas, Krishnan Raghavan, Venkatachalam Ramaswamy, Markus Rapp, Florian Rauser, Markus Reichstein, Aromar Revi, Sonakshi Saluja, Masaki Satoh, Vera Schemann, Sebastian Schemm, Christina Schnadt Poberaj, Thomas Schulthess, Cath Senior, Jagadish Shukla, Manmeet Singh, Julia Slingo, Adam Sobel, Silvina Solman, Jenna Spitzer, Philip Stier, Thomas Stocker, Sarah Strock, Hang Su, Petteri Taalas, John Taylor, Susann Tegtmeier, Georg Teutsch, Adrian Tompkins, Uwe Ulbrich, Pier-Luigi Vidale, Chien-Ming Wu, Hao Xu, Najibullah Zaki, Laure Zanna, Tianjun Zhou, and Florian Ziemen
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 16, 2113–2122, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-2113-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-2113-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
To manage Earth in the Anthropocene, new tools, new institutions, and new forms of international cooperation will be required. Earth Virtualization Engines is proposed as an international federation of centers of excellence to empower all people to respond to the immense and urgent challenges posed by climate change.
Lars Ackermann, Thomas Rackow, Kai Himstedt, Paul Gierz, Gregor Knorr, and Gerrit Lohmann
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 3279–3301, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3279-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3279-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We present long-term simulations with interactive icebergs in the Southern Ocean. By melting, icebergs reduce the temperature and salinity of the surrounding ocean. In our simulations, we find that this cooling effect of iceberg melting is not limited to the surface ocean but also reaches the deep ocean and propagates northward into all ocean basins. Additionally, the formation of deep-water masses in the Southern Ocean is enhanced.
Nathan Beech, Thomas Rackow, Tido Semmler, and Thomas Jung
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 529–543, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-529-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-529-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Cost-reducing modeling strategies are applied to high-resolution simulations of the Southern Ocean in a changing climate. They are evaluated with respect to observations and traditional, lower-resolution modeling methods. The simulations effectively reproduce small-scale ocean flows seen in satellite data and are largely consistent with traditional model simulations after 4 °C of warming. Small-scale flows are found to intensify near bathymetric features and to become more variable.
Felix Pithan, Marylou Athanase, Sandro Dahlke, Antonio Sánchez-Benítez, Matthew D. Shupe, Anne Sledd, Jan Streffing, Gunilla Svensson, and Thomas Jung
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 1857–1873, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1857-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1857-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Evaluating climate models usually requires long observational time series, but we present a method that also works for short field campaigns. We compare climate model output to observations from the MOSAiC expedition in the central Arctic Ocean. All models show how the arrival of a warm air mass warms the Arctic in April 2020, but two models do not show the response of snow temperature to the diurnal cycle. One model has too little liquid water and too much ice in clouds during cold days.
Hugues Goosse, Sofia Allende Contador, Cecilia M. Bitz, Edward Blanchard-Wrigglesworth, Clare Eayrs, Thierry Fichefet, Kenza Himmich, Pierre-Vincent Huot, François Klein, Sylvain Marchi, François Massonnet, Bianca Mezzina, Charles Pelletier, Lettie Roach, Martin Vancoppenolle, and Nicole P. M. van Lipzig
The Cryosphere, 17, 407–425, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-407-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-407-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Using idealized sensitivity experiments with a regional atmosphere–ocean–sea ice model, we show that sea ice advance is constrained by initial conditions in March and the retreat season is influenced by the magnitude of several physical processes, in particular by the ice–albedo feedback and ice transport. Atmospheric feedbacks amplify the response of the winter ice extent to perturbations, while some negative feedbacks related to heat conduction fluxes act on the ice volume.
Jan Streffing, Dmitry Sidorenko, Tido Semmler, Lorenzo Zampieri, Patrick Scholz, Miguel Andrés-Martínez, Nikolay Koldunov, Thomas Rackow, Joakim Kjellsson, Helge Goessling, Marylou Athanase, Qiang Wang, Jan Hegewald, Dmitry V. Sein, Longjiang Mu, Uwe Fladrich, Dirk Barbi, Paul Gierz, Sergey Danilov, Stephan Juricke, Gerrit Lohmann, and Thomas Jung
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 6399–6427, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-6399-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-6399-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
We developed a new atmosphere–ocean coupled climate model, AWI-CM3. Our model is significantly more computationally efficient than its predecessors AWI-CM1 and AWI-CM2. We show that the model, although cheaper to run, provides results of similar quality when modeling the historic period from 1850 to 2014. We identify the remaining weaknesses to outline future work. Finally we preview an improved simulation where the reduction in computational cost has to be invested in higher model resolution.
Sara Pasqualetto, Luisa Cristini, and Thomas Jung
Geosci. Commun., 5, 87–100, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-5-87-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-5-87-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Many projects in their reporting phase are required to provide a clear plan for evaluating the results of those efforts aimed at translating scientific results to a broader audience. This paper illustrates methodologies and strategies used in the framework of a European research project to assess the impact of knowledge transfer activities, both quantitatively and qualitatively, and provides recommendations and hints for developing a useful impact plan for scientific projects.
Christopher Horvat and Lettie A. Roach
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 803–814, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-803-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-803-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Sea ice is a composite of individual pieces, called floes, ranging in horizontal size from meters to kilometers. Variations in sea ice geometry are often forced by ocean waves, a process that is an important target of global climate models as it affects the rate of sea ice melting. Yet directly simulating these interactions is computationally expensive. We present a neural-network-based model of wave–ice fracture that allows models to incorporate their effect without added computational cost.
Patrick Scholz, Dmitry Sidorenko, Sergey Danilov, Qiang Wang, Nikolay Koldunov, Dmitry Sein, and Thomas Jung
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 335–363, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-335-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-335-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Structured-mesh ocean models are still the most mature in terms of functionality due to their long development history. However, unstructured-mesh ocean models have acquired new features and caught up in their functionality. This paper continues the work by Scholz et al. (2019) of documenting the features available in FESOM2.0. It focuses on the following two aspects: (i) partial bottom cells and embedded sea ice and (ii) dealing with mixing parameterisations enabled by using the CVMix package.
Cited articles
Abram, N. J., Purich, A., England, M. H., McCormack, F. S., Strugnell, J. M., Bergstrom, D. M., Vance, T. R., Stål, T. , Wienecke, B., Heil, P., Doddridge, E. D., Sallée, J-B., Williams, T. J., Reading, A. M., Mackintosh, A., Reese, R., Winkelmann, R., Klose, A. K., Boyd, P. W., Chown, S. L., and Robinson, S. A.: Emerging evidence of abrupt changes in the Antarctic environment, Nature, 644, 621–633, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-025-09349-5, 2025. a
Athanase, M., Köhler, R., Heuzé, C., Lévine, X., and Williams, R.: The Arctic Beaufort Gyre in CMIP6 Models: Present and Future, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 130, e2024JC021873, https://doi.org/10.1029/2024JC021873, 2025. a
Auger, M., Morrow, R., Kestenare, E., Sallée, J.-B., and Cowley, R.: Southern Ocean in-situ temperature trends over 25 years emerge from interannual variability, Nat. Commun., 12, 514, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-20781-1, 2021. a
Balsamo, G., Beljaars, A., Scipal, K., Viterbo, P., van den Hurk, B., Hirschi, M., and Betts, A. K.: A revised hydrology for the ECMWF model: Verification from field site to terrestrial water storage and impact in the Integrated Forecast System, J. Hydrometeorol., 10, 623–643, https://doi.org/10.1175/2008JHM1068.1, 2009. a
Beadling, R. L., Russell, J., Stouffer, R., Mazloff, M., Talley, L., Goodman, P., Sallée, J.-B., Hewitt, H., Hyder, P., and Pandde, A.: Representation of Southern Ocean properties across coupled model intercomparison project generations: CMIP3 to CMIP6, J. Climate, 33, 6555–6581, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-19-0970.1, 2020. a
Bell, B., Hersbach, H., Simmons, A., Berrisford, P., Dahlgren, P., Horányi, A., Muñoz-Sabater, J., Nicolas, J., Radu, R., Schepers, D., Soci, C., Villaume, S., Bidlot, J.-B., Haimberger, L., Woollen, J., Buontempo, C., and Thépaut, J.-N.: The ERA5 global reanalysis: Preliminary extension to 1950, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 147, 4186–4227, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.4174, 2021. a
Beszczynska-Möller, A., Von Appen, W., and Fahrbach, E.: Physical oceanography and current meter data from moorings F1-F14 and F15/F16 in the Fram Strait, 1997–2012, PANGAEA [data set], https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.150016, 2015. a
Bock, L., Lauer, A., Schlund, M., Barreiro, M., Bellouin, N., Jones, C., Meehl, G., Predoi, V., Roberts, M., and Eyring, V.: Quantifying progress across different CMIP phases with the ESMValTool, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 125, e2019JD032321, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JD032321, 2020. a, b, c, d, e, f
Casagrande, F., Stachelski, L., and de Souza, R. B.: Assessment of Antarctic sea ice area and concentration in Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 and Phase 6 models, Int. J. Climatol., 43, 1314–1332, https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.7916, 2023. a
Cesana, G. V., Khadir, T., and Chepfer, Hand Chiriaco, M.: Southern Ocean solar reflection biases in CMIP6 models linked to cloud phase and vertical structure representations, Geophys. Res. Lett., 49, e2022GL099777, https://doi.org/10.1029/2022GL099777, 2022. a
Cesana, G. V., Roach, L. A., and Blanchard-Wriggleswort, E.: Clouds are crucial to capture Antarctic sea ice variability, Geophys. Res. Lett., 52, e2024GL113322, https://doi.org/10.1029/2024GL113322, 2025. a
Chen, D., Rojas, M., Samset, B. H., Cobb, K., Diongue Niang, A., Edwards, P., Emori, S., Faria, S. H., Hawkins, E., Hope, P., Huybrechts, P., Meinshausen, M., Mustafa, S. K., Plattner, G.-K., and Tréguier, A.-M.: Framing, Context, and Methods, in: Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, edited by: Masson-Delmotte, V., Zhai, P., Pirani, A., Connors, S. L., Péan, C., Berger, S., Caud, N., Chen, Y., Goldfarb, L., Gomis, M. I., Huang, M., Leitzell, K., Lonnoy, E., Matthews, J. B. R., Maycock, T. K., Waterfield, T., Yelekçi, O., Yu, R., and Zhou, B., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, 147–286, https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157896.003, 2021. a
Craig, A., Valcke, S., and Coquart, L.: Development and performance of a new version of the OASIS coupler, OASIS3-MCT_3.0, Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 3297–3308, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-3297-2017, 2017. a
Curry, B., Lee, C. M., Petrie, B., Moritz, R. E., and Kwok, R.: Multiyear volume, liquid freshwater, and sea ice transports through Davis Strait, 2004–10, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 44, 1244–1266, https://doi.org/10.1175/JPO-D-13-0177.1, 2014. a
Danabasoglu, G., McWilliams, J. C., and Large, W. G.: Approach to equilibrium in accelerated global oceanic models, J. Climate, 1092–1110, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(1996)009<1092:ATEIAG>2.0.CO;2, 1996. a
Danek, C., Scholz, P., and Lohmann, G.: Effects of high resolution and spinup time on modeled North Atlantic circulation, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 49, 1159–1181, https://doi.org/10.1175/JPO-D-18-0141.1, 2019. a
Danilov, S., Wang, Q., Timmermann, R., Iakovlev, N., Sidorenko, D., Kimmritz, M., Jung, T., and Schröter, J.: Finite-Element Sea Ice Model (FESIM), version 2, Geosci. Model Dev., 8, 1747–1761, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-1747-2015, 2015. a
Danilov, S., Sidorenko, D., Wang, Q., and Jung, T.: The Finite-volumE Sea ice–Ocean Model (FESOM2), Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 765–789, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-765-2017, 2017. a
De Boer, A., Gavilan P-A, E., Stevens, D., Chafik, L., Hutchinson, D., Zhang, Q., Sime, L., and Willmott, A.: Interconnectivity between volume transports through Arctic straits, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 123, 8714–8729, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JC014320, 2018. a
DiGirolamo, N., Parkinson, C. L., Cavalieri, D. J., Gloersen, P., and Zwally, H. J.: Sea Ice Concentrations from Nimbus-7 SMMR and DMSP SSM/I-SSMIS Passive Microwave Data (NSIDC-0051, Version 2), NASA National Snow and Ice Data Center Distributed Active Archive Center [data set], https://doi.org/10.5067/MPYG15WAA4WX, 2017. a
Doblas-Reyes, F. J., Kontkanen, J., Sandu, I., Acosta, M., Al Turjmam, M. H., Alsina-Ferrer, I., Andrés-Martínez, M., Anerdi, C., Arriola, L., Axness, M., Batlle Martín, M., Bauer, P., Becker, T., Beltrán, D., Beyer, S., Bockelmann, H., Bretonnière, P.-A., Cabaniols, S., Caprioli, S., Castrillo, M., Chandrasekar, A., Cheedela, S., Correal, V., Danovaro, E., Davini, P., Enkovaara, J., Frauen, C., Früh, B., Gaya Àvila, A., Ghinassi, P., Ghosh, R., Ghosh, S., González, I., Grayson, K., Griffith, M., Hadade, I., Haine, C., Hartick, C., Haus, U.-U., Hearne, S., Järvinen, H., Jiménez, B., John, A., Juchem, M., Jung, T., Kegel, J., Kelbling, M., Keller, K., Kinoshita, B., Kiszler, T., Klocke, D., Kluft, L., Koldunov, N., Kölling, T., Kolstela, J., Kornblueh, L., Kosukhin, S., Lacima-Nadolnik, A., Leal Rojas, J. J., Lehtiranta, J., Lunttila, T., Luoma, A., Manninen, P., Medvedev, A., Milinski, S., Mohammed, A., Müller, S., Naryanappa, D., Nazarova, N., Niemelä, S., Niraula, B., Nortamo, H., Nummelin, A., Nurisso, M., Ortega, P., Paronuzzi, S., Pedruzo-Bagazgoitia, X., Pelletier, C., Peña, C., Polade, S., Pradhan, H. K., Quintanilla, R., Quintino, T., Rackow, T., Räisänen, J., Rajput, M. M., Redler, R., Reuter, B., Rocha Monteiro, N., Roura-Adserias, F., Ruppert, S., Sayed, S., Schnur, R., Sharma, T., Sidorenko, D., Sievi-Korte, O., Soret, A., Steger, C., Stevens, B., Streffing, J., Sunny, J., Tenorio, L., Thober, S., Tigerstedt, U., Tinto, O., Tonttila, J., Tuomenvirta, H., Tuppi, L., Van Thielen, G., Vitali, E., von Hardenberg, J., Wagner, I., Wedi, N., Wehner, J., Willner, S., Yepes-Arbós, X., Ziemen, F., and Zimmermann, J.: The Destination Earth digital twin for climate change adaptation, Geosci. Model Dev., 19, 2821–2848, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-2821-2026, 2026. a, b
Donohue, K. A., Tracey, K. L., Watts, D. R., Chidichimo, M. P., and Chereskin, T. K.: Mean antarctic circumpolar current transport measured in drake passage, Geophys. Res. Lett., 43, 11–760, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL070319, 2016. a, b
ECMWF: IFS Documentation CY43R3 – Part III: Dynamics and numerical procedures, ECMWF, https://doi.org/10.21957/8l7miod5m, 2017a. a
ECMWF: IFS Documentation CY43R3 – Part IV: Physical processes, ECMWF, https://doi.org/10.21957/efyk72kl, 2017b. a
ECMWF: IFS Documentation CY43R3 – Part VII: ECMWF wave model, ECMWF, https://doi.org/10.21957/mxz9z1gb, 2017c. a
Elsbury, D., Peings, Y., and Magnusdottir, G.: CMIP6 models underestimate the Holton-Tan effect, Geophys. Res. Lett., 48, e2021GL094083, https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL094083, 2021. a
Eyring, V., Bony, S., Meehl, G. A., Senior, C. A., Stevens, B., Stouffer, R. J., and Taylor, K. E.: Overview of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) experimental design and organization, Geosci. Model Dev., 9, 1937–1958, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-1937-2016, 2016. a
Eyring, V., Gillett, N. P., Achuta Rao, K. M., Barimalala, R., Barreiro Parrillo, M., Bellouin, N., Cassou, C., Durack, P. J., Kosaka, Y., McGregor, S., Min, S., Morgenstern, O., and Sun, Y.: Human Influence on the Climate System, in: Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, edited by: Masson-Delmotte, V., Zhai, P., Pirani, A., Connors, S. L., Péan, C., Berger, S., Caud, N., Chen, Y., Goldfarb, L., Gomis, M. I., Huang, M., Leitzell, K., Lonnoy, E., Matthews, J. B. R., Maycock, T. K., Waterfield, T., Yelekçi, O., Yu, R., and Zhou, B., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, 423–552, https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157896.005, 2021. a
Gent, P. R. and Mcwilliams, J. C.: Isopycnal mixing in ocean circulation models, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 20, 150–155, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0485(1990)020<0150:IMIOCM>2.0.CO;2, 1990. a
Good, S. A., Martin, M. J., and Rayner, N. A.: EN4: Quality controlled ocean temperature and salinity profiles and monthly objective analyses with uncertainty estimates, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 118, 6704–6716, https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JC009067, 2013. a
Gordon, A. L., Sprintall, J., Van Aken, H. M., Susanto, D., Wijffels, S., Molcard, R., Ffield, A., Pranowo, W., and Wirasantosa, S.: The Indonesian throughflow during 2004–2006 as observed by the INSTANT program, Dynam. Atmos. Oceans, 50, 115–128, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dynatmoce.2009.12.002, 2010. a
Griffies, S. M., Winton, M., Anderson, W. G., Benson, R., Delworth, T. L., Dufour, C. O., Dunne, J. P., Goddard, P., Morrison, A. K., Rosati, A., Wittenberg, A. T., Yin, J., and Zhang, R.: Impacts on ocean heat from transient mesoscale eddies in a hierarchy of climate models, J. Climate, 28, 952–977, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-14-00353.1, 2015. a, b, c, d
Großelindemann, H., Castruccio, F. S., Danabasoglu, G., and Biastoch, A.: Long-term variability and trends in the Agulhas Leakage and its impacts on the global overturning, Ocean Sci., 21, 93–112, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-21-93-2025, 2025. a
Gutjahr, O., Putrasahan, D., Lohmann, K., Jungclaus, J. H., von Storch, J.-S., Brüggemann, N., Haak, H., and Stössel, A.: Max Planck Institute Earth System Model (MPI-ESM1.2) for the High-Resolution Model Intercomparison Project (HighResMIP), Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 3241–3281, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-3241-2019, 2019. a, b, c
Haarsma, R. J., Roberts, M. J., Vidale, P. L., Senior, C. A., Bellucci, A., Bao, Q., Chang, P., Corti, S., Fučkar, N. S., Guemas, V., von Hardenberg, J., Hazeleger, W., Kodama, C., Koenigk, T., Leung, L. R., Lu, J., Luo, J.-J., Mao, J., Mizielinski, M. S., Mizuta, R., Nobre, P., Satoh, M., Scoccimarro, E., Semmler, T., Small, J., and von Storch, J.-S.: High Resolution Model Intercomparison Project (HighResMIP v1.0) for CMIP6, Geosci. Model Dev., 9, 4185–4208, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-4185-2016, 2016. a
Hallberg, R.: Using a resolution function to regulate parameterizations of oceanic mesoscale eddy effects, Ocean Model., 72, 92–103, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocemod.2013.08.007, 2013. a
Hellmuth, F., Carlsen, T., Daloz, A. S., David, R. O., Che, H., and Storelvmo, T.: Evaluation of biases in mid-to-high-latitude surface snowfall and cloud phase in ERA5 and CMIP6 using satellite observations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 1353–1383, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-1353-2025, 2025. a
Heuzé, C. and Liu, H.: No emergence of deep convection in the Arctic Ocean across CMIP6 models, Geophys. Res. Lett., 51, e2023GL106499, https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GL106499, 2024. a
Heuzé, C., Heywood, K. J., Stevens, D. P., and Ridley, J. K.: Southern Ocean bottom water characteristics in CMIP5 models, Geophys. Res. Lett., 40, 1409–1414, https://doi.org/10.1002/grl.50287, 2013. a
Heuzé, C., Zanowski, H., Karam, S., and Muilwijk, M.: The deep arctic ocean and fram strait in cmip6 models, J. Climate, 36, 2551–2584, 2023. a
Hewitt, H., Fox-Kemper, B., Pearson, B., Roberts, M., and Klocke, D.: The small scales of the ocean may hold the key to surprises, Nat. Clim. Change, 12, 496–499, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-022-01386-6, 2022. a
Hobbs, W. R., Klekociuk, A. R., and Pan, Y.: Validation of reanalysis Southern Ocean atmosphere trends using sea ice data, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 14757–14768, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-14757-2020, 2020. a
Hohenegger, C., Korn, P., Linardakis, L., Redler, R., Schnur, R., Adamidis, P., Bao, J., Bastin, S., Behravesh, M., Bergemann, M., Biercamp, J., Bockelmann, H., Brokopf, R., Brüggemann, N., Casaroli, L., Chegini, F., Datseris, G., Esch, M., George, G., Giorgetta, M., Gutjahr, O., Haak, H., Hanke, M., Ilyina, T., Jahns, T., Jungclaus, J., Kern, M., Klocke, D., Kluft, L., Kölling, T., Kornblueh, L., Kosukhin, S., Kroll, C., Lee, J., Mauritsen, T., Mehlmann, C., Mieslinger, T., Naumann, A. K., Paccini, L., Peinado, A., Praturi, D. S., Putrasahan, D., Rast, S., Riddick, T., Roeber, N., Schmidt, H., Schulzweida, U., Schütte, F., Segura, H., Shevchenko, R., Singh, V., Specht, M., Stephan, C. C., von Storch, J.-S., Vogel, R., Wengel, C., Winkler, M., Ziemen, F., Marotzke, J., and Stevens, B.: ICON-Sapphire: simulating the components of the Earth system and their interactions at kilometer and subkilometer scales, Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 779–811, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-779-2023, 2023. a
Jaison, A. M., Gray, L. J., Osprey, S. M., Knight, J. R., and Andrews, M. B.: Role of the quasi-biennial oscillation in alleviating biases in the semi-annual oscillation, Weather Clim. Dynam., 5, 1489–1504, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-5-1489-2024, 2024. a
Johnson, G. C., Lyman, J. M., and Loeb, N. G.: Improving estimates of Earth's energy imbalance, Nat. Clim. Change, 6, 639–640, https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3043, 2016. a
Keil, P., Schmidt, H., Stevens, B., and Bao, J.: Variations of tropical lapse rates in climate models and their implications for upper-tropospheric warming, J. Climate, 34, 9747–9761, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-21-0196.1, 2021. a
Kim, D.-W., Zapponini, M., Jung, T., Kim, M.-H., Koldunov, N., Puthiyaveettil, N., Sharma, S., Sidorenko, D., Sinha, N., Streffing, J., Timmermann, A., Semmler, T., and Park, W.: Accelerating Southern Ocean Sea Ice Decline due to Cloud-Climate Feedbacks, Research Square [preprint], https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-7325013/v1, 2026. a, b, c, d, e, f
Koldunov, N. V., Aizinger, V., Rakowsky, N., Scholz, P., Sidorenko, D., Danilov, S., and Jung, T.: Scalability and some optimization of the Finite-volumE Sea ice–Ocean Model, Version 2.0 (FESOM2), Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 3991–4012, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-3991-2019, 2019a. a
Koldunov, N., Danilov, S., Sidorenko, D., Hutter, N., Losch, M., Goessling, H., Rakowsky, N., Scholz, P., Sein, D., Wang, Q., and Jung, T.: Fast EVP solutions in a high-resolution sea ice model, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 11, 1269–1284, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018MS001485, 2019b. a
Komen, G. J., Cavaleri, L., Donelan, M., Hasselmann, K., Hasselmann, S., and Janssen, P.: Dynamics and modelling of ocean waves, Cambridge University Press, UK, https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511628955, 1996. a
Large, W. G., McWilliams, J. C., and Doney, S. C.: Oceanic vertical mixing: A review and a model with a nonlocal boundary layer parameterization, Rev. Geophys., 32, 363–403, https://doi.org/10.1029/94RG01872, 1994. a
Lauer, A., Bock, L., Hassler, B., Schröder, M., and Stengel, M.: Cloud climatologies from global climate models – A comparison of CMIP5 and CMIP6 models with satellite data, J. Climate, 36, 281–311, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-22-0181.1, 2023. a
Lavergne, T. and Down, E.: A climate data record of year-round global sea-ice drift from the EUMETSAT Ocean and Sea Ice Satellite Application Facility (OSI SAF), Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 15, 5807–5834, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-5807-2023, 2023. a
Lellouche, J.-M., Greiner, E., Bourdallé-Badie, R., Garric, G., Melet, A., Drévillon, M., Bricaud, C., Hamon, M., Le Galloudec, O., Regnier, C., Candela, T., Testut, C.-E., Gasparin, F., Ruggiero, G., Benkiran, M., Drillet, Y., and Le Traon, P.-Y.: The Copernicus global
Li, D., Chang, P., Yeager, S. G., Danabasoglu, G., Castruccio, F. S., Small, J., Wang, H., Zhang, Q., and Gopal, A.: The impact of horizontal resolution on projected sea-level rise along US east continental shelf with the community earth system model, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 14, e2021MS002868, https://doi.org/10.1029/2021MS002868, 2022. a
Li, X., Wang, Q., Danilov, S., Koldunov, N., Liu, C., Müller, V., Sidorenko, D., and Jung, T.: Eddy activity in the Arctic Ocean projected to surge in a warming world, Nat. Clim. Change, 14, 156–162, 2024. a
Marshall, J. and Speer, K.: Closure of the meridional overturning circulation through Southern Ocean upwelling, Nat. Geosci., 5, 171–180, https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo1391, 2012. a
Mercator Ocean International: Global Ocean Physics Reanalysis, E.U. Copernicus Marine Service Information (CMEMS) Marine Data Store (MDS) [data set], https://doi.org/10.48670/moi-00021, 2018. a
Meinshausen, M., Vogel, E., Nauels, A., Lorbacher, K., Meinshausen, N., Etheridge, D. M., Fraser, P. J., Montzka, S. A., Rayner, P. J., Trudinger, C. M., Krummel, P. B., Beyerle, U., Canadell, J. G., Daniel, J. S., Enting, I. G., Law, R. M., Lunder, C. R., O'Doherty, S., Prinn, R. G., Reimann, S., Rubino, M., Velders, G. J. M., Vollmer, M. K., Wang, R. H. J., and Weiss, R.: Historical greenhouse gas concentrations for climate modelling (CMIP6), Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 2057–2116, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-2057-2017, 2017. a
Meredith, M. P., Woodworth, P. L., Chereskin, T. K., Marshall, D. P., Allison, L. C., Bigg, G. R., Donohue, K., Heywood, K. J., Hughes, C. W., Hibbert, A., McC. Hogg, A., Johnson, H. J., Jullion, L, King, B. A., Leach, H., Lenn, Y. D., Morales Maqueda, M. A., Munday, D. A., Naveira Garabato, A. C., Provost, C., Sallée, J.-B., and Sprintall, J.: Sustained monitoring of the Southern Ocean at Drake Passage: Past achievements and future priorities, Rev. Geophys., 49, https://doi.org/10.1029/2010RG000348, 2011. a, b
Mitchell, D. M., Lo, E. Y. T., Seviour, W. J. M., Haimberger, L., and Polvani, L. M.: The vertical profile of recent tropical temperature trends: Persistent model biases in the context of internal variability, Environ. Res. Lett., 15, 1040b4, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab9af7, 2020. a
Mmame, B. and Ngongondo, C.: Evaluation of CMIP6 model skills in simulating tropical climate extremes over Malawi, Southern Africa, Modeling Earth Systems and Environment, 10, 1695–1709, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-023-01867-3, 2024. a
Moat, B. I., Smeed, D. A., Rayner, D., Johns, W. E., Smith, R., Volkov, D., Elipot, S., Petit, T., Kajtar, J., Baringer, M. O., and Collins, J.: Atlantic meridional overturning circulation observed by the RAPID-MOCHA-WBTS (RAPID-Meridional Overturning Circulation and Heatflux Array-Western Boundary Time Series) array at 26N from 2004 to 2023 (v2023.1), British Oceanographic Data Centre – Natural Environment Research Council [data set], https://doi.org/10.5285/223b34a3-2dc5-c945-e063-7086abc0f274, 2024. a
Mohrmann, M., Heuzé, C., and Swart, S.: Southern Ocean polynyas in CMIP6 models, The Cryosphere, 15, 4281–4313, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-4281-2021, 2021. a, b
Monterey, G. I. and Levitus, S.: Seasonal variability of mixed layer depth for the world ocean, NOAA (NESDIS series), https://repository.library.noaa.gov/view/noaa/49153/noaa_49153_DS1.pdf (last access: 3 April 2025), 1997. a
Moon, J.-Y., Streffing, J., Lee, S.-S., Semmler, T., Andrés-Martínez, M., Chen, J., Cho, E.-B., Chu, J.-E., Franzke, C. L. E., Gärtner, J. P., Ghosh, R., Hegewald, J., Hong, S., Kim, D.-W., Koldunov, N., Lee, J.-Y., Lin, Z., Liu, C., Loza, S. N., Park, W., Roh, W., Sein, D. V., Sharma, S., Sidorenko, D., Son, J.-H., Stuecker, M. F., Wang, Q., Yi, G., Zapponini, M., Jung, T., and Timmermann, A.: Earth's future climate and its variability simulated at 9 km global resolution, Earth Syst. Dynam., 16, 1103–1134, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-16-1103-2025, 2025. a, b, c, d, e, f
Moreno-Chamarro, E., Caron, L.-P., Loosveldt Tomas, S., Vegas-Regidor, J., Gutjahr, O., Moine, M.-P., Putrasahan, D., Roberts, C. D., Roberts, M. J., Senan, R., Terray, L., Tourigny, E., and Vidale, P. L.: Impact of increased resolution on long-standing biases in HighResMIP-PRIMAVERA climate models, Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 269–289, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-269-2022, 2022. a
Muilwijk, M., Hattermann, T., Martin, T., and Granskog, M. A.: Future sea ice weakening amplifies wind-driven trends in surface stress and Arctic Ocean spin-up, Nat. Commun., 15, 6889, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-50874-0, 2024. a
Nakayama, Y., Malyarenko, A., Zhang, H., Wang, O., Auger, M., Nie, Y., Fenty, I., Mazloff, M., Köhl, A., and Menemenlis, D.: Evaluation of MITgcm-based ocean reanalyses for the Southern Ocean, Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 8613–8638, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8613-2024, 2024. a, b
NASA/LARC/SD/ASDC: CERES Energy Balanced and Filled (EBAF) TOA and surface monthly means data in netCDF edition 4.1. NASA, https://doi.org/10.5067/TERRA-AQUA/CERES/EBAF_L3B.004.1, 2019. a
Notz, D. and SIMIP Community: Arctic sea ice in CMIP6, Geophys. Res. Lett., 47, e2019GL086749, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL086749, 2020. a
Pimonsree, S., Kamworapan, S., Gheewala, S. H., Thongbhakdi, A., and Prueksakorn, K.: Evaluation of CMIP6 GCMs performance to simulate precipitation over Southeast Asia, Atmos. Res., 282, 106522, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2022.106522, 2023. a
Platnick, S., Ackerman, S., King, M., Meyer, K., Menzel, W. P., Holz, R. E., Baum, B. A., and Yang, P.: MODIS atmosphere L2 cloud product (06_L2), NASA MODIS Adaptive Processing System, Goddard Space Flight Center [data set], https://doi.org/10.5067/MODIS/MOD06_L2.006, 2015. a
Putrasahan, D. A., Lohmann, K., von Storch, J.-S., Jungclaus, J. H., Gutjahr, O., and Haak, H.: Surface flux drivers for the slowdown of the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation in a high-resolution global coupled climate model, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 11, 1349–1363, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018MS001447, 2019. a
Rabezanahary, T., Mirindra, F., Zhai, J., and Andrianarimanana, M. H.: Performance evaluation of CMIP6 in simulating extreme precipitation in Madagascar, Theor. Appl. Climatol., 155, 4089–4100, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-024-04868-z, 2024. a
Rackow, T., Sein, D. V., Semmler, T., Danilov, S., Koldunov, N. V., Sidorenko, D., Wang, Q., and Jung, T.: Sensitivity of deep ocean biases to horizontal resolution in prototype CMIP6 simulations with AWI-CM1.0, Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 2635–2656, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-2635-2019, 2019. a
Rackow, T., Danilov, S., Goessling, H. F., Hellmer, H. H., Sein, D. V., Semmler, T., Sidorenko, D., and Jung, T.: Delayed Antarctic sea-ice decline in high-resolution climate change simulations, Nat. Commun., 13, 637, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-28259-y, 2022. a
Rackow, T., Pedruzo-Bagazgoitia, X., Becker, T., Milinski, S., Sandu, I., Aguridan, R., Bechtold, P., Beyer, S., Bidlot, J., Boussetta, S., Deconinck, W., Diamantakis, M., Dueben, P., Dutra, E., Forbes, R., Ghosh, R., Goessling, H. F., Hadade, I., Hegewald, J., Jung, T., Keeley, S., Kluft, L., Koldunov, N., Koldunov, A., Kölling, T., Kousal, J., Kühnlein, C., Maciel, P., Mogensen, K., Quintino, T., Polichtchouk, I., Reuter, B., Sármány, D., Scholz, P., Sidorenko, D., Streffing, J., Sützl, B., Takasuka, D., Tietsche, S., Valentini, M., Vannière, B., Wedi, N., Zampieri, L., and Ziemen, F.: Multi-year simulations at kilometre scale with the Integrated Forecasting System coupled to FESOM2.5 and NEMOv3.4, Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 33–69, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-33-2025, 2025. a
Rayner, N. A., Parker, D. E., Horton, E. B., Folland, C. K., Alexander, L. V., Rowell, D. P., Kent, E. C., and Kaplan, A.: Global analyses of sea surface temperature, sea ice, and night marine air temperature since the late nineteenth century, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 108, https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD002670, 2003. a
Redi, M. H.: Oceanic isopycnal mixing by coordinate rotation, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 12, 1154–1158, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0485(1982)012<1154:OIMBCR>2.0.CO;2, 1982. a
Richter, J. H., Anstey, J. A., Butchart, N., Kawatani, Y., Meehl, G. A., Osprey, S., and Simpson, I. R.: Progress in simulating the quasi-biennial oscillation in CMIP models, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 125, e2019JD032362, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JD032362, 2020. a
Ridderinkhof, H., Van der Werf, P. M., Ullgren, J. E., Van Aken, H. M., Van Leeuwen, P. J., and De Ruijter, W. P. M.: Seasonal and interannual variability in the Mozambique Channel from moored current observations, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 115, https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JC005619, 2010. a
Roach, L. A., Dörr, J., Holmes, C. R., Massonnet, F., Blockley, E. W., Notz, D., Rackow, T., Raphael, M. N., O’Farrell, S. P., Bailey, D. A., and Bitz, C. M.: Antarctic sea ice area in CMIP6, Geophys. Res. Lett., 47, e2019GL086729, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL086729, 2020. a, b
Roberts, M. J., Reed, K. A., Bao, Q., Barsugli, J. J., Camargo, S. J., Caron, L.-P., Chang, P., Chen, C.-T., Christensen, H. M., Danabasoglu, G., Frenger, I., Fučkar, N. S., ul Hasson, S., Hewitt, H. T., Huang, H., Kim, D., Kodama, C., Lai, M., Leung, L.-Y. R., Mizuta, R., Nobre, P., Ortega, P., Paquin, D., Roberts, C. D., Scoccimarro, E., Seddon, J., Treguier, A. M., Tu, C.-Y., Ullrich, P. A., Vidale, P. L., Wehner, M. F., Zarzycki, C. M., Zhang, B., Zhang, W., and Zhao, M.: High-Resolution Model Intercomparison Project phase 2 (HighResMIP2) towards CMIP7, Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 1307–1332, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1307-2025, 2025. a, b
Scholz, P., Sidorenko, D., Danilov, S., Wang, Q., Koldunov, N., Sein, D., and Jung, T.: Assessment of the Finite-VolumE Sea ice–Ocean Model (FESOM2.0) – Part 2: Partial bottom cells, embedded sea ice and vertical mixing library CVMix, Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 335–363, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-335-2022, 2022. a
Scholz, P., Sidorenko, D., Streffing, J., Hegewald, J., Koldunov, N., Cheedela, S. K., Rackow, T., Loch, W. J., Gierz, P., Ackermann, L., Deconinck, W., Butzin, M., Song, P., Gürses, O., Heukamp., F., Degregori, E., Hinck, S., Beyer, S., Andrés-Martínez, M., Wilms, A., Vitali, E., Kinoshita, B. P., Goessling, H. F., Zapponini, M., Müller, V., Koldunov, A., Guibert, D., Wang, Q., and Okzan, U.: mzapponi/fesom2: FESOM2 version used for production runs in Zapponini et al. (2025), Zenodo [code], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17961041, 2025. a
Sein, D., Danilov, S., Biastoch, A., Durgadoo, J. V., Sidorenko, D., Harig, S., and Wang, Q.: Designing variable ocean model resolution based on the observed ocean variability, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 8, 904–916, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016MS000650, 2016. a
Sein, D., Koldunov, N., Danilov, S., Wang, Q., Sidorenko, D., Fast, I., Rackow, T., Cabos, W., and Jung, T.: Ocean modeling on a mesh with resolution following the local Rossby radius, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 9, 2601–2614, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017MS001099, 2017. a, b
Shi, Q., Yang, Q., Mu, L., Wang, J., Massonnet, F., and Mazloff, M. R.: Evaluation of sea-ice thickness from four reanalyses in the Antarctic Weddell Sea, The Cryosphere, 15, 31–47, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-31-2021, 2021. a
Slingo, J., Bates, P., Bauer, P., Belcher, S., Palmer, T., Stephens, G., Stevens, B., Stocker, T., and Teutsch, G.: Ambitious partnership needed for reliable climate prediction, Nat. Clim. Change, 12, 499–503, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-022-01384-8, 2022. a
Song, J.-N., Fu, G., Xu, Y., Han, Z.-Y., Sun, Q.-Z., and Wang, H.: Assessment of the capability of CMIP6 global climate models to simulate Arctic cyclones, Advances in Climate Change Research, 12, 660–676, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accre.2021.07.007, 2021. a
Soto-Navarro, J., Criado-Aldeanueva, F., García-Lafuente, J., and Sánchez-Román, A.: Estimation of the Atlantic inflow through the Strait of Gibraltar from climatological and in situ data, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 115, https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JC006302, 2010. a
Steele, M., Morley, R., and Ermold, W.: PHC: A global ocean hydrography with a high-quality Arctic Ocean, J. Climate, 14, 2079–2087, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(2001)014<2079:PAGOHW>2.0.CO;2, 2001. a
Streffing, J., Zapponini, M., Andrés-Martínez, M., and Wieters, N.: JanStreffing/cmpitool: v1.2 (v1.2), Zenodo [code], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16961790, 2025. a, b, c
Streffing, J., Sidorenko, D., Semmler, T., Zampieri, L., Scholz, P., Andrés-Martínez, M., Koldunov, N., Rackow, T., Kjellsson, J., Goessling, H., Athanase, M., Wang, Q., Hegewald, J., Sein, D. V., Mu, L., Fladrich, U., Barbi, D., Gierz, P., Danilov, S., Juricke, S., Lohmann, G., and Jung, T.: AWI-CM3 coupled climate model: description and evaluation experiments for a prototype post-CMIP6 model, Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 6399–6427, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-6399-2022, 2022. a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j, k, l
Taylor, G. P., Loikith, P. C., Aragon, C. M., Lee, H., and Waliser, D. E.: CMIP6 model fidelity at simulating large-scale atmospheric circulation patterns and associated temperature and precipitation over the Pacific Northwest, Clim. Dynam., 60, 2199–2218, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-022-06410-1, 2023. a
Tian, B. and Dong, X.: The double-ITCZ bias in CMIP3, CMIP5, and CMIP6 models based on annual mean precipitation, Geophys. Res. Lett., 47, e2020GL087232, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL087232, 2020. a
Tian, T., Yang, S., Høyer, J., Nielsen-Englyst, P., and Singha, S.: Cooler Arctic surface temperatures simulated by climate models are closer to satellite-based data than the ERA5 reanalysis, Communications Earth & Environment, 5, 111, https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-024-01276-z, 2024. a, b
Timmermann, R. and Beckmann, A.: Parameterization of vertical mixing in the Weddell Sea, Ocean Model., 6, 83–100, https://doi.org/10.1016/S1463-5003(02)00061-6, 2004. a
Tokarska, K. B., Stolpe, M. B., Sippel, S., Fischer, E. M., Smith, C. J., Lehner, F., and Knutti, R.: Past warming trend constrains future warming in CMIP6 models, Science Advances, 6, eaaz9549, https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aaz9549, 2020. a
von Storch, J.-S., Haak, H., Hertwig, E., and Fast, I.: Vertical heat and salt fluxes due to resolved and parameterized meso-scale eddies, Ocean Model., 108, 1–19, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocemod.2016.10.001, 2016. a
Walden, V. P., Hudson, S. R., Cohen, L., Murphy, S. Y., and Granskog, M. A.: Atmospheric components of the surface energy budget over young sea ice: Results from the N-ICE2015 campaign, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 122, 8427–8446, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD026091, 2017. a
Wielicki, B. A., Barkstrom, B. R., Harrison, E. F., Lee III, R. B., Smith, G. L., and Cooper, J. E.: Clouds and the Earth's Radiant Energy System (CERES): An earth observing system experiment, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 77, 853–868, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477(1996)077<0853:CATERE>2.0.CO;2, 1996. a
Wild, M.: The global energy balance as represented in CMIP6 climate models, Clim. Dynam., 55, 553–577, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-020-05282-7, 2020. a
Woodgate, R. A.: Increases in the Pacific inflow to the Arctic from 1990 to 2015, and insights into seasonal trends and driving mechanisms from year-round Bering Strait mooring data, Prog. Oceanogr., 160, 124–154, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pocean.2017.12.007, 2018. a
Woodgate, R. A., Aagaard, K., and Weingartner, T. J.: Monthly temperature, salinity, and transport variability of the Bering Strait through flow, Geophys. Res. Lett., 32, https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GL021880, 2005. a
Yepes-Arbós, X., van den Oord, G., Acosta, M. C., and Carver, G. D.: Evaluation and optimisation of the I/O scalability for the next generation of Earth system models: IFS CY43R3 and XIOS 2.0 integration as a case study, Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 379–394, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-379-2022, 2022. a
Zapponini, M.: AWI-CM3.1 historical and ssp585 scenario in TCo95-CORE2 setup, Zenodo [data set], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17377570, 2025a. a
Zapponini, M.: AWI-CM3.1 historical and ssp585 scenario in TCo319-DART setup, Zenodo [data set], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17397357, 2025b. a
Zapponini, M.: mzapponi/AWICM3_ResolutionSensitivity_paper: Notebooks_AWI-CM3_resolutions, Zenodo [code], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17996211, 2025c. a
Zapponini, M. and Goessling, H.: Atmospheric destabilization leads to Arctic Ocean winter surface wind intensification, Communications Earth & Environment, 5, 262, https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-024-01428-1, 2024. a
Zelinka, M. D., Myers, T. A., McCoy, D. T., Po-Chedley, Sand Caldwell, P. M., Ceppi, P., Klein, S. A., and Taylor, K. E.: Causes of higher climate sensitivity in CMIP6 models, Geophys. Res. Lett., 47, e2019GL085782, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL085782, 2020. a
Zhang, B., Song, S., Wang, Hand Guo, T., and Ding, Y.: Evaluation of the performance of CMIP6 models in simulating extreme precipitation and its projected changes in global climate regions, Nat. Hazards, 121, 1737–1763, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-024-06850-4, 2025a. a
Zhang, R., Sun, S., Chen, Z., and Wu, L.: Limited influence of the Agulhas leakage on the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation under present-day climate conditions, Communications Earth & Environment, 6, 133, https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-025-02097-4, 2025b. a
Zhao, L., Wang, Y., Zhao, C., Dong, X., and Yung, Y. L.: Compensating errors in cloud radiative and physical properties over the Southern Ocean in the CMIP6 climate models, Adv. Atmos. Sci., 39, 2156–2171, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-022-2036-z, 2022. a
Short summary
This study evaluates the impact of grid resolution on long-term present and future climate runs using the Alfred Wegener Institute global model AWI-CM3. A higher-resolution setup (35 km atmosphere, eddy-permitting/resolving ocean) improves small-scale processes and long-term variability, across variables and regions, and can capture nonlinear ocean–atmosphere interactions often missed by Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP) models.
This study evaluates the impact of grid resolution on long-term present and future climate runs...
