Geoscientific Model Development
Geoscientific Model Development
GMD
Articles | Volume 19, issue 7
Articles | Volume 19, issue 7
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-2881-2026
© Author(s) 2026. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-2881-2026
© Author(s) 2026. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Articles | Volume 19, issue 7
Model evaluation paper
 | 
16 Apr 2026
Model evaluation paper |  | 16 Apr 2026

Towards improved Euro-Mediterranean discharge simulations in regional coupled climate models: a comparative assessment of hydrologic performance

Mohamed Hamitouche, Giorgia Fosser, Arezoo RafieeiNasab, and Alessandro Anav

Viewed

Total article views: 7,829 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
6,643 946 240 7,829 425 255 279
  • HTML: 6,643
  • PDF: 946
  • XML: 240
  • Total: 7,829
  • Supplement: 425
  • BibTeX: 255
  • EndNote: 279
Views and downloads (calculated since 28 Jul 2025)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 28 Jul 2025)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 7,829 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 7,758 with geography defined and 71 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Saved (final revised paper)

Latest update: 24 Oct 2026
Download
Short summary
Predicting how much water flows from rivers into the Mediterranean is challenging due to climate change and human impacts. We compared two hydrological models – a global river routing model and a fully coupled land surface–hydrology model – to assess their performance. The coupled model, especially after calibration, better reproduces river discharge and seasonal flow, helping improve flood and drought planning.
Read more
Share