Geoscientific Model Development
Geoscientific Model Development
GMD
Articles | Volume 18, issue 22
Articles | Volume 18, issue 22
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-8973-2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-8973-2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Articles | Volume 18, issue 22
Model evaluation paper
 | 
25 Nov 2025
Model evaluation paper |  | 25 Nov 2025

Modelling stratospheric composition for the Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service: multi-species evaluation of IFS-COMPO Cy49

Simon Chabrillat, Samuel Rémy, Quentin Errera, Vincent Huijnen, Christine Bingen, Jonas Debosscher, François Hendrick, Swen Metzger, Adrien Mora, Daniele Minganti, Marc Op de beek, Léa Reisenfeld, Jason E. Williams, Henk Eskes, and Johannes Flemming

Viewed

Total article views: 2,349 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
2,121 199 29 2,349 44 29 51
  • HTML: 2,121
  • PDF: 199
  • XML: 29
  • Total: 2,349
  • Supplement: 44
  • BibTeX: 29
  • EndNote: 51
Views and downloads (calculated since 29 Apr 2025)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 29 Apr 2025)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 2,349 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 2,348 with geography defined and 1 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 25 Nov 2025
Download
Short summary
We document the forecasts of the composition of the stratosphere by the Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service. The model's predictions are compared with satellite measurements over a recent period, during polar ozone depletion events, and after the Mount Pinatubo volcanic eruption. The system performs well for sulfate aerosols, ozone and several other key gases but not as well for several nitrogen-containing gases. Chemical processes in aerosols and polar clouds should be improved.
Read more
Share