Articles | Volume 18, issue 5
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1851-2025
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1851-2025
Methods for assessment of models
 | 
18 Mar 2025
Methods for assessment of models |  | 18 Mar 2025

Cell-tracking-based framework for assessing nowcasting model skill in reproducing growth and decay of convective rainfall

Jenna Ritvanen, Seppo Pulkkinen, Dmitri Moisseev, and Daniele Nerini

Related authors

Complementarity of wind measurements from co-located X-band weather radar and Doppler lidar
Jenna Ritvanen, Ewan O'Connor, Dmitri Moisseev, Raisa Lehtinen, Jani Tyynelä, and Ludovic Thobois
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 6507–6519, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-6507-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-6507-2022, 2022
Short summary
Boundary-layer height and surface stability at Hyytiälä, Finland, in ERA5 and observations
Victoria Anne Sinclair, Jenna Ritvanen, Gabin Urbancic, Irene Erner, Yurii Batrak, Dmitri Moisseev, and Mona Kurppa
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 3075–3103, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-3075-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-3075-2022, 2022
Short summary

Related subject area

Atmospheric sciences
Optimized dynamic mode decomposition for reconstruction and forecasting of atmospheric chemistry data
Meghana Velagar, Christoph Keller, and J. Nathan Kutz
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 4667–4684, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-4667-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-4667-2025, 2025
Short summary
Interpolating turbulent heat fluxes missing from a prairie observation on the Tibetan Plateau using artificial intelligence models
Quanzhe Hou, Zhiqiu Gao, Zexia Duan, and Minghui Yu
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 4625–4641, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-4625-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-4625-2025, 2025
Short summary
Carbon dioxide plume dispersion simulated at the hectometer scale using DALES: model formulation and observational evaluation
Arseniy Karagodin-Doyennel, Fredrik Jansson, Bart J. H. van Stratum, Hugo Denier van der Gon, Jordi Vilà-Guerau de Arellano, and Sander Houweling
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 4571–4599, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-4571-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-4571-2025, 2025
Short summary
Low-level jets in the North and Baltic seas: mesoscale model sensitivity and climatology using WRF V4.2.1
Bjarke T. E. Olsen, Andrea N. Hahmann, Nicolas G. Alonso-de-Linaje, Mark Žagar, and Martin Dörenkämper
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 4499–4533, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-4499-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-4499-2025, 2025
Short summary
SynRad v1.0: a radar forward operator to simulate synthetic weather radar observations from volcanic ash clouds
Vishnu Nair, Anujah Mohanathan, Michael Herzog, David G. Macfarlane, and Duncan A. Robertson
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 4417–4432, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-4417-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-4417-2025, 2025
Short summary

Cited articles

Ayzel, G., Scheffer, T., and Heistermann, M.: RainNet v1.0: a convolutional neural network for radar-based precipitation nowcasting, Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 2631–2644, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-2631-2020, 2020. a, b, c
Berne, A., Delrieu, G., Creutin, J.-D., and Obled, C.: Temporal and Spatial Resolution of Rainfall Measurements Required for Urban Hydrology, J. Hydrol., 299, 166–179, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2004.08.002, 2004. a
Beucher, S. and Lantuejoul, C.: Use of Watersheds in Contour Detection, in: International Workshop on Image Processing: Real-time Edge and Motion Detection/Estimation, Rennes, France, https://people.cmm.minesparis.psl.eu/users/beucher/publi/watershed.pdf (last access: 12 March 2025), 1979. a
Bi, K., Xie, L., Zhang, H., Chen, X., Gu, X., and Tian, Q.: Accurate Medium-Range Global Weather Forecasting with 3D Neural Networks, Nature, 619, 533–538, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06185-3, 2023. a, b
Bouguet, J.-Y.: Pyramidal Implementation of the Affine Lucas Kanade Feature Tracker Description of the Algorithm, Intel corporation, https://robots.stanford.edu/cs223b04/algo_affine_tracking.pdf (last access: 12 March 2025), 2001. a, b
Download
Short summary
Nowcasting models struggle with the rapid evolution of heavy rain, and common verification methods are unable to describe how accurately the models predict the growth and decay of heavy rain. We propose a framework to assess model performance. In the framework, convective cells are identified and tracked in the forecasts and observations, and the model skill is then evaluated by comparing differences between forecast and observed cells. We demonstrate the framework with four open-source models.
Share