Articles | Volume 17, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-685-2024
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-685-2024
Model evaluation paper
 | 
26 Jan 2024
Model evaluation paper |  | 26 Jan 2024

Modeling below-cloud scavenging of size-resolved particles in GEM-MACHv3.1

Roya Ghahreman, Wanmin Gong, Paul A. Makar, Alexandru Lupu, Amanda Cole, Kulbir Banwait, Colin Lee, and Ayodeji Akingunola

Related authors

Estimates of critical loads and exceedances of acidity and nutrient nitrogen for mineral soils in Canada for 2014–2016 average annual sulfur and nitrogen atmospheric deposition
Hazel Cathcart, Julian Aherne, Michael D. Moran, Verica Savic-Jovcic, Paul A. Makar, and Amanda Cole
Biogeosciences, 22, 535–554, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-22-535-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-22-535-2025, 2025
Short summary
Modelling Arctic Lower Tropospheric Ozone: processes controlling seasonal variations
Wanmin Gong, Stephen R. Beagley, Kenjiro Toyota, Henrik Skov, Jesper Heile Christensen, Alexandru Lupu, Diane Pendlebury, Junhua Zhang, Ulas Im, Yugo Kanaya, Alfonso Saiz-Lopez, Roberto Sommariva, Peter Effertz, John W. Halfacre, Nis Jepsen, Rigel Kivi, Theodore K. Koenig, Katrin Müller, Claus Nordstrøm, Irina Petropavlovskikh, Paul B. Shepson, William R. Simpson, Sverre Solberg, Ralf M. Staebler, David W. Tarasick, Roeland Van Malderen, and Mika Vestenius
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3750,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3750, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP).
Short summary
Retrieval of NO2 profiles from three years of Pandora MAX-DOAS measurements in Toronto, Canada
Ramina Alwarda, Kristof Bognar, Xiaoyi Zhao, Vitali Fioletov, Jonathan Davies, Sum Chi Lee, Debora Griffin, Alexandru Lupu, Udo Frieß, Alexander Cede, Yushan Su, and Kimberly Strong
Atmos. Meas. Tech. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2024-180,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2024-180, 2024
Preprint under review for AMT
Short summary
The Global Forest Fire Emissions Prediction System version 1.0
Kerry Anderson, Jack Chen, Peter Englefield, Debora Griffin, Paul A. Makar, and Dan Thompson
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 7713–7749, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7713-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7713-2024, 2024
Short summary
Implementation of the MOSAIC Aerosol Module (v1.0) in the Canadian Air Quality Model GEM-MACH (v3.1)
Kirill Semeniuk, Ashu Dastoor, and Alex Lupu
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-2958,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-2958, 2024
Short summary

Related subject area

Atmospheric sciences
Exploring a high-level programming model for the NWP domain using ECMWF microphysics schemes
Stefano Ubbiali, Christian Kühnlein, Christoph Schär, Linda Schlemmer, Thomas C. Schulthess, Michael Staneker, and Heini Wernli
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 529–546, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-529-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-529-2025, 2025
Short summary
Quantifying uncertainties in satellite NO2 superobservations for data assimilation and model evaluation
Pieter Rijsdijk, Henk Eskes, Arlene Dingemans, K. Folkert Boersma, Takashi Sekiya, Kazuyuki Miyazaki, and Sander Houweling
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 483–509, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-483-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-483-2025, 2025
Short summary
ML-AMPSIT: Machine Learning-based Automated Multi-method Parameter Sensitivity and Importance analysis Tool
Dario Di Santo, Cenlin He, Fei Chen, and Lorenzo Giovannini
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 433–459, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-433-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-433-2025, 2025
Short summary
Coupling the urban canopy model TEB (SURFEXv9.0) with the radiation model SPARTACUS-Urbanv0.6.1 for more realistic urban radiative exchange calculation
Robert Schoetter, Robin James Hogan, Cyril Caliot, and Valéry Masson
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 405–431, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-405-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-405-2025, 2025
Short summary
Forecasting contrail climate forcing for flight planning and air traffic management applications: the CocipGrid model in pycontrails 0.51.0
Zebediah Engberg, Roger Teoh, Tristan Abbott, Thomas Dean, Marc E. J. Stettler, and Marc L. Shapiro
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 253–286, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-253-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-253-2025, 2025
Short summary

Cited articles

AAF: Alberta Agriculture and Forestry, Alberta Climate Information Service (ACIS), https://agriculture.alberta.ca/acis (last access: 25 January 2024), 2022. 
Abdul-Razzak, H. and Ghan, S. J.: A parameterization of aerosol activation, 3, Sectional representation, J. Geophys. Res., 107, 4026, https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD000483, 2022. 
Andronache, C.: Estimates of sulphate aerosol wet scavenging coefficient for locations in the Eastern United States, Atmos. Environ., 38, 795–804, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2003.10.035, 2004. 
Andronache, C., Grönholm, T., Laakso, L., Phillips, V., and Venäläinen, A.: Scavenging of ultrafine particles by rainfall at a boreal site: observations and model estimations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 4739–4754, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-4739-2006, 2006. 
Berthet, S., Leriche, M., Pinty, J.-P., Cuesta, J., and Pigeon, G.: Scavenging of aerosol particles by rain in a cloud resolving model, Atmos. Res., 96, 325–336, 2010. 
Download
Short summary
The article explores the impact of different representations of below-cloud scavenging on model biases. A new scavenging scheme and precipitation-phase partitioning improve the model's performance, with better SO42- scavenging and wet deposition of NO3- and NH4+.