Articles | Volume 17, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-685-2024
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-685-2024
Model evaluation paper
 | 
26 Jan 2024
Model evaluation paper |  | 26 Jan 2024

Modeling below-cloud scavenging of size-resolved particles in GEM-MACHv3.1

Roya Ghahreman, Wanmin Gong, Paul A. Makar, Alexandru Lupu, Amanda Cole, Kulbir Banwait, Colin Lee, and Ayodeji Akingunola

Related authors

Operational, diagnostic, and probabilistic evaluation of AQMEII-4 regional-scale ozone dry deposition: time to harmonize our LULC masks
Ioannis Kioutsioukis, Christian Hogrefe, Paul A. Makar, Ummugulsum Alyuz, Jesse O. Bash, Roberto Bellasio, Roberto Bianconi, Tim Butler, Olivia E. Clifton, Philip Cheung, Alma Hodzic, Richard Kranenburg, Aura Lupascu, Kester Momoh, Juan Luis Perez-Camaño, Jonathan Pleim, Young-Hee Ryu, Roberto San Jose, Donna Schwede, Ranjeet Sokhi, and Stefano Galmarini
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 12923–12953, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-12923-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-12923-2025, 2025
Short summary
Evaluation of plume rise parameterizations in GEM-MACHv2 with analysis of image data using a deep convolutional neural network
Kevin M. Axelrod, Mark Gordon, Mohammad Koushafar, Jingliang Hao, Paul A. Makar, Sepehr Fathi, and Gunho Sohn
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4582,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4582, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Geoscientific Model Development (GMD).
Short summary
A diagnostic intercomparison of modeled ozone dry deposition over North America and Europe using AQMEII4 regional-scale simulations
Christian Hogrefe, Stefano Galmarini, Paul A. Makar, Ioannis Kioutsioukis, Olivia E. Clifton, Ummugulsum Alyuz, Jesse O. Bash, Roberto Bellasio, Roberto Bianconi, Tim Butler, Philip Cheung, Alma Hodzic, Richard Kranenburg, Aurelia Lupascu, Kester Momoh, Juan Luis Perez-Camanyo, Jonathan E. Pleim, Young-Hee Ryu, Roberto San Jose, Martijn Schaap, Donna B. Schwede, and Ranjeet Sokhi
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 12629–12656, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-12629-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-12629-2025, 2025
Short summary
Implementation of the MOSAIC aerosol module (v1.0) in the Canadian air quality model GEM-MACH (v3.1)
Kirill Semeniuk, Ashu Dastoor, and Alex Lupu
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 6479–6515, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-6479-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-6479-2025, 2025
Short summary
Observational ozone datasets over the global oceans and polar regions (version 2024)
Yugo Kanaya, Roberto Sommariva, Alfonso Saiz-Lopez, Andrea Mazzeo, Theodore K. Koenig, Kaori Kawana, James E. Johnson, Aurélie Colomb, Pierre Tulet, Suzie Molloy, Ian E. Galbally, Rainer Volkamer, Anoop Mahajan, John W. Halfacre, Paul B. Shepson, Julia Schmale, Hélène Angot, Byron Blomquist, Matthew D. Shupe, Detlev Helmig, Junsu Gil, Meehye Lee, Sean C. Coburn, Ivan Ortega, Gao Chen, James Lee, Kenneth C. Aikin, David D. Parrish, John S. Holloway, Thomas B. Ryerson, Ilana B. Pollack, Eric J. Williams, Brian M. Lerner, Andrew J. Weinheimer, Teresa Campos, Frank M. Flocke, J. Ryan Spackman, Ilann Bourgeois, Jeff Peischl, Chelsea R. Thompson, Ralf M. Staebler, Amir A. Aliabadi, Wanmin Gong, Roeland Van Malderen, Anne M. Thompson, Ryan M. Stauffer, Debra E. Kollonige, Juan Carlos Gómez Martin, Masatomo Fujiwara, Katie Read, Matthew Rowlinson, Keiichi Sato, Junichi Kurokawa, Yoko Iwamoto, Fumikazu Taketani, Hisahiro Takashima, Mónica Navarro-Comas, Marios Panagi, and Martin G. Schultz
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 17, 4901–4932, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-4901-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-4901-2025, 2025
Short summary

Cited articles

AAF: Alberta Agriculture and Forestry, Alberta Climate Information Service (ACIS), https://agriculture.alberta.ca/acis (last access: 25 January 2024), 2022. 
Abdul-Razzak, H. and Ghan, S. J.: A parameterization of aerosol activation, 3, Sectional representation, J. Geophys. Res., 107, 4026, https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD000483, 2022. 
Andronache, C.: Estimates of sulphate aerosol wet scavenging coefficient for locations in the Eastern United States, Atmos. Environ., 38, 795–804, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2003.10.035, 2004. 
Andronache, C., Grönholm, T., Laakso, L., Phillips, V., and Venäläinen, A.: Scavenging of ultrafine particles by rainfall at a boreal site: observations and model estimations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 4739–4754, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-4739-2006, 2006. 
Berthet, S., Leriche, M., Pinty, J.-P., Cuesta, J., and Pigeon, G.: Scavenging of aerosol particles by rain in a cloud resolving model, Atmos. Res., 96, 325–336, 2010. 
Download
Short summary
The article explores the impact of different representations of below-cloud scavenging on model biases. A new scavenging scheme and precipitation-phase partitioning improve the model's performance, with better SO42- scavenging and wet deposition of NO3- and NH4+.
Share