Articles | Volume 17, issue 16
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-6319-2024
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-6319-2024
Development and technical paper
 | 
27 Aug 2024
Development and technical paper |  | 27 Aug 2024

Deep-learning-driven simulations of boundary layer clouds over the Southern Great Plains

Tianning Su and Yunyan Zhang

Related authors

Best Estimate of the Planetary Boundary Layer Height from Multiple Remote Sensing Measurements
Damao Zhang, Jennifer Comstock, Chitra Sivaraman, Kefei Mo, Raghavendra Krishnamurthy, Jingjing Tian, Tianning Su, Zhanqing Li, and Natalia Roldán-Henao
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3959,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3959, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Measurement Techniques (AMT).
Short summary
Deep-learning-derived planetary boundary layer height from conventional meteorological measurements
Tianning Su and Yunyan Zhang
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 6477–6493, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-6477-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-6477-2024, 2024
Short summary
Methodology to determine the coupling of continental clouds with surface and boundary layer height under cloudy conditions from lidar and meteorological data
Tianning Su, Youtong Zheng, and Zhanqing Li
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 1453–1466, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-1453-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-1453-2022, 2022
Short summary
Investigation of near-global daytime boundary layer height using high-resolution radiosondes: first results and comparison with ERA5, MERRA-2, JRA-55, and NCEP-2 reanalyses
Jianping Guo, Jian Zhang, Kun Yang, Hong Liao, Shaodong Zhang, Kaiming Huang, Yanmin Lv, Jia Shao, Tao Yu, Bing Tong, Jian Li, Tianning Su, Steve H. L. Yim, Ad Stoffelen, Panmao Zhai, and Xiaofeng Xu
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 17079–17097, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-17079-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-17079-2021, 2021
Short summary
The mechanisms and seasonal differences of the impact of aerosols on daytime surface urban heat island effect
Wenchao Han, Zhanqing Li, Fang Wu, Yuwei Zhang, Jianping Guo, Tianning Su, Maureen Cribb, Jiwen Fan, Tianmeng Chen, Jing Wei, and Seoung-Soo Lee
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 6479–6493, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-6479-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-6479-2020, 2020
Short summary

Related subject area

Atmospheric sciences
Accurate space-based NOx emission estimates with the flux divergence approach require fine-scale model information on local oxidation chemistry and profile shapes
Felipe Cifuentes, Henk Eskes, Enrico Dammers, Charlotte Bryan, and Folkert Boersma
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 621–649, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-621-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-621-2025, 2025
Short summary
Exploring a high-level programming model for the NWP domain using ECMWF microphysics schemes
Stefano Ubbiali, Christian Kühnlein, Christoph Schär, Linda Schlemmer, Thomas C. Schulthess, Michael Staneker, and Heini Wernli
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 529–546, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-529-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-529-2025, 2025
Short summary
Quantifying uncertainties in satellite NO2 superobservations for data assimilation and model evaluation
Pieter Rijsdijk, Henk Eskes, Arlene Dingemans, K. Folkert Boersma, Takashi Sekiya, Kazuyuki Miyazaki, and Sander Houweling
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 483–509, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-483-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-483-2025, 2025
Short summary
ML-AMPSIT: Machine Learning-based Automated Multi-method Parameter Sensitivity and Importance analysis Tool
Dario Di Santo, Cenlin He, Fei Chen, and Lorenzo Giovannini
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 433–459, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-433-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-433-2025, 2025
Short summary
Coupling the urban canopy model TEB (SURFEXv9.0) with the radiation model SPARTACUS-Urbanv0.6.1 for more realistic urban radiative exchange calculation
Robert Schoetter, Robin James Hogan, Cyril Caliot, and Valéry Masson
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 405–431, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-405-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-405-2025, 2025
Short summary

Cited articles

Altmann, A., Toloşi, L., Sander, O., and Lengauer, T.: Permutation importance: a corrected feature importance measure, Bioinformatics, 26, 1340–1347, 2010. 
Atmospheric Radiation Measurement user facility (ARM): ARM Best Estimate Data Products (ARMBEATM). Southern Great Plains (SGP) Central Facility, Lamont, OK (C1), compiled by: Xiao, C. and Shaocheng, X., ARM Data Center [data set], https://doi.org/10.5439/1333748, 1994. 
Atmospheric Radiation Measurement user facility (ARM): Active Remote Sensing of CLouds (ARSCL1CLOTH). 2024-02-05 to 2024-02-13, Southern Great Plains (SGP) Central Facility, Lamont, OK (C1), compiled by: Giangrande, S., Wang, D., Clothiaux, E., and Kollias, P., ARM Data Center [data set], https://doi.org/10.5439/1996113, 1996. 
Battaglia, P. W., Hamrick, J. B., Bapst, V., Sanchez-Gonzalez, A., Zambaldi, V., Malinowski, M., Tacchetti, A., Raposo, D., Santoro, A., Faulkner, R., and Gulcehre, C.: Relational inductive biases, deep learning, and graph networks, arXiv [preprint], https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1806.01261, 2018. 
Berg, L. K. and Kassianov, E. I.: Temporal variability of fair-weather cumulus statistics at the ACRF SGP site, J. Climate, 21, 3344–3358, 2008. 
Download
Short summary
Using 2 decades of field observations over the Southern Great Plains, this study developed a deep-learning model to simulate the complex dynamics of boundary layer clouds. The deep-learning model can serve as the cloud parameterization within reanalysis frameworks, offering insights into improving the simulation of low clouds. By quantifying biases due to various meteorological factors and parameterizations, this deep-learning-driven approach helps bridge the observation–modeling divide.
Share