Articles | Volume 17, issue 14
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-5733-2024
© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-5733-2024
© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Development and technical paper
| 
31 Jul 2024
Development and technical paper |
| 31 Jul 2024
| 31 Jul 2024
Bayesian hierarchical model for bias-correcting climate models
Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Lancaster University, Lancaster, United Kingdom
Data Science Institute, Lancaster University, Lancaster, United Kingdom
Erick A. Chacón-Montalván
Escuela Profesional de Ingeniería Estadística, Universidad Nacional de Ingeniería, Lima, Peru
Amber Leeson
Data Science Institute, Lancaster University, Lancaster, United Kingdom
Lancaster Environment Center, Lancaster University, Lancaster, United Kingdom
Related authors
Jeremy Carter, Amber Leeson, Andrew Orr, Christoph Kittel, and J. Melchior van Wessem
The Cryosphere, 16, 3815–3841, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-3815-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-3815-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Climate models provide valuable information for studying processes such as the collapse of ice shelves over Antarctica which impact estimates of sea level rise. This paper examines variability across climate simulations over Antarctica for fields including snowfall, temperature and melt. Significant systematic differences between outputs are found, occurring at both large and fine spatial scales across Antarctica. Results are important for future impact assessments and model development.
Emily Glen, Alison F. Banwell, Katie E. Miles, Amber A. Leeson, Rebecca L. Dell, Malcolm McMillan, and Jennifer Maddalena
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-5159, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-5159, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for The Cryosphere (TC).
Short summary
Short summary
Using satellite imagery and machine learning, we created the first Greenland-wide dataset of slush. We found that it covers about three percent of the ice sheet each summer and expands in area and to higher elevations in years of high melt. Slush influences ice sheet mass loss, and our maps help to improve understanding of meltwater processes in a warming climate.
Emily Glen, Amber Leeson, Alison F. Banwell, Jennifer Maddalena, Diarmuid Corr, Olivia Atkins, Brice Noël, and Malcolm McMillan
The Cryosphere, 19, 1047–1066, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-1047-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-1047-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We compare surface meltwater features from optical satellite imagery in the Russell–Leverett glacier catchment during high (2019) and low (2018) melt years. In the high melt year, features appear at higher elevations, meltwater systems are more connected, small lakes are more frequent, and slush is more widespread. These findings provide insights into how a warming climate, where high melt years become common, could alter meltwater distribution and dynamics on the Greenland Ice Sheet.
Ryan Hossaini, David Sherry, Zihao Wang, Martyn P. Chipperfield, Wuhu Feng, David E. Oram, Karina E. Adcock, Stephen A. Montzka, Isobel J. Simpson, Andrea Mazzeo, Amber A. Leeson, Elliot Atlas, and Charles C.-K. Chou
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 13457–13475, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-13457-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-13457-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
DCE (1,2-dichloroethane) is an industrial chemical used to produce PVC (polyvinyl chloride). We analysed DCE production data to estimate global DCE emissions (2002–2020). The emissions were included in an atmospheric model and evaluated by comparing simulated DCE to DCE measurements in the troposphere. We show that DCE contributes ozone-depleting Cl to the stratosphere and that this has increased with increasing DCE emissions. DCE’s impact on stratospheric O3 is currently small but non-zero.
Laura Melling, Amber Leeson, Malcolm McMillan, Jennifer Maddalena, Jade Bowling, Emily Glen, Louise Sandberg Sørensen, Mai Winstrup, and Rasmus Lørup Arildsen
The Cryosphere, 18, 543–558, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-543-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-543-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Lakes on glaciers hold large volumes of water which can drain through the ice, influencing estimates of sea level rise. To estimate water volume, we must calculate lake depth. We assessed the accuracy of three satellite-based depth detection methods on a study area in western Greenland and considered the implications for quantifying the volume of water within lakes. We found that the most popular method of detecting depth on the ice sheet scale has higher uncertainty than previously assumed.
Louise Sandberg Sørensen, Rasmus Bahbah, Sebastian B. Simonsen, Natalia Havelund Andersen, Jade Bowling, Noel Gourmelen, Alex Horton, Nanna B. Karlsson, Amber Leeson, Jennifer Maddalena, Malcolm McMillan, Anne Solgaard, and Birgit Wessel
The Cryosphere, 18, 505–523, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-505-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-505-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Under the right topographic and hydrological conditions, lakes may form beneath the large ice sheets. Some of these subglacial lakes are active, meaning that they periodically drain and refill. When a subglacial lake drains rapidly, it may cause the ice surface above to collapse, and here we investigate how to improve the monitoring of active subglacial lakes in Greenland by monitoring how their associated collapse basins change over time.
Prateek Gantayat, Alison F. Banwell, Amber A. Leeson, James M. Lea, Dorthe Petersen, Noel Gourmelen, and Xavier Fettweis
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 5803–5823, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-5803-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-5803-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
We developed a new supraglacial hydrology model for the Greenland Ice Sheet. This model simulates surface meltwater routing, meltwater drainage, supraglacial lake (SGL) overflow, and formation of lake ice. The model was able to reproduce 80 % of observed lake locations and provides a good match between the observed and modelled temporal evolution of SGLs.
Jeremy Carter, Amber Leeson, Andrew Orr, Christoph Kittel, and J. Melchior van Wessem
The Cryosphere, 16, 3815–3841, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-3815-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-3815-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Climate models provide valuable information for studying processes such as the collapse of ice shelves over Antarctica which impact estimates of sea level rise. This paper examines variability across climate simulations over Antarctica for fields including snowfall, temperature and melt. Significant systematic differences between outputs are found, occurring at both large and fine spatial scales across Antarctica. Results are important for future impact assessments and model development.
Daniel Clarkson, Emma Eastoe, and Amber Leeson
The Cryosphere, 16, 1597–1607, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-1597-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-1597-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The Greenland ice sheet has seen large amounts of melt in recent years, and accurately modelling temperatures is vital to understand how much of the ice sheet is melting. We estimate the probability of melt from ice surface temperature data to identify which areas of the ice sheet have experienced melt and estimate temperature quantiles. Our results suggest that for large areas of the ice sheet, melt has become more likely over the past 2 decades and high temperatures are also becoming warmer.
Diarmuid Corr, Amber Leeson, Malcolm McMillan, Ce Zhang, and Thomas Barnes
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 14, 209–228, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-209-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-209-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
We identify 119 km2 of meltwater area over West Antarctica in January 2017. In combination with Stokes et al., 2019, this forms the first continent-wide assessment helping to quantify the mass balance of Antarctica and its contribution to global sea level rise. We apply thresholds for meltwater classification to satellite images, mapping the extent and manually post-processing to remove false positives. Our study provides a high-fidelity dataset to train and validate machine learning methods.
Thomas James Barnes, Amber Alexandra Leeson, Malcolm McMillan, Vincent Verjans, Jeremy Carter, and Christoph Kittel
The Cryosphere Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-2021-214, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-2021-214, 2021
Revised manuscript not accepted
Short summary
Short summary
We find that the area covered by lakes on George VI ice shelf in 2020 is similar to that seen in other years such as 1989. However, the climate conditions are much more in favour of lakes forming. We find that it is likely that snowfall, and the build up of a surface snow layer limits the development of lakes on the surface of George VI ice shelf in 2020. We also find that in future, snowfall is predicted to decrease, and therefore this limiting effect may be reduced in future.
Cited articles
Bader, D., Covey, C., Gutowski, W., Held, I., Kunkel, K., Miller, R., Tokmakian, R., and Zhang, M.: Climate Models: An Assessment of Strengths and Limitations, Climate Models: An Assessment of Strengths and Limitations, ISBN 9781507847190, 2008. a
Beyer, R., Krapp, M., and Manica, A.: An empirical evaluation of bias correction methods for palaeoclimate simulations, Clim. Past, 16, 1493–1508, https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-1493-2020, 2020. a, b
Carter, J.: Bias Correction of Climate Models using a Bayesian Hierarchical Model: Code, Zenodo [code], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10053653, 2023a. a
Carter, J.: Data used in generation of results in “Bias Correction of Climate Models using a Bayesian Hierarchical Model” J.Carter et. al., Zenodo [data set], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10053531, 2023b. a
Carter, J., Leeson, A., Orr, A., Kittel, C., and van Wessem, M.: Variability in Antarctic surface climatology across regional climate models and reanalysis datasets, The Cryosphere, 16, 3815–3841, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-3815-2022, 2022. a, b
Cattiaux, J., Douville, H., and Peings, Y.: European temperatures in CMIP5: origins of present-day biases and future uncertainties, Clim. Dynam., 41, 2889–2907, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-013-1731-y, 2013. a
Das, A., Rokaya, P., and Lindenschmidt, K.-E.: The impact of a bias-correction approach (delta change) applied directly to hydrological model output when modelling the severity of ice jam flooding under future climate scenarios, Climatic Change, 172, 19, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-022-03364-5, 2022. a, b
Datta, A., Banerjee, S., Finley, A. O., and Gelfand, A. E.: Hierarchical Nearest-Neighbor Gaussian Process Models for Large Geostatistical Datasets, J. Am. Stat. Assoc., 111, 800–812, https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.2015.1044091, 2016. a
DeConto, R. M. and Pollard, D.: Contribution of Antarctica to past and future sea-level rise, Nature, 531, 591–597, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature17145, 2016. a
Doblas-Reyes, F. J., Sörensson, A. A., Almazroui, M., Dosio, A., Gutowski, W. J., Haarsma, R., Hamdi, R., Hewitson, B., Kwon, W.-T., Lamptey, B. L., Maraun, D., Stephenson, T. S., Takayabu, I., Terray, L., Turner, A., and Zuo, Z.: Linking global to regional climate change, in: Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, edited by: Masson-Delmotte, V., Zhai, P., Pirani, A., Connors, S. L., Péan, C., Berger, S., Caud, N., Chen, Y., Goldfarb, L., Gomis, M. I., Huang, M., Leitzell, K., Lonnoy, E., Matthews, J. B. R., Maycock, T. K., Waterfield, T., Yelekçi, O., Yu, R., and Zhou, B., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, 1363–1512, https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157896.001, 2021. a
Flato, G., Marotzke, J., Abiodun, B., Braconnot, P., Chou, S. C., Collins, W., Cox, P., Driouech, F., Emori, S., Eyring, V., Forest, C., Gleckler, P., Guilyardi, E., Jakob, C., Kattsov, V., Reason, C., and Rummukainen, M.: Evaluation of Climate Models, in: Climate Change 2013 – The Physical Science Basis: Working Group I Contribution to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, edited by: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 741–866, ISBN 978-1-107-05799-9, https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.020, 2013. a, b
Foreman-Mackey, D.: dfm/tinygp: The tiniest of Gaussian Process libraries, Zenodo [code], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7646759, 2023 a
Giorgi, F.: Thirty Years of Regional Climate Modeling: Where Are We and Where Are We Going next?, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 124, 5696–5723, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JD030094, 2019. a, b
Greeves, C., Pope, V., Stratton, R., and Martin, G.: Representation of Northern Hemisphere winter storm tracks in climate models, Clim. Dynam., 28, 683–702, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-006-0205-x, 2007. a
Guilyardi, E., Wittenberg, A., Fedorov, A., Collins, C., Capotondi, A., Van Oldenborgh, G. J., and Stockdale, T.: Understanding El Niño in Ocean-Atmosphere General Circulation Models: Progress and Challenges, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 90, 325–340, https://doi.org/10.1175/2008BAMS2387.1, 2009. a
Haerter, J. O., Hagemann, S., Moseley, C., and Piani, C.: Climate model bias correction and the role of timescales, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 15, 1065–1079, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-15-1065-2011, 2011. a
Harris, C. R., Millman, K. J., van der Walt, S. J., Gommers, R., Virtanen, P., Cournapeau, D., Wieser, E., Taylor, J., Berg, S., Smith, N. J., Kern, R., Picus, M., Hoyer, S., van Kerkwijk, M. H., Brett, M., Haldane, A., del Río, J. F., Wiebe, M., Peterson, P., Gérard-Marchant, P., Sheppard, K., Reddy, T., Weckesser, W., Abbasi, H., Gohlke, C., and Oliphant, T. E.: Array programming with NumPy, Nature, 585, 357–362, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2, 2020. a
Hensman, J., Matthews, A. G., Filippone, M., and Ghahramani, Z.: MCMC for Variationally Sparse Gaussian Processes, in: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 28, Curran Associates, Inc., https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper_files/paper/2015/hash/6b180037abbebea991d8b1232f8a8ca9-Abstract.html (last access: 24 March 2024), 2015. a
Hoffman, M. D. and Gelman, A.: The No-U-Turn Sampler: Adaptively Setting Path Lengths in Hamiltonian Monte Carlo, J. Mach. Learn. Re., 15, 1593–1623, http://jmlr.org/papers/v15/hoffman14a.html (last access: 11 October 2023), 2014. a
Hourdin, F., Mauritsen, T., Gettelman, A., Golaz, J.-C., Balaji, V., Duan, Q., Folini, D., Ji, D., Klocke, D., Qian, Y., Rauser, F., Rio, C., Tomassini, L., Watanabe, M., and Williamson, D.: The Art and Science of Climate Model Tuning, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 98, 589–602, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-15-00135.1, 2017. a
Hunter, J. D.: Matplotlib: A 2D Graphics Environment, Comput. Sci. Eng., 9, 90–95, https://doi.org/10.1109/MCSE.2007.55, 2007. a
Liu, M., Rajagopalan, K., Chung, S. H., Jiang, X., Harrison, J., Nergui, T., Guenther, A., Miller, C., Reyes, J., Tague, C., Choate, J., Salathé, E. P., Stöckle, C. O., and Adam, J. C.: What is the importance of climate model bias when projecting the impacts of climate change on land surface processes?, Biogeosciences, 11, 2601–2622, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-11-2601-2014, 2014. a, b
Maraun, D.: Bias Correcting Climate Change Simulations – a Critical Review, Current Climate Change Reports, 2, 211–220, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40641-016-0050-x, 2016. a, b
Mendez, M., Maathuis, B., Hein-Griggs, D., and Alvarado-Gamboa, L.-F.: Performance Evaluation of Bias Correction Methods for Climate Change Monthly Precipitation Projections over Costa Rica, Water, 12, 482, https://doi.org/10.3390/w12020482, 2020. a
Phan, D., Pradhan, N., and Jankowiak, M.: Composable Effects for Flexible and Accelerated Probabilistic Programming in NumPyro, arXiv [preprint], https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1912.11554, 2019. a, b, c
Qian, W. and Chang, H. H.: Projecting Health Impacts of Future Temperature: A Comparison of Quantile-Mapping Bias-Correction Methods, Int. J. Environ. Res. Pub. He., 18, 1992, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18041992, 2021. a, b, c
Rasmussen, C. E.: Gaussian Processes in Machine Learning, in: Advanced Lectures on Machine Learning: ML Summer Schools 2003, Canberra, Australia, February 2–14 2003, Tübingen, Germany, August 4–16 2003, Revised Lectures, edited by: Bousquet, O., von Luxburg, U., and Rätsch, G., Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 63–71, ISBN 978-3-540-28650-9, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-28650-9_4, 2004. a
Räty, O., Räisänen, J., and Ylhäisi, J. S.: Evaluation of delta change and bias correction methods for future daily precipitation: intermodel cross-validation using ENSEMBLES simulations, Clim. Dynam., 42, 2287–2303, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-014-2130-8, 2014. a
Sippel, S., Otto, F. E. L., Forkel, M., Allen, M. R., Guillod, B. P., Heimann, M., Reichstein, M., Seneviratne, S. I., Thonicke, K., and Mahecha, M. D.: A novel bias correction methodology for climate impact simulations, Earth Syst. Dynam., 7, 71–88, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-7-71-2016, 2016. a
Tebaldi, C., Debeire, K., Eyring, V., Fischer, E., Fyfe, J., Friedlingstein, P., Knutti, R., Lowe, J., O'Neill, B., Sanderson, B., van Vuuren, D., Riahi, K., Meinshausen, M., Nicholls, Z., Tokarska, K. B., Hurtt, G., Kriegler, E., Lamarque, J.-F., Meehl, G., Moss, R., Bauer, S. E., Boucher, O., Brovkin, V., Byun, Y.-H., Dix, M., Gualdi, S., Guo, H., John, J. G., Kharin, S., Kim, Y., Koshiro, T., Ma, L., Olivié, D., Panickal, S., Qiao, F., Rong, X., Rosenbloom, N., Schupfner, M., Séférian, R., Sellar, A., Semmler, T., Shi, X., Song, Z., Steger, C., Stouffer, R., Swart, N., Tachiiri, K., Tang, Q., Tatebe, H., Voldoire, A., Volodin, E., Wyser, K., Xin, X., Yang, S., Yu, Y., and Ziehn, T.: Climate model projections from the Scenario Model Intercomparison Project (ScenarioMIP) of CMIP6, Earth Syst. Dynam., 12, 253–293, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-12-253-2021, 2021. a
Teutschbein, C. and Seibert, J.: Bias correction of regional climate model simulations for hydrological climate-change impact studies: Review and evaluation of different methods, J. Hydrol., 456-457, 12–29, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.05.052, 2012. a
Wang, Y. and Chaib-draa, B.: An online Bayesian filtering framework for Gaussian process regression: Application to global surface temperature analysis, Expert Syst. Appl., 67, 285–295, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2016.09.018, 2017. a
Zhang, Y., Feng, M., Zhang, W., Wang, H., and Wang, P.: A Gaussian process regression-based sea surface temperature interpolation algorithm, J. Ocean. Limnol., 39, 1211–1221, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00343-020-0062-1, 2021. a
Short summary
Climate models are essential tools in the study of climate change and its wide-ranging impacts on life on Earth. However, the output is often afflicted with some bias. In this paper, a novel model is developed to predict and correct bias in the output of climate models. The model captures uncertainty in the correction and explicitly models underlying spatial correlation between points. These features are of key importance for climate change impact assessments and resulting decision-making.
Climate models are essential tools in the study of climate change and its wide-ranging impacts...
