Articles | Volume 17, issue 12
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4891-2024
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4891-2024
Development and technical paper
 | 
21 Jun 2024
Development and technical paper |  | 21 Jun 2024

A parameterization scheme for the floating wind farm in a coupled atmosphere–wave model (COAWST v3.7)

Shaokun Deng, Shengmu Yang, Shengli Chen, Daoyi Chen, Xuefeng Yang, and Shanshan Cui

Related authors

Inclusion of the subgrid wake effect between turbines in the wind farm parameterization of WRF
Wei Liu, Xuefeng Yang, Shengli Chen, Shaokun Deng, Peining Yu, and Jiuxing Xing
Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2023-174,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2023-174, 2023
Revised manuscript not accepted
Short summary

Related subject area

Atmospheric sciences
Development of a fast radiative transfer model for ground-based microwave radiometers (ARMS-gb v1.0): validation and comparison to RTTOV-gb
Yi-Ning Shi, Jun Yang, Wei Han, Lujie Han, Jiajia Mao, Wanlin Kan, and Fuzhong Weng
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 1947–1964, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1947-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1947-2025, 2025
Short summary
Indian Institute of Tropical Meteorology (IITM) High-Resolution Global Forecast Model version 1: an attempt to resolve monsoon prediction deadlock
R. Phani Murali Krishna, Siddharth Kumar, A. Gopinathan Prajeesh, Peter Bechtold, Nils Wedi, Kumar Roy, Malay Ganai, B. Revanth Reddy, Snehlata Tirkey, Tanmoy Goswami, Radhika Kanase, Sahadat Sarkar, Medha Deshpande, and Parthasarathi Mukhopadhyay
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 1879–1894, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1879-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1879-2025, 2025
Short summary
Cell-tracking-based framework for assessing nowcasting model skill in reproducing growth and decay of convective rainfall
Jenna Ritvanen, Seppo Pulkkinen, Dmitri Moisseev, and Daniele Nerini
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 1851–1878, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1851-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1851-2025, 2025
Short summary
NeuralMie (v1.0): an aerosol optics emulator
Andrew Geiss and Po-Lun Ma
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 1809–1827, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1809-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1809-2025, 2025
Short summary
Simulation performance of planetary boundary layer schemes in WRF v4.3.1 for near-surface wind over the western Sichuan Basin: a single-site assessment
Qin Wang, Bo Zeng, Gong Chen, and Yaoting Li
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 1769–1784, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1769-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1769-2025, 2025
Short summary

Cited articles

Abkar, M. and Porté-Agel, F.: A new wind-farm parameterization for large-scale atmospheric models, J. Renew. Sustain. Energ., 7, 013121, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4907600, 2015. 
Alari, V. and Raudsepp, U.: Simulation of wave damping near coast due to offshore wind farms, J. Coast. Res., 279, 143–148, https://doi.org/10.2112/JCOASTRES-D-10-00054.1, 2012. 
AlSam, A., Szasz, R., and Revstedt, J.: The influence of sea waves on offshore wind turbine aerodynamics, J. Energ. Resour. Technol., Transactions of the ASME, 137, 1–10, https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4031005, 2015. 
Archer, C., Wu, S., Ma, Y., and Jiménez, P.: Two corrections for turbulent kinetic energy generated by wind farms in the WRF model, Mon. Weather Rev., 148, 4823–4835, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-20-0097.1, 2020. 
Battjes, J. and Janssen, J.: Energy loss and set-up due to breaking of random waves, Costal Eng. Proc., 1, 32, https://doi.org/10.9753/icce.v16.32, 1978. 
Download
Short summary
Global offshore wind power development is moving from offshore to deeper waters, where floating offshore wind turbines have an advantage over bottom-fixed turbines. However, current wind farm parameterization schemes in mesoscale models are not applicable to floating turbines. We propose a floating wind farm parameterization scheme that accounts for the attenuation of the significant wave height by floating turbines. The results indicate that it has a significant effect on the power output.
Share