Geoscientific Model Development
Geoscientific Model Development
GMD
Articles | Volume 17, issue 6
Articles | Volume 17, issue 6
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2471-2024
© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2471-2024
© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Articles | Volume 17, issue 6
Model evaluation paper
 | 
02 Apr 2024
Model evaluation paper |  | 02 Apr 2024

Intercomparison of multiple two-way coupled meteorology and air quality models (WRF v4.1.1–CMAQ v5.3.1, WRF–Chem v4.1.1, and WRF v3.7.1–CHIMERE v2020r1) in eastern China

Chao Gao, Xuelei Zhang, Aijun Xiu, Qingqing Tong, Hongmei Zhao, Shichun Zhang, Guangyi Yang, Mengduo Zhang, and Shengjin Xie

Viewed

Total article views: 1,376 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
1,046 279 51 1,376 75 31 42
  • HTML: 1,046
  • PDF: 279
  • XML: 51
  • Total: 1,376
  • Supplement: 75
  • BibTeX: 31
  • EndNote: 42
Views and downloads (calculated since 27 Mar 2023)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 27 Mar 2023)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 1,376 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 1,370 with geography defined and 6 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 16 May 2024
Download
Short summary
A comprehensive comparison study is conducted targeting the performances of three two-way coupled meteorology and air quality models (WRF-CMAQ, WRF-Chem, and WRF-CHIMERE) for eastern China during 2017. The impacts of aerosol–radiation–cloud interactions on these models’ results are evaluated against satellite and surface observations. Further improvements to the calculation of aerosol–cloud interactions in these models are crucial to ensure more accurate and timely air quality forecasts.
Read more