Articles | Volume 17, issue 1
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-117-2024
© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Special issue:
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-117-2024
© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Development and technical paper
| 
09 Jan 2024
Development and technical paper |
| 09 Jan 2024
| 09 Jan 2024
The wave-age-dependent stress parameterisation (WASP) for momentum and heat turbulent fluxes at sea in SURFEX v8.1
Marie-Noëlle Bouin
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
CNRM, University of Toulouse, Météo-France, CNRS, Toulouse, France
University of Brest, CNRS, Ifremer, IRD, Laboratoire d'Océanographie Physique et Spatiale (LOPS), IUEM, Plouzané, France
Cindy Lebeaupin Brossier
CNRM, University of Toulouse, Météo-France, CNRS, Toulouse, France
Sylvie Malardel
Laboratoire de l’Atmosphère et des Cyclones, University of La Réunion, CNRS, Météo-France, Saint-Denis, France
Aurore Voldoire
CNRM, University of Toulouse, Météo-France, CNRS, Toulouse, France
César Sauvage
CNRM, University of Toulouse, Météo-France, CNRS, Toulouse, France
now at: Physical Oceanography Department, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Woods Hole, MA, USA
Related authors
Aurore Voldoire, Romain Roehrig, Hervé Giordani, Robin Waldman, Yunyan Zhang, Shaocheng Xie, and Marie-Nöelle Bouin
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 3347–3370, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-3347-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-3347-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
A single-column version of the global climate model CNRM-CM6-1 has been designed to ease development and validation of the model physics at the air–sea interface in a simplified environment. This model is then used to assess the ability to represent the sea surface temperature diurnal cycle. We conclude that the sea surface temperature diurnal variability is reasonably well represented in CNRM-CM6-1 with a 1 h coupling time step and the upper-ocean model resolution of 1 m.
César Sauvage, Cindy Lebeaupin Brossier, and Marie-Noëlle Bouin
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 11857–11887, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-11857-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-11857-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Air–sea processes are key elements during Mediterranean heavy precipitation events. We aim to progress in their representation in high-resolution weather forecast. Using coupled ocean–air–wave simulations, we investigated air–sea mechanisms modulated by ocean and waves during a case that occurred in southern France. Results showed significant impact of the forecast on low-level dynamics and air–sea fluxes and illustrated potential benefits of coupled numerical weather prediction systems.
Nefeli Makrygianni, Ségolène Berthou, David L. A. Flack, Cindy Lebeaupin Brossier, Jonathan Beuvier, Juan Manuel Castillo, Emiliano Renzi, Clare O’Neill, Daniel Peláez-Zapata, Frederic Dias, Huw Lewis, and Diego Bruciaferri
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3555, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3555, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences (NHESS).
Short summary
Short summary
Meteotsunamis are rare but dangerous anomalous waves triggered by atmospheric disturbances, they are not currently forecast in Northwest Europe. We analysed the strongest recorded event on June 18, 2022, which reached 1 m amplitude. We showed high-resolution, high-frequency coupled models can predict such events up to three days ahead and help better understand their atmospheric triggers. These models, together with improved observations, can enhance early warnings and coastal safety.
Alisée A. Chaigneau, Angélique Melet, Aurore Voldoire, Maialen Irazoqui Apecechea, Guillaume Reffray, Stéphane Law-Chune, and Lotfi Aouf
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 4031–4048, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-4031-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-4031-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Climate-change-induced sea level rise increases the frequency of extreme sea levels. We analyze projected changes in extreme sea levels for western European coasts produced with high-resolution models (∼ 6 km). Unlike commonly used coarse-scale global climate models, this approach allows us to simulate key processes driving coastal sea level variations, such as long-term sea level rise, tides, storm surges induced by low atmospheric surface pressure and winds, waves, and their interactions.
Marc Mallet, Aurore Voldoire, Fabien Solmon, Pierre Nabat, Thomas Drugé, and Romain Roehrig
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 12509–12535, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-12509-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-12509-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
This study investigates the interactions between smoke aerosols and climate in tropical Africa using a coupled ocean–atmosphere–aerosol climate model. The work shows that smoke plumes have a significant impact by increasing the low-cloud fraction, decreasing the ocean and continental surface temperature and reducing the precipitation of coastal western Africa. It also highlights the role of the ocean temperature response and its feedbacks for the September–November season.
Alisée A. Chaigneau, Stéphane Law-Chune, Angélique Melet, Aurore Voldoire, Guillaume Reffray, and Lotfi Aouf
Ocean Sci., 19, 1123–1143, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-19-1123-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-19-1123-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Wind waves and swells are major drivers of coastal environment changes and can drive coastal marine hazards such as coastal flooding. In this paper, by using numerical modeling along the European Atlantic coastline, we assess how present and future wave characteristics are impacted by sea level changes. For example, at the end of the century under the SSP5-8.5 climate change scenario, extreme significant wave heights are higher by up to +40 % due to the effect of tides and mean sea level rise.
Thibault Guinaldo, Aurore Voldoire, Robin Waldman, Stéphane Saux Picart, and Hervé Roquet
Ocean Sci., 19, 629–647, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-19-629-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-19-629-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
In the summer of 2022, France experienced a series of unprecedented heatwaves. This study is the first to examine the response of sea surface temperatures to these events, using spatial operational data and attributing the observed abnormally warm SSTs to atmospheric forcings. The findings of this study underscore the critical need for an efficient and sustainable operational system to monitor alterations that threaten the oceans in the context of climate change.
Aurore Voldoire, Romain Roehrig, Hervé Giordani, Robin Waldman, Yunyan Zhang, Shaocheng Xie, and Marie-Nöelle Bouin
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 3347–3370, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-3347-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-3347-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
A single-column version of the global climate model CNRM-CM6-1 has been designed to ease development and validation of the model physics at the air–sea interface in a simplified environment. This model is then used to assess the ability to represent the sea surface temperature diurnal cycle. We conclude that the sea surface temperature diurnal variability is reasonably well represented in CNRM-CM6-1 with a 1 h coupling time step and the upper-ocean model resolution of 1 m.
Joris Pianezze, Jonathan Beuvier, Cindy Lebeaupin Brossier, Guillaume Samson, Ghislain Faure, and Gilles Garric
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 1301–1324, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-1301-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-1301-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Most numerical weather and oceanic prediction systems do not consider ocean–atmosphere feedback during forecast, and this can lead to significant forecast errors, notably in cases of severe situations. A new high-resolution coupled ocean–atmosphere system is presented in this paper. This forecast-oriented system, based on current regional operational systems and evaluated using satellite and in situ observations, shows that the coupling improves both atmospheric and oceanic forecasts.
Alisée A. Chaigneau, Guillaume Reffray, Aurore Voldoire, and Angélique Melet
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 2035–2062, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-2035-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-2035-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Climate-change-induced sea level rise is a major threat for coastal and low-lying regions. Projections of coastal sea level changes are thus of great interest for coastal risk assessment and have significantly developed in recent years. In this paper, the objective is to provide high-resolution (6 km) projections of sea level changes in the northeastern Atlantic region bordering western Europe. For that purpose, a regional model is used to refine existing coarse global projections.
Samira Khodayar, Silvio Davolio, Paolo Di Girolamo, Cindy Lebeaupin Brossier, Emmanouil Flaounas, Nadia Fourrie, Keun-Ok Lee, Didier Ricard, Benoit Vie, Francois Bouttier, Alberto Caldas-Alvarez, and Veronique Ducrocq
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 17051–17078, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-17051-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-17051-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Heavy precipitation (HP) constitutes a major meteorological threat in the western Mediterranean. Every year, recurrent events affect the area with fatal consequences. Despite this being a well-known issue, open questions still remain. The understanding of the underlying mechanisms and the modeling representation of the events must be improved. In this article we present the most recent lessons learned from the Hydrological Cycle in the Mediterranean Experiment (HyMeX).
César Sauvage, Cindy Lebeaupin Brossier, and Marie-Noëlle Bouin
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 11857–11887, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-11857-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-11857-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Air–sea processes are key elements during Mediterranean heavy precipitation events. We aim to progress in their representation in high-resolution weather forecast. Using coupled ocean–air–wave simulations, we investigated air–sea mechanisms modulated by ocean and waves during a case that occurred in southern France. Results showed significant impact of the forecast on low-level dynamics and air–sea fluxes and illustrated potential benefits of coupled numerical weather prediction systems.
Olivier Caumont, Marc Mandement, François Bouttier, Judith Eeckman, Cindy Lebeaupin Brossier, Alexane Lovat, Olivier Nuissier, and Olivier Laurantin
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 1135–1157, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-21-1135-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-21-1135-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
This study focuses on the heavy precipitation event of 14 and 15 October 2018, which caused deadly flash floods in the Aude basin in south-western France.
The case is studied from a meteorological point of view using various operational numerical weather prediction systems, as well as a unique combination of observations from both standard and personal weather stations. The peculiarities of this case compared to other cases of Mediterranean heavy precipitation events are presented.
Claudia Tebaldi, Kevin Debeire, Veronika Eyring, Erich Fischer, John Fyfe, Pierre Friedlingstein, Reto Knutti, Jason Lowe, Brian O'Neill, Benjamin Sanderson, Detlef van Vuuren, Keywan Riahi, Malte Meinshausen, Zebedee Nicholls, Katarzyna B. Tokarska, George Hurtt, Elmar Kriegler, Jean-Francois Lamarque, Gerald Meehl, Richard Moss, Susanne E. Bauer, Olivier Boucher, Victor Brovkin, Young-Hwa Byun, Martin Dix, Silvio Gualdi, Huan Guo, Jasmin G. John, Slava Kharin, YoungHo Kim, Tsuyoshi Koshiro, Libin Ma, Dirk Olivié, Swapna Panickal, Fangli Qiao, Xinyao Rong, Nan Rosenbloom, Martin Schupfner, Roland Séférian, Alistair Sellar, Tido Semmler, Xiaoying Shi, Zhenya Song, Christian Steger, Ronald Stouffer, Neil Swart, Kaoru Tachiiri, Qi Tang, Hiroaki Tatebe, Aurore Voldoire, Evgeny Volodin, Klaus Wyser, Xiaoge Xin, Shuting Yang, Yongqiang Yu, and Tilo Ziehn
Earth Syst. Dynam., 12, 253–293, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-12-253-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-12-253-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
We present an overview of CMIP6 ScenarioMIP outcomes from up to 38 participating ESMs according to the new SSP-based scenarios. Average temperature and precipitation projections according to a wide range of forcings, spanning a wider range than the CMIP5 projections, are documented as global averages and geographic patterns. Times of crossing various warming levels are computed, together with benefits of mitigation for selected pairs of scenarios. Comparisons with CMIP5 are also discussed.
Cited articles
Albrecht, B. A., Bretherton, C. S., Johnson, D., Scubert, W. H., and Frisch, A. S.: The Atlantic stratocumulus transition experiment – ASTEX, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 76, 889–904, 1995. a
Andreas, E. L.: Spray stress revisited, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 34, 1429–1440, 2004. a
Bao, J.-W., Fairall, C. W., Michelson, S., and Bianco, L.: Parameterizations of sea-spray impact on the air–sea momentum and heat fluxes, Mon. Weather Rev., 139, 3781–3797, 2011. a
Beljaars, A. C. M.: The parametrization of surface fluxes in large-scale models under free convection, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 121, 255–270, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49712152203, 1994. a
Bharti, V., Fairall, C. W., Blomquist, B. W., Huang, Y., Protat, A., Sullivan, P. P., Siems, S. T., and Manton, M. J.: Air-sea heat and momentum fluxes in the Southern Ocean, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 124, 12426–12443, 2019. a
Black, P. G., D'Asaro, E. A., Drennan, W. M., French, J. R., Niiler, P. P., Sanford, T. B., Terrill, E. J., Walsh, E. J., and Zhang, J. A.: Air–sea exchange in hurricanes: Synthesis of observations from the coupled boundary layer air–sea transfer experiment, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 88, 357–374, 2007. a, b, c
Blomquist, B. W., Brumer, S. E., Fairall, C. W., Huebert, B. J., Zappa, C. J., Brooks, I. M., Yang, M., Bariteau, L., Prytherch, J., Hare, J. E., Czerski, H., Matel, A., and Pascal, R. W.: Wind speed and sea state dependencies of air-sea gas transfer: Results from the High Wind speed Gas exchange Study (HiWinGS), J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 122, 8034–8062, 2017. a
Bouin, M.-N.: WASP turbulent fluxes parameterization for SURFEX 8.0, Zenodo [code], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4557378, 2021. a
Bouin, M.-N.: Datasets and model outputs used for validating WASP for SURFEX v8.0, Zenodo [data set], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6783319, 2022. a
Bouin, M.-N., Redelsperger, J.-L., and Lebeaupin Brossier, C.: Processes leading to deep convection and sensitivity to sea-state representation during HyMeX IOP8 heavy precipitation event, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 143, 2600–2615, 2017. a
Bousquet, O., Barbary, D., Bielli, S., Kebir, S., Raynaud, L., Malardel, S., and Faure, G.: An evaluation of tropical cyclone forecast in the Southwest Indian Ocean basin with AROME-Indian Ocean convection-permitting numerical weather predicting system, Atmos. Sci. Lett., 21, e950, https://doi.org/10.1002/asl.950, 2020. a
Brousseau, P., Seity, Y., Ricard, D., and Léger, J.: Improvement of the forecast of convective activity from the AROME-France system, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 142, 2231–2243, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2822, 2016. a
Bruch, W., Piazzola, J., Branger, H., van Eijk, A. M., Luneau, C., Bourras, D., and Tedeschi, G.: Sea-Spray-Generation Dependence on Wind and Wave Combinations: A Laboratory Study, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 180, 477–505, 2021. a
Bryan, G. H.: Effects of surface exchange coefficients and turbulence length scales on the intensity and structure of numerically simulated hurricanes, Mon. Weather Rev., 140, 1125–1143, 2012. a
Charnock, H.: Wind stress on a water surface, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 81, 639–640, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49708135027, 1955. a
Chen, X., Hara, T., and Ginis, I.: Impact of shoaling ocean surface waves on wind stress and drag coefficient in coastal waters: 1. Uniform wind, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 125, e2020JC016222, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JC016222, 2020. a
DeCosmo, J., Katsaros, K., Smith, S., Anderson, R., Oost, W., Bumke, K., and Chadwick, H.: Air-sea exchange of water vapor and sensible heat: The Humidity Exchange Over the Sea (HEXOS) results, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 101, 12001–12016, 1996. a
Déqué, M., Dreveton, C., Braun, A., and Cariolle, D.: The ARPEGE/IFS atmosphere model: a contribution to the French community climate modelling, Clim. Dynam., 10, 249–266, 1994. a
De Szoeke, S. P., Edson, J. B., Marion, J. R., Fairall, C. W., and Bariteau, L.: The MJO and air–sea interaction in TOGA COARE and DYNAMO, J. Climate, 28, 597–622, 2015. a
Donelan, M. A., Dobson, F. W., Smith, S. D., and Anderson, R. J.: On the dependence of sea surface roughness on wave development, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 23, 2143–2149, 1993. a
Donelan, M. A., Drennan, W. M., and Katsaros, K. B.: The air–sea momentum flux in conditions of wind sea and swell, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 27, 2087–2099, 1997. a
Drennan, W. M., Graber, H. C., Hauser, D., and Quentin, C.: On the wave age dependence of wind stress over pure wind seas, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 108, 8062, https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JC000715, 2003. a
Ducrocq, V., Braud, I., Davolio, S., Ferretti, R., Flamant, C., Jansa, A., Kalthoff, N., Richard, E., Taupier-Letage, I., Ayral, P., Belamari, S., Berne, A., Borga, M., Boudevillain, B., Bock, O., Boichard, J.-L., Bouin, M.-N., Bousquet, O., Bouvier, C., Chiggiato, J., Cimini, D., Corsmeier, U., Coppola, L., Cocquerez, P., Defer, E., Delanoë, J., Di Girolamo, P., Doerenbecher, A., Drobinski, P., Dufournet, Y., Fourrié, N., Gourley, J. J., Labatut, L., Lambert, D., Le Coz, J., Marzano, F. S., Molinié, G., Montani, A., Nord, G., Nuret, M., Ramage, K., Rison, B., Roussot, O., Saïd, F., Schwarzenboeck, A., Testor, P., Van Baelen, J., Vincendon, B., Aran, M., and Tamayo, J.: HyMeX-SOP1, the field campaign dedicated to heavy precipitation and flash flooding in the Northwestern Mediterranean, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 95, 1083–1100, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-12-00244.1, 2014. a
Edson, J., Crawford, T., Crescenti, J., Farrar, T., Frew, N., Gerbi, G., Helmis, C., Hristov, T., Khelif, D., Jessup, A., Johnson, H., Li, M., Mahrt, L., McGillis, W., Plueddemann, A., Shen, L., Skyllingstad, E., Stanton, T., Sullivan, P., Sun, J., Trowbridge, J., Vickers, D., Wang, S., Wang, Q., Weller, R., Wilkin, J., Williams III, A. J., Yue, D. K. P., and Zappa, C.: The coupled boundary layers and air–sea transfer experiment in low winds, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 88, 341–356, 2007. a
Emanuel, K. A.: Sensitivity of tropical cyclones to surface exchange coefficients and a revised steady-state model incorporating eye dynamics, J. Atmos. Sci., 52, 3969–3976, 1995. a
Emanuel, K. A.: Tropical cyclone energetics and structure, Atmospheric Turbulence and Mesoscale Meteorology, 8, 165–191, 2004. a
Emanuel, K. A.: 100 years of progress in tropical cyclone research, Meteor. Mon., 59, 15.1–15.68, 2018. a
Fairall, C. W., Hare, J. E., Edson, J. B., and McGillis, W.: Parameterization and micrometeorological measurement of air–sea gas transfer, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 96, 63–106, 2000. a
Gaspar, P., Grégoris, Y., and Lefevre, J.-M.: A simple eddy kinetic energy model for simulations of the oceanic vertical mixing: Tests at station Papa and Long-Term Upper Ocean Study site, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 95, 16179–16193, 1990. a
Green, B. W. and Zhang, F.: Impacts of air–sea flux parameterizations on the intensity and structure of tropical cyclones, Mon. Weather Rev., 141, 2308–2324, 2013. a
Green, B. W. and Zhang, F.: Sensitivity of tropical cyclone simulations to parametric uncertainties in air–sea fluxes and implications for parameter estimation, Mon. Weather Rev., 142, 2290–2308, 2014. a
Hare, J., Persson, P., Fairall, C., and Edson, J.: Behavior of Charnock’s relationship for high wind conditions, in: Preprints, in: 13th Symp. on Boundary Layers and Turbulence, Dallas, TX, 10–15 January 1999, Amer. Meteor. Soc, 252–255, 1999. a
Haus, B. K., Jeong, D., Donelan, M. A., Zhang, J. A., and Savelyev, I.: Relative rates of sea-air heat transfer and frictional drag in very high winds, Geophys. Res. Lett., 37, L07802, https://doi.org/10.1029/2009GL042206, 2010. a
Janssen, P. A. E. M.: Quasi-linear theory of wind-wave generation applied to wave forecasting, J. Phys. Oceanograph., 21, 1631–1642, 1991. a
Janssen, P. A. E. M.: Does wind stress depend on sea-state or not? – A statistical error analysis of Hexmax data, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 83, 479–503, 1997. a
Janssen, P. A. E. M., Doyle, J. D., Bidlot, J., Hansen, B., Isaksen, L., and Viterbo, P.: Impact and feedback of ocean waves on the atmosphere, Tech. Rep. 341, ECMWF Technical Memoranda Series, https://doi.org/10.21957/c1ey8zifx, 2001. a
Joly, A., Browning, K. A., Bessemoulin, P., Cammas, J.-P., Caniaux, G., Chalon, J.-P., Clough, S. A., Dirks, R., Emanuel, K. A., Eymard, L., Gall, R., Hewson, T. D., Hildebrand, P. H., Jorgensen, D., Lalaurette, F., Langland, R. H., Lemaǐtre, Y., Mascart, P., Moore, J. A., Persson, P. O., Roux, F., Shapiro, M. A., Snyder, C., Toth, Z., and Wakimoto, R. M.: Overview of the field phase of the Fronts and Atlantic Storm-Track EXperiment (FASTEX) project, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 125, 3131–3163, 1999. a
Khodayar, S., Davolio, S., Di Girolamo, P., Lebeaupin Brossier, C., Flaounas, E., Fourrie, N., Lee, K.-O., Ricard, D., Vie, B., Bouttier, F., Caldas-Alvarez, A., and Ducrocq, V.: Overview towards improved understanding of the mechanisms leading to heavy precipitation in the western Mediterranean: lessons learned from HyMeX, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 17051–17078, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-17051-2021, 2021. a
Kitaigorodskii, S.: On the roughness parameter of the sea surface and the calculation of momentum flux in the near surface layer of the atmosphere, Izv., Atmos. Oceanic Phys., 1, 973–988, 1965. a
Knapp, K. R., Kruk, M. C., Levinson, D. H., Diamond, H. J., and Neumann, C. J.: The International Best Track Archive for Climate Stewardship (IBTrACS): Unifying tropical cyclone best track data, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 91, 363–376, https://doi.org/10.1175/2009BAMS2755.1, 2010. a
Knapp, K. R., Diamond, H. J., Kossin, J. P., Kruk, M. C., Schreck, C. J.: International Best Track Archive for Climate Stewardship (IBTrACS) Project, Version 4, NOAA National Centers for Environmental Information [data set], https://doi.org/10.25921/82ty-9e16, 2018. a
Komen, G., Hasselmann, S., and Hasselmann, K.: On the existence of a fully developed wind-sea spectrum, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 14, 1271–1285, 1984. a
Kudryavtsev, V., Chapron, B., and Makin, V.: Impact of wind waves on the air-sea fluxes: A coupled model, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 119, 1217–1236, 2014. a
Lac, C., Chaboureau, J.-P., Masson, V., Pinty, J.-P., Tulet, P., Escobar, J., Leriche, M., Barthe, C., Aouizerats, B., Augros, C., Aumond, P., Auguste, F., Bechtold, P., Berthet, S., Bielli, S., Bosseur, F., Caumont, O., Cohard, J.-M., Colin, J., Couvreux, F., Cuxart, J., Delautier, G., Dauhut, T., Ducrocq, V., Filippi, J.-B., Gazen, D., Geoffroy, O., Gheusi, F., Honnert, R., Lafore, J.-P., Lebeaupin Brossier, C., Libois, Q., Lunet, T., Mari, C., Maric, T., Mascart, P., Mogé, M., Molinié, G., Nuissier, O., Pantillon, F., Peyrillé, P., Pergaud, J., Perraud, E., Pianezze, J., Redelsperger, J.-L., Ricard, D., Richard, E., Riette, S., Rodier, Q., Schoetter, R., Seyfried, L., Stein, J., Suhre, K., Taufour, M., Thouron, O., Turner, S., Verrelle, A., Vié, B., Visentin, F., Vionnet, V., and Wautelet, P.: Overview of the Meso-NH model version 5.4 and its applications, Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 1929–1969, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-1929-2018, 2018. a
Large, W. and Pond, S.: Open ocean momentum flux measurements in moderate to strong winds, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 11, 324–336, 1981. a
Lazure, P. and Dumas, F.: An external–internal mode coupling for a 3D hydrodynamical model for applications at regional scale (MARS), Adv. Water Resour., 31, 233–250, 2008. a
Lellouche, J.-M., Le Galloudec, O., Drévillon, M., Régnier, C., Greiner, E., Garric, G., Ferry, N., Desportes, C., Testut, C.-E., Bricaud, C., Bourdallé-Badie, R., Tranchant, B., Benkiran, M., Drillet, Y., Daudin, A., and De Nicola, C.: Evaluation of global monitoring and forecasting systems at Mercator Océan, Ocean Sci., 9, 57–81, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-9-57-2013, 2013. a
Lellouche, J.-M., Greiner, E., Le Galloudec, O., Garric, G., Regnier, C., Drevillon, M., Benkiran, M., Testut, C.-E., Bourdalle-Badie, R., Gasparin, F., Hernandez, O., Levier, B., Drillet, Y., Remy, E., and Le Traon, P.-Y.: Recent updates to the Copernicus Marine Service global ocean monitoring and forecasting real-time
Llasat, M. C., Llasat-Botija, M., Petrucci, O., Pasqua, A. A., Rosselló, J., Vinet, F., and Boissier, L.: Towards a database on societal impact of Mediterranean floods within the framework of the HYMEX project, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 13, 1337–1350, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-13-1337-2013, 2013. a
Majumdar, S. J., Magnusson, L., Bechtold, P., Bidlot, J. R., and Doyle, J. D.: Advanced tropical cyclone prediction using the experimental global ECMWF and operational regional COAMPS-TC systems, Mon. Weather Rev., 151, 2029–2048, 2023. a
Masson, V., Le Moigne, P., Martin, E., Faroux, S., Alias, A., Alkama, R., Belamari, S., Barbu, A., Boone, A., Bouyssel, F., Brousseau, P., Brun, E., Calvet, J.-C., Carrer, D., Decharme, B., Delire, C., Donier, S., Essaouini, K., Gibelin, A.-L., Giordani, H., Habets, F., Jidane, M., Kerdraon, G., Kourzeneva, E., Lafaysse, M., Lafont, S., Lebeaupin Brossier, C., Lemonsu, A., Mahfouf, J.-F., Marguinaud, P., Mokhtari, M., Morin, S., Pigeon, G., Salgado, R., Seity, Y., Taillefer, F., Tanguy, G., Tulet, P., Vincendon, B., Vionnet, V., and Voldoire, A.: The SURFEXv7.2 land and ocean surface platform for coupled or offline simulation of earth surface variables and fluxes, Geosci. Model Dev., 6, 929–960, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-6-929-2013, 2013. a, b
Meroni, A. N., Parodi, A., and Pasquero, C.: Role of SST patterns on surface wind modulation of a heavy midlatitude precipitation event, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 123, 9081–9096, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JD028276, 2018. a
Meroni, A. N., Giurato, M., Ragone, F., and Pasquero, C.: Observational evidence of the preferential occurrence of wind convergence over sea surface temperature fronts in the Mediterranean, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 146, 1443–1458, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3745, 2020. a
Miles, J. W.: On the generation of surface waves by shear flows, J. Fluid Mech., 3, 185–204, 1957. a
Monin, A. S. and Obukhov, A. M.: Basic laws of turbulent mixing in the surface layer of the atmosphere, Contrib. Geophys. Inst. Acad. Sci. USSR, 151, e187, 1954. a
Mouche, A. and Archer, O.: CyclObs Tropical Cyclones, Ifremer [data set], https://cyclobs.ifremer.fr/app/archive/2022/SI/sh082022, last access: 20 December 2023. a
Mouche, A. A., Chapron, B., Zhang, B., and Husson, R.: Combined co-and cross-polarized SAR measurements under extreme wind conditions, IEEE T. Geosci. Remote, 55, 6746–6755, 2017. a
Moum, J. N., de Szoeke, S. P., Smyth, W. D., Edson, J. B., DeWitt, H. L., Moulin, A. J., Thompson, E. J., Zappa, C. J., Rutledge, S. A., Johnson, R. H., and Fairall, C. W.: Air–sea interactions from westerly wind bursts during the November 2011 MJO in the Indian Ocean, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 95, 1185–1199, 2014. a
Nystrom, R. G., Rotunno, R., Davis, C. A., and Zhang, F.: Consistent impacts of surface enthalpy and drag coefficient uncertainty between an analytical model and simulated tropical cyclone maximum intensity and storm structure, J. Atmos. Sci., 77, 3059–3080, 2020. a
Oost, W., Komen, G., Jacobs, C., and Van Oort, C.: New evidence for a relation between wind stress and wave age from measurements during ASGAMAGE, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 103, 409–438, https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014913624535, 2002. a, b, c
Pelletier, C., Lemarié, F., Blayo, E., Bouin, M.-N., and Redelsperger, J.-L.: Two-sided turbulent surface-layer parameterizations for computing air–sea fluxes, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 147, 1726–1751, 2021. a
Petersen, G. and Renfrew, I.: Aircraft-based observations of air–sea fluxes over Denmark Strait and the Irminger Sea during high wind speed conditions, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 135, 2030–2045, 2009. a
Potter, H., Graber, H. C., Williams, N. J., Collins III, C. O., Ramos, R. J., and Drennan, W. M.: In situ measurements of momentum fluxes in typhoons, J. Atmos. Sci., 72, 104–118, 2015. a
Powell, M. D. and Ginis, I.: Drag coefficient distribution and wind speed dependence in tropical cyclones, Final Report to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Joint Hurricane Testbed (JHT) Program For the Atlantic Oceanographic and Meteorological Laboratory Rickenbacker CausewayMiami, Florida, 33149, ftp://ftp.aoml.noaa.gov/pub/hrd/powell/GaryB/CD_Revised.pdf (last access: 20 December 2023), 2006. a, b
Rainaud, R., Lebeaupin Brossier, C., Ducrocq, V., and Giordani, H.: High-resolution air-sea coupling impact on two heavy precipitation events in the Western Mediterranean, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 143, 2448–2462, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3098, 2017. a
Redelsperger, J.-L., Bouin, M.-N., Pianezze, J., Garnier, V., and Marié, L.: Impact of a sharp, small-scale SST front on the marine atmospheric boundary layer on the Iroise Sea: Analysis from a hectometric simulation, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 145, 3692–3714, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3650, 2019. a, b, c, d
Roehrig, R., Beau, I., Saint-Martin, D., Alias, A., Decharme, B., Guérémy, J.-F., Voldoire, A., Abdel-Lathif, A. Y., Bazile, E., Belamari, S., Blein, S., Bouniol, D., Bouteloup, Y., Cattiaux, J., Chauvin, F., Chevallier, M., Colin, J., Douville, H., Marquet, P., Michou, M., Nabat, P., Oudar, T., Peyrillé, P., Piriou, J.-M., Salas y Mélia, D., Séférian, R., and Sénési, S.: The CNRM global atmosphere model ARPEGE-Climat 6.3: Description and evaluation, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 12, e2020MS002075, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020MS002075, 2020. a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j, k
Romero, L. and Melville, W. K.: Airborne observations of fetch-limited waves in the Gulf of Tehuantepec, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 40, 441–465, 2010. a
Rutgersson, A., Smedman, A.-S., and Omstedt, A.: Measured and simulated latent and sensible heat fluxes at two marine sites in the Baltic Sea, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 99, 53–84, 2001. a
Sanford, T. B., Price, J. F., and Girton, J. B.: Upper-ocean response to Hurricane Frances (2004) observed by profiling EM-APEX floats, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 41, 1041–1056, 2011. a
Sauvage, C., Lebeaupin Brossier, C., Bouin, M.-N., and Ducrocq, V.: Characterization of the air–sea exchange mechanisms during a Mediterranean heavy precipitation event using realistic sea state modelling, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 1675–1699, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-1675-2020, 2020. a
Senatore, A., Furnari, L., and Mendicino, G.: Impact of high-resolution sea surface temperature representation on the forecast of small Mediterranean catchments' hydrological responses to heavy precipitation, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 269–291, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-269-2020, 2020. a
Small, R. J., deSzoeke, S. P., Xie, S. P., O’Neill, L., Seo, H., Song, Q., Cornillon, P., Spall, M., and Minobe, S.: Air–sea interaction over ocean fronts and eddies, Dynam. Atmos. Oceans, 45, 274–319, 2008. a
Smith, S. D.: Wind stress and heat flux over the ocean in gale force winds, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 10, 709–726, 1980. a
Smith, S. D., Anderson, R. J., Oost, W. A., Kraan, C., Maat, N., De Cosmo, J., Katsaros, K. B., Davidson, K. L., Bumke, K., Hasse, L., and Chadwick, H. M.: Sea surface wind stress and drag coefficients: The HEXOS results, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 60, 109–142, 1992. a
Snyder, R., Dobson, F., Elliott, J., and Long, R.: Array measurements of atmospheric pressure fluctuations above surface gravity waves, J. Fluid Mech., 102, 1–59, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112081002528, 1981. a
Stocchi, P. and Davolio, S.: Intense air-sea exchanges and heavy orographic precipitation over Italy: The role of Adriatic sea surface temperature uncertainty, Atmos. Res., 196, 62–82, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2017.06.004, 2017. a
Taylor, P. K. and Yelland, M. J.: The Dependence of Sea Surface Roughness on the Height and Steepness of the Waves, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 31, 572–590, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0485(2001)031<0572:TDOSSR>2.0.CO;2, 2001. a, b, c
Thévenot, O., Bouin, M.-N., Ducrocq, V., Lebeaupin Brossier, C., Nuissier, O., Pianezze, J., and Duffourg, F.: Influence of the sea state on Mediterranean heavy precipitation: a case-study from HyMeX SOP1, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 142, 377–389, 2016. a
Tolman, H. L.: User manual and system documentation of WAVEWATCH III TM version 3.14, Technical note, MMAB Contribution, 276, https://polar.ncep.noaa.gov/mmab/papers/tn276/MMAB_276.pdf (last access: 20 December 2023), 2009. a
Voldoire, A., Decharme, B., Pianezze, J., Lebeaupin Brossier, C., Sevault, F., Seyfried, L., Garnier, V., Bielli, S., Valcke, S., Alias, A., Accensi, M., Ardhuin, F., Bouin, M.-N., Ducrocq, V., Faroux, S., Giordani, H., Léger, F., Marsaleix, P., Rainaud, R., Redelsperger, J.-L., Richard, E., and Riette, S.: SURFEX v8.0 interface with OASIS3-MCT to couple atmosphere with hydrology, ocean, waves and sea-ice models, from coastal to global scales, Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 4207–4227, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-4207-2017, 2017. a, b
Zhang, J. A., Black, P. G., French, J. R., and Drennan, W. M.: First direct measurements of enthalpy flux in the hurricane boundary layer: The CBLAST results, Geophys. Res. Lett., 35, L14813, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GL034374, 2008. a
Zou, Z., Zhao, D., Liu, B., Zhang, J. A., and Huang, J.: Observation-based parameterization of air-sea fluxes in terms of wind speed and atmospheric stability under low-to-moderate wind conditions, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 122, 4123–4142, 2017. a
Short summary
In numerical models, the turbulent exchanges of heat and momentum at the air–sea interface are not represented explicitly but with parameterisations depending on the surface parameters. A new parameterisation of turbulent fluxes (WASP) has been implemented in the surface model SURFEX v8.1 and validated on four case studies. It combines a close fit to observations including cyclonic winds, a dependency on the wave growth rate, and the possibility of being used in atmosphere–wave coupled models.
In numerical models, the turbulent exchanges of heat and momentum at the air–sea interface are...
Special issue