Geoscientific Model Development
Geoscientific Model Development
GMD
Articles | Volume 16, issue 22
Articles | Volume 16, issue 22
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-6805-2023
© Author(s) 2023. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-6805-2023
© Author(s) 2023. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Articles | Volume 16, issue 22
Methods for assessment of models
 | 
23 Nov 2023
Methods for assessment of models |  | 23 Nov 2023

A mountain-induced moist baroclinic wave test case for the dynamical cores of atmospheric general circulation models

Owen K. Hughes and Christiane Jablonowski

Viewed

Total article views: 878 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
635 196 47 878 45 33
  • HTML: 635
  • PDF: 196
  • XML: 47
  • Total: 878
  • BibTeX: 45
  • EndNote: 33
Views and downloads (calculated since 31 May 2023)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 31 May 2023)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 878 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 855 with geography defined and 23 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 17 Jul 2024
Download
Short summary
Atmospheric models benefit from idealized tests that assess their accuracy in a simpler simulation. A new test with artificial mountains is developed for models on a spherical earth. The mountains trigger the development of both planetary-scale and small-scale waves. These can be analyzed in dry or moist environments, with a simple rainfall mechanism. Four atmospheric models are intercompared. This sheds light on the pros and cons of the model design and the impact of mountains on the flow.
Read more