Articles | Volume 16, issue 16
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-4715-2023
© Author(s) 2023. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-4715-2023
© Author(s) 2023. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Methods for assessment of models
| 
23 Aug 2023
Methods for assessment of models |
| 23 Aug 2023
| 23 Aug 2023
Climate model Selection by Independence, Performance, and Spread (ClimSIPS v1.0.1) for regional applications
Anna L. Merrifield
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Institute for Atmospheric and Climate Science, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
Lukas Brunner
Department of Meteorology and Geophysics, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
Ruth Lorenz
Institute for Atmospheric and Climate Science, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
Vincent Humphrey
Institute for Atmospheric and Climate Science, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
Reto Knutti
Institute for Atmospheric and Climate Science, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
Viewed
Total article views: 3,197 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
| HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2,332 | 784 | 81 | 3,197 | 189 | 74 | 69 |
- HTML: 2,332
- PDF: 784
- XML: 81
- Total: 3,197
- Supplement: 189
- BibTeX: 74
- EndNote: 69
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 24 Feb 2023)
Total article views: 2,407 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 23 Aug 2023)
| HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1,845 | 504 | 58 | 2,407 | 129 | 65 | 60 |
- HTML: 1,845
- PDF: 504
- XML: 58
- Total: 2,407
- Supplement: 129
- BibTeX: 65
- EndNote: 60
Total article views: 790 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 24 Feb 2023)
| HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 487 | 280 | 23 | 790 | 60 | 9 | 9 |
- HTML: 487
- PDF: 280
- XML: 23
- Total: 790
- Supplement: 60
- BibTeX: 9
- EndNote: 9
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Total article views: 3,197 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 3,178 with geography defined
and 19 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 2,407 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 2,391 with geography defined
and 16 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 790 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 787 with geography defined
and 3 with unknown origin.
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States of America | 1 | 879 | 27 |
| Germany | 2 | 369 | 11 |
| China | 3 | 344 | 10 |
| Switzerland | 4 | 165 | 5 |
| France | 5 | 126 | 3 |
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States of America | 1 | 698 | 28 |
| Germany | 2 | 307 | 12 |
| China | 3 | 249 | 10 |
| Switzerland | 4 | 102 | 4 |
| France | 5 | 102 | 4 |
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States of America | 1 | 181 | 22 |
| China | 2 | 95 | 12 |
| Australia | 3 | 63 | 7 |
| Switzerland | 4 | 63 | 7 |
| Germany | 5 | 62 | 7 |
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
- 879
1
879
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
- 698
1
698
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
- 181
1
181
Cited
20 citations as recorded by crossref.
- Improving access and use of climate projections for ecological research through the use of a new Python tool A. Paz et al. 10.1111/ecog.07186
- Bringing it all together: science priorities for improved understanding of Earth system change and to support international climate policy C. Jones et al. 10.5194/esd-15-1319-2024
- Uncertainty-informed selection of CMIP6 Earth system model subsets for use in multisectoral and impact models A. Snyder et al. 10.5194/esd-15-1301-2024
- The Selection of Global Climate Models for Regional Impact Studies Should Consider Information from Historical Simulations and Future Projections A. Rohith et al. 10.1007/s41748-024-00410-3
- Climate model large ensembles as test beds for applied compound event research F. Lehner 10.1016/j.isci.2024.111113
- Projected amplification of summer marine heatwaves in a warming Northeast Pacific Ocean M. Athanase et al. 10.1038/s43247-024-01212-1
- Developing climate services for vulnerable islands in the Southwest Indian Ocean: A combined statistical and dynamical CMIP6 downscaling approach for climate change assessment M. Leroux et al. 10.1016/j.cliser.2024.100491
- How climate change intensified storm Boris’ extreme rainfall, revealed by near-real-time storylines M. Athanase et al. 10.1038/s43247-024-01847-0
- Doing better rather than promising more: A basic principle applicable to both climate modelling and climate policies H. Douville & J. Añel 10.1371/journal.pclm.0000466
- User-tailored sub-selection of climate model ensemble members for impact studies A. Sikorska-Senoner et al. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.175769
- Why Does the Ensemble Mean of CMIP6 Models Simulate Arctic Temperature More Accurately Than Global Temperature? P. Chylek et al. 10.3390/atmos15050567
- An Assessment of the Climate Change Impacts on the Distribution of the Glacial Relict Woodpecker Three-Toed Woodpecker Picoides tridactylus T. Popović et al. 10.3390/ani14131879
- Pitfalls in diagnosing temperature extremes L. Brunner & A. Voigt 10.1038/s41467-024-46349-x
- Mid-latitude baroclinic waves in a zonally homogeneous Earth-like planet A. Sukhanovskii et al. 10.1007/s00382-024-07561-z
- From global to regional-scale CMIP6-derived wind wave extremes: a single-GCM HighResMIP and CORDEX downscaling experiment in South-East Australia M. Lorenzo et al. 10.1007/s00382-024-07504-8
- Systematic and objective evaluation of Earth system models: PCMDI Metrics Package (PMP) version 3 J. Lee et al. 10.5194/gmd-17-3919-2024
- A non-stationary climate-informed weather generator for assessing future flood risks V. Nguyen et al. 10.5194/ascmo-10-195-2024
- Projected increase in droughts over the Arabian Peninsula and associated uncertainties M. Saharwardi et al. 10.1038/s41598-025-85863-w
- On the relation of CMIP6 GCMs errors at RCM driving boundary condition zones and inner region for Central Europe region E. Holtanová et al. 10.1007/s00382-024-07216-z
- Identifying climate models based on their daily output using machine learning L. Brunner & S. Sippel 10.1017/eds.2023.23
19 citations as recorded by crossref.
- Improving access and use of climate projections for ecological research through the use of a new Python tool A. Paz et al. 10.1111/ecog.07186
- Bringing it all together: science priorities for improved understanding of Earth system change and to support international climate policy C. Jones et al. 10.5194/esd-15-1319-2024
- Uncertainty-informed selection of CMIP6 Earth system model subsets for use in multisectoral and impact models A. Snyder et al. 10.5194/esd-15-1301-2024
- The Selection of Global Climate Models for Regional Impact Studies Should Consider Information from Historical Simulations and Future Projections A. Rohith et al. 10.1007/s41748-024-00410-3
- Climate model large ensembles as test beds for applied compound event research F. Lehner 10.1016/j.isci.2024.111113
- Projected amplification of summer marine heatwaves in a warming Northeast Pacific Ocean M. Athanase et al. 10.1038/s43247-024-01212-1
- Developing climate services for vulnerable islands in the Southwest Indian Ocean: A combined statistical and dynamical CMIP6 downscaling approach for climate change assessment M. Leroux et al. 10.1016/j.cliser.2024.100491
- How climate change intensified storm Boris’ extreme rainfall, revealed by near-real-time storylines M. Athanase et al. 10.1038/s43247-024-01847-0
- Doing better rather than promising more: A basic principle applicable to both climate modelling and climate policies H. Douville & J. Añel 10.1371/journal.pclm.0000466
- User-tailored sub-selection of climate model ensemble members for impact studies A. Sikorska-Senoner et al. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.175769
- Why Does the Ensemble Mean of CMIP6 Models Simulate Arctic Temperature More Accurately Than Global Temperature? P. Chylek et al. 10.3390/atmos15050567
- An Assessment of the Climate Change Impacts on the Distribution of the Glacial Relict Woodpecker Three-Toed Woodpecker Picoides tridactylus T. Popović et al. 10.3390/ani14131879
- Pitfalls in diagnosing temperature extremes L. Brunner & A. Voigt 10.1038/s41467-024-46349-x
- Mid-latitude baroclinic waves in a zonally homogeneous Earth-like planet A. Sukhanovskii et al. 10.1007/s00382-024-07561-z
- From global to regional-scale CMIP6-derived wind wave extremes: a single-GCM HighResMIP and CORDEX downscaling experiment in South-East Australia M. Lorenzo et al. 10.1007/s00382-024-07504-8
- Systematic and objective evaluation of Earth system models: PCMDI Metrics Package (PMP) version 3 J. Lee et al. 10.5194/gmd-17-3919-2024
- A non-stationary climate-informed weather generator for assessing future flood risks V. Nguyen et al. 10.5194/ascmo-10-195-2024
- Projected increase in droughts over the Arabian Peninsula and associated uncertainties M. Saharwardi et al. 10.1038/s41598-025-85863-w
- On the relation of CMIP6 GCMs errors at RCM driving boundary condition zones and inner region for Central Europe region E. Holtanová et al. 10.1007/s00382-024-07216-z
1 citations as recorded by crossref.
Latest update: 31 Mar 2025
Short summary
Using all Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP) models is unfeasible for many applications. We provide a subselection protocol that balances user needs for model independence, performance, and spread capturing CMIP’s projection uncertainty simultaneously. We show how sets of three to five models selected for European applications map to user priorities. An audit of model independence and its influence on equilibrium climate sensitivity uncertainty in CMIP is also presented.
Using all Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP) models is unfeasible for many...
