Articles | Volume 16, issue 16
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-4617-2023
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-4617-2023
Methods for assessment of models
 | 
17 Aug 2023
Methods for assessment of models |  | 17 Aug 2023

Visual analysis of model parameter sensitivities along warm conveyor belt trajectories using Met.3D (1.6.0-multivar1)

Christoph Neuhauser, Maicon Hieronymus, Michael Kern, Marc Rautenhaus, Annika Oertel, and Rüdiger Westermann

Related authors

Arctic Multilayer Clouds Require Accurate Thermodynamic Profiles and Efficient Primary and Secondary Ice Processes for a Realistic Structure and Composition
Gabriella Wallentin, Annika Oertel, Luisa Ickes, Peggy Achtert, Matthias Tesche, and Corinna Hoose
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-2988,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-2988, 2024
Short summary
From Sea to Sky: Understanding the sea surface temperature impact on an atmospheric blocking event using sensitivity experiments with the ICOsahedral Nonhydrostatic (ICON) model
Svenja Christ, Marta Wenta, Christian M. Grams, and Annika Oertel
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-2403,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-2403, 2024
Short summary
An objective identification technique for potential vorticity structures associated with African easterly waves
Christoph Fischer, Andreas H. Fink, Elmar Schömer, Marc Rautenhaus, and Michael Riemer
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 4213–4228, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4213-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4213-2024, 2024
Short summary
Explaining neural networks for detection of tropical cyclones and atmospheric rivers in gridded atmospheric simulation data
Tim Radke, Susanne Fuchs, Christian Wilms, Iuliia Polkova, and Marc Rautenhaus
Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2024-60,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2024-60, 2024
Revised manuscript accepted for GMD
Short summary
The effect of lossy compression of numerical weather prediction data on data analysis: a case study using enstools-compression 2023.11
Oriol Tintó Prims, Robert Redl, Marc Rautenhaus, Tobias Selz, Takumi Matsunobu, Kameswar Rao Modali, and George Craig
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-753,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-753, 2024
Short summary

Related subject area

Atmospheric sciences
Modeling of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) from global to regional scales: model development (IAP-AACM_PAH v1.0) and investigation of health risks in 2013 and 2018 in China
Zichen Wu, Xueshun Chen, Zifa Wang, Huansheng Chen, Zhe Wang, Qing Mu, Lin Wu, Wending Wang, Xiao Tang, Jie Li, Ying Li, Qizhong Wu, Yang Wang, Zhiyin Zou, and Zijian Jiang
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 8885–8907, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8885-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8885-2024, 2024
Short summary
LIMA (v2.0): A full two-moment cloud microphysical scheme for the mesoscale non-hydrostatic model Meso-NH v5-6
Marie Taufour, Jean-Pierre Pinty, Christelle Barthe, Benoît Vié, and Chien Wang
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 8773–8798, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8773-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8773-2024, 2024
Short summary
SLUCM+BEM (v1.0): a simple parameterisation for dynamic anthropogenic heat and electricity consumption in WRF-Urban (v4.3.2)
Yuya Takane, Yukihiro Kikegawa, Ko Nakajima, and Hiroyuki Kusaka
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 8639–8664, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8639-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8639-2024, 2024
Short summary
NAQPMS-PDAF v2.0: a novel hybrid nonlinear data assimilation system for improved simulation of PM2.5 chemical components
Hongyi Li, Ting Yang, Lars Nerger, Dawei Zhang, Di Zhang, Guigang Tang, Haibo Wang, Yele Sun, Pingqing Fu, Hang Su, and Zifa Wang
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 8495–8519, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8495-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8495-2024, 2024
Short summary
Source-specific bias correction of US background and anthropogenic ozone modeled in CMAQ
T. Nash Skipper, Christian Hogrefe, Barron H. Henderson, Rohit Mathur, Kristen M. Foley, and Armistead G. Russell
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 8373–8397, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8373-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8373-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Afzal, S., Hittawe, M., Ghani, S., Jamil, T., Knio, O., Hadwiger, M., and Hoteit, I.: The State of the Art in Visual Analysis Approaches for Ocean and Atmospheric Datasets, Comput. Graph. Forum, 38, 881–907, https://doi.org/10.1111/cgf.13731, 2019. a
Bader, R., Sprenger, M., Ban, N., Radisuhli, S., Schar, C., and Günther, T.: Extraction and Visual Analysis of Potential Vorticity Banners around the Alps, IEEE T. Vis. Comput. Gr., 26, 259–269, https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2019.2934310, 2019. a
Baldauf, M., Seifert, A., Förstner, J., Majewski, D., Raschendorfer, M., and Reinhardt, T.: Operational Convective-Scale Numerical Weather Prediction with the COSMO Model: Description and Sensitivities, Mon. Weather Rev., 139, 3887–3905, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-10-05013.1, 2011. a
Barklie, R. H. D. and Gokhale, N. R.: The freezing of supercooled water drops, Stormy Weather Group, McGill Univ., Sci. Rep. MW-30, Part 3, 43–64, 1959. a
Baumgartner, M., Sagebaum, M., Gauger, N. R., Spichtinger, P., and Brinkmann, A.: Algorithmic differentiation for cloud schemes (IFS Cy43r3) using CoDiPack (v1.8.1), Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 5197–5212, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-5197-2019, 2019. a
Download
Short summary
Numerical weather prediction models rely on parameterizations for sub-grid-scale processes, which are a source of uncertainty. We present novel visual analytics solutions to analyze interactively the sensitivities of a selected prognostic variable to multiple model parameters along trajectories regarding similarities in temporal development and spatiotemporal relationships. The proposed workflow is applied to cloud microphysical sensitivities along coherent strongly ascending trajectories.