Geoscientific Model Development
Geoscientific Model Development
GMD
Articles | Volume 16, issue 10
Articles | Volume 16, issue 10
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-2975-2023
© Author(s) 2023. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-2975-2023
© Author(s) 2023. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Articles | Volume 16, issue 10
Model evaluation paper
 | 
31 May 2023
Model evaluation paper |  | 31 May 2023

Intercomparison of the weather and climate physics suites of a unified forecast–climate model system (GRIST-A22.7.28) based on single-column modeling

Xiaohan Li, Yi Zhang, Xindong Peng, Baiquan Zhou, Jian Li, and Yiming Wang

Viewed

Total article views: 2,285 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
1,695 512 78 2,285 80 76 130
  • HTML: 1,695
  • PDF: 512
  • XML: 78
  • Total: 2,285
  • Supplement: 80
  • BibTeX: 76
  • EndNote: 130
Views and downloads (calculated since 08 Feb 2023)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 08 Feb 2023)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 2,285 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 2,250 with geography defined and 35 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 16 Nov 2025
Download
Short summary
The weather and climate physics suites used in GRIST-A22.7.28 are compared using single-column modeling. The source of their discrepancies in terms of modeling cloud and precipitation is explored. Convective parameterization is found to be a key factor responsible for the differences. The two suites also have intrinsic differences in the interaction between microphysics and other processes, resulting in different cloud features and time step sensitivities.
Read more
Share