Articles | Volume 16, issue 8
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-2077-2023
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-2077-2023
Model evaluation paper
 | 
18 Apr 2023
Model evaluation paper |  | 18 Apr 2023

Evaluating wind profiles in a numerical weather prediction model with Doppler lidar

Pyry Pentikäinen, Ewan J. O'Connor, and Pablo Ortiz-Amezcua

Related authors

Methodology for deriving the telescope focus function and its uncertainty for a heterodyne pulsed Doppler lidar
Pyry Pentikäinen, Ewan James O'Connor, Antti Juhani Manninen, and Pablo Ortiz-Amezcua
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 2849–2863, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-2849-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-2849-2020, 2020
Short summary

Related subject area

Climate and Earth system modeling
CARIB12: a regional Community Earth System Model/Modular Ocean Model 6 configuration of the Caribbean Sea
Giovanni Seijo-Ellis, Donata Giglio, Gustavo Marques, and Frank Bryan
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 8989–9021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8989-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8989-2024, 2024
Short summary
Architectural insights into and training methodology optimization of Pangu-Weather
Deifilia To, Julian Quinting, Gholam Ali Hoshyaripour, Markus Götz, Achim Streit, and Charlotte Debus
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 8873–8884, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8873-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8873-2024, 2024
Short summary
Evaluation of global fire simulations in CMIP6 Earth system models
Fang Li, Xiang Song, Sandy P. Harrison, Jennifer R. Marlon, Zhongda Lin, L. Ruby Leung, Jörg Schwinger, Virginie Marécal, Shiyu Wang, Daniel S. Ward, Xiao Dong, Hanna Lee, Lars Nieradzik, Sam S. Rabin, and Roland Séférian
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 8751–8771, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8751-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8751-2024, 2024
Short summary
Evaluating downscaled products with expected hydroclimatic co-variances
Seung H. Baek, Paul A. Ullrich, Bo Dong, and Jiwoo Lee
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 8665–8681, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8665-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8665-2024, 2024
Short summary
Software sustainability of global impact models
Emmanuel Nyenah, Petra Döll, Daniel S. Katz, and Robert Reinecke
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 8593–8611, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8593-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8593-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Accadia, C., Zecchetto, S., Lavagnini, A., and Speranza, A.: Comparison of 10-m wind forecasts from a Regional Area Model and QuikSCAT Scatterometer wind observations over the Mediterranean Sea, Mon. Weather Rev., 135, 1945– 1960, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR3370.1, 2007. a, b
Andersson, E.: How to evolve global observing systems, ECMWF Newsletter, 153, 37–40, https://doi.org/10.21957/9fxea2, 2017. a
Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) user facility: Balloon-Borne Sounding System (SONDEWNPN), 2013-09-28 to 2022-05-29, ARM Mobile Facility (PVC) Highland Center, Cape Cod MA; AMF1 (M1), Eastern North Atlantic (ENA) Graciosa Island, Azores, Portugal (C1), Southern Great Plains (SGP) Central Facility, Lamont, OK (C1), Tropical Western Pacific (TWP) Central Facility, Darwin, Australia (C3), compiled by: Keeler, E., Coulter, R., Kyrouac, J., and Holdridge, D., ARM Data Center [data set], https://doi.org/10.5439/1021460, 2013. a
Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) user facility: Doppler Lidar Horizontal Wind Profiles (DLPROFWIND4NEWS), 2014-10-21 to 2022-03-20, ARM Mobile Facility (PVC) Highland Center, Cape Cod MA; AMF1 (M1), Eastern North Atlantic (ENA) Graciosa Island, Azores, Portugal (C1), Southern Great Plains (SGP) Central Facility, Lamont, OK (C1), Tropical Western Pacific (TWP) Central Facility, Darwin, Australia (C3), compiled by: Shippert, T., Newsom, R., and Riihimaki, L., ARM Data Center [data set], https://doi.org/10.5439/1178582, 2014. a
Beck, J., Nuret, M., and Bousquet, O.: Model wind field forecast verification using multiple-Doppler syntheses from a national radar network, Weather Forecast., 29, 331–348, https://doi.org/10.1175/WAF-D-13-00068.1, 2014. a
Download
Short summary
We used Doppler lidar to evaluate the wind profiles generated by a weather forecast model. We first compared the Doppler lidar observations with co-located radiosonde profiles, and they agree well. The model performs best over marine and coastal locations. Larger errors were seen in locations where the surface was more complex, especially in the wind direction. Our results show that Doppler lidar is a suitable instrument for evaluating the boundary layer wind profiles in atmospheric models.