Geoscientific Model Development
Geoscientific Model Development
GMD
Articles | Volume 16, issue 4
Articles | Volume 16, issue 4
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1359-2023
© Author(s) 2023. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1359-2023
© Author(s) 2023. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Articles | Volume 16, issue 4
Methods for assessment of models
 | 
27 Feb 2023
Methods for assessment of models |  | 27 Feb 2023

Incorporation of aerosol into the COSPv2 satellite lidar simulator for climate model evaluation

Marine Bonazzola, Hélène Chepfer, Po-Lun Ma, Johannes Quaas, David M. Winker, Artem Feofilov, and Nick Schutgens

Viewed

Total article views: 1,356 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
1,040 281 35 1,356 24 16
  • HTML: 1,040
  • PDF: 281
  • XML: 35
  • Total: 1,356
  • BibTeX: 24
  • EndNote: 16
Views and downloads (calculated since 31 Aug 2022)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 31 Aug 2022)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 1,356 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 1,319 with geography defined and 37 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 25 Apr 2024
Download
Short summary
Aerosol has a large impact on climate. Using a lidar aerosol simulator ensures consistent comparisons between modeled and observed aerosol. We present a lidar aerosol simulator that applies a cloud masking and an aerosol detection threshold. We estimate the lidar signals that would be observed at 532 nm by the Cloud-Aerosol Lidar with Orthogonal Polarization overflying the atmosphere predicted by a climate model. Our comparison at the seasonal timescale shows a discrepancy in the Southern Ocean.
Read more