Articles | Volume 15, issue 22
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-8439-2022
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-8439-2022
Model description paper
 | 
21 Nov 2022
Model description paper |  | 21 Nov 2022

Development of an LSTM broadcasting deep-learning framework for regional air pollution forecast improvement

Haochen Sun, Jimmy C. H. Fung, Yiang Chen, Zhenning Li, Dehao Yuan, Wanying Chen, and Xingcheng Lu

Related authors

Abundance of volatile organic compounds and their role in ozone pollution management: Evidence from multi-platform observations and model representations during the 2021–2022 field campaign in Hong Kong
Xueying Liu, Yeqi Huang, Yao Chen, Xin Feng, Yang Xu, Yi Chen, Dasa Gu, Hao Sun, Zhi Ning, Jianzhen Yu, Wing Sze Chow, Changqing Lin, Yan Xiang, Tianshu Zhang, Claire Granier, Guy Brasseur, Zhe Wang, and Jimmy C. H. Fung
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3227,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3227, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP).
Short summary
Coupling the TKE-ACM2 Planetary Boundary Layer Scheme with the Building Effect Parameterization Model
Wanliang Zhang, Chao Ren, Edward Yan Yung Ng, Michael Mau Fung Wong, and Jimmy Chi Hung Fung
Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2024-205,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2024-205, 2024
Revised manuscript under review for GMD
Short summary
Estimation of ground-level NO2 and its spatiotemporal variations in China using GEMS measurements and a nested machine learning model
Naveed Ahmad, Changqing Lin, Alexis K. H. Lau, Jhoon Kim, Tianshu Zhang, Fangqun Yu, Chengcai Li, Ying Li, Jimmy C. H. Fung, and Xiang Qian Lao
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 9645–9665, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-9645-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-9645-2024, 2024
Short summary
Spatiotemporal source apportionment of ozone pollution over the Greater Bay Area
Yiang Chen, Xingcheng Lu, and Jimmy C. H. Fung
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 8847–8864, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-8847-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-8847-2024, 2024
Short summary
Development of a new emission reallocation method for industrial sources in China
Yun Fat Lam, Chi Chiu Cheung, Xuguo Zhang, Joshua S. Fu, and Jimmy Chi Hung Fung
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 12895–12908, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-12895-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-12895-2021, 2021
Short summary

Related subject area

Atmospheric sciences
Development of the CMA-GFS-AERO 4D-Var assimilation system v1.0 – Part 1: System description and preliminary experimental results
Yongzhu Liu, Xiaoye Zhang, Wei Han, Chao Wang, Wenxing Jia, Deying Wang, Zhaorong Zhuang, and Xueshun Shen
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 4855–4876, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-4855-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-4855-2025, 2025
Short summary
Optimized dynamic mode decomposition for reconstruction and forecasting of atmospheric chemistry data
Meghana Velagar, Christoph Keller, and J. Nathan Kutz
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 4667–4684, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-4667-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-4667-2025, 2025
Short summary
Interpolating turbulent heat fluxes missing from a prairie observation on the Tibetan Plateau using artificial intelligence models
Quanzhe Hou, Zhiqiu Gao, Zexia Duan, and Minghui Yu
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 4625–4641, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-4625-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-4625-2025, 2025
Short summary
Carbon dioxide plume dispersion simulated at the hectometer scale using DALES: model formulation and observational evaluation
Arseniy Karagodin-Doyennel, Fredrik Jansson, Bart J. H. van Stratum, Hugo Denier van der Gon, Jordi Vilà-Guerau de Arellano, and Sander Houweling
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 4571–4599, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-4571-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-4571-2025, 2025
Short summary
Low-level jets in the North and Baltic seas: mesoscale model sensitivity and climatology using WRF V4.2.1
Bjarke T. E. Olsen, Andrea N. Hahmann, Nicolas G. Alonso-de-Linaje, Mark Žagar, and Martin Dörenkämper
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 4499–4533, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-4499-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-4499-2025, 2025
Short summary

Cited articles

Ayturan, Y. A., Ayturan, Z. C., and Altun, H. O.: Air pollution modelling with deep learning: a review, International Journal of Environmental Pollution and Environmental Modelling, 1, 58–62, 2018. 
Bi, J., Knowland, K. E., Keller, C. A., and Liu, Y.: Combining Machine Learning and Numerical Simulation for High-Resolution PM2.5 Concentration Forecast, Environ. Sci. Technol., 56, 1544–1556, 2022. 
Bui, T.-C., Le, V.-D., and Cha, S.-K.: A deep learning approach for forecasting air pollution in South Korea using LSTM, arXiv [preprint], https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1804.07891, 2018. 
Fan, C., Li, Y., Guang, J., Li, Z., Elnashar, A., Allam, M., and de Leeuw, G.: The impact of the control measures during the COVID-19 outbreak on air pollution in China, Remote Sensing, 12, 1613, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12101613, 2020. 
Gilliam, R. C., Hogrefe, C., Godowitch, J. M., Napelenok, S., Mathur, R., and Rao, S. T.: Impact of inherent meteorology uncertainty on air quality model predictions, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 120, 12259–12280, 2015. 
Download
Short summary
This study developed a novel deep-learning layer, the broadcasting layer, to build an end-to-end LSTM-based deep-learning model for regional air pollution forecast. By combining the ground observation, WRF-CMAQ simulation, and the broadcasting LSTM deep-learning model, forecast accuracy has been significantly improved when compared to other methods. The broadcasting layer and its variants can also be applied in other research areas to supersede the traditional numerical interpolation methods.
Share