Geoscientific Model Development
Geoscientific Model Development
GMD
Articles | Volume 15, issue 22
Articles | Volume 15, issue 22
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-8411-2022
© Author(s) 2022. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-8411-2022
© Author(s) 2022. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Articles | Volume 15, issue 22
Model description paper
 | Highlight paper
 | 
21 Nov 2022
Model description paper | Highlight paper |  | 21 Nov 2022

Global biomass burning fuel consumption and emissions at 500 m spatial resolution based on the Global Fire Emissions Database (GFED)

Dave van Wees, Guido R. van der Werf, James T. Randerson, Brendan M. Rogers, Yang Chen, Sander Veraverbeke, Louis Giglio, and Douglas C. Morton

Viewed

Total article views: 4,573 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
3,395 1,132 46 4,573 293 19 34
  • HTML: 3,395
  • PDF: 1,132
  • XML: 46
  • Total: 4,573
  • Supplement: 293
  • BibTeX: 19
  • EndNote: 34
Views and downloads (calculated since 30 May 2022)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 30 May 2022)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 4,573 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 4,332 with geography defined and 241 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 04 Dec 2023
Download
Executive editor
Fire is a pervasive feature of the Earth system, and a cause of significant carbon emissions. This manuscript presents a higher resolution fire emissions data set than previously available, thereby providing a valuable resource to the scientific community.
Read more
Short summary
We present a global fire emission model based on the GFED model framework with a spatial resolution of 500 m. The higher resolution allowed for a more detailed representation of spatial heterogeneity in fuels and emissions. Specific modules were developed to model, for example, emissions from fire-related forest loss and belowground burning. Results from the 500 m model were compared to GFED4s, showing that global emissions were relatively similar but that spatial differences were substantial.
Read more