Geoscientific Model Development
Geoscientific Model Development
Geoscientific Model Development
Articles | Volume 15, issue 22
Articles | Volume 15, issue 22
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 8411–8437, 2022
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-8411-2022
© Author(s) 2022. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 8411–8437, 2022
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-8411-2022
© Author(s) 2022. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Articles | Volume 15, issue 22
Model description paper
 | Highlight paper
21 Nov 2022
Model description paper  | Highlight paper | 21 Nov 2022

Global biomass burning fuel consumption and emissions at 500 m spatial resolution based on the Global Fire Emissions Database (GFED)

Dave van Wees et al.

Viewed

Total article views: 2,357 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
1,810 516 31 2,357 140 8 16
  • HTML: 1,810
  • PDF: 516
  • XML: 31
  • Total: 2,357
  • Supplement: 140
  • BibTeX: 8
  • EndNote: 16
Views and downloads (calculated since 30 May 2022)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 30 May 2022)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 2,357 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 2,195 with geography defined and 162 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 31 Jan 2023
Download
Executive editor
Fire is a pervasive feature of the Earth system, and a cause of significant carbon emissions. This manuscript presents a higher resolution fire emissions data set than previously available, thereby providing a valuable resource to the scientific community.
Read more
Short summary
We present a global fire emission model based on the GFED model framework with a spatial resolution of 500 m. The higher resolution allowed for a more detailed representation of spatial heterogeneity in fuels and emissions. Specific modules were developed to model, for example, emissions from fire-related forest loss and belowground burning. Results from the 500 m model were compared to GFED4s, showing that global emissions were relatively similar but that spatial differences were substantial.
Read more