Geoscientific Model Development
Geoscientific Model Development
GMD
Articles | Volume 15, issue 16
Articles | Volume 15, issue 16
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-6385-2022
© Author(s) 2022. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-6385-2022
© Author(s) 2022. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Articles | Volume 15, issue 16
Development and technical paper
 | 
29 Aug 2022
Development and technical paper |  | 29 Aug 2022

Impact of the numerical solution approach of a plant hydrodynamic model (v0.1) on vegetation dynamics

Yilin Fang, L. Ruby Leung, Ryan Knox, Charlie Koven, and Ben Bond-Lamberty

Viewed

Total article views: 2,765 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
2,017 660 88 2,765 209 67 103
  • HTML: 2,017
  • PDF: 660
  • XML: 88
  • Total: 2,765
  • Supplement: 209
  • BibTeX: 67
  • EndNote: 103
Views and downloads (calculated since 03 Jun 2022)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 03 Jun 2022)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 2,765 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 2,563 with geography defined and 202 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 09 Oct 2025
Download
Short summary
Accounting for water movement in the soil and water transport within the plant is important for plant growth in Earth system modeling. We implemented different numerical approaches for a plant hydrodynamic model and compared their impacts on the simulated aboveground biomass (AGB) at single points and globally. We found care should be taken when discretizing the number of soil layers for numerical simulations as it can significantly affect AGB if accuracy and computational costs are of concern.
Read more
Share