Articles | Volume 15, issue 12
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-4657-2022
© Author(s) 2022. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-4657-2022
© Author(s) 2022. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Regional evaluation of the performance of the global CAMS chemical modeling system over the United States (IFS cycle 47r1)
Jason E. Williams
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
R&D Weather and Climate Modeling, Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute, De Bilt, the Netherlands
Vincent Huijnen
R&D Weather and Climate Modeling, Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute, De Bilt, the Netherlands
Idir Bouarar
Environmental Modeling, Max Planck Institute for Meteorology, Hamburg, Germany
Mehdi Meziane
Centre National de Recherches Météorologiques, Université de Toulouse, Météo-France, CNRS, Toulouse, France
Timo Schreurs
R&D Weather and Climate Modeling, Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute, De Bilt, the Netherlands
Sophie Pelletier
Centre National de Recherches Météorologiques, Université de Toulouse, Météo-France, CNRS, Toulouse, France
Virginie Marécal
Centre National de Recherches Météorologiques, Université de Toulouse, Météo-France, CNRS, Toulouse, France
Beatrice Josse
Centre National de Recherches Météorologiques, Université de Toulouse, Météo-France, CNRS, Toulouse, France
Johannes Flemming
European Centre for Medium Range Weather Forecasts, Shinfield Park, Reading, UK
Viewed
Total article views: 4,343 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 01 Oct 2021)
| HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3,203 | 1,022 | 118 | 4,343 | 325 | 132 | 180 |
- HTML: 3,203
- PDF: 1,022
- XML: 118
- Total: 4,343
- Supplement: 325
- BibTeX: 132
- EndNote: 180
Total article views: 2,739 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 17 Jun 2022)
| HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2,012 | 652 | 75 | 2,739 | 170 | 110 | 163 |
- HTML: 2,012
- PDF: 652
- XML: 75
- Total: 2,739
- Supplement: 170
- BibTeX: 110
- EndNote: 163
Total article views: 1,604 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 01 Oct 2021)
| HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1,191 | 370 | 43 | 1,604 | 155 | 22 | 17 |
- HTML: 1,191
- PDF: 370
- XML: 43
- Total: 1,604
- Supplement: 155
- BibTeX: 22
- EndNote: 17
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Total article views: 4,343 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 4,157 with geography defined
and 186 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 2,739 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 2,663 with geography defined
and 76 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 1,604 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 1,494 with geography defined
and 110 with unknown origin.
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
Cited
13 citations as recorded by crossref.
- Production and loss pathways of tropospheric ozone under different ambient conditions R. Lehmann et al.
- Introducing Volatile Organic Compound Model Intercomparison Project (VOCMIP) G. Myhre et al.
- Technical note: Evaluation of the Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service Cy48R1 upgrade of June 2023 H. Eskes et al.
- Assessment of the contribution of the Meteosat Third Generation Infrared Sounder (MTG-IRS) for the characterisation of ozone over Europe F. Vittorioso et al.
- Tropospheric and Surface Measurements of Combustion Tracers During the 2021 Mediterranean Wildfire Crisis: Insights from the WMO/GAW Site of Lamezia Terme in Calabria, Southern Italy F. D’Amico et al.
- Hunga Tonga–Hunga Ha′apai Volcano Impact Model Observation Comparison (HTHH-MOC) project: experiment protocol and model descriptions Y. Zhu et al.
- An evaluation of the regional distribution and wet deposition of secondary inorganic aerosols and their gaseous precursors in IFS-COMPO preparatory to cycle 49R1 J. Williams et al.
- Technical note: The CAMS greenhouse gas reanalysis from 2003 to 2020 A. Agustí-Panareda et al.
- OpenIFS/AC: atmospheric chemistry and aerosol in OpenIFS 43r3 V. Huijnen et al.
- Chemical composition of aerosols over the Bay of Bengal based on global reanalyses data and on-board ship measurements G. Shukla & A. Kumar
- Evaluation of Aerosol Optical Depth (AOD) estimated by Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service (CAMS) in Brazil A. Júnior et al.
- An improved representation of aerosol in the ECMWF IFS-COMPO 49R1 through the integration of EQSAM4Climv12 – a first attempt at simulating aerosol acidity S. Rémy et al.
- A computationally efficient parameterization of aerosol, cloud and precipitation pH for application at global and regional scale (EQSAM4Clim-v12) S. Metzger et al.
13 citations as recorded by crossref.
- Production and loss pathways of tropospheric ozone under different ambient conditions R. Lehmann et al.
- Introducing Volatile Organic Compound Model Intercomparison Project (VOCMIP) G. Myhre et al.
- Technical note: Evaluation of the Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service Cy48R1 upgrade of June 2023 H. Eskes et al.
- Assessment of the contribution of the Meteosat Third Generation Infrared Sounder (MTG-IRS) for the characterisation of ozone over Europe F. Vittorioso et al.
- Tropospheric and Surface Measurements of Combustion Tracers During the 2021 Mediterranean Wildfire Crisis: Insights from the WMO/GAW Site of Lamezia Terme in Calabria, Southern Italy F. D’Amico et al.
- Hunga Tonga–Hunga Ha′apai Volcano Impact Model Observation Comparison (HTHH-MOC) project: experiment protocol and model descriptions Y. Zhu et al.
- An evaluation of the regional distribution and wet deposition of secondary inorganic aerosols and their gaseous precursors in IFS-COMPO preparatory to cycle 49R1 J. Williams et al.
- Technical note: The CAMS greenhouse gas reanalysis from 2003 to 2020 A. Agustí-Panareda et al.
- OpenIFS/AC: atmospheric chemistry and aerosol in OpenIFS 43r3 V. Huijnen et al.
- Chemical composition of aerosols over the Bay of Bengal based on global reanalyses data and on-board ship measurements G. Shukla & A. Kumar
- Evaluation of Aerosol Optical Depth (AOD) estimated by Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service (CAMS) in Brazil A. Júnior et al.
- An improved representation of aerosol in the ECMWF IFS-COMPO 49R1 through the integration of EQSAM4Climv12 – a first attempt at simulating aerosol acidity S. Rémy et al.
- A computationally efficient parameterization of aerosol, cloud and precipitation pH for application at global and regional scale (EQSAM4Clim-v12) S. Metzger et al.
Saved (final revised paper)
Latest update: 06 May 2026
Short summary
The global CAMS air quality model is used for providing tropospheric ozone information to end users. This paper updates the chemical mechanism employed (CBA) and compares it against two other mechanisms (MOCAGE, MOZART) and a multi-decadal dataset based on a previous version of CBA. We perform extensive validation for the US using multiple surface and aircraft datasets, providing an assessment of biases and the extent of correlation across different seasons during 2014.
The global CAMS air quality model is used for providing tropospheric ozone information to end...