Articles | Volume 14, issue 12
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-7749-2021
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-7749-2021
Model description paper
 | 
22 Dec 2021
Model description paper |  | 22 Dec 2021

An explicit GPU-based material point method solver for elastoplastic problems (ep2-3De v1.0)

Emmanuel Wyser, Yury Alkhimenkov, Michel Jaboyedoff, and Yury Y. Podladchikov

Related authors

Machine learning prediction of the mass and the velocity of controlled single-block rockfalls from the seismic waves they generate
Clément Hibert, François Noël, David Toe, Miloud Talib, Mathilde Desrues, Emmanuel Wyser, Ombeline Brenguier, Franck Bourrier, Renaud Toussaint, Jean-Philippe Malet, and Michel Jaboyedoff
Earth Surf. Dynam., 12, 641–656, https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-12-641-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-12-641-2024, 2024
Short summary
A fast and efficient MATLAB-based MPM solver: fMPMM-solver v1.1
Emmanuel Wyser, Yury Alkhimenkov, Michel Jaboyedoff, and Yury Y. Podladchikov
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 6265–6284, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-6265-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-6265-2020, 2020
Short summary

Related subject area

Numerical methods
Positive matrix factorization of large real-time atmospheric mass spectrometry datasets using error-weighted randomized hierarchical alternating least squares
Benjamin C. Sapper, Sean Youn, Daven K. Henze, Manjula Canagaratna, Harald Stark, and Jose L. Jimenez
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 2891–2919, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2891-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2891-2025, 2025
Short summary
CLAQC v1.0 – Country Level Air Quality Calculator: an empirical modeling approach
Stefania Renna, Francesco Granella, Lara Aleluia Reis, and Paulina Schulz-Antipa
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 2373–2408, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2373-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2373-2025, 2025
Short summary
Hydro-geomorphological modelling of leaky wooden dam efficacy from reach to catchment scale with CAESAR-Lisflood 1.9j
Joshua M. Wolstenholme, Christopher J. Skinner, David Milan, Robert E. Thomas, and Daniel R. Parsons
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 1395–1411, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1395-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1395-2025, 2025
Short summary
Stabilized two-phase material point method for hydromechanical coupling problems in solid-fluid porous media
Xiong Tang, Wei Liu, Siming He, Lei Zhu, Michel Jaboyedoff, Huanhuan Zhang, Yuqing Sun, and Zenan Huo
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-707,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-707, 2025
Short summary
Enhancing single precision with quasi-double precision: achieving double-precision accuracy in the Model for Prediction Across Scales – Atmosphere (MPAS-A) version 8.2.1
Jiayi Lai, Lanning Wang, Qizhong Wu, Yizhou Yang, and Fang Wang
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 1089–1102, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1089-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1089-2025, 2025
Short summary

Cited articles

Alejano, L. R. and Bobet, A.: Drucker–Prager Criterion, Rock Mech. Rock Eng., 45, 995–999, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-012-0278-22012. a
Alkhimenkov, Y., Räss, L., Khakimova, L., Quintal, B., and Podladchikov, Y.: Resolving wave propagation in anisotropic poroelastic media using graphical processing units (GPUs), J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 126, e2020JB021175, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JB021175, 2021. a, b, c, d, e
Anderson, C. E.: An overview of the theory of hydrocodes, Int. J. Impact Eng., 5, 33–59, https://doi.org/10.1016/0734-743X(87)90029-7, 1987. a
Bandara, S. and Soga, K.: Coupling of soil deformation and pore fluid flow using material point method, Comput. Geotech., 63, 199–214, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2014.09.009, 2015. a
Bandara, S., Ferrari, A., and Laloui, L.: Modelling landslides in unsaturated slopes subjected to rainfall infiltration using material point method, Int. J. Numer. Anal. Met., 40, 1358–1380, https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.2499, 2016. a, b
Download
Short summary
We propose an implementation of the material point method using graphical processing units (GPUs) to solve elastoplastic problems in three-dimensional configurations, such as the granular collapse or the slumping mechanics, i.e., landslide. The computational power of GPUs promotes fast code executions, compared to a traditional implementation using central processing units (CPUs). This allows us to study complex three-dimensional problems tackling high spatial resolution.
Share