Articles | Volume 14, issue 12
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-7621-2021
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-7621-2021
Model description paper
 | 
16 Dec 2021
Model description paper |  | 16 Dec 2021

Reduced-complexity air quality intervention modeling over China: the development of InMAPv1.6.1-China and a comparison with CMAQv5.2

Ruili Wu, Christopher W. Tessum, Yang Zhang, Chaopeng Hong, Yixuan Zheng, Xinyin Qin, Shigan Liu, and Qiang Zhang

Related authors

Direct measurements of black carbon fluxes in central Beijing using the eddy covariance method
Rutambhara Joshi, Dantong Liu, Eiko Nemitz, Ben Langford, Neil Mullinger, Freya Squires, James Lee, Yunfei Wu, Xiaole Pan, Pingqing Fu, Simone Kotthaus, Sue Grimmond, Qiang Zhang, Ruili Wu, Oliver Wild, Michael Flynn, Hugh Coe, and James Allan
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 147–162, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-147-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-147-2021, 2021
Short summary
Decadal changes in anthropogenic source contribution of PM2.5 pollution and related health impacts in China, 1990–2015
Jun Liu, Yixuan Zheng, Guannan Geng, Chaopeng Hong, Meng Li, Xin Li, Fei Liu, Dan Tong, Ruili Wu, Bo Zheng, Kebin He, and Qiang Zhang
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 7783–7799, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-7783-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-7783-2020, 2020
Short summary
Street-scale air quality modelling for Beijing during a winter 2016 measurement campaign
Michael Biggart, Jenny Stocker, Ruth M. Doherty, Oliver Wild, Michael Hollaway, David Carruthers, Jie Li, Qiang Zhang, Ruili Wu, Simone Kotthaus, Sue Grimmond, Freya A. Squires, James Lee, and Zongbo Shi
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 2755–2780, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-2755-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-2755-2020, 2020
Short summary

Related subject area

Atmospheric sciences
Accounting for effects of coagulation and model uncertainties in particle number concentration estimates based on measurements from sampling lines – a Bayesian inversion approach with SLIC v1.0
Matti Niskanen, Aku Seppänen, Henri Oikarinen, Miska Olin, Panu Karjalainen, Santtu Mikkonen, and Kari Lehtinen
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 2983–3001, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2983-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2983-2025, 2025
Short summary
Top-down CO emission estimates using TROPOMI CO data in the TM5-4DVAR (r1258) inverse modeling suit
Johann Rasmus Nüß, Nikos Daskalakis, Fabian Günther Piwowarczyk, Angelos Gkouvousis, Oliver Schneising, Michael Buchwitz, Maria Kanakidou, Maarten C. Krol, and Mihalis Vrekoussis
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 2861–2890, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2861-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2861-2025, 2025
Short summary
The Multi-Compartment Hg Modeling and Analysis Project (MCHgMAP): mercury modeling to support international environmental policy
Ashu Dastoor, Hélène Angot, Johannes Bieser, Flora Brocza, Brock Edwards, Aryeh Feinberg, Xinbin Feng, Benjamin Geyman, Charikleia Gournia, Yipeng He, Ian M. Hedgecock, Ilia Ilyin, Jane Kirk, Che-Jen Lin, Igor Lehnherr, Robert Mason, David McLagan, Marilena Muntean, Peter Rafaj, Eric M. Roy, Andrei Ryjkov, Noelle E. Selin, Francesco De Simone, Anne L. Soerensen, Frits Steenhuisen, Oleg Travnikov, Shuxiao Wang, Xun Wang, Simon Wilson, Rosa Wu, Qingru Wu, Yanxu Zhang, Jun Zhou, Wei Zhu, and Scott Zolkos
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 2747–2860, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2747-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2747-2025, 2025
Short summary
Similarity-based analysis of atmospheric organic compounds for machine learning applications
Hilda Sandström and Patrick Rinke
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 2701–2724, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2701-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2701-2025, 2025
Short summary
Porting the Meso-NH atmospheric model on different GPU architectures for the next generation of supercomputers (version MESONH-v55-OpenACC)
Juan Escobar, Philippe Wautelet, Joris Pianezze, Florian Pantillon, Thibaut Dauhut, Christelle Barthe, and Jean-Pierre Chaboureau
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 2679–2700, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2679-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2679-2025, 2025
Short summary

Cited articles

Appel, K. W., Napelenok, S. L., Hogrefe, C., Foley, K. M., Pouliot, G. A., Murphy, B., Heath, N., Roselle, S., Pleim, J., Bash, J. O., Pye, H. O. T., and Mathur, R.: Overview and evaluation of the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) modelling system version 5.2, Air Pollution Modeling and its Application XXV, ITM 2016, Springer Proceedings in Complexity, edited by: Mensink, C. and Kallos, G., Springer, Cham, 69–73, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57645-9_11, 2018. 
Baker, K. R., Amend, M., Penn, S., Bankert, J., Simon, H., Chan, E., Fann, N., Zawacki, M., Davidson, K., and Roman, H.: A database for evaluating the InMAP, APEEP, and EASIUR reduced complexity air-quality modelling tools, Data in Brief, 28, 104886, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2019.104886, 2020. 
Chang, X., Wang, S., Zhao, B., Xing, J., Liu, X., Wei, L., Song, Y., Wu, W., Cai, S., Zheng, H., Ding, D., and Zheng, M.: Contributions of inter-city and regional transport to PM2.5 concentrations in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region and its implications on regional joint air pollution control, Sci. Total Environ., 660, 1191–1200, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.12.474, 2019. 
Download
Short summary
Reduced-complexity air quality models are less computationally intensive and easier to use. We developed a reduced-complexity air quality Intervention Model for Air Pollution over China (InMAP-China) to rapidly predict the air quality and estimate the health impacts of emission sources in China. We believe that this work will be of great interest to a broad audience, including environmentalists in China and scientists in relevant fields at both national and local institutes.
Share