Articles | Volume 14, issue 11
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 6765–6780, 2021
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 6765–6780, 2021
Methods for assessment of models
05 Nov 2021
Methods for assessment of models | 05 Nov 2021

Verification of boundary layer wind patterns in COSMO-REA2 using clear-air radar echoes

Sebastian Buschow and Petra Friederichs

Related authors

Using wavelets to verify the scale structure of precipitation forecasts
Sebastian Buschow and Petra Friederichs
Adv. Stat. Clim. Meteorol. Oceanogr., 6, 13–30,,, 2020
Short summary
Assessment of wavelet-based spatial verification by means of a stochastic precipitation model (wv_verif v0.1.0)
Sebastian Buschow, Jakiw Pidstrigach, and Petra Friederichs
Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 3401–3418,,, 2019
Short summary

Related subject area

Atmospheric sciences
Earth System Model Aerosol–Cloud Diagnostics (ESMAC Diags) package, version 1: assessing E3SM aerosol predictions using aircraft, ship, and surface measurements
Shuaiqi Tang, Jerome D. Fast, Kai Zhang, Joseph C. Hardin, Adam C. Varble, John E. Shilling, Fan Mei, Maria A. Zawadowicz, and Po-Lun Ma
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 4055–4076,,, 2022
Short summary
Effects of vertical ship exhaust plume distributions on urban pollutant concentration – a sensitivity study with MITRAS v2.0 and EPISODE-CityChem v1.4
Ronny Badeke, Volker Matthias, Matthias Karl, and David Grawe
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 4077–4103,,, 2022
Short summary
An emergency response model for the formation and dispersion of plumes originating from major fires (BUOYANT v4.20)
Jaakko Kukkonen, Juha Nikmo, Kari Riikonen, Ilmo Westerholm, Pekko Ilvessalo, Tuomo Bergman, and Klaus Haikarainen
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 4027–4054,,, 2022
Short summary
Description and evaluation of the community aerosol dynamics model MAFOR v2.0
Matthias Karl, Liisa Pirjola, Tiia Grönholm, Mona Kurppa, Srinivasan Anand, Xiaole Zhang, Andreas Held, Rolf Sander, Miikka Dal Maso, David Topping, Shuai Jiang, Leena Kangas, and Jaakko Kukkonen
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 3969–4026,,, 2022
Short summary
Modeling the high-mercury wet deposition in the southeastern US with WRF-GC-Hg v1.0
Xiaotian Xu, Xu Feng, Haipeng Lin, Peng Zhang, Shaojian Huang, Zhengcheng Song, Yiming Peng, Tzung-May Fu, and Yanxu Zhang
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 3845–3859,,, 2022
Short summary

Cited articles

Atkinson, B. W. and Wu Zhang, J.: Mesoscale shallow convection in the atmosphere, Rev. Geophys., 34, 403–431,, 1996. a, b
Baldauf, M., Seifert, A., Förstner, J., Majewski, D., Raschendorfer, M., and Reinhardt, T.: Operational Convective-Scale Numerical Weather Prediction with the COSMO Model: Description and Sensitivities, Mon. Weather Rev., 139, 3887–3905,, 2011. a
Banghoff, J. R., Stensrud, D. J., and Kumjian, M. R.: Convective Boundary Layer Depth Estimation from S-Band Dual-Polarization Radar, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 35, 1723–1733,, 2018. a
Banghoff, J. R., Sorber, J. D., Stensrud, D. J., Young, G. S., and Kumjian, M. R.: A 10-Year Warm-Season Climatology of Horizontal Convective Rolls and Cellular Convection in Central Oklahoma, Mon. Weather Rev., 148, 21–42,, 2020. a, b, c, d, e, f
Bauer, H.-S., Muppa, S. K., Wulfmeyer, V., Behrendt, A., Warrach-Sagi, K., and Späth, F.: Multi-nested WRF simulations for studying planetary boundary layer processes on the turbulence-permitting scale in a realistic mesoscale environment, Tellus A, 72, 1–28,, 2020. a
Short summary
When insects fill the lower kilometers of the atmosphere, they get caught in the convergent parts of the wind field. Their concentration visualizes the otherwise invisible circulation on radar images. This study shows how clear-air radar data can be compared to simulated wind fields in terms of scale, anisotropy, and direction. Despite known difficulties with simulating these near-surface wind systems, we find decent agreement between a long-term simulation and the German radar mosaic.