Articles | Volume 14, issue 10
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 5927–5955, 2021
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-5927-2021
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 5927–5955, 2021
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-5927-2021
Model evaluation paper
30 Sep 2021
Model evaluation paper | 30 Sep 2021

Performance of the Adriatic Sea and Coast (AdriSC) climate component – a COAWST V3.3-based one-way coupled atmosphere–ocean modelling suite: ocean results

Petra Pranić et al.

Related authors

Performance of the Adriatic Sea and Coast (AdriSC) climate component – a COAWST V3.3-based coupled atmosphere–ocean modelling suite: atmospheric dataset
Cléa Denamiel, Petra Pranić, Damir Ivanković, Iva Tojčić, and Ivica Vilibić
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 3995–4017, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-3995-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-3995-2021, 2021
Short summary

Related subject area

Climate and Earth system modeling
Stable climate simulations using a realistic general circulation model with neural network parameterizations for atmospheric moist physics and radiation processes
Xin Wang, Yilun Han, Wei Xue, Guangwen Yang, and Guang J. Zhang
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 3923–3940, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-3923-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-3923-2022, 2022
Short summary
Description of historical and future projection simulations by the global coupled E3SMv1.0 model as used in CMIP6
Xue Zheng, Qing Li, Tian Zhou, Qi Tang, Luke P. Van Roekel, Jean-Christophe Golaz, Hailong Wang, and Philip Cameron-Smith
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 3941–3967, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-3941-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-3941-2022, 2022
Short summary
Training a supermodel with noisy and sparse observations: a case study with CPT and the synch rule on SPEEDO – v.1
Francine Schevenhoven and Alberto Carrassi
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 3831–3844, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-3831-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-3831-2022, 2022
Short summary
GREB-ISM v1.0: A coupled ice sheet model for the Globally Resolved Energy Balance model for global simulations on timescales of 100 kyr
Zhiang Xie, Dietmar Dommenget, Felicity S. McCormack, and Andrew N. Mackintosh
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 3691–3719, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-3691-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-3691-2022, 2022
Short summary
A scalability study of the Ice-sheet and Sea-level System Model (ISSM, version 4.18)
Yannic Fischler, Martin Rückamp, Christian Bischof, Vadym Aizinger, Mathieu Morlighem, and Angelika Humbert
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 3753–3771, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-3753-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-3753-2022, 2022
Short summary

Cited articles

Akhtar, N., Brauch, J., and Ahrens, B.: Climate modeling over the Mediterranean Sea: impact of resolution and ocean coupling, Clim. Dynam., 51, 933–948, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-017-3570-8, 2018. 
Amante, C. and Eakins, B. W.: ETOPO1 1 arc-minute global relief model: procedures, data sources and analysis, in: NOAA Technical Memorandum NESDIS, NGDC-24, NOAA, Boulder, Colorado, 2009. 
Artegiani, A., Bregant, D., Paschini, E., Pinardi, N., Raicich, F., and Russo, A.: The Adriatic Sea general circulation, part I: air-sea interactions and water mass structure, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 27, 1492–1514, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0485(1997)027<1492:TASGCP>2.0.CO;2, 1997. 
Batistić, M., Garić, R., and Molinero, J. C.: Interannual variations in Adriatic Sea zooplankton mirror shifts in circulation regimes in the Ionian Sea, Clim. Res., 61, 231–240, https://doi.org/10.3354/cr01248, 2014. 
Beg Paklar, G., Isakov, V., Koračin, D., Kourafalou, V., and Orlić, M.: A case study of bora-driven flow and density changes on the Adriatic shelf (January 1987), Cont. Shelf Res., 21, 1751–1783, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-4343(01)00029-2, 2001. 
Download

The requested paper has a corresponding corrigendum published. Please read the corrigendum first before downloading the article.

Short summary
The Adriatic Sea and Coast model was developed due to the need for higher-resolution climate models and longer-term simulations to capture coastal atmospheric and ocean processes at climate scales in the Adriatic Sea. The ocean results of a 31-year-long simulation were compared to the observational data. The evaluation revealed that the model is capable of reproducing the observed physical properties with good accuracy and can be further used to study the dynamics of the Adriatic–Ionian basin.