Articles | Volume 14, issue 10
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-5927-2021
© Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-5927-2021
© Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Model evaluation paper
| 
30 Sep 2021
Model evaluation paper |
| 30 Sep 2021
| 30 Sep 2021
Performance of the Adriatic Sea and Coast (AdriSC) climate component – a COAWST V3.3-based one-way coupled atmosphere–ocean modelling suite: ocean results
Physical Oceanography Laboratory, Institute of Oceanography and Fisheries, Šetalište I.
Meštrovića 63, 21000 Split, Croatia
Cléa Denamiel
Physical Oceanography Laboratory, Institute of Oceanography and Fisheries, Šetalište I.
Meštrovića 63, 21000 Split, Croatia
Division for Marine and Environmental Research, Ruđer Bošković Institute, Bijenička cesta 54, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia
Ivica Vilibić
Physical Oceanography Laboratory, Institute of Oceanography and Fisheries, Šetalište I.
Meštrovića 63, 21000 Split, Croatia
Division for Marine and Environmental Research, Ruđer Bošković Institute, Bijenička cesta 54, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia
Related authors
Cléa Denamiel, Iva Tojčić, and Petra Pranić
Ocean Sci., 21, 37–62, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-21-37-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-21-37-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We use a high-resolution atmosphere–ocean model to project Adriatic Dense Water dynamics under extreme warming. We find that a 15 % increase in sea surface evaporation will offset a 25 % decrease in extreme windstorms. As a result, future dense water will form at the same rate as today but will be too light to reach the Adriatic's deepest parts, making deep-water presence reliant on exchanges with the Ionian Sea.
Davide Bonaldo, Sandro Carniel, Renato R. Colucci, Cléa Denamiel, Petra Pranic, Fabio Raicich, Antonio Ricchi, Lorenzo Sangelantoni, Ivica Vilibic, and Maria Letizia Vitelletti
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1468, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1468, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We present a high-resolution modelling effort to investigate the possible end-of-century evolution of the main physical processes in the Adriatic Sea in a severe climate change scenario, with an ensemble approach (viz., use a of multiple simulations) allowing to control the uncertainty of the predictions. Our model exhibits a satisfactory capability to reproduce the recent past and provides a ground for a set of multidisciplinary studies in this area over a multi-decadal horizon.
Petra Pranić, Cléa Denamiel, Ivica Janeković, and Ivica Vilibić
Ocean Sci., 19, 649–670, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-19-649-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-19-649-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
In this study, we analyse and compare the results of four different approaches in modelling bora-driven dense-water dynamics in the Adriatic. The study investigated the likely requirements for modelling the ocean circulation in the Adriatic and found that a 31-year run of a fine-resolution Adriatic climate model is able to outperform most aspects of the newest reanalysis product, a short-term hindcast and data-assimilated simulation, in reproducing the dense-water dynamics in the Adriatic Sea.
Cléa Denamiel, Petra Pranić, Damir Ivanković, Iva Tojčić, and Ivica Vilibić
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 3995–4017, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-3995-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-3995-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
The atmospheric results of the Adriatic Sea and Coast (AdriSC) climate simulation (1987–2017) are evaluated against available observational datasets in the Adriatic region. Generally, the AdriSC model performs better than regional climate models that have resolutions that are 4 times more coarse, except concerning summer temperatures, which are systematically underestimated. High-resolution climate models may thus provide new insights about the local impacts of global warming in the Adriatic.
Clea Lumina Denamiel
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1363, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1363, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Ocean Science (OS).
Short summary
Short summary
This study advances our understanding of Adriatic Marine Heatwaves (MHWs) under historical and far-future extreme warming scenarios, emphasizing the critical role of the Po River plume and Adriatic natural variability in shaping MHW dynamics. While the Pseudo Global Warming (PGW) approach used in the study provides valuable insights, future research should adopt more comprehensive modelling frameworks to better capture the complexities of future climate change and its impacts on MHWs.
Elena Terzić, Clara Gardiol, and Ivica Vilibić
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-600, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-600, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Vertical salinity profiles with highest values at the surface layers – surface saline lakes – have been known to occur in the Eastern Mediterranean, where strong evaporation, warm summers and low winds all contribute to an increase in surface salinity. Our analysis of Argo data from the past 2 decades showed that saline lakes occur also in other regions across the Mediterranean Sea. This poses a question whether such changes indicate a salinification of the entire basin due to climate change.
Cléa Denamiel, Iva Tojčić, and Petra Pranić
Ocean Sci., 21, 37–62, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-21-37-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-21-37-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We use a high-resolution atmosphere–ocean model to project Adriatic Dense Water dynamics under extreme warming. We find that a 15 % increase in sea surface evaporation will offset a 25 % decrease in extreme windstorms. As a result, future dense water will form at the same rate as today but will be too light to reach the Adriatic's deepest parts, making deep-water presence reliant on exchanges with the Ionian Sea.
Davide Bonaldo, Sandro Carniel, Renato R. Colucci, Cléa Denamiel, Petra Pranic, Fabio Raicich, Antonio Ricchi, Lorenzo Sangelantoni, Ivica Vilibic, and Maria Letizia Vitelletti
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1468, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1468, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We present a high-resolution modelling effort to investigate the possible end-of-century evolution of the main physical processes in the Adriatic Sea in a severe climate change scenario, with an ensemble approach (viz., use a of multiple simulations) allowing to control the uncertainty of the predictions. Our model exhibits a satisfactory capability to reproduce the recent past and provides a ground for a set of multidisciplinary studies in this area over a multi-decadal horizon.
Petra Pranić, Cléa Denamiel, Ivica Janeković, and Ivica Vilibić
Ocean Sci., 19, 649–670, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-19-649-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-19-649-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
In this study, we analyse and compare the results of four different approaches in modelling bora-driven dense-water dynamics in the Adriatic. The study investigated the likely requirements for modelling the ocean circulation in the Adriatic and found that a 31-year run of a fine-resolution Adriatic climate model is able to outperform most aspects of the newest reanalysis product, a short-term hindcast and data-assimilated simulation, in reproducing the dense-water dynamics in the Adriatic Sea.
Cléa Denamiel and Ivica Vilibić
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-913, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-913, 2023
Preprint archived
Short summary
Short summary
We present a new methodology using coupled atmosphere-ocean-wave models and demonstrate the feasibility to provide meter scale assessments of the impact of climate change on storm surge hazards. We show that sea level variations and distributions can be derived at the climate scale in the Adriatic Sea small lagoons and bays. We expect that the newly developed methodology could lead to more targeted adaptation strategies in regions of the world vulnerable to atmospherically driven extreme events.
Begoña Pérez Gómez, Ivica Vilibić, Jadranka Šepić, Iva Međugorac, Matjaž Ličer, Laurent Testut, Claire Fraboul, Marta Marcos, Hassen Abdellaoui, Enrique Álvarez Fanjul, Darko Barbalić, Benjamín Casas, Antonio Castaño-Tierno, Srđan Čupić, Aldo Drago, María Angeles Fraile, Daniele A. Galliano, Adam Gauci, Branislav Gloginja, Víctor Martín Guijarro, Maja Jeromel, Marcos Larrad Revuelto, Ayah Lazar, Ibrahim Haktan Keskin, Igor Medvedev, Abdelkader Menassri, Mohamed Aïssa Meslem, Hrvoje Mihanović, Sara Morucci, Dragos Niculescu, José Manuel Quijano de Benito, Josep Pascual, Atanas Palazov, Marco Picone, Fabio Raicich, Mohamed Said, Jordi Salat, Erdinc Sezen, Mehmet Simav, Georgios Sylaios, Elena Tel, Joaquín Tintoré, Klodian Zaimi, and George Zodiatis
Ocean Sci., 18, 997–1053, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-18-997-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-18-997-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
This description and mapping of coastal sea level monitoring networks in the Mediterranean and Black seas reveals the existence of 240 presently operational tide gauges. Information is provided about the type of sensor, time sampling, data availability, and ancillary measurements. An assessment of the fit-for-purpose status of the network is also included, along with recommendations to mitigate existing bottlenecks and improve the network, in a context of sea level rise and increasing extremes.
Emma Reyes, Eva Aguiar, Michele Bendoni, Maristella Berta, Carlo Brandini, Alejandro Cáceres-Euse, Fulvio Capodici, Vanessa Cardin, Daniela Cianelli, Giuseppe Ciraolo, Lorenzo Corgnati, Vlado Dadić, Bartolomeo Doronzo, Aldo Drago, Dylan Dumas, Pierpaolo Falco, Maria Fattorini, Maria J. Fernandes, Adam Gauci, Roberto Gómez, Annalisa Griffa, Charles-Antoine Guérin, Ismael Hernández-Carrasco, Jaime Hernández-Lasheras, Matjaž Ličer, Pablo Lorente, Marcello G. Magaldi, Carlo Mantovani, Hrvoje Mihanović, Anne Molcard, Baptiste Mourre, Adèle Révelard, Catalina Reyes-Suárez, Simona Saviano, Roberta Sciascia, Stefano Taddei, Joaquín Tintoré, Yaron Toledo, Marco Uttieri, Ivica Vilibić, Enrico Zambianchi, and Alejandro Orfila
Ocean Sci., 18, 797–837, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-18-797-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-18-797-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
This work reviews the existing advanced and emerging scientific and societal applications using HFR data, developed to address the major challenges identified in Mediterranean coastal waters organized around three main topics: maritime safety, extreme hazards and environmental transport processes. It also includes a discussion and preliminary assessment of the capabilities of existing HFR applications, finally providing a set of recommendations towards setting out future prospects.
Pablo Lorente, Eva Aguiar, Michele Bendoni, Maristella Berta, Carlo Brandini, Alejandro Cáceres-Euse, Fulvio Capodici, Daniela Cianelli, Giuseppe Ciraolo, Lorenzo Corgnati, Vlado Dadić, Bartolomeo Doronzo, Aldo Drago, Dylan Dumas, Pierpaolo Falco, Maria Fattorini, Adam Gauci, Roberto Gómez, Annalisa Griffa, Charles-Antoine Guérin, Ismael Hernández-Carrasco, Jaime Hernández-Lasheras, Matjaž Ličer, Marcello G. Magaldi, Carlo Mantovani, Hrvoje Mihanović, Anne Molcard, Baptiste Mourre, Alejandro Orfila, Adèle Révelard, Emma Reyes, Jorge Sánchez, Simona Saviano, Roberta Sciascia, Stefano Taddei, Joaquín Tintoré, Yaron Toledo, Laura Ursella, Marco Uttieri, Ivica Vilibić, Enrico Zambianchi, and Vanessa Cardin
Ocean Sci., 18, 761–795, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-18-761-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-18-761-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
High-frequency radar (HFR) is a land-based remote sensing technology that can provide maps of the surface circulation over broad coastal areas, along with wave and wind information. The main goal of this work is to showcase the current status of the Mediterranean HFR network as well as present and future applications of this sensor for societal benefit such as search and rescue operations, safe vessel navigation, tracking of marine pollutants, and the monitoring of extreme events.
Petra Zemunik, Jadranka Šepić, Havu Pellikka, Leon Ćatipović, and Ivica Vilibić
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 13, 4121–4132, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-4121-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-4121-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
A new global dataset – MISELA (Minute Sea-Level Analysis) – has been developed and contains quality-checked sea-level records from 331 tide gauges worldwide for a period from 2004 to 2019. The dataset is appropriate for research on atmospherically induced high-frequency sea-level oscillations. Research on these oscillations is important, as they can, like all sea-level extremes, seriously threaten coastal zone infrastructure and populations.
Iva Tojčić, Cléa Denamiel, and Ivica Vilibić
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 2427–2446, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-21-2427-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-21-2427-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
This study quantifies the performance of the Croatian meteotsunami early warning system (CMeEWS) composed of a network of air pressure and sea level observations developed in order to help coastal communities prepare for extreme events. The system would have triggered the warnings for most of the observed events but also set off some false alarms if it was operational during the multi-meteotsunami event of 11–19 May 2020 in the eastern Adriatic. Further development of the system is planned.
Cléa Denamiel, Petra Pranić, Damir Ivanković, Iva Tojčić, and Ivica Vilibić
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 3995–4017, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-3995-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-3995-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
The atmospheric results of the Adriatic Sea and Coast (AdriSC) climate simulation (1987–2017) are evaluated against available observational datasets in the Adriatic region. Generally, the AdriSC model performs better than regional climate models that have resolutions that are 4 times more coarse, except concerning summer temperatures, which are systematically underestimated. High-resolution climate models may thus provide new insights about the local impacts of global warming in the Adriatic.
Ivica Vilibić, Petra Zemunik, Jadranka Šepić, Natalija Dunić, Oussama Marzouk, Hrvoje Mihanović, Clea Denamiel, Robert Precali, and Tamara Djakovac
Ocean Sci., 15, 1351–1362, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-15-1351-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-15-1351-2019, 2019
Ivica Vilibić, Hrvoje Mihanović, Ivica Janeković, Cléa Denamiel, Pierre-Marie Poulain, Mirko Orlić, Natalija Dunić, Vlado Dadić, Mira Pasarić, Stipe Muslim, Riccardo Gerin, Frano Matić, Jadranka Šepić, Elena Mauri, Zoi Kokkini, Martina Tudor, Žarko Kovač, and Tomislav Džoić
Ocean Sci., 14, 237–258, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-14-237-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-14-237-2018, 2018
H. Mihanović, I. Vilibić, S. Carniel, M. Tudor, A. Russo, A. Bergamasco, N. Bubić, Z. Ljubešić, D. Viličić, A. Boldrin, V. Malačič, M. Celio, C. Comici, and F. Raicich
Ocean Sci., 9, 561–572, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-9-561-2013, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-9-561-2013, 2013
S. Pasquet, I. Vilibić, and J. Šepić
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 13, 473–482, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-13-473-2013, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-13-473-2013, 2013
Related subject area
Climate and Earth system modeling
Development and evaluation of a new 4DEnVar-based weakly coupled ocean data assimilation system in E3SMv2
TemDeep: a self-supervised framework for temporal downscaling of atmospheric fields at arbitrary time resolutions
The ensemble consistency test: from CESM to MPAS and beyond
Presentation, calibration and testing of the DCESS II Earth system model of intermediate complexity (version 1.0)
Synthesizing global carbon–nitrogen coupling effects – the MAGICC coupled carbon–nitrogen cycle model v1.0
Historical trends and controlling factors of isoprene emissions in CMIP6 Earth system models
Investigating carbon and nitrogen conservation in reported CMIP6 Earth system model data
From weather data to river runoff: using spatiotemporal convolutional networks for discharge forecasting
A Fortran–Python interface for integrating machine learning parameterization into earth system models
A rapid-application emissions-to-impacts tool for scenario assessment: Probabilistic Regional Impacts from Model patterns and Emissions (PRIME)
The DOE E3SM version 2.1: overview and assessment of the impacts of parameterized ocean submesoscales
WRF-ELM v1.0: a regional climate model to study land–atmosphere interactions over heterogeneous land use regions
Modeling commercial-scale CO2 storage in the gas hydrate stability zone with PFLOTRAN v6.0
DiuSST: a conceptual model of diurnal warm layers for idealized atmospheric simulations with interactive sea surface temperature
High-Resolution Model Intercomparison Project phase 2 (HighResMIP2) towards CMIP7
T&C-CROP: representing mechanistic crop growth with a terrestrial biosphere model (T&C, v1.5) – model formulation and validation
An updated non-intrusive, multi-scale, and flexible coupling interface in WRF 4.6.0
Monitoring and benchmarking Earth system model simulations with ESMValTool v2.12.0
The Earth Science Box Modeling Toolkit (ESBMTK 0.14.0.11): a Python library for research and teaching
CropSuite v1.0 – a comprehensive open-source crop suitability model considering climate variability for climate impact assessment
ICON ComIn – the ICON Community Interface (ComIn version 0.1.0, with ICON version 2024.01-01)
Using feature importance as an exploratory data analysis tool on Earth system models
A new metrics framework for quantifying and intercomparing atmospheric rivers in observations, reanalyses, and climate models
The real challenges for climate and weather modelling on its way to sustained exascale performance: a case study using ICON (v2.6.6)
Improving the representation of major Indian crops in the Community Land Model version 5.0 (CLM5) using site-scale crop data
Evaluation of CORDEX ERA5-forced NARCliM2.0 regional climate models over Australia using the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model version 4.1.2
Design, evaluation, and future projections of the NARCliM2.0 CORDEX-CMIP6 Australasia regional climate ensemble
Amending the algorithm of aerosol–radiation interactions in WRF-Chem (v4.4)
The very-high-resolution configuration of the EC-Earth global model for HighResMIP
GOSI9: UK Global Ocean and Sea Ice configurations
Decomposition of skill scores for conditional verification: impact of Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation phases on the predictability of decadal temperature forecasts
Virtual Integration of Satellite and In-situ Observation Networks (VISION) v1.0: In-Situ Observations Simulator (ISO_simulator)
Climate model downscaling in central Asia: a dynamical and a neural network approach
Advanced climate model evaluation with ESMValTool v2.11.0 using parallel, out-of-core, and distributed computing
Multi-year simulations at kilometre scale with the Integrated Forecasting System coupled to FESOM2.5 and NEMOv3.4
Subsurface hydrological controls on the short-term effects of hurricanes on nitrate–nitrogen runoff loading: a case study of Hurricane Ida using the Energy Exascale Earth System Model (E3SM) Land Model (v2.1)
CARIB12: a regional Community Earth System Model/Modular Ocean Model 6 configuration of the Caribbean Sea
Process-based modeling framework for sustainable irrigation management at the regional scale: Integrating rice production, water use, and greenhouse gas emissions
Architectural insights into and training methodology optimization of Pangu-Weather
Evaluation of global fire simulations in CMIP6 Earth system models
Evaluating downscaled products with expected hydroclimatic co-variances
Software sustainability of global impact models
fair-calibrate v1.4.1: calibration, constraining, and validation of the FaIR simple climate model for reliable future climate projections
ISOM 1.0: a fully mesoscale-resolving idealized Southern Ocean model and the diversity of multiscale eddy interactions
A computationally lightweight model for ensemble forecasting of environmental hazards: General TAMSAT-ALERT v1.2.1
Introducing the MESMER-M-TPv0.1.0 module: spatially explicit Earth system model emulation for monthly precipitation and temperature
The need for carbon-emissions-driven climate projections in CMIP7
Robust handling of extremes in quantile mapping – “Murder your darlings”
A protocol for model intercomparison of impacts of marine cloud brightening climate intervention
An extensible perturbed parameter ensemble for the Community Atmosphere Model version 6
Pengfei Shi, L. Ruby Leung, and Bin Wang
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 2443–2460, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2443-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2443-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Improving climate predictions has significant socio-economic impacts. In this study, we develop and apply a new weakly coupled ocean data assimilation (WCODA) system to a coupled climate model. The WCODA system improves simulations of ocean temperature and salinity across many global regions. This system is meant to advance our understanding of the ocean's role in climate predictability.
Liwen Wang, Qian Li, Qi Lv, Xuan Peng, and Wei You
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 2427–2442, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2427-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2427-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Our research presents a novel deep learning approach called "TemDeep" for downscaling atmospheric variables at arbitrary time resolutions based on temporal coherence. Results show that our method can accurately recover evolution details superior to other methods, reaching 53.7 % in the restoration rate. Our findings are important for advancing weather forecasting models and enabling more precise and reliable predictions to support disaster preparedness, agriculture, and sustainable development.
Teo Price-Broncucia, Allison Baker, Dorit Hammerling, Michael Duda, and Rebecca Morrison
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 2349–2372, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2349-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2349-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
The ensemble consistency test (ECT) and its ultrafast variant (UF-ECT) have become powerful tools in the development community for the identification of unwanted changes in the Community Earth System Model (CESM). We develop a generalized setup framework to enable easy adoption of the ECT approach for other model developers and communities. This framework specifies test parameters to accurately characterize model variability and balance test sensitivity and computational cost.
Esteban Fernández Villanueva and Gary Shaffer
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 2161–2192, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2161-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2161-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We describe, calibrate and test the Danish Center for Earth System Science (DCESS) II model, a new, broad, adaptable and fast Earth system model. DCESS II is designed for global simulations over timescales of years to millions of years using limited computer resources like a personal computer. With its flexibility and comprehensive treatment of the global carbon cycle, DCESS II is a useful, computationally friendly tool for simulations of past climates as well as for future Earth system projections.
Gang Tang, Zebedee Nicholls, Alexander Norton, Sönke Zaehle, and Malte Meinshausen
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 2193–2230, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2193-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2193-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We studied carbon–nitrogen coupling in Earth system models by developing a global carbon–nitrogen cycle model (CNit v1.0) within the widely used emulator MAGICC. CNit effectively reproduced the global carbon–nitrogen cycle dynamics observed in complex models. Our results show persistent nitrogen limitations on plant growth (net primary production) from 1850 to 2100, suggesting that nitrogen deficiency may constrain future land carbon sequestration.
Ngoc Thi Nhu Do, Kengo Sudo, Akihiko Ito, Louisa K. Emmons, Vaishali Naik, Kostas Tsigaridis, Øyvind Seland, Gerd A. Folberth, and Douglas I. Kelley
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 2079–2109, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2079-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2079-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Understanding historical isoprene emission changes is important for predicting future climate, but trends and their controlling factors remain uncertain. This study shows that long-term isoprene trends vary among Earth system models mainly due to partially incorporating CO2 effects and land cover changes rather than to climate. Future models that refine these factors’ effects on isoprene emissions, along with long-term observations, are essential for better understanding plant–climate interactions.
Gang Tang, Zebedee Nicholls, Chris Jones, Thomas Gasser, Alexander Norton, Tilo Ziehn, Alejandro Romero-Prieto, and Malte Meinshausen
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 2111–2136, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2111-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2111-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We analyzed carbon and nitrogen mass conservation in data from various Earth system models. Our findings reveal significant discrepancies between flux and pool size data, where cumulative imbalances can reach hundreds of gigatons of carbon or nitrogen. These imbalances appear primarily due to missing or inconsistently reported fluxes – especially for land-use and fire emissions. To enhance data quality, we recommend that future climate data protocols address this issue at the reporting stage.
Florian Börgel, Sven Karsten, Karoline Rummel, and Ulf Gräwe
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 2005–2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2005-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2005-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Forecasting river runoff, which is crucial for managing water resources and understanding climate impacts, can be challenging. This study introduces a new method using convolutional long short-term memory (ConvLSTM) networks, a machine learning model that processes spatial and temporal data. Focusing on the Baltic Sea region, our model uses weather data as input to predict daily river runoff for 97 rivers.
Tao Zhang, Cyril Morcrette, Meng Zhang, Wuyin Lin, Shaocheng Xie, Ye Liu, Kwinten Van Weverberg, and Joana Rodrigues
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 1917–1928, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1917-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1917-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Earth system models (ESMs) struggle with the uncertainties associated with parameterizing subgrid physics. Machine learning (ML) algorithms offer a solution by learning the important relationships and features from high-resolution models. To incorporate ML parameterizations into ESMs, we develop a Fortran–Python interface that allows for calling Python functions within Fortran-based ESMs. Through two case studies, this interface demonstrates its feasibility, modularity, and effectiveness.
Camilla Mathison, Eleanor J. Burke, Gregory Munday, Chris D. Jones, Chris J. Smith, Norman J. Steinert, Andy J. Wiltshire, Chris Huntingford, Eszter Kovacs, Laila K. Gohar, Rebecca M. Varney, and Douglas McNeall
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 1785–1808, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1785-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1785-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We present PRIME (Probabilistic Regional Impacts from Model patterns and Emissions), which is designed to take new emissions scenarios and rapidly provide regional impact information. PRIME allows large ensembles to be run on multi-centennial timescales, including the analysis of many important variables for impact assessments. Our evaluation shows that PRIME reproduces the climate response for known scenarios, providing confidence in using PRIME for novel scenarios.
Katherine M. Smith, Alice M. Barthel, LeAnn M. Conlon, Luke P. Van Roekel, Anthony Bartoletti, Jean-Christophe Golaz, Chengzhu Zhang, Carolyn Branecky Begeman, James J. Benedict, Gautam Bisht, Yan Feng, Walter Hannah, Bryce E. Harrop, Nicole Jeffery, Wuyin Lin, Po-Lun Ma, Mathew E. Maltrud, Mark R. Petersen, Balwinder Singh, Qi Tang, Teklu Tesfa, Jonathan D. Wolfe, Shaocheng Xie, Xue Zheng, Karthik Balaguru, Oluwayemi Garuba, Peter Gleckler, Aixue Hu, Jiwoo Lee, Ben Moore-Maley, and Ana C. Ordoñez
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 1613–1633, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1613-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1613-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Version 2.1 of the U.S. Department of Energy's Energy Exascale Earth System Model (E3SM) adds the Fox-Kemper et al. (2011) mixed-layer eddy parameterization, which restratifies the ocean surface layer through an overturning streamfunction. Results include surface layer bias reduction in temperature, salinity, and sea ice extent in the North Atlantic; a small strengthening of the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation; and improvements to many atmospheric climatological variables.
Huilin Huang, Yun Qian, Gautam Bisht, Jiali Wang, Tirthankar Chakraborty, Dalei Hao, Jianfeng Li, Travis Thurber, Balwinder Singh, Zhao Yang, Ye Liu, Pengfei Xue, William J. Sacks, Ethan Coon, and Robert Hetland
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 1427–1443, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1427-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1427-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We integrate the E3SM Land Model (ELM) with the WRF model through the Lightweight Infrastructure for Land Atmosphere Coupling (LILAC) Earth System Modeling Framework (ESMF). This framework includes a top-level driver, LILAC, for variable communication between WRF and ELM and ESMF caps for ELM initialization, execution, and finalization. The LILAC–ESMF framework maintains the integrity of the ELM's source code structure and facilitates the transfer of future ELM model developments to WRF-ELM.
Michael Nole, Jonah Bartrand, Fawz Naim, and Glenn Hammond
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 1413–1425, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1413-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1413-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Safe carbon dioxide (CO2) storage is likely to be critical for mitigating some of the most severe effects of climate change. We present a simulation framework for modeling CO2 storage beneath the seafloor, where CO2 can form a solid. This can aid in permanent CO2 storage for long periods of time. Our models show what a commercial-scale CO2 injection would look like in a marine environment. We discuss what would need to be considered when designing a subsea CO2 injection.
Reyk Börner, Jan O. Haerter, and Romain Fiévet
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 1333–1356, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1333-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1333-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
The daily cycle of sea surface temperature (SST) impacts clouds above the ocean and could influence the clustering of thunderstorms linked to extreme rainfall and hurricanes. However, daily SST variability is often poorly represented in modeling studies of how clouds cluster. We present a simple, wind-responsive model of upper-ocean temperature for use in atmospheric simulations. Evaluating the model against observations, we show that it performs significantly better than common slab models.
Malcolm J. Roberts, Kevin A. Reed, Qing Bao, Joseph J. Barsugli, Suzana J. Camargo, Louis-Philippe Caron, Ping Chang, Cheng-Ta Chen, Hannah M. Christensen, Gokhan Danabasoglu, Ivy Frenger, Neven S. Fučkar, Shabeh ul Hasson, Helene T. Hewitt, Huanping Huang, Daehyun Kim, Chihiro Kodama, Michael Lai, Lai-Yung Ruby Leung, Ryo Mizuta, Paulo Nobre, Pablo Ortega, Dominique Paquin, Christopher D. Roberts, Enrico Scoccimarro, Jon Seddon, Anne Marie Treguier, Chia-Ying Tu, Paul A. Ullrich, Pier Luigi Vidale, Michael F. Wehner, Colin M. Zarzycki, Bosong Zhang, Wei Zhang, and Ming Zhao
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 1307–1332, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1307-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1307-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
HighResMIP2 is a model intercomparison project focusing on high-resolution global climate models, that is, those with grid spacings of 25 km or less in the atmosphere and ocean, using simulations of decades to a century in length. We are proposing an update of our simulation protocol to make the models more applicable to key questions for climate variability and hazard in present-day and future projections and to build links with other communities to provide more robust climate information.
Jordi Buckley Paules, Simone Fatichi, Bonnie Warring, and Athanasios Paschalis
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 1287–1305, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1287-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1287-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We present and validate enhancements to the process-based T&C model aimed at improving its representation of crop growth and management practices. The updated model, T&C-CROP, enables applications such as analysing the hydrological and carbon storage impacts of land use transitions (e.g. conversions between crops, forests, and pastures) and optimizing irrigation and fertilization strategies in response to climate change.
Sébastien Masson, Swen Jullien, Eric Maisonnave, David Gill, Guillaume Samson, Mathieu Le Corre, and Lionel Renault
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 1241–1263, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1241-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1241-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
This article details a new feature we implemented in the popular regional atmospheric model WRF. This feature allows for data exchange between WRF and any other model (e.g. an ocean model) using the coupling library Ocean–Atmosphere–Sea–Ice–Soil Model Coupling Toolkit (OASIS3-MCT). This coupling interface is designed to be non-intrusive, flexible and modular. It also offers the possibility of taking into account the nested zooms used in WRF or in the models with which it is coupled.
Axel Lauer, Lisa Bock, Birgit Hassler, Patrick Jöckel, Lukas Ruhe, and Manuel Schlund
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 1169–1188, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1169-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1169-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Earth system models are important tools to improve our understanding of current climate and to project climate change. Thus, it is crucial to understand possible shortcomings in the models. New features of the ESMValTool software package allow one to compare and visualize a model's performance with respect to reproducing observations in the context of other climate models in an easy and user-friendly way. We aim to help model developers assess and monitor climate simulations more efficiently.
Ulrich G. Wortmann, Tina Tsan, Mahrukh Niazi, Irene A. Ma, Ruben Navasardyan, Magnus-Roland Marun, Bernardo S. Chede, Jingwen Zhong, and Morgan Wolfe
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 1155–1167, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1155-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1155-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
The Earth Science Box Modeling Toolkit (ESBMTK) is a user-friendly Python library that simplifies the creation of models to study earth system processes, such as the carbon cycle and ocean chemistry. It enhances learning by emphasizing concepts over programming and is accessible to students and researchers alike. By automating complex calculations and promoting code clarity, ESBMTK accelerates model development while improving reproducibility and the usability of scientific research.
Florian Zabel, Matthias Knüttel, and Benjamin Poschlod
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 1067–1087, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1067-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1067-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
CropSuite is a new open-source crop suitability model. It provides a GUI and a wide range of options, including a spatial downscaling of climate data. We apply CropSuite to 48 staple and opportunity crops at a 1 km spatial resolution in Africa. We find that climate variability significantly impacts suitable areas but also affects optimal sowing dates and multiple cropping potential. The results provide valuable information for climate impact assessments, adaptation, and land-use planning.
Kerstin Hartung, Bastian Kern, Nils-Arne Dreier, Jörn Geisbüsch, Mahnoosh Haghighatnasab, Patrick Jöckel, Astrid Kerkweg, Wilton Jaciel Loch, Florian Prill, and Daniel Rieger
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 1001–1015, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1001-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1001-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
The ICOsahedral Non-hydrostatic (ICON) model system Community Interface (ComIn) library supports connecting third-party modules to the ICON model. Third-party modules can range from simple diagnostic Python scripts to full chemistry models. ComIn offers a low barrier for code extensions to ICON, provides multi-language support (Fortran, C/C++, and Python), and reduces the migration effort in response to new ICON releases. This paper presents the ComIn design principles and a range of use cases.
Daniel Ries, Katherine Goode, Kellie McClernon, and Benjamin Hillman
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 1041–1065, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1041-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1041-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Machine learning has advanced research in the climate science domain, but its models are difficult to understand. In order to understand the impacts and consequences of climate interventions such as stratospheric aerosol injection, complex models are often necessary. We use a case study to illustrate how we can understand the inner workings of a complex model. We present this technique as an exploratory tool that can be used to quickly discover and assess relationships in complex climate data.
Bo Dong, Paul Ullrich, Jiwoo Lee, Peter Gleckler, Kristin Chang, and Travis A. O'Brien
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 961–976, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-961-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-961-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
A metrics package designed for easy analysis of atmospheric river (AR) characteristics and statistics is presented. The tool is efficient for diagnosing systematic AR bias in climate models and useful for evaluating new AR characteristics in model simulations. In climate models, landfalling AR precipitation shows dry biases globally, and AR tracks are farther poleward (equatorward) in the North and South Atlantic (South Pacific and Indian Ocean).
Panagiotis Adamidis, Erik Pfister, Hendryk Bockelmann, Dominik Zobel, Jens-Olaf Beismann, and Marek Jacob
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 905–919, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-905-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-905-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
In this paper, we investigated performance indicators of the climate model ICON (ICOsahedral Nonhydrostatic) on different compute architectures to answer the question of how to generate high-resolution climate simulations. Evidently, it is not enough to use more computing units of the conventionally used architectures; higher memory throughput is the most promising approach. More potential can be gained from single-node optimization rather than simply increasing the number of compute nodes.
Kangari Narender Reddy, Somnath Baidya Roy, Sam S. Rabin, Danica L. Lombardozzi, Gudimetla Venkateswara Varma, Ruchira Biswas, and Devavat Chiru Naik
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 763–785, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-763-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-763-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
The study aimed to improve the representation of wheat and rice in a land model for the Indian region. The modified model performed significantly better than the default model in simulating crop phenology, yield, and carbon, water, and energy fluxes compared to observations. The study highlights the need for global land models to use region-specific crop parameters for accurately simulating vegetation processes and land surface processes.
Giovanni Di Virgilio, Fei Ji, Eugene Tam, Jason P. Evans, Jatin Kala, Julia Andrys, Christopher Thomas, Dipayan Choudhury, Carlos Rocha, Yue Li, and Matthew L. Riley
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 703–724, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-703-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-703-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We evaluate the skill in simulating the Australian climate of some of the latest generation of regional climate models. We show when and where the models simulate this climate with high skill versus model limitations. We show how new models perform relative to the previous-generation models, assessing how model design features may underlie key performance improvements. This work is of national and international relevance as it can help guide the use and interpretation of climate projections.
Giovanni Di Virgilio, Jason P. Evans, Fei Ji, Eugene Tam, Jatin Kala, Julia Andrys, Christopher Thomas, Dipayan Choudhury, Carlos Rocha, Stephen White, Yue Li, Moutassem El Rafei, Rishav Goyal, Matthew L. Riley, and Jyothi Lingala
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 671–702, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-671-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-671-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We introduce new climate models that simulate Australia’s future climate at regional scales, including at an unprecedented resolution of 4 km for 1950–2100. We describe the model design process used to create these new climate models. We show how the new models perform relative to previous-generation models and compare their climate projections. This work is of national and international relevance as it can help guide climate model design and the use and interpretation of climate projections.
Jiawang Feng, Chun Zhao, Qiuyan Du, Zining Yang, and Chen Jin
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 585–603, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-585-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-585-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
In this study, we improved the calculation of how aerosols in the air interact with radiation in WRF-Chem. The original model used a simplified method, but we developed a more accurate approach. We found that this method significantly changes the properties of the estimated aerosols and their effects on radiation, especially for dust aerosols. It also impacts the simulated weather conditions. Our work highlights the importance of correctly representing aerosol–radiation interactions in models.
Eduardo Moreno-Chamarro, Thomas Arsouze, Mario Acosta, Pierre-Antoine Bretonnière, Miguel Castrillo, Eric Ferrer, Amanda Frigola, Daria Kuznetsova, Eneko Martin-Martinez, Pablo Ortega, and Sergi Palomas
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 461–482, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-461-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-461-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We present the high-resolution model version of the EC-Earth global climate model to contribute to HighResMIP. The combined model resolution is about 10–15 km in both the ocean and atmosphere, which makes it one of the finest ever used to complete historical and scenario simulations. This model is compared with two lower-resolution versions, with a 100 km and a 25 km grid. The three models are compared with observations to study the improvements thanks to the increased resolution.
Catherine Guiavarc'h, David Storkey, Adam T. Blaker, Ed Blockley, Alex Megann, Helene Hewitt, Michael J. Bell, Daley Calvert, Dan Copsey, Bablu Sinha, Sophia Moreton, Pierre Mathiot, and Bo An
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 377–403, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-377-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-377-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
The Global Ocean and Sea Ice configuration version 9 (GOSI9) is the new UK hierarchy of model configurations based on the Nucleus for European Modelling of the Ocean (NEMO) and available at three resolutions. It will be used for various applications, e.g. weather forecasting and climate prediction. It improves upon the previous version by reducing global temperature and salinity biases and enhancing the representation of Arctic sea ice and the Antarctic Circumpolar Current.
Andy Richling, Jens Grieger, and Henning W. Rust
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 361–375, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-361-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-361-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
The performance of weather and climate prediction systems is variable in time and space. It is of interest how this performance varies in different situations. We provide a decomposition of a skill score (a measure of forecast performance) as a tool for detailed assessment of performance variability to support model development or forecast improvement. The framework is exemplified with decadal forecasts to assess the impact of different ocean states in the North Atlantic on temperature forecast.
Maria R. Russo, Sadie L. Bartholomew, David Hassell, Alex M. Mason, Erica Neininger, A. James Perman, David A. J. Sproson, Duncan Watson-Parris, and Nathan Luke Abraham
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 181–191, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-181-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-181-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Observational data and modelling capabilities have expanded in recent years, but there are still barriers preventing these two data sources from being used in synergy. Proper comparison requires generating, storing, and handling a large amount of data. This work describes the first step in the development of a new set of software tools, the VISION toolkit, which can enable the easy and efficient integration of observational and model data required for model evaluation.
Bijan Fallah, Masoud Rostami, Emmanuele Russo, Paula Harder, Christoph Menz, Peter Hoffmann, Iulii Didovets, and Fred F. Hattermann
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 161–180, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-161-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-161-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We tried to contribute to a local climate change impact study in central Asia, a region that is water-scarce and vulnerable to global climate change. We use regional models and machine learning to produce reliable local data from global climate models. We find that regional models show more realistic and detailed changes in heavy precipitation than global climate models. Our work can help assess the future risks of extreme events and plan adaptation strategies in central Asia.
Manuel Schlund, Bouwe Andela, Jörg Benke, Ruth Comer, Birgit Hassler, Emma Hogan, Peter Kalverla, Axel Lauer, Bill Little, Saskia Loosveldt Tomas, Francesco Nattino, Patrick Peglar, Valeriu Predoi, Stef Smeets, Stephen Worsley, Martin Yeo, and Klaus Zimmermann
Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2024-236, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2024-236, 2025
Revised manuscript accepted for GMD
Short summary
Short summary
The Earth System Model Evaluation Tool (ESMValTool) is a community diagnostics and performance metrics tool for the evaluation of Earth system models. Here, we describe recent significant improvements of ESMValTool’s computational efficiency including parallel, out-of-core, and distributed computing. Evaluations with the enhanced version of ESMValTool are faster, use less computational resources, and can handle input data larger than the available memory.
Thomas Rackow, Xabier Pedruzo-Bagazgoitia, Tobias Becker, Sebastian Milinski, Irina Sandu, Razvan Aguridan, Peter Bechtold, Sebastian Beyer, Jean Bidlot, Souhail Boussetta, Willem Deconinck, Michail Diamantakis, Peter Dueben, Emanuel Dutra, Richard Forbes, Rohit Ghosh, Helge F. Goessling, Ioan Hadade, Jan Hegewald, Thomas Jung, Sarah Keeley, Lukas Kluft, Nikolay Koldunov, Aleksei Koldunov, Tobias Kölling, Josh Kousal, Christian Kühnlein, Pedro Maciel, Kristian Mogensen, Tiago Quintino, Inna Polichtchouk, Balthasar Reuter, Domokos Sármány, Patrick Scholz, Dmitry Sidorenko, Jan Streffing, Birgit Sützl, Daisuke Takasuka, Steffen Tietsche, Mirco Valentini, Benoît Vannière, Nils Wedi, Lorenzo Zampieri, and Florian Ziemen
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 33–69, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-33-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-33-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Detailed global climate model simulations have been created based on a numerical weather prediction model, offering more accurate spatial detail down to the scale of individual cities ("kilometre-scale") and a better understanding of climate phenomena such as atmospheric storms, whirls in the ocean, and cracks in sea ice. The new model aims to provide globally consistent information on local climate change with greater precision, benefiting environmental planning and local impact modelling.
Yilin Fang, Hoang Viet Tran, and L. Ruby Leung
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 19–32, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-19-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-19-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Hurricanes may worsen water quality in the lower Mississippi River basin (LMRB) by increasing nutrient runoff. We found that runoff parameterizations greatly affect nitrate–nitrogen runoff simulated using an Earth system land model. Our simulations predicted increased nitrogen runoff in the LMRB during Hurricane Ida in 2021, albeit less pronounced than the observations, indicating areas for model improvement to better understand and manage nutrient runoff loss during hurricanes in the region.
Giovanni Seijo-Ellis, Donata Giglio, Gustavo Marques, and Frank Bryan
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 8989–9021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8989-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8989-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
A CESM–MOM6 regional configuration of the Caribbean Sea was developed in response to the rising need for high-resolution models for climate impact studies. The configuration is validated for the period 2000–2020 and improves significant errors in a low-resolution model. Oceanic properties are well represented. Patterns of freshwater associated with the Amazon River are well captured, and the mean flows of ocean waters across multiple passages in the Caribbean Sea agree with observations.
Yan Bo, Hao Liang, Tao Li, and Feng Zhou
Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2024-212, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2024-212, 2024
Revised manuscript accepted for GMD
Short summary
Short summary
This study proposed an advancing framework for modeling regional rice production, water use, and greenhouse gas emissions. The framework integrated a process-based soil-crop model with key physiological effects, a novel model upscaling method, and the NSGA-II multi-objective optimization algorithm at a parallel computing platform. The framework provides a valuable tool for irrigation optimization to deliver co-benefits of ensuring food production, reducing water use and greenhouse gas emissions.
Deifilia To, Julian Quinting, Gholam Ali Hoshyaripour, Markus Götz, Achim Streit, and Charlotte Debus
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 8873–8884, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8873-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8873-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Pangu-Weather is a breakthrough machine learning model in medium-range weather forecasting that considers 3D atmospheric information. We show that using a simpler 2D framework improves robustness, speeds up training, and reduces computational needs by 20 %–30 %. We introduce a training procedure that varies the importance of atmospheric variables over time to speed up training convergence. Decreasing computational demand increases the accessibility of training and working with the model.
Fang Li, Xiang Song, Sandy P. Harrison, Jennifer R. Marlon, Zhongda Lin, L. Ruby Leung, Jörg Schwinger, Virginie Marécal, Shiyu Wang, Daniel S. Ward, Xiao Dong, Hanna Lee, Lars Nieradzik, Sam S. Rabin, and Roland Séférian
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 8751–8771, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8751-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8751-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
This study provides the first comprehensive assessment of historical fire simulations from 19 Earth system models in phase 6 of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP6). Most models reproduce global totals, spatial patterns, seasonality, and regional historical changes well but fail to simulate the recent decline in global burned area and underestimate the fire response to climate variability. CMIP6 simulations address three critical issues of phase-5 models.
Seung H. Baek, Paul A. Ullrich, Bo Dong, and Jiwoo Lee
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 8665–8681, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8665-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8665-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We evaluate downscaled products by examining locally relevant co-variances during precipitation events. Common statistical downscaling techniques preserve expected co-variances during convective precipitation (a stationary phenomenon). However, they dampen future intensification of frontal precipitation (a non-stationary phenomenon) captured in global climate models and dynamical downscaling. Our study quantifies a ramification of the stationarity assumption underlying statistical downscaling.
Emmanuel Nyenah, Petra Döll, Daniel S. Katz, and Robert Reinecke
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 8593–8611, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8593-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8593-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Research software is vital for scientific progress but is often developed by scientists with limited skills, time, and funding, leading to challenges in usability and maintenance. Our study across 10 sectors shows strengths in version control, open-source licensing, and documentation while emphasizing the need for containerization and code quality. We recommend workshops; code quality metrics; funding; and following the findable, accessible, interoperable, and reusable (FAIR) standards.
Chris Smith, Donald P. Cummins, Hege-Beate Fredriksen, Zebedee Nicholls, Malte Meinshausen, Myles Allen, Stuart Jenkins, Nicholas Leach, Camilla Mathison, and Antti-Ilari Partanen
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 8569–8592, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8569-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8569-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Climate projections are only useful if the underlying models that produce them are well calibrated and can reproduce observed climate change. We formalise a software package that calibrates the open-source FaIR simple climate model to full-complexity Earth system models. Observations, including historical warming, and assessments of key climate variables such as that of climate sensitivity are used to constrain the model output.
Jingwei Xie, Xi Wang, Hailong Liu, Pengfei Lin, Jiangfeng Yu, Zipeng Yu, Junlin Wei, and Xiang Han
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 8469–8493, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8469-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8469-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We propose the concept of mesoscale ocean direct numerical simulation (MODNS), which should resolve the first baroclinic deformation radius and ensure the numerical dissipative effects do not directly contaminate the mesoscale motions. It can be a benchmark for testing mesoscale ocean large eddy simulation (MOLES) methods in ocean models. We build an idealized Southern Ocean model using MITgcm to generate a type of MODNS. We also illustrate the diversity of multiscale eddy interactions.
Emily Black, John Ellis, and Ross I. Maidment
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 8353–8372, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8353-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8353-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We present General TAMSAT-ALERT, a computationally lightweight and versatile tool for generating ensemble forecasts from time series data. General TAMSAT-ALERT is capable of combining multiple streams of monitoring and meteorological forecasting data into probabilistic hazard assessments. In this way, it complements existing systems and enhances their utility for actionable hazard assessment.
Sarah Schöngart, Lukas Gudmundsson, Mathias Hauser, Peter Pfleiderer, Quentin Lejeune, Shruti Nath, Sonia Isabelle Seneviratne, and Carl-Friedrich Schleussner
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 8283–8320, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8283-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8283-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Precipitation and temperature are two of the most impact-relevant climatic variables. Yet, projecting future precipitation and temperature data under different emission scenarios relies on complex models that are computationally expensive. In this study, we propose a method that allows us to generate monthly means of local precipitation and temperature at low computational costs. Our modelling framework is particularly useful for all downstream applications of climate model data.
Benjamin M. Sanderson, Ben B. B. Booth, John Dunne, Veronika Eyring, Rosie A. Fisher, Pierre Friedlingstein, Matthew J. Gidden, Tomohiro Hajima, Chris D. Jones, Colin G. Jones, Andrew King, Charles D. Koven, David M. Lawrence, Jason Lowe, Nadine Mengis, Glen P. Peters, Joeri Rogelj, Chris Smith, Abigail C. Snyder, Isla R. Simpson, Abigail L. S. Swann, Claudia Tebaldi, Tatiana Ilyina, Carl-Friedrich Schleussner, Roland Séférian, Bjørn H. Samset, Detlef van Vuuren, and Sönke Zaehle
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 8141–8172, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8141-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8141-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We discuss how, in order to provide more relevant guidance for climate policy, coordinated climate experiments should adopt a greater focus on simulations where Earth system models are provided with carbon emissions from fossil fuels together with land use change instructions, rather than past approaches that have largely focused on experiments with prescribed atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations. We discuss how these goals might be achieved in coordinated climate modeling experiments.
Peter Berg, Thomas Bosshard, Denica Bozhinova, Lars Bärring, Joakim Löw, Carolina Nilsson, Gustav Strandberg, Johan Södling, Johan Thuresson, Renate Wilcke, and Wei Yang
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 8173–8179, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8173-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8173-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
When bias adjusting climate model data using quantile mapping, one needs to prescribe what to do at the tails of the distribution, where a larger data range is likely encountered outside of the calibration period. The end result is highly dependent on the method used. We show that, to avoid discontinuities in the time series, one needs to exclude data in the calibration range to also activate the extrapolation functionality in that time period.
Philip J. Rasch, Haruki Hirasawa, Mingxuan Wu, Sarah J. Doherty, Robert Wood, Hailong Wang, Andy Jones, James Haywood, and Hansi Singh
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 7963–7994, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7963-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7963-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We introduce a protocol to compare computer climate simulations to better understand a proposed strategy intended to counter warming and climate impacts from greenhouse gas increases. This slightly changes clouds in six ocean regions to reflect more sunlight and cool the Earth. Example changes in clouds and climate are shown for three climate models. Cloud changes differ between the models, but precipitation and surface temperature changes are similar when their cooling effects are made similar.
Trude Eidhammer, Andrew Gettelman, Katherine Thayer-Calder, Duncan Watson-Parris, Gregory Elsaesser, Hugh Morrison, Marcus van Lier-Walqui, Ci Song, and Daniel McCoy
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 7835–7853, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7835-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7835-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We describe a dataset where 45 parameters related to cloud processes in the Community Earth System Model version 2 (CESM2) Community Atmosphere Model version 6 (CAM6) are perturbed. Three sets of perturbed parameter ensembles (263 members) were created: current climate, preindustrial aerosol loading and future climate with sea surface temperature increased by 4 K.
Cited articles
Akhtar, N., Brauch, J., and Ahrens, B.: Climate modeling over the
Mediterranean Sea: impact of resolution and ocean coupling, Clim. Dynam., 51,
933–948, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-017-3570-8, 2018.
Amante, C. and Eakins, B. W.: ETOPO1 1 arc-minute global relief model:
procedures, data sources and analysis, in: NOAA Technical Memorandum NESDIS,
NGDC-24, NOAA, Boulder, Colorado, 2009.
Artegiani, A., Bregant, D., Paschini, E., Pinardi, N., Raicich, F., and
Russo, A.: The Adriatic Sea general circulation, part I: air-sea
interactions and water mass structure, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 27, 1492–1514,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0485(1997)027<1492:TASGCP>2.0.CO;2,
1997.
Batistić, M., Garić, R., and Molinero, J. C.: Interannual variations
in Adriatic Sea zooplankton mirror shifts in circulation regimes in the
Ionian Sea, Clim. Res., 61, 231–240, https://doi.org/10.3354/cr01248, 2014.
Beg Paklar, G., Isakov, V., Koračin, D., Kourafalou, V., and Orlić, M.: A case study of bora-driven flow and density changes on the Adriatic shelf (January 1987), Cont. Shelf Res., 21, 1751–1783,
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-4343(01)00029-2, 2001.
Benetazzo, A., Bergamasco, A., Bonaldo, D., Falcieri, F. M., Sclavo, M.,
Langone, L., and Carniel, S.: Response of the Adriatic Sea to an intense
cold air outbreak: Dense water dynamics and wave-induced transport, Prog.
Oceanogr., 128, 115–138, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pocean.2014.08.015, 2014.
Bergamasco, A., Oguz, T., and Malanotte-Rizzoli, P.: Modeling dense water
mass formation and winter circulation in the northern and central Adriatic
Sea, J. Marine Syst., 20, 279–300,
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-7963(98)00087-6, 1999.
Boldrin, A., Carniel, S., Giani, M., Marini, M., Bernardi Aubry, F., Campanelli,
A., Grilli, F., and Russo, A.: Effects of bora wind on physical and
biogeochemical properties of stratified waters in the northern Adriatic, J.
Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 114, C08S92, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JC004837, 2009.
Burrage, D. M., Book, J. W., and Martin, P. J.: Eddies and filaments of the
Western Adriatic Current near Cape Gargano: Analysis and prediction, J. Marine Syst., 78, S205–S226, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmarsys.2009.01.024, 2009.
Carniel, S., Benetazzo, A., Bonaldo, D., Falcieri, F. M., Miglietta, M. M.,
Ricchi, A., and Sclavo, M.: Scratching beneath the surface while coupling
atmosphere, ocean and waves: Analysis of a dense water formation event,
Ocean Model., 101, 101–112, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocemod.2016.03.007, 2016.
Cavaleri, L. and Bertotti, L.: In search of the correct wind and wave fields
in a minor basin, Mon. Weather Rev., 125, 1964–1975,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1997)125<1964:ISOTCW>2.0.CO;2,
1997.
Cavaleri, L., Bertotti, L., Buizza, R., Buzzi, A., Masato, V., Umgiesser,
G., and Zampieri, M.: Predictability of extreme meteo-oceanographic events
in the Adriatic Sea, Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc., 136, 400–413,
https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.567, 2010.
Cavaleri, L., Abdalla, S., Benetazzo, A., Bertotti, L., Bidlot, J-R,
Breivik, Ø., Carniel, S., Jensen, R. E., Portilla-Yandun, Rogers, W. E.,
Roland, A., Sanchez-Arcilla, A., Smith, J. M., Staneva, J., Toledo, Y., van
Vledder, G. P., and van der Westhuysen, A. J.: Wave modelling in coastal and
inner seas, Prog. Oceanogr., 167, 164–233,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pocean.2018.03.010, 2018.
Chapman, D. C.: Numerical treatment of cross-shelf open boundaries in a
barotropic coastal ocean model, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 15, 1060–1075,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0485(1985)015<1060:NTOCSO>2.0.CO;2,
1985.
Cushman-Roisin, B. and Naimie, C. E.: A 3d finite-element model of the
Adriatic tides, J. Mar. Syst., 37, 279–297, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-7963(02)00204-X, 2002.
Darmaraki, S., Somot, S., Sevault, F., Nabat, P., Cabos Narvaez, W. D.,
Cavicchia, L., Djurdjevic, V., Li, L., Sannino, G., and Sein, D. V.: Future
evolution of Marine Heatwaves in the Mediterranean Sea, Clim. Dynam., 53,
1371–1392, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-019-04661-z, 2019.
Denamiel, C. L.: AdriSC Climate Model: Evaluation Run, OSF [code], https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/ZB3CM, 2021.
Denamiel, C., Šepić, J., Ivanković, D., and Vilibić, I.: The
Adriatic Sea and Coast modelling suite: Evaluation of the meteotsunami
forecast component, Ocean Model., 135, 71–93,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocemod.2019.02.003, 2019.
Denamiel, C., Pranić, P., Quentin, F., Mihanović, H., and
Vilibić, I.: Pseudo-global warming projections of extreme wave storms in
complex coastal regions: the case of the Adriatic Sea, Clim. Dynam.,
55, 2483–2509, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-020-05397-x, 2020a.
Denamiel, C., Tojčić, I., and Vilibić, I.: Far future climate
(2060–2100) of the northern Adriatic air–sea heat transfers associated
with extreme bora events, Clim. Dynam., 55, 3043–3066,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-020-05435-8, 2020b.
Denamiel, C., Tojčić, I., and Vilibić, I.: Balancing accuracy
and efficiency of atmospheric models in the northern Adriatic during severe
bora events, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 126, e2020JD033516,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JD033516, 2021a.
Denamiel, C., Pranić, P., Ivanković, D., Tojčić, I., and Vilibić, I.: Performance of the Adriatic Sea and Coast (AdriSC) climate component – a COAWST V3.3-based coupled atmosphere–ocean modelling suite: atmospheric dataset, Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 3995–4017, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-3995-2021, 2021b.
Di Luca, A., Flaounas, E., Drobinski, P., and Lebeaupin-Brossier, C.: The
atmospheric component of the Mediterranean Sea water budget in a WRF
multi-physics ensemble and observations, Clim. Dynam., 43,
2349–2375, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-014-2058-z, 2014.
Dunić, N., Vilibić, I., Šepić, J., Mihanović, H.,
Sevault, F., Somot, S., Waldman, R., Nabat, P., Arsouze, T., Pennel, R.,
Jordà, G., and Precali, R.: Performance of multi-decadal ocean
simulations in the Adriatic Sea, Ocean Model., 134, 84–109,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocemod.2019.01.006, 2019.
Dutour Sikirić, M., Janeković, I., and Kuzmić, M.: A new
approach to bathymetry smoothing in sigma-coordinate ocean models, Ocean
Model., 29, 128–136, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocemod.2009.03.009, 2009.
Egbert, G. D. and Erofeeva, S. Y.: Efficient inverse modeling of barotropic
ocean tides, J. Atmos. Ocean. Technol., 19, 183–204,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0426(2002)019<0183:EIMOBO>2.0.CO;2,
2002.
Egbert, G. D., Bennett, A. F., and Foreman, M. G. G.: Topex/Poseidon tides
estimated using a global inverse model, J. Geophys. Res., 99, 24821–24852,
https://doi.org/10.1029/94JC01894, 1994.
Escudier, R., Clementi, E., Omar, M., Cipollone, A., Pistoia, J., Aydogdu,
A., Drudi, M., Grandi, A., Lyubartsev, V., Lecci, R., Cretí, S.,
Masina, S., Coppini, G., and Pinardi, N.: Mediterranean Sea Physical
Reanalysis (CMEMS MED-Currents) (Version 1), Copernicus
Monitoring Environment Marine Service (CMEMS) [data set],
https://doi.org/10.25423/CMCC/MEDSEA_MULTIYEAR_PHY_006_004_E3R1, 2020.
Flather, R. A.: A tidal model of the north-west European continental shelf,
Mem. Soc. R. Sci Liege, 6, 141–164, 1976.
Gačić, M., Civitarese, G., Miserocchi, S., Cardin, V., Crise, A.,
and Mauri, E.: The open-ocean convection in the Southern Adriatic: A
controlling mechanism of the spring phytoplankton bloom, Cont. Shelf Res.,
22, 1897–1908, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-4343(02)00050-X, 2002.
Gačić, M., Borzelli, G. E., Civitarese, G., Cardin, V., and Yari,
S.: Can internal processes sustain reversals of the ocean upper circulation?
The Ionian Sea example, Geophys. Res. Lett., 37, L09608,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GL043216, 2010.
Gačić, M., Civitarese, G., Eusebi Borzelli, G. L.,
Kovačević, V., Poulain, P.-M., Theocharis, A., Menna, M., Catucci,
A., and Zarokanellos, N.: On the relationship between the decadal
oscillations of the northern Ionian Sea and the salinity distributions in
the eastern Mediterranean, J. Geophys. Res., 116, C12002,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JC007280, 2011.
Gačić, M., Civitarese, G., Kovačević, V., Ursella, L., Bensi, M., Menna, M., Cardin, V., Poulain, P.-M., Cosoli, S., Notarstefano, G., and Pizzi, C.: Extreme winter 2012 in the Adriatic: an example of climatic effect on the BiOS rhythm, Ocean Sci., 10, 513–522, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-10-513-2014, 2014.
Hersbach, H., de Rosnay, P., Bell, B., Schepers, D., Simmons, A., Soci, C.,
Abdalla, S., Alonso-Balmaseda, M., Balsamo, G., Bechtold, P., Berrisford,
P., Bidlot, J.-R., de Boisséson, E., Bonavita, M., Browne, P., Buizza,
R., Dahlgren, P., Dee, D., Dragani, R., Diamantakis, M., Flemming, J.,
Forbes, R., Geer, A.J., Haiden, T., Hólm, E., Haimberger, L., Hogan, R.,
Horányi, A., Janiskova, M., Laloyaux, P., Lopez, P., Munoz-Sabater, J.,
Peubey, C., Radu, R., Richardson, D., Thépaut, J.-N., Vitart, F., Yang,
X., Zsótér, E., and Zuo, H.: Operational global reanalysis:
Progress, future directions and synergies with NWP, ECMWF ERA Report Series No. 27, https://doi.org/10.21957/tkic6g3wm, 2018.
Horak, J., Hofer, M., Gutmann, E., Gohm, A., and Rotach, M. W.: A process-based evaluation of the Intermediate Complexity Atmospheric Research Model (ICAR) 1.0.1, Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 1657–1680, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-1657-2021, 2021.
Ivanković, D., Denamiel, C., and Jelavić, D.: Web visualization of
data from numerical models and real-time stations network in frame of
Adriatic Sea and Coast (AdriSC) Meteotsunami Forecast, OCEANS 2019 –
Marseille, France, 17-20 June 2019, 1–5, https://doi.org/10.1109/OCEANSE.2019.8867225, 2019.
Janeković, I. and Kuzmić, M.: Numerical simulation of the Adriatic Sea principal tidal constituents, Ann. Geophys., 23, 3207–3218, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-23-3207-2005, 2005.
Janeković, I., Mihanović, H., Vilibić, I., and Tudor, M.:
Extreme cooling and dense water formation estimates in open and coastal
regions of the Adriatic Sea during the winter of 2012, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 119, 3200–3218, https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JC009865, 2014.
Janeković, I., Mihanović, H., Vilibić, I., Grčić, B.,
Ivatek-Šahdan, S., Tudor, M., and Djakovac, T.: Multi-platform 4D-Var
data assimilation for improving the Adriatic Sea dynamics, Ocean Model.,
146, 101538, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocemod.2019.101538, 2020.
Johnson, N. C., Krishnamurthy, L., Wittenberg, A. T., Xiang, B., Vecchi, G.
A., Kapnick, S. B., and Pascale, S.: The Impact of Sea Surface Temperature
Biases on North American Precipitation in a High-Resolution Climate
Model, J. Climate, 33, 2427–2447, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-19-0417.1,
2020.
JPL MUR MEaSUREs Project: GHRSST Level 4 MUR Global Foundation Sea Surface
Temperature Analysis (v4.1), Ver. 4.1. PO.DAAC, CA, USA,
https://doi.org/10.5067/GHGMR-4FJ04, 2015.
Krasakopoulou, E., Souvermezoglou, E., Minas, H.J., and Scoullos, M: Organic
matter stoichiometry based on oxygen consumption—nutrients regeneration
during a stagnation period in Jabuka Pit (middle Adriatic Sea), Cont. Shelf
Res., 25, 127–142, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csr.2004.07.026, 2005.
Larson, J., Jacob, R., and Ong, E.: The model coupling toolkit: a new
fortran90 toolkit for building multiphysics parallel coupled models,
Int. J. High Perform. Comput. Appl., 19, 277–292, https://doi.org/10.1177/1094342005056115, 2005.
L'Hévéder, B., Li, L., Sevault, F., and Somot, S.: Interannual
variability of deep convection in the Northwestern Mediterranean simulated
with a coupled AORCM, Clim. Dynam., 41,
937–960, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-012-1527-5, 2013.
Ličer, M., Smerkol, P., Fettich, A., Ravdas, M., Papapostolou, A., Mantziafou, A., Strajnar, B., Cedilnik, J., Jeromel, M., Jerman, J., Petan, S., Malačič, V., and Sofianos, S.: Modeling the ocean and atmosphere during an extreme bora event in northern Adriatic using one-way and two-way atmosphere–ocean coupling, Ocean Sci., 12, 71–86, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-12-71-2016, 2016.
Lipizer, M., Partescano, E., Rabitti, A., Giorgetti, A., and Crise, A.: Qualified temperature, salinity and dissolved oxygen climatologies in a changing Adriatic Sea, Ocean Sci., 10, 771–797, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-10-771-2014, 2014.
Liu, F., Mikolajewicz, U., and Six, K. D. : Drivers of the decadal variability of the North Ionian Gyre upper layer circulation during 1910–2010: a regional modelling study, Clim. Dynam., https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-021-05714-y, 2021.
Ljubenkov, I.: Hydrodynamic modeling of stratified estuary: case study of
the Jadro River (Croatia), J. Hydrol. Hydromech., 63, 29–37,
https://doi.org/10.1515/johh-2015-0001, 2015.
Ludwig, W., Dumont, E., Meybeck, M., and Heussner, S.: River discharges of
water and nutrients to the Mediterranean Sea: major drivers for ecosystem
changes during past and future decades?, Prog. Oceanogr., 80, 199–217,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pocean.2009.02.001, 2009.
Malačič, V. and Petelin, B.: Climatic circulation in the Gulf of Trieste (northern Adriatic), J. Geophys. Res., 114, C07002, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JC004904, 2009.
Manca, B. B., Kovačević, V., Gačić, M., and Viezzoli, D.:
Dense water formation in the Southern Adriatic Sea and spreading into the
Ionian Sea in the period 1997–1999, J. Mar. Syst., 33–34, 133–154,
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-7963(02)00056-8, 2002.
Mantziafou, A. and Lascaratos, A.: An eddy resolving numerical study of the
general circulation and deep-water formation in the Adriatic Sea, Deep-Sea
Res. I, 51, 251–292, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr.2004.03.006, 2004.
Mantziafou, A. and Lascaratos, A.: Deep-water formation in the Adriatic Sea:
interannual simulations for the years 1979–1999, Deep-Sea Res. I, 55,
1403–1427, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr.2008.06.005, 2008.
Marchesiello, P., McWilliams, J. C., and Shchepetkin, A.: Open boundary
conditions for long-term integration of regional oceanic models, Ocean
Model., 3, 1–20, https://doi.org/10.1016/S1463-5003(00)00013-5, 2001.
Martin, P. J., Book, J. W., Burrage, D. M., Rowley, C. D., and Tudor, M.:
Comparison of model-simulated and observed currents in the central Adriatic
during DART, J. Geophys. Res., 114, C01S05, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JC004842, 2009.
May, P. W.: Climatological flux estimates in the Mediterranean Sea: Part 1.
Winds and wind stresses, NORDA Report 54, NSTL Station, Mississippi 39529, USA, 1982.
McKiver, W. J., Sannino, G., Braga, F., and Bellafiore, D.: Investigation of model capability in capturing vertical hydrodynamic coastal processes: a case study in the north Adriatic Sea, Ocean Sci., 12, 51–69, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-12-51-2016, 2016.
Mejia, J. F., Koračin, D., and Wilcox, E. M.: Effect of coupled global climate
models sea surface temperature biases on simulated climate of the western
United States, Int. J. Climatol., 38, 5386–5404, https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.5817,
2018.
Mihanović, H., Vilibić, I., Carniel, S., Tudor, M., Russo, A., Bergamasco, A., Bubić, N., Ljubešić, Z., Viličić, D., Boldrin, A., Malačič, V., Celio, M., Comici, C., and Raicich, F.: Exceptional dense water formation on the Adriatic shelf in the winter of 2012, Ocean Sci., 9, 561–572, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-9-561-2013, 2013.
Mihanović, H., Janeković, I., Vilibić, I., Bensi, M., and
Kovačević, V.: Modelling Interannual Changes in Dense Water
Formation on the Northern Adriatic Shelf, Pure Appl.
Geophys., 175, 4065–4081, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-018-1935-5, 2018.
National Centers for Environmental Information: Daily L4 Optimally
Interpolated SST (OISST) In situ and AVHRR Analysis, Ver. 2.0. PO.DAAC, CA,
USA, https://doi.org/10.5067/GHAAO-4BC02, 2016.
Oddo, P. and Guarnieri, A.: A study of the hydrographic conditions in the Adriatic Sea from numerical modelling and direct observations (2000–2008), Ocean Sci., 7, 549–567, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-7-549-2011, 2011.
Oddo, P., Pinardi, N., and Zavatarelli, M.: A numerical study of the
interannual variability of the Adriatic Sea (2000–2002), Sci. Total
Environ., 353, 39–56, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2005.09.061, 2005.
Orlanski, I.: A simple boundary condition for unbounded hyperbolic flows, J.
Comput. Phys., 21, 251–269, https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9991(76)90023-1, 1976.
Orlić, M., Dadić, V., Grbec, B., Leder, N., Marki, A., Matić,
F., Mihanović, H., Beg Paklar, G., Pasarić, M., Pasarić, Z., and
Vilibić, I.: Wintertime buoyancy forcing, changing seawater properties
and two different circulation systems produced in the Adriatic, J. Geophys.
Res., 112, C03S07, https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JC003271, 2006.
Pano, N. and Abdyli, B.: Maximum floods and their regionalization on the
Albanian hydrographic river network, in: International Conference on Flood
Estimation, 6–8 March 2002, CHR. Report II,17, Bern, Switzerland, 379–388, 2002.
Pano, N., Frasheri, A., and Avdyli, B.: The climatic change impact in water
potential processe on the Albanian hydrographic river network, in:
International Congress on Environmental Modelling and Software, 5–8 July 2010, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, available at:
https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/iemssconference/2010/all/266 (last access: 20 September 2021), 2010.
Parras-Berrocal, I. M., Vazquez, R., Cabos, W., Sein, D., Mañanes, R., Perez-Sanz, J., and Izquierdo, A.: The climate change signal in the Mediterranean Sea in a regionally coupled atmosphere–ocean model, Ocean Sci., 16, 743–765, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-16-743-2020, 2020.
Pinardi, N., Allen, I., Demirov, E., De Mey, P., Korres, G., Lascaratos, A., Le Traon, P.-Y., Maillard, C., Manzella, G., and Tziavos, C.: The Mediterranean ocean forecasting system: first phase of implementation (1998–2001), Ann. Geophys., 21, 3–20, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-21-3-2003, 2003.
Poli, P., Hersbach, H., Dee, D. P., Berrisford, P., Simmons, A. J., Vitart,
F., Laloyaux, P., Tan, D. G., Peubey, C., Thépaut, J. N., Trémolet,
Y., Hólm, E.V., Bonavita, M., Isaksen, L., and Fisher, M.: ERA-20C: An
atmospheric reanalysis of the twentieth century, J. Climate, 29,
4083–4097, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-15-0556.1, 2016.
Pranić, P.: Evaluation of the AdriSC Climate Model: Ocean Part, OSF [data set], https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/W8F4J, 2021.
Prein, A. F., Langhans, W., Fosser, G., Ferrone, A., Ban, N., Goergen,
K., Keller, M., Tölle, M., Gutjahr, O., Feser, F., Brisson, E., Kollet,
S., Schmidli, J., van Lipzig, N. P. M., and Leung, R.: A review on regional
convection-permitting climate modeling: Demonstrations, prospects and
challenges, Rev. Geophys., 53, 323–361, https://doi.org/10.1002/2014RG000475, 2015.
Pullen, J., Doyle, J., and Signell, R.: Two-way air–sea coupling: a study
of the Adriatic, Mon. Weather Rev., 134, 1465–1483, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR3137.1,
2006.
Pullen, J., Doyle, J. D., Haack, T., Dorman, C., Signell, R. P., and Lee,
C. M.: Bora event variability and the role of air-sea feedback, J. Geophys.
Res., 112, C03S18, https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JC003726, 2007.
Raicich, F.: Notes on the flow rates of the Adriatic rivers, Technical
Report RF 02/94, CNR, Istituto sperimentale talassografico, Trieste,
Italy, 8 pp., 1994.
Raicich, F.: On the fresh water balance of the Adriatic Sea, J. Mar. Syst.,
9, 305–319, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-7963(96)00042-5, 1996.
Ricchi, A., Miglietta, M. M., Falco, P. P., Benetazzo, A., Bonaldo, D.,
Bergamasco, A., Sclavo, M., and Carniel, S.: On the use of a coupled
ocean–atmosphere–wave model during an extreme cold air outbreak over the
Adriatic Sea, Atmos. Res., 172–173, 48–65,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2015.12.023, 2016.
Schär, C., Frei, C., Luthi, D., and Davies, H. C.: Surrogate
climate-change scenarios for regional climate models, Geophys. Res. Lett.,
23, 669–672, https://doi.org/10.1029/96GL00265, 1996.
Schär, C., Fuhrer, O., Arteaga, A., Ban, N., Charpilloz, C., Di
Girolamo, S., Hentgen, L., Hoefler, T., Lapillonne, X., Leutwyler, D.,
Osterried, K., Panosetti, D., Rüdisühli, S., Schlemmer, L.,
Schulthess, T. C., Sprenger, M., Ubbiali, S., and Wernli, H.:
Kilometer-Scale Climate Models: Prospects and Challenges, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 101, E567–E587, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-18-0167.1, 2020.
Sevault, F., Somot, S., Alias, A., Dubois, C., Lebeaupin-Brossier, C.,
Nabat, P., Adloff, F., Déqué, M., and Decharme, B.: A fully coupled
Mediterranean regional climate system model: design and evaluation of the
ocean component for the 1980–2012 period, Tellus A, 66, 23967,
https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusa.v66.23967, 2014.
Shchepetkin, A. F. and McWilliams, J. C.: Correction and commentary for “ocean forecasting in terrain-following coordinates: formulation and skill assessment of the regional ocean modeling system” by Haidvogel et al., J. Comput. Phys., 227, pp. 3595–3624, J. Comput. Phys., 228, 8985–9000, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2009.09.002, 2009.
Skamarock, W. C., Klemp, J. B., Dudhia, J., Gill, D. O., Barker, D. M., Wang, W., and Powers, J. G.: A description of the advanced research WRF version 2, NCAR Technical Note, NCAR/TN-468+STR, https://doi.org/10.5065/D6DZ069T, 2005.
Smolarkiewicz, P. K. and Grabowski, W. W.: The multidimensional positive
definite advection transport algorithm: nonoscillatory option, J. Comput.
Phys., 86, 355–375, https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9991(90)90105-A, 1990.
Somot, S., Sevault, F., and Déqué, M.: Transient climate change
scenario simulation of the Mediterranean Sea for the twenty-first century
using a high-resolution ocean circulation model, Clim. Dynam. 27, 851–879,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-006-0167-z, 2006.
Somot, S., Ruti, P., Ahrens, B., Coppola, E., Jordà, G., Sannino, G.,
and Solmon, F.: Editorial for the Med-CORDEX special issue, Clim. Dynam., 51,
771–777, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-018-4325-x, 2018.
Supić, N. and Orlić, M.: Seasonal and interannual variability of the
northern Adriatic surface fluxes, J. Marine Syst. 20, 205–229,
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-7963(98)00083-9, 1999.
Taylor, K.: Summarizing multiple aspects of model performance in a single
diagram, J. Geophys. Res, 106, 7183–7192, https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JD900719,
2001.
Theocharis, A., Krokos, G., Velaoras, D., and Korres, G.: An internal
mechanism driving the alternation of the Eastern Mediterranean dense/deep
water sources, in: The Mediterranean Sea: Temporal Variability
and Spatial Patterns, Geophysical Monograph Series, edited by: Eusebi Borzelli, G. L., Gačić M., Lionello, P., and Malanotte-Rizzoli, P., AGU, 113–137, https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118847572.ch8, 2014.
Tudor, M., Ivatek-Sahdan, S., Stanešć, A., Horvath, K., and
Bajić, A.: Forecasting weather in Croatia using ALADIN numerical weather
prediction model, in: Climate Change and Regional/Local Responses, edited by:
Zhang, Y. and Ray, P., InTech, Rijeka, Croatia, 59–88, 2013.
Umgiesser, G., Bajo, M., Ferrarin, C., Cucco, A., Lionello, P., Zanchettin, D., Papa, A., Tosoni, A., Ferla, M., Coraci, E., Morucci, S., Crosato, F., Bonometto, A., Valentini, A., Orlić, M., Haigh, I. D., Nielsen, J. W., Bertin, X., Fortunato, A. B., Pérez Gómez, B., Alvarez Fanjul, E., Paradis, D., Jourdan, D., Pasquet, A., Mourre, B., Tintoré, J., and Nicholls, R. J.: The prediction of floods in Venice: methods, models and uncertainty (review article), Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 2679–2704, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-21-2679-2021, 2021.
Umlauf, L. and Burchard, H.: A generic length-scale equation for geophysical
turbulence models, J. Mar. Res., 61, 235–265,
https://doi.org/10.1357/002224003322005087, 2003.
Vested, H. J., Berg, P., and Uhrenholdt, T.: Dense water formation in the
northern Adriatic, J. Mar. Syst., 18, 135–160,
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-7963(98)00009-8, 1998.
Vilibić, I. and Orlić, M.: Least squares tracer analysis of water
masses in the South Adriatic (1967–1990), Deep-Sea Res. I, 48, 2297–2330,
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0967-0637(01)00014-0, 2001.
Vilibić, I. and Orlić, M.: Adriatic water masses, their rates of
formation and transport through the Otranto Strait, Deep-Sea Res. I,
49, 1321–1340, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0967-0637(02)00028-6, 2002.
Vilibić, I. and Supić, N.: Dense water generation on a shelf: the
case of the Adriatic Sea, Ocean Dyn., 55, 403–415,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10236-005-0030-5, 2005.
Vilibić, I., Šepić, and Proust, N.: Observational evidence of a
weakening of thermohaline circulation in the Adriatic Sea, Clim. Res., 55,
217–225, https://doi.org/10.3354/cr01128, 2013.
Vilibić, I., Mihanović, H., Janeković, I., and Šepić,
J.: Modelling the formation of dense water in the northern Adriatic:
sensitivity studies, Ocean Model., 101, 17–29,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocemod.2016.03.001, 2016.
Vilibić, I., Mihanović, H., Janeković, I., Denamiel, C., Poulain, P.-M., Orlić, M., Dunić, N., Dadić, V., Pasarić, M., Muslim, S., Gerin, R., Matić, F., Šepić, J., Mauri, E., Kokkini, Z., Tudor, M., Kovač, Ž., and Džoić, T.: Wintertime dynamics in the coastal northeastern Adriatic Sea: the NAdEx 2015 experiment, Ocean Sci., 14, 237–258, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-14-237-2018, 2018.
Vilibić, I., Zemunik, P., Šepić, J., Dunić, N., Marzouk, O., Mihanović, H., Denamiel, C., Precali, R., and Djakovac, T.: Present climate trends and variability in thermohaline properties of the northern Adriatic shelf, Ocean Sci., 15, 1351–1362, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-15-1351-2019, 2019.
Vörösmarty, C., Fakers, B., and Tucker, B.: River discharge database, version 1.0 (RivDIS vLO), volumes 0 through 6, in: A contribution to IHP-V Theme 1, Technical Documents Series, Technical report, UNESCO, Paris, France, 1996.
Warner, J. C., Armstrong, B., He, R., and Zambon, J. B.: Development of a coupled ocean atmosphere-wave-sediment transport (COAWST) modeling system, Ocean Model, 35, 230–244, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocemod.2010.07.010, 2010.
Yang, B., Zhang, Y., Qian, Y., Song, F., Leung, L. R., Wu, P., Guo, Z., Lu, Y., and Huang, A.: Better monsoon precipitation in
coupled climate models due to bias compensation, npj Clim. Atmos.
Sci., 2, 43, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-019-0100-x, 2019.
Zavatarelli, M. and Pinardi, N.: The Adriatic Sea modelling system: a nested approach, Ann. Geophys., 21, 345–364, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-21-345-2003, 2003.
Zavatarelli, M., Pinardi, N., Kourafalou, V. H., and Maggiore, A.: Diagnostic
and prognostic model studies of the Adriatic Sea general circulation:
Seasonal variability, J. Geophys. Res., 107, 3004, https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JC000210,
2002.
Zlotnicki, V., Qu, Z., and Willis, J.: SEA_SURFACE_HEIGHT_ALT_GRIDS_L4_2SATS_5DAY_6THDEG_V_JPL1609, Ver. 1812, PO.DAAC [data set], CA, USA, https://doi.org/10.5067/SLREF-CDRV2, 2019.
Zore-Armanda, M.: Les masses d'eau de la mer Adriatique, Acta Adriat., 10,
5–88, 1963.
Download
The requested paper has a corresponding corrigendum published. Please read the corrigendum first before downloading the article.
- Article
(25410 KB) - Full-text XML
- Corrigendum
-
Supplement
(1931 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
Short summary
The Adriatic Sea and Coast model was developed due to the need for higher-resolution climate models and longer-term simulations to capture coastal atmospheric and ocean processes at climate scales in the Adriatic Sea. The ocean results of a 31-year-long simulation were compared to the observational data. The evaluation revealed that the model is capable of reproducing the observed physical properties with good accuracy and can be further used to study the dynamics of the Adriatic–Ionian basin.
The Adriatic Sea and Coast model was developed due to the need for higher-resolution climate...
