Articles | Volume 14, issue 7
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 4617–4639, 2021
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 4617–4639, 2021

Model evaluation paper 27 Jul 2021

Model evaluation paper | 27 Jul 2021

Model intercomparison of COSMO 5.0 and IFS 45r1 at kilometer-scale grid spacing

Christian Zeman et al.

Related authors

An Ensemble-Based Statistical Methodology to Detect Differences in Weather and Climate Model Executables
Christian Zeman and Christoph Schär
Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss.,,, 2021
Preprint under review for GMD
Short summary

Related subject area

Atmospheric sciences
Modeling sensitivities of BVOCs to different versions of MEGAN emission schemes in WRF-Chem (v3.6) and its impacts over eastern China
Mingshuai Zhang, Chun Zhao, Yuhan Yang, Qiuyan Du, Yonglin Shen, Shengfu Lin, Dasa Gu, Wenjing Su, and Cheng Liu
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 6155–6175,,, 2021
Short summary
Influence on the temperature estimation of the planetary boundary layer scheme with different minimum eddy diffusivity in WRF v3.9.1.1
Hongyi Ding, Le Cao, Haimei Jiang, Wenxing Jia, Yong Chen, and Junling An
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 6135–6153,,, 2021
Short summary
GCAP 2.0: a global 3-D chemical-transport model framework for past, present, and future climate scenarios
Lee T. Murray, Eric M. Leibensperger, Clara Orbe, Loretta J. Mickley, and Melissa Sulprizio
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 5789–5823,,, 2021
Short summary
Incorporation of volcanic SO2 emissions in the Hemispheric CMAQ (H-CMAQ) version 5.2 modeling system and assessing their impacts on sulfate aerosol over the Northern Hemisphere
Syuichi Itahashi, Rohit Mathur, Christian Hogrefe, Sergey L. Napelenok, and Yang Zhang
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 5751–5768,,, 2021
Short summary
Efficient ensemble generation for uncertain correlated parameters in atmospheric chemical models: a case study for biogenic emissions from EURAD-IM version 5
Annika Vogel and Hendrik Elbern
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 5583–5605,,, 2021
Short summary

Cited articles

Bacmeister, J. T., Eckermann, S. D., Newman, P. A., Lait, L., Chan, R. K., Loewenstein, M., Proffitt, M. H., and Gary, B. L.: Stratospheric horizontal wavenumber spectra of winds, potential temperature, and atmospheric tracers observed by high-altitude aircraft, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 101, 9441–9470,, 1996. a
Baldauf, M., Seifert, A., Förstner, J., Majewski, D., Raschendorfer, M., and Reinhardt, T.: Operational Convective-Scale Numerical Weather Prediction with the COSMO Model: Description and Sensitivities, Mon. Weather Rev., 139, 3887–3905,, 2011. a, b
Balsamo, G., Pappenberger, F., Dutra, E., Viterbo, P., and van den Hurk, B.: A revised land hydrology in the ECMWF model: a step towards daily water flux prediction in a fully-closed water cycle, Hydrol. Process., 25, 1046–1054,, 2011. a
Ban, N., Schmidli, J., and Schär, C.: Evaluation of the convection-resolving regional climate modeling approach in decade-long simulations, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 119, 7889–7907,, 2014. a, b, c, d
Barker, H. W., Cole, J. N. S., Morcrette, J.-J., Pincus, R., Räisänen, P., von Salzen, K., and Vaillancourt, P. A.: The Monte Carlo Independent Column Approximation: an assessment using several global atmospheric models, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 134, 1463–1478,, 2008. a
Short summary
Kilometer-scale atmospheric models allow us to partially resolve thunderstorms and thus improve their representation. We present an intercomparison between two distinct atmospheric models for 2 summer days with heavy thunderstorms over Europe. We show the dependence of precipitation and vertical wind speed on spatial and temporal resolution and also discuss the possible influence of the system of equations, numerical methods, and diffusion in the models.