Articles | Volume 14, issue 6
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-3437-2021
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-3437-2021
Model evaluation paper
 | 
08 Jun 2021
Model evaluation paper |  | 08 Jun 2021

Evaluating the physical and biogeochemical state of the global ocean component of UKESM1 in CMIP6 historical simulations

Andrew Yool, Julien Palmiéri, Colin G. Jones, Lee de Mora, Till Kuhlbrodt, Ekatarina E. Popova, A. J. George Nurser, Joel Hirschi, Adam T. Blaker, Andrew C. Coward, Edward W. Blockley, and Alistair A. Sellar

Viewed

Total article views: 3,004 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
2,058 904 42 3,004 313 39 38
  • HTML: 2,058
  • PDF: 904
  • XML: 42
  • Total: 3,004
  • Supplement: 313
  • BibTeX: 39
  • EndNote: 38
Views and downloads (calculated since 03 Nov 2020)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 03 Nov 2020)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 3,004 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 2,639 with geography defined and 365 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 26 Apr 2024
Download
Short summary
The ocean plays a key role in modulating the Earth’s climate. Understanding this role is critical when using models to project future climate change. Consequently, it is necessary to evaluate their realism against the ocean's observed state. Here we validate UKESM1, a new Earth system model, focusing on the realism of its ocean physics and circulation, as well as its biological cycles and productivity. While we identify biases, generally the model performs well over a wide range of properties.