Articles | Volume 14, issue 1
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 275–293, 2021
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-275-2021
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 275–293, 2021
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-275-2021

Model description paper 19 Jan 2021

Model description paper | 19 Jan 2021

FORTE 2.0: a fast, parallel and flexible coupled climate model

Adam T. Blaker et al.

Related authors

Evaluating the physical and biogeochemical state of the global ocean component of UKESM1 in CMIP6 Historical simulations
Andrew Yool, Julien Palmiéri, Colin G. Jones, Lee de Mora, Till Kuhlbrodt, Ekatarina E. Popova, A. J. George Nurser, Joel Hirschi, Adam T. Blaker, Andrew C. Coward, Edward W. Blockley, and Alistair A. Sellar
Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2020-333,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2020-333, 2020
Revised manuscript under review for GMD
Short summary
UK Global Ocean GO6 and GO7: a traceable hierarchy of model resolutions
David Storkey, Adam T. Blaker, Pierre Mathiot, Alex Megann, Yevgeny Aksenov, Edward W. Blockley, Daley Calvert, Tim Graham, Helene T. Hewitt, Patrick Hyder, Till Kuhlbrodt, Jamie G. L. Rae, and Bablu Sinha
Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 3187–3213, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-3187-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-3187-2018, 2018
Short summary
Tuning without over-tuning: parametric uncertainty quantification for the NEMO ocean model
Daniel B. Williamson, Adam T. Blaker, and Bablu Sinha
Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 1789–1816, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-1789-2017,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-1789-2017, 2017
Short summary
NEMO–ICB (v1.0): interactive icebergs in the NEMO ocean model globally configured at eddy-permitting resolution
R. Marsh, V. O. Ivchenko, N. Skliris, S. Alderson, G. R. Bigg, G. Madec, A. T. Blaker, Y. Aksenov, B. Sinha, A. C. Coward, J. Le Sommer, N. Merino, and V. B. Zalesny
Geosci. Model Dev., 8, 1547–1562, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-1547-2015,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-1547-2015, 2015
Short summary

Related subject area

Climate and Earth system modeling
A process-based evaluation of the Intermediate Complexity Atmospheric Research Model (ICAR) 1.0.1
Johannes Horak, Marlis Hofer, Ethan Gutmann, Alexander Gohm, and Mathias W. Rotach
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 1657–1680, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-1657-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-1657-2021, 2021
Short summary
Effects of coupling a stochastic convective parameterization with the Zhang–McFarlane scheme on precipitation simulation in the DOE E3SMv1.0 atmosphere model
Yong Wang, Guang J. Zhang, Shaocheng Xie, Wuyin Lin, George C. Craig, Qi Tang, and Hsi-Yen Ma
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 1575–1593, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-1575-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-1575-2021, 2021
Short summary
Sensitivity of surface solar radiation to aerosol–radiation and aerosol–cloud interactions over Europe in WRFv3.6.1 climatic runs with fully interactive aerosols
Sonia Jerez, Laura Palacios-Peña, Claudia Gutiérrez, Pedro Jiménez-Guerrero, Jose María López-Romero, Enrique Pravia-Sarabia, and Juan Pedro Montávez
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 1533–1551, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-1533-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-1533-2021, 2021
Short summary
Evaluation of regional climate models ALARO-0 and REMO2015 at 0.22° resolution over the CORDEX Central Asia domain
Sara Top, Lola Kotova, Lesley De Cruz, Svetlana Aniskevich, Leonid Bobylev, Rozemien De Troch, Natalia Gnatiuk, Anne Gobin, Rafiq Hamdi, Arne Kriegsmann, Armelle Reca Remedio, Abdulla Sakalli, Hans Van De Vyver, Bert Van Schaeybroeck, Viesturs Zandersons, Philippe De Maeyer, Piet Termonia, and Steven Caluwaerts
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 1267–1293, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-1267-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-1267-2021, 2021
Short summary
Using the anomaly forcing Community Land Model (CLM 4.5) for crop yield projections
Yaqiong Lu and Xianyu Yang
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 1253–1265, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-1253-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-1253-2021, 2021
Short summary

Cited articles

Ambaum, M. H. P., Hoskins, B. J., and Stephenson, D. B.: Arctic Oscillation or North Atlantic Oscillation?, J. Climate, 14, 3495–3507, 2001. a
Arakawa, A.: Computational design for long-term numerical integrations of the equations of atmospheric motion, J. Comput. Phys., 1, 119–143, 1966. a
Atkinson, C. P., Wells, N. C., Blaker, A. T., Sinha, B., and Ivchenko, V. O.: Rapid ocean wave teleconnections linking Antarctic salinity anomalies to the equatorial ocean-atmosphere system, Geophys. Res. Lett., 36, L08603, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GL036976, 2009. a
Beadling, R. L., Russell, J. L., Stouffer, R. J., Mazloff, M., Talley, L. D., Goodman, P. J., Sallée, J. B., Hewitt, H. T., Hyder, P., and Pandde, A.: Representation of Southern Ocean Properties across Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Generations: CMIP3 to CMIP6, J. Climate, 33, 6555–6581, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-19-0970.1, 2020. a
Betts, A. K. and Miller, M. J.: The Betts-Miller scheme, in: The Representation of Cumulus Convection in Numerical Models of the Atmosphere, Chapter 9, edited by: Emanuel, K. A. and Raymond, D. J., Amer. Meteor. Soc., Meteor. Mon., 24, 107–121, 1993. a
Download
Short summary
FORTE 2.0 is a flexible coupled atmosphere–ocean general circulation model that can be run on modest hardware. We present two 2000-year simulations which show that FORTE 2.0 is capable of producing a stable climate. Earlier versions of FORTE were used for a wide range of studies, ranging from aquaplanet configurations to investigating the cold European winters of 2009–2010. This paper introduces the updated model for which the code and configuration are now publicly available.