Articles | Volume 14, issue 4
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-2143-2021
© Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-2143-2021
© Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Development and technical paper
| 
23 Apr 2021
Development and technical paper |
| 23 Apr 2021
| 23 Apr 2021
Ensemble prediction using a new dataset of ECMWF initial states – OpenEnsemble 1.0
Pirkka Ollinaho
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Finnish Meteorological Institute (FMI), Helsinki, Finland
Glenn D. Carver
European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF), Research Department, Reading, UK
Simon T. K. Lang
European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF), Research Department, Reading, UK
Lauri Tuppi
Institute for Atmospheric and Earth System Research/Physics, Faculty of Science, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
Madeleine Ekblom
Institute for Atmospheric and Earth System Research/Physics, Faculty of Science, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
Heikki Järvinen
Institute for Atmospheric and Earth System Research/Physics, Faculty of Science, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
Related authors
Ralf Döscher, Mario Acosta, Andrea Alessandri, Peter Anthoni, Thomas Arsouze, Tommi Bergman, Raffaele Bernardello, Souhail Boussetta, Louis-Philippe Caron, Glenn Carver, Miguel Castrillo, Franco Catalano, Ivana Cvijanovic, Paolo Davini, Evelien Dekker, Francisco J. Doblas-Reyes, David Docquier, Pablo Echevarria, Uwe Fladrich, Ramon Fuentes-Franco, Matthias Gröger, Jost v. Hardenberg, Jenny Hieronymus, M. Pasha Karami, Jukka-Pekka Keskinen, Torben Koenigk, Risto Makkonen, François Massonnet, Martin Ménégoz, Paul A. Miller, Eduardo Moreno-Chamarro, Lars Nieradzik, Twan van Noije, Paul Nolan, Declan O'Donnell, Pirkka Ollinaho, Gijs van den Oord, Pablo Ortega, Oriol Tintó Prims, Arthur Ramos, Thomas Reerink, Clement Rousset, Yohan Ruprich-Robert, Philippe Le Sager, Torben Schmith, Roland Schrödner, Federico Serva, Valentina Sicardi, Marianne Sloth Madsen, Benjamin Smith, Tian Tian, Etienne Tourigny, Petteri Uotila, Martin Vancoppenolle, Shiyu Wang, David Wårlind, Ulrika Willén, Klaus Wyser, Shuting Yang, Xavier Yepes-Arbós, and Qiong Zhang
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 2973–3020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-2973-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-2973-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The Earth system model EC-Earth3 is documented here. Key performance metrics show physical behavior and biases well within the frame known from recent models. With improved physical and dynamic features, new ESM components, community tools, and largely improved physical performance compared to the CMIP5 version, EC-Earth3 represents a clear step forward for the only European community ESM. We demonstrate here that EC-Earth3 is suited for a range of tasks in CMIP6 and beyond.
Twan van Noije, Tommi Bergman, Philippe Le Sager, Declan O'Donnell, Risto Makkonen, María Gonçalves-Ageitos, Ralf Döscher, Uwe Fladrich, Jost von Hardenberg, Jukka-Pekka Keskinen, Hannele Korhonen, Anton Laakso, Stelios Myriokefalitakis, Pirkka Ollinaho, Carlos Pérez García-Pando, Thomas Reerink, Roland Schrödner, Klaus Wyser, and Shuting Yang
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 5637–5668, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-5637-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-5637-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
This paper documents the global climate model EC-Earth3-AerChem, one of the members of the EC-Earth3 family of models participating in CMIP6. We give an overview of the model and describe in detail how it differs from its predecessor and the other EC-Earth3 configurations. The model's performance is characterized using coupled simulations conducted for CMIP6. The model has an effective equilibrium climate sensitivity of 3.9 °C and a transient climate response of 2.1 °C.
Sarah Sparrow, Andrew Bowery, Glenn D. Carver, Marcus O. Köhler, Pirkka Ollinaho, Florian Pappenberger, David Wallom, and Antje Weisheimer
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 3473–3486, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-3473-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-3473-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
This paper describes how the research version of the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts’ Integrated Forecast System is combined with climateprediction.net’s public volunteer computing resource to develop OpenIFS@home. Thousands of volunteer personal computers simulated slightly different realizations of Tropical Cyclone Karl to demonstrate the performance of the large-ensemble forecast. OpenIFS@Home offers researchers a new tool to study weather forecasts and related questions.
Lauri Tuppi, Pirkka Ollinaho, Madeleine Ekblom, Vladimir Shemyakin, and Heikki Järvinen
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 5799–5812, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-5799-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-5799-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
This paper presents general guidelines on how to utilise computer algorithms efficiently in order to tune weather models so that they would produce better forecasts. The main conclusions are that the computer algorithms work most efficiently with a suitable cost function, certain forecast length and ensemble size. We expect that our results will facilitate the use of algorithmic methods in the tuning of weather models.
Maksym Vasiuta, Angel Navarro Trastoy, Sanam Motlaghzadeh, Lauri Tuppi, Torsten Mayer-Gürr, and Heikki Järvinen
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 5015–5030, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-5015-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-5015-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Propagation of electromagnetic signals in Earth's neutral atmosphere inflicts errors in space geodetic observations. To model these errors accurately, it is necessary to use a signal tracing algorithm which is informed of the state of the atmosphere. We developed such an algorithm and tested it by processing Global Navigation Satellite System network observations. Our algorithm's main advantage is lossless utilization of atmospheric information provided by numerical weather prediction models.
Francisco J. Doblas-Reyes, Jenni Kontkanen, Irina Sandu, Mario Acosta, Mohammed Hussam Al Turjmam, Ivan Alsina-Ferrer, Miguel Andrés-Martínez, Leo Arriola, Marvin Axness, Marc Batlle Martín, Peter Bauer, Tobias Becker, Daniel Beltrán, Sebastian Beyer, Hendryk Bockelmann, Pierre-Antoine Bretonnière, Sebastien Cabaniols, Silvia Caprioli, Miguel Castrillo, Aparna Chandrasekar, Suvarchal Cheedela, Victor Correal, Emanuele Danovaro, Paolo Davini, Jussi Enkovaara, Claudia Frauen, Barbara Früh, Aina Gaya Àvila, Paolo Ghinassi, Rohit Ghosh, Supriyo Ghosh, Iker González, Katherine Grayson, Matthew Griffith, Ioan Hadade, Christopher Haine, Carl Hartick, Utz-Uwe Haus, Shane Hearne, Heikki Järvinen, Bernat Jiménez, Amal John, Marlin Juchem, Thomas Jung, Jessica Kegel, Matthias Kelbling, Kai Keller, Bruno Kinoshita, Theresa Kiszler, Daniel Klocke, Lukas Kluft, Nikolay Koldunov, Tobias Kölling, Joonas Kolstela, Luis Kornblueh, Sergey Kosukhin, Aleksander Lacima-Nadolnik, Jeisson Javier Leal Rojas, Jonni Lehtiranta, Tuomas Lunttila, Anna Luoma, Pekka Manninen, Alexey Medvedev, Sebastian Milinski, Ali Omar Abdelazim Mohammed, Sebastian Müller, Devaraju Naryanappa, Natalia Nazarova, Sami Niemelä, Bimochan Niraula, Henrik Nortamo, Aleksi Nummelin, Matteo Nurisso, Pablo Ortega, Stella Paronuzzi, Xabier Pedruzo Bagazgoitia, Charles Pelletier, Carlos Peña, Suraj Polade, Himansu Pradhan, Rommel Quintanilla, Tiago Quintino, Thomas Rackow, Jouni Räisänen, Maqsood Mubarak Rajput, René Redler, Balthasar Reuter, Nuno Rocha Monteiro, Francesc Roura-Adserias, Silva Ruppert, Susan Sayed, Reiner Schnur, Tanvi Sharma, Dmitry Sidorenko, Outi Sievi-Korte, Albert Soret, Christian Steger, Bjorn Stevens, Jan Streffing, Jaleena Sunny, Luiggi Tenorio, Stephan Thober, Ulf Tigerstedt, Oriol Tinto, Juha Tonttila, Heikki Tuomenvirta, Lauri Tuppi, Ginka Van Thielen, Emanuele Vitali, Jost von Hardenberg, Ingo Wagner, Nils Wedi, Jan Wehner, Sven Willner, Xavier Yepes-Arbós, Florian Ziemen, and Janos Zimmermann
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2198, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2198, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Geoscientific Model Development (GMD).
Short summary
Short summary
The Climate Change Adaptation Digital Twin (Climate DT) pioneers the operationalisation of climate projections. The system produces global simulations with local granularity for adaptation decision-making. Applications are embedded to generate tailored indicators. A unified workflow orchestrates all components in several supercomputers. Data management ensures consistency and streaming enables real-time use. It is a complementary innovation to initiatives like CMIP, CORDEX, and climate services.
Hans Segura, Xabier Pedruzo-Bagazgoitia, Philipp Weiss, Sebastian K. Müller, Thomas Rackow, Junhong Lee, Edgar Dolores-Tesillos, Imme Benedict, Matthias Aengenheyster, Razvan Aguridan, Gabriele Arduini, Alexander J. Baker, Jiawei Bao, Swantje Bastin, Eulàlia Baulenas, Tobias Becker, Sebastian Beyer, Hendryk Bockelmann, Nils Brüggemann, Lukas Brunner, Suvarchal K. Cheedela, Sushant Das, Jasper Denissen, Ian Dragaud, Piotr Dziekan, Madeleine Ekblom, Jan Frederik Engels, Monika Esch, Richard Forbes, Claudia Frauen, Lilli Freischem, Diego García-Maroto, Philipp Geier, Paul Gierz, Álvaro González-Cervera, Katherine Grayson, Matthew Griffith, Oliver Gutjahr, Helmuth Haak, Ioan Hadade, Kerstin Haslehner, Shabeh ul Hasson, Jan Hegewald, Lukas Kluft, Aleksei Koldunov, Nikolay Koldunov, Tobias Kölling, Shunya Koseki, Sergey Kosukhin, Josh Kousal, Peter Kuma, Arjun U. Kumar, Rumeng Li, Nicolas Maury, Maximilian Meindl, Sebastian Milinski, Kristian Mogensen, Bimochan Niraula, Jakub Nowak, Divya Sri Praturi, Ulrike Proske, Dian Putrasahan, René Redler, David Santuy, Domokos Sármány, Reiner Schnur, Patrick Scholz, Dmitry Sidorenko, Dorian Spät, Birgit Sützl, Daisuke Takasuka, Adrian Tompkins, Alejandro Uribe, Mirco Valentini, Menno Veerman, Aiko Voigt, Sarah Warnau, Fabian Wachsmann, Marta Wacławczyk, Nils Wedi, Karl-Hermann Wieners, Jonathan Wille, Marius Winkler, Yuting Wu, Florian Ziemen, Janos Zimmermann, Frida A.-M. Bender, Dragana Bojovic, Sandrine Bony, Simona Bordoni, Patrice Brehmer, Marcus Dengler, Emanuel Dutra, Saliou Faye, Erich Fischer, Chiel van Heerwaarden, Cathy Hohenegger, Heikki Järvinen, Markus Jochum, Thomas Jung, Johann H. Jungclaus, Noel S. Keenlyside, Daniel Klocke, Heike Konow, Martina Klose, Szymon Malinowski, Olivia Martius, Thorsten Mauritsen, Juan Pedro Mellado, Theresa Mieslinger, Elsa Mohino, Hanna Pawłowska, Karsten Peters-von Gehlen, Abdoulaye Sarré, Pajam Sobhani, Philip Stier, Lauri Tuppi, Pier Luigi Vidale, Irina Sandu, and Bjorn Stevens
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-509, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-509, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
The nextGEMS project developed two Earth system models that resolve processes of the order of 10 km, giving more fidelity to the representation of local phenomena, globally. In its fourth cycle, nextGEMS performed simulations with coupled ocean, land, and atmosphere over the 2020–2049 period under the SSP3-7.0 scenario. Here, we provide an overview of nextGEMS, insights into the model development, and the realism of multi-decadal, kilometer-scale simulations.
Clément Bouvier, Daan van den Broek, Madeleine Ekblom, and Victoria A. Sinclair
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 2961–2986, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2961-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2961-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
An analytical initial background state has been developed for moist baroclinic wave simulation on an aquaplanet and implemented into OpenIFS. Seven parameters can be controlled, which are used to generate the background states and the development of baroclinic waves. The meteorological and numerical stability has been assessed. Resulting baroclinic waves have proven to be realistic and sensitive to the jet's width.
Vincent Huijnen, Philippe Le Sager, Marcus O. Köhler, Glenn Carver, Samuel Rémy, Johannes Flemming, Simon Chabrillat, Quentin Errera, and Twan van Noije
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 6221–6241, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-6221-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-6221-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
We report on the first implementation of atmospheric chemistry and aerosol as part of the OpenIFS model, based on the CAMS global model. We give an overview of the model and evaluate two reference model configurations, with and without the stratospheric chemistry extension, against a variety of observational datasets. This OpenIFS version with atmospheric composition components is open to the scientific user community under a standard OpenIFS license.
Ralf Döscher, Mario Acosta, Andrea Alessandri, Peter Anthoni, Thomas Arsouze, Tommi Bergman, Raffaele Bernardello, Souhail Boussetta, Louis-Philippe Caron, Glenn Carver, Miguel Castrillo, Franco Catalano, Ivana Cvijanovic, Paolo Davini, Evelien Dekker, Francisco J. Doblas-Reyes, David Docquier, Pablo Echevarria, Uwe Fladrich, Ramon Fuentes-Franco, Matthias Gröger, Jost v. Hardenberg, Jenny Hieronymus, M. Pasha Karami, Jukka-Pekka Keskinen, Torben Koenigk, Risto Makkonen, François Massonnet, Martin Ménégoz, Paul A. Miller, Eduardo Moreno-Chamarro, Lars Nieradzik, Twan van Noije, Paul Nolan, Declan O'Donnell, Pirkka Ollinaho, Gijs van den Oord, Pablo Ortega, Oriol Tintó Prims, Arthur Ramos, Thomas Reerink, Clement Rousset, Yohan Ruprich-Robert, Philippe Le Sager, Torben Schmith, Roland Schrödner, Federico Serva, Valentina Sicardi, Marianne Sloth Madsen, Benjamin Smith, Tian Tian, Etienne Tourigny, Petteri Uotila, Martin Vancoppenolle, Shiyu Wang, David Wårlind, Ulrika Willén, Klaus Wyser, Shuting Yang, Xavier Yepes-Arbós, and Qiong Zhang
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 2973–3020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-2973-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-2973-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The Earth system model EC-Earth3 is documented here. Key performance metrics show physical behavior and biases well within the frame known from recent models. With improved physical and dynamic features, new ESM components, community tools, and largely improved physical performance compared to the CMIP5 version, EC-Earth3 represents a clear step forward for the only European community ESM. We demonstrate here that EC-Earth3 is suited for a range of tasks in CMIP6 and beyond.
Angel Navarro Trastoy, Sebastian Strasser, Lauri Tuppi, Maksym Vasiuta, Markku Poutanen, Torsten Mayer-Gürr, and Heikki Järvinen
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 2763–2771, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-2763-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-2763-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Production of satellite products relies on information from different centers. By coupling a weather model and an orbit determination solver we eliminate the dependence on one of the centers. The coupling has proven to be possible in the first stage, where no formatting has been applied to any of the models involved. This opens a window for further development and improvement to a coupling that has proven to be as good as the predecessor model.
Xavier Yepes-Arbós, Gijs van den Oord, Mario C. Acosta, and Glenn D. Carver
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 379–394, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-379-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-379-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Climate prediction models produce a large volume of simulated data that sometimes might not be efficiently managed. In this paper we present an approach to address this issue by reducing the computing time and storage space. As a case study, we analyse the output writing process of the ECMWF atmospheric model called IFS, and we integrate into it a data writing tool called XIOS. The results suggest that the integration between the two components achieves an adequate computational performance.
Twan van Noije, Tommi Bergman, Philippe Le Sager, Declan O'Donnell, Risto Makkonen, María Gonçalves-Ageitos, Ralf Döscher, Uwe Fladrich, Jost von Hardenberg, Jukka-Pekka Keskinen, Hannele Korhonen, Anton Laakso, Stelios Myriokefalitakis, Pirkka Ollinaho, Carlos Pérez García-Pando, Thomas Reerink, Roland Schrödner, Klaus Wyser, and Shuting Yang
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 5637–5668, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-5637-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-5637-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
This paper documents the global climate model EC-Earth3-AerChem, one of the members of the EC-Earth3 family of models participating in CMIP6. We give an overview of the model and describe in detail how it differs from its predecessor and the other EC-Earth3 configurations. The model's performance is characterized using coupled simulations conducted for CMIP6. The model has an effective equilibrium climate sensitivity of 3.9 °C and a transient climate response of 2.1 °C.
Sarah Sparrow, Andrew Bowery, Glenn D. Carver, Marcus O. Köhler, Pirkka Ollinaho, Florian Pappenberger, David Wallom, and Antje Weisheimer
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 3473–3486, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-3473-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-3473-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
This paper describes how the research version of the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts’ Integrated Forecast System is combined with climateprediction.net’s public volunteer computing resource to develop OpenIFS@home. Thousands of volunteer personal computers simulated slightly different realizations of Tropical Cyclone Karl to demonstrate the performance of the large-ensemble forecast. OpenIFS@Home offers researchers a new tool to study weather forecasts and related questions.
Janne Lampilahti, Katri Leino, Antti Manninen, Pyry Poutanen, Anna Franck, Maija Peltola, Paula Hietala, Lisa Beck, Lubna Dada, Lauriane Quéléver, Ronja Öhrnberg, Ying Zhou, Madeleine Ekblom, Ville Vakkari, Sergej Zilitinkevich, Veli-Matti Kerminen, Tuukka Petäjä, and Markku Kulmala
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 7901–7915, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-7901-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-7901-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Using airborne measurements we observed increased number concentrations of sub-25 nm particles in the upper residual layer. These particles may be entrained into the well-mixed boundary layer and observed at the surface. We attribute our observations to new particle formation in the topmost part of the residual layer.
Lauri Tuppi, Pirkka Ollinaho, Madeleine Ekblom, Vladimir Shemyakin, and Heikki Järvinen
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 5799–5812, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-5799-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-5799-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
This paper presents general guidelines on how to utilise computer algorithms efficiently in order to tune weather models so that they would produce better forecasts. The main conclusions are that the computer algorithms work most efficiently with a suitable cost function, certain forecast length and ensemble size. We expect that our results will facilitate the use of algorithmic methods in the tuning of weather models.
Irene Erner, Alexey Y. Karpechko, and Heikki J. Järvinen
Weather Clim. Dynam., 1, 657–674, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-1-657-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-1-657-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
In this paper we investigate the role of the tropospheric forcing in the occurrence of the sudden stratospheric warming (SSW) that took place in February 2018, its predictability and teleconnection with the Madden–Julian oscillation (MJO) by analysing the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) ensemble forecast. The purpose of the paper is to present the results of the analysis of the atmospheric circulation before and during the SSW and clarify the driving mechanisms.
Janne Lampilahti, Hanna Elina Manninen, Katri Leino, Riikka Väänänen, Antti Manninen, Stephany Buenrostro Mazon, Tuomo Nieminen, Matti Leskinen, Joonas Enroth, Marja Bister, Sergej Zilitinkevich, Juha Kangasluoma, Heikki Järvinen, Veli-Matti Kerminen, Tuukka Petäjä, and Markku Kulmala
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 11841–11854, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-11841-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-11841-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
In this work, by using co-located airborne and ground-based measurements, we show that counter-rotating horizontal circulations in the planetary boundary layer (roll vortices) frequently enhance regional new particle formation or induce localized bursts of new particle formation. These observations can be explained by the ability of the rolls to efficiently lift low-volatile vapors emitted from the surface to the top of the boundary layer where new particle formation is more favorable.
Cited articles
Barkmeijer, J., Buizza, R., Palmer, T. N., Puri, K., and Mahfouf, J.-F.:
Tropical singular vectors computed with linearized diabatic physics,
Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 127, 685–708,
https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49712757221, 2001. a
Berner, J., Shutts, G. J., Leutbecher, M., and Palmer, T. N.: A Spectral
Stochastic Kinetic Energy Backscatter Scheme and Its Impact on Flow-Dependent
Predictability in the ECMWF Ensemble Prediction System, J.
Atmos. Sci., 66, 603–626, https://doi.org/10.1175/2008JAS2677.1, 2009. a
Buizza, R., Leutbecher, M., and Isaksen, L.: Potential use of an ensemble of
analyses in the ECMWF Ensemble Prediction System, Q. J.
Roy. Meteor. Soc., 134, 2051–2066, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.346,
2008. a, b, c
ECMWF: PART VII: ECMWF WAVE MODEL, p. 7, IFS Documentation,
available at: https://www.ecmwf.int/node/19311 (last access: 21 April 2021), 2019c. a
ECMWF: OpenIFS CY43R3 release notes,
available at: https://confluence.ecmwf.int/display/OIFS/Release+notes+for+OpenIFS+43r3v1 (last access: 21 April 2021),
2020a. a
ECMWF: Severe Event Catalogue,
available at: https://confluence.ecmwf.int/display/FCST/201711+-+Tropical+Cyclone+-+Damrey (last access: 21 April 2021),
2020b. a
Ehrendorfer, M. and Tribbia, J.: Optimal prediction of forecast error
covariance through singular vectors, J. Atmos. Sci., 54, 286–313, 1997. a
Ferro, C. A. T.: Fair scores for ensemble forecasts, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 140, 1917–1923, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2270, 2014. a
Friederichs, P., Wahl, S., and Buschow, S.: Chapter 5 – Postprocessing for
Extreme Events, in: Statistical Postprocessing of Ensemble Forecasts, edited
by: Vannitsem, S., Wilks, D. S., and Messner, J. W., 127–154, Elsevier,
https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-812372-0.00005-4, 2018. a
GFDRR: 2017 Vietnam Post-Typhoon Damrey Rapid Damage and Needs Assessment,
available at: https://www.gfdrr.org/sites/default/files/publication/vietnam-damrey-rapid-assessment-report-en.pdf (last access: 21 April 2021),
2018. a
Haiden, T., Janousek, M., Bidlot, J.-R., Ferranti, L., Prates, F., Vitart, F.,
Bauer, P., and Richardson, D.: Evaluation of ECMWF forecasts, including
2016–2017 upgrades, Technical memorandum, 817, https://doi.org/10.21957/x397za5p5, 2017. a
Lang, S., Hólm, E., Bonavita, M., and Tremolet, Y.: A 50-member Ensemble of
Data Assimilations, 27–29, https://doi.org/10.21957/nb251xc4sl, 2019. a, b, c
Lang, S. T. K., Leutbecher, M., and Jones, S. C.: Impact of perturbation
methods in the ECMWF ensemble prediction system on tropical cyclone
forecasts, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 138,
2030–2046, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.1942, 2012. a, b, c
Lang, S. T. K., Bonavita, M., and Leutbecher, M.: On the impact of re-centring
initial conditions for ensemble forecasts, Q. J. Roy.
Meteor. Soc., 141, 2571–2581, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2543, 2015. a
Lang, S. T. K., Lock, S.-J., Leutbecher, M., Bechtold, P., and Forbes, R. M.:
Revision of the SPP model uncertainty scheme in the IFS, Q. J.
Roy. Meteor. Soc., 147, 1364–1381, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3978,
2021. a
Leutbecher, M.: Ensemble size: How suboptimal is less than infinity?, Q. J.
Roy. Meteor. Soc., 145, 107–128,
https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3387, 2019. a, b, c
Leutbecher, M. and Lang, S. T. K.: On the reliability of ensemble variance in
subspaces defined by singular vectors, Q. J.
Roy. Meteor. Soc., 140, 1453–1466, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2229, 2014. a, b, c
Leutbecher, M., Lock, S.-J., Ollinaho, P., Lang, S. T. K., Balsamo, G.,
Bechtold, P., Bonavita, M., Christensen, H. M., Diamantakis, M., Dutra, E.,
English, S., Fisher, M., Forbes, R. M., Goddard, J., Haiden, T., Hogan,
R. J., Juricke, S., Lawrence, H., MacLeod, D., Magnusson, L., Malardel, S.,
Massart, S., Sandu, I., Smolarkiewicz, P. K., Subramanian, A., Vitart, F.,
Wedi, N., and Weisheimer, A.: Stochastic representations of model
uncertainties at ECMWF: state of the art and future vision, Q. J.
Roy. Meteor. Soc., 143, 2315–2339, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3094,
2017. a, b
Lock, S.-J., Lang, S. T. K., Leutbecher, M., Hogan, R. J., and Vitart, F.:
Treatment of model uncertainty from radiation by the Stochastically Perturbed
Parametrization Tendencies (SPPT) scheme and associated revisions in the
ECMWF ensembles, Q. J.
Roy. Meteor. Soc., 145,
75–89, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3570, 2019. a, b
Lorenz, E. N.: A study of predictability of a 28-variable atmospheric model,
Tellus, 17, 321–333, 1965. a
Malardel, S., Wedi, N., Deconinck, W., Diamantakis, M., Kühnlein, C.,
Mozdzynski, G., Hamrud, M., and Smolarkiewicz, P.: A new grid for the IFS,
ECMWF Newsletter, 146, 23–28, 2016. a
Ollinaho, P.: pirkkao/OpenEPS: Initial release (Version v0.952), Zenodo, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3759127, 2020a. a
Ollinaho, P.: pirkkao/OpenEPS_PPro: Tag for Zenodo (Version v0.9), Zenodo, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4001495, 2020b. a
Ollinaho, P.: pirkkao/nc_plot: Tag for Zenodo (Version v0.9), Zenodo, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4001516, 2020c. a
Ollinaho, P., Bechtold, P., Leutbecher, M., Laine, M., Solonen, A., Haario, H., and Järvinen, H.: Parameter variations in prediction skill optimization at ECMWF, Nonlin. Processes Geophys., 20, 1001–1010, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-20-1001-2013, 2013. a
Ollinaho, P., Järvinen, H., Bauer, P., Laine, M., Bechtold, P., Susiluoto, J., and Haario, H.: Optimization of NWP model closure parameters using total energy norm of forecast error as a target, Geosci. Model Dev., 7, 1889–1900, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-7-1889-2014, 2014. a
Ollinaho, P., Lock, S.-J., Leutbecher, M., Bechtold, P., Beljaars, A., Bozzo,
A., Forbes, R. M., Haiden, T., Hogan, R. J., and Sandu, I.: Towards
process-level representation of model uncertainties: stochastically perturbed
parametrizations in the ECMWF ensemble, Q. J. Roy.
Meteor. Soc., 143, 408–422, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2931, 2017. a, b
Palmer, T. N., Gelaro, R., Barkmeijer, J., and Buizza, R.: SVs, metrics and
adaptive observations, J. Atmos. Sci., 55, 633–653, 1998. a
Puri, K., Barkmeijer, J., and Palmer, T. N.: Ensemble prediction of tropical
cyclones using targeted diabatic singular vectors, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,
127, 709–731, 2001. a
Rasku, T., Miettinen, J., Rinne, E., and Kiviluoma, J.: Impact of 15-day energy
forecasts on the hydro-thermal scheduling of a future Nordic power system,
Energy, 192, 116668, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2019.116668,
2020. a
Smith, P., Pappenberger, F., Wetterhall, F., del Pozo, J. T., Krzeminski, B.,
Salamon, P., Muraro, D., Kalas, M., and Baugh, C.: Chapter 11 – On the
Operational Implementation of the European Flood Awareness System (EFAS), in:
Flood Forecasting, edited by: Adams, T. E. and Pagano, T. C., Academic Press, 313–348,
https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-801884-2.00011-6,
2016. a
Sperati, S., Alessandrini, S., and Monache, L. D.: An application of the ECMWF
Ensemble Prediction System for short-term solar power forecasting, Sol.
Energy, 133, 437–450, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2016.04.016,
2016. a
Tuppi, L., Ollinaho, P., Ekblom, M., Shemyakin, V., and Järvinen, H.: Necessary conditions for algorithmic tuning of weather prediction models using OpenIFS as an example, Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 5799–5812, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-5799-2020, 2020. a
Yamaguchi, M., Lang, S. T. K., Leutbecher, M., Rodwell, M. J., Radnoti, G., and
Bormann, N.: Observation-based evaluation of ensemble reliability, Q.
J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 142, 506–514,
https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2675, 2016. a
Short summary
OpenEnsemble 1.0 is a novel dataset that aims to open ensemble or probabilistic weather forecasting research up to the academic community. The dataset contains atmospheric states that are required for running model forecasts of atmospheric evolution. Our capacity to observe the atmosphere is limited; thus, a single reconstruction of the atmospheric state contains some errors. Our dataset provides sets of 50 slightly different atmospheric states so that these errors can be taken into account.
OpenEnsemble 1.0 is a novel dataset that aims to open ensemble or probabilistic weather...
