Articles | Volume 13, issue 10
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-4869-2020
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-4869-2020
Model description paper
 | 
12 Oct 2020
Model description paper |  | 12 Oct 2020

Newly developed aircraft routing options for air traffic simulation in the chemistry–climate model EMAC 2.53: AirTraf 2.0

Hiroshi Yamashita, Feijia Yin, Volker Grewe, Patrick Jöckel, Sigrun Matthes, Bastian Kern, Katrin Dahlmann, and Christine Frömming

Viewed

Total article views: 3,741 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
2,453 1,203 85 3,741 337 103 75
  • HTML: 2,453
  • PDF: 1,203
  • XML: 85
  • Total: 3,741
  • Supplement: 337
  • BibTeX: 103
  • EndNote: 75
Views and downloads (calculated since 19 Dec 2019)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 19 Dec 2019)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 3,741 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 3,321 with geography defined and 420 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 24 Jul 2024
Download
Short summary
This paper describes the updated submodel AirTraf 2.0 which simulates global air traffic in the ECHAM/MESSy Atmospheric Chemistry (EMAC) model. Nine aircraft routing options have been integrated, including contrail avoidance, minimum economic costs, and minimum climate impact. Example simulations reveal characteristics of different routing options on air traffic performances. The consistency of the AirTraf simulations is verified with literature data.