Geoscientific Model Development
Geoscientific Model Development
GMD
Articles | Volume 13, issue 8
Articles | Volume 13, issue 8
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-3731-2020
© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-3731-2020
© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Articles | Volume 13, issue 8
Model evaluation paper
 | 
25 Aug 2020
Model evaluation paper |  | 25 Aug 2020

Global aerosol simulations using NICAM.16 on a 14 km grid spacing for a climate study: improved and remaining issues relative to a lower-resolution model

Daisuke Goto, Yousuke Sato, Hisashi Yashiro, Kentaroh Suzuki, Eiji Oikawa, Rei Kudo, Takashi M. Nagao, and Teruyuki Nakajima

Viewed

Total article views: 2,679 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
1,916 695 68 2,679 489 81 81
  • HTML: 1,916
  • PDF: 695
  • XML: 68
  • Total: 2,679
  • Supplement: 489
  • BibTeX: 81
  • EndNote: 81
Views and downloads (calculated since 26 Feb 2020)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 26 Feb 2020)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 2,679 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 2,187 with geography defined and 492 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 29 Jun 2024
Download
Short summary
We executed a global aerosol model over 3 years with the finest grid size in the world. The results elucidated that global annual averages of parameters associated with the aerosols were generally comparable to those obtained from a low-resolution model (LRM), but spatiotemporal variabilities of the aerosol components and their associated parameters provided better results closer to the observations than those from the LRM. This study clarified the advantages of the high-resolution model.
Read more