Geoscientific Model Development
Geoscientific Model Development
GMD
Articles | Volume 13, issue 5
Articles | Volume 13, issue 5
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-2487-2020
© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-2487-2020
© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Articles | Volume 13, issue 5
Methods for assessment of models
 | 
29 May 2020
Methods for assessment of models |  | 29 May 2020

Correcting a bias in a climate model with an augmented emulator

Doug McNeall, Jonny Williams, Richard Betts, Ben Booth, Peter Challenor, Peter Good, and Andy Wiltshire

Viewed

Total article views: 3,214 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
2,526 645 43 3,214 360 44 44
  • HTML: 2,526
  • PDF: 645
  • XML: 43
  • Total: 3,214
  • Supplement: 360
  • BibTeX: 44
  • EndNote: 44
Views and downloads (calculated since 29 Jul 2019)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 29 Jul 2019)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 3,214 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 2,736 with geography defined and 478 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 25 Apr 2024
Download
Short summary
In the climate model FAMOUS, matching the modelled Amazon rainforest to observations required different land surface parameter settings than for other forests. It was unclear if this discrepancy was due to a bias in the modelled climate or an error in the land surface component of the model. Correcting the climate of the model with a statistical model corrects the simulation of the Amazon forest, suggesting that the land surface component of the model is not the source of the discrepancy.
Read more