Articles | Volume 13, issue 5
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-2487-2020
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-2487-2020
Methods for assessment of models
 | 
29 May 2020
Methods for assessment of models |  | 29 May 2020

Correcting a bias in a climate model with an augmented emulator

Doug McNeall, Jonny Williams, Richard Betts, Ben Booth, Peter Challenor, Peter Good, and Andy Wiltshire

Download

Interactive discussion

Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement

Peer-review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision
AR by Douglas McNeall on behalf of the Authors (24 Feb 2020)  Author's response   Manuscript 
ED: Publish as is (15 Apr 2020) by David Topping
AR by Douglas McNeall on behalf of the Authors (16 Apr 2020)  Manuscript 
Download
Short summary
In the climate model FAMOUS, matching the modelled Amazon rainforest to observations required different land surface parameter settings than for other forests. It was unclear if this discrepancy was due to a bias in the modelled climate or an error in the land surface component of the model. Correcting the climate of the model with a statistical model corrects the simulation of the Amazon forest, suggesting that the land surface component of the model is not the source of the discrepancy.