70 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. The representation of alkalinity and the carbonate pump from CMIP5 to CMIP6 Earth system models and implications for the carbon cycle A. Planchat et al. 10.5194/bg-20-1195-2023
2. Modelling terrigenous DOC across the north west European Shelf: Fate of riverine input and impact on air-sea CO2 fluxes H. Powley et al. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.168938
3. Weak interannual variability of sea–air carbon flux in the Tropical Pacific Ocean simulated by CMIP6 models Y. Li et al. 10.1016/j.ocemod.2023.102300
4. An Assessment of Vertical Carbon Flux Parameterizations Using Backscatter Data From BGC Argo B. Wang & K. Fennel 10.1029/2022GL101220
5. Riverine impact on future projections of marine primary production and carbon uptake S. Gao et al. 10.5194/bg-20-93-2023
6. Evaluation of Ocean Biogeochemistry and Carbon Cycling in CMIP Earth System Models With the International Ocean Model Benchmarking (IOMB) Software System W. Fu et al. 10.1029/2022JC018965
7. Carbon isotopes in the marine biogeochemistry model FESOM2.1-REcoM3 M. Butzin et al. 10.5194/gmd-17-1709-2024
8. Added value of a regional coupled model: the case study for marine heatwaves in the Caribbean M. Pontoppidan et al. 10.1007/s00382-023-06758-y
9. Biogeochemical and Physical Assessment of CMIP5 and CMIP6 Ocean Components for the Southwest Pacific Ocean G. Rickard et al. 10.1029/2022JG007123
10. The sensitivity of Southern Ocean atmospheric dimethyl sulfide (DMS) to modeled oceanic DMS concentrations and emissions Y. Bhatti et al. 10.5194/acp-23-15181-2023
11. Evaluation of ocean dimethylsulfide concentration and emission in CMIP6 models J. Bock et al. 10.5194/bg-18-3823-2021
12. Spatio-temporal variability of surface chlorophyll and pCO2 over the tropical Indian Ocean and its long-term trend using CMIP6 models S. Mohanty et al. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.168285
13. Evaluating the biological pump efficiency of the Last Glacial Maximum ocean using <i>δ</i><sup>13</sup>C A. Morée et al. 10.5194/cp-17-753-2021
14. Zooplankton grazing is the largest source of uncertainty for marine carbon cycling in CMIP6 models T. Rohr et al. 10.1038/s43247-023-00871-w
15. Key physical processes and their model representation for projecting climate impacts on subarctic Atlantic net primary production: A synthesis M. Myksvoll et al. 10.1016/j.pocean.2023.103084
16. NorCPM1 and its contribution to CMIP6 DCPP I. Bethke et al. 10.5194/gmd-14-7073-2021
17. Assessing Climate Change Impact on Water Balance Components Using Integrated Groundwater–Surface Water Models (Case Study: Shazand Plain, Iran) F. Soltani et al. 10.3390/w15040813
18. Alkalinity biases in CMIP6 Earth system models and implications for simulated CO2 drawdown via artificial alkalinity enhancement C. Hinrichs et al. 10.5194/bg-20-3717-2023
19. More Frequent Abrupt Marine Environmental Changes Expected C. Heinze et al. 10.1029/2023GL106192
20. Net primary production annual maxima in the North Atlantic projected to shift in the 21st century J. Hieronymus et al. 10.5194/bg-21-2189-2024
21. Early detection of anthropogenic climate change signals in the ocean interior J. Tjiputra et al. 10.1038/s41598-023-30159-0
22. Trivial gain of downscaling in future projections of higher trophic levels in the Nordic and Barents Seas I. Nilsen et al. 10.1111/fog.12641
23. An Assessment of the Oceanic Physical and Biogeochemical Components of CMIP5 and CMIP6 Models for the Ross Sea Region G. Rickard et al. 10.1029/2022JC018880
24. An along-track Biogeochemical Argo modelling framework: a case study of model improvements for the Nordic seas V. Yumruktepe et al. 10.5194/gmd-16-6875-2023
25. A Synthesis of Global Coastal Ocean Greenhouse Gas Fluxes L. Resplandy et al. 10.1029/2023GB007803
26. Contrasting projections of the ENSO-driven CO2flux variability in the equatorial Pacific under high-warming scenario P. Vaittinada Ayar et al. 10.5194/esd-13-1097-2022
27. Antarctic Bottom Water and North Atlantic Deep Water in CMIP6 models C. Heuzé 10.5194/os-17-59-2021
28. Carbon–concentration and carbon–climate feedbacks in CMIP6 models and their comparison to CMIP5 models V. Arora et al. 10.5194/bg-17-4173-2020
29. Description of a global marine particulate organic carbon-13 isotope data set M. Verwega et al. 10.5194/essd-13-4861-2021
30. Disentangling the impact of Atlantic Niño on sea-air CO2 flux S. Koseki et al. 10.1038/s41467-023-38718-9
31. Atlantic circulation changes across a stadial–interstadial transition C. Waelbroeck et al. 10.5194/cp-19-901-2023
32. Incorporating the stable carbon isotope <sup>13</sup>C in the ocean biogeochemical component of the Max Planck Institute Earth System Model B. Liu et al. 10.5194/bg-18-4389-2021
33. Overview of the Norwegian Earth System Model (NorESM2) and key climate response of CMIP6 DECK, historical, and scenario simulations Ø. Seland et al. 10.5194/gmd-13-6165-2020
34. Ocean biogeochemistry in the coupled ocean–sea ice–biogeochemistry model FESOM2.1–REcoM3 Ö. Gürses et al. 10.5194/gmd-16-4883-2023
35. Nutrient uptake plasticity in phytoplankton sustains future ocean net primary production E. Kwon et al. 10.1126/sciadv.add2475
36. Intensified surface chlorophyll responses to the Indian Ocean Dipole under greenhouse warming G. Pathirana et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/ad4db8
37. Biogeochemical Timescales of Climate Change Onset and Recovery in the North Atlantic Interior Under Rapid Atmospheric CO2 Forcing L. Bertini & J. Tjiputra 10.1029/2021JC017929
38. Substantial regional climate change expected following cessation of CO2 emissions A. MacDougall et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/ac9f59
39. Carbon Fluxes in the Coastal Ocean: Synthesis, Boundary Processes, and Future Trends M. Dai et al. 10.1146/annurev-earth-032320-090746
40. Simulations of ocean deoxygenation in the historical era: insights from forced and coupled models Y. Takano et al. 10.3389/fmars.2023.1139917
41. What goes in must come out: the oceanic outgassing of anthropogenic carbon D. Couespel & J. Tjiputra 10.1088/1748-9326/ad16e0
42. Irreversible loss in marine ecosystem habitability after a temperature overshoot Y. Santana-Falcón et al. 10.1038/s43247-023-01002-1
43. The potential for structural errors in emergent constraints B. Sanderson et al. 10.5194/esd-12-899-2021
44. Rainfall Erosivity Characteristics during 1961–2100 in the Loess Plateau, China X. Li et al. 10.3390/rs16040661
45. Natural marine bromoform emissions in the fully coupled ocean–atmosphere model NorESM2 D. Booge et al. 10.5194/esd-15-801-2024
46. Extreme event counterfactual analysis of electricity consumption in Brazil: Historical impacts and future outlook under climate change G. Zuin et al. 10.1016/j.energy.2023.128101
47. Recommendations for the formulation of grazing in marine biogeochemical and ecosystem models T. Rohr et al. 10.1016/j.pocean.2022.102878
48. Overturning Pathways Control AMOC Weakening in CMIP6 Models J. Baker et al. 10.1029/2023GL103381
49. Twenty-first century ocean warming, acidification, deoxygenation, and upper-ocean nutrient and primary production decline from CMIP6 model projections L. Kwiatkowski et al. 10.5194/bg-17-3439-2020
50. Changes in global DMS production driven by increased CO2 levels and its impact on radiative forcing J. Zhao et al. 10.1038/s41612-024-00563-y
51. Observation-constrained estimates of the global ocean carbon sink from Earth system models J. Terhaar et al. 10.5194/bg-19-4431-2022
52. Carbon cycle feedbacks in an idealized simulation and a scenario simulation of negative emissions in CMIP6 Earth system models A. Asaadi et al. 10.5194/bg-21-411-2024
53. Estimation of Ocean Biogeochemical Parameters in an Earth System Model Using the Dual One Step Ahead Smoother: A Twin Experiment T. Singh et al. 10.3389/fmars.2022.775394
54. How Well do Earth System Models Capture Apparent Relationships Between Phytoplankton Biomass and Environmental Variables? C. Holder & A. Gnanadesikan 10.1029/2023GB007701
55. A Regime View of ENSO Flavors Through Clustering in CMIP6 Models P. Vaittinada Ayar et al. 10.1029/2022EF003460
56. Is there warming in the pipeline? A multi-model analysis of the Zero Emissions Commitment from CO<sub>2</sub> A. MacDougall et al. 10.5194/bg-17-2987-2020
57. Modellering av biogeokjemiske prosesser i den norske klimamodellen NorESM T. Berntsen 10.18261/issn.1504-3118-2021-05-06
58. Changes in the ground surface temperature in permafrost regions along the Qinghai–Tibet engineering corridor from 1900 to 2014: A modified assessment of CMIP6 Z. Xing et al. 10.1016/j.accre.2023.01.007
59. Comparison of ocean deoxygenation between CMIP models and an observational dataset in the North Pacific from 1958 to 2005 Y. Abe & S. Minobe 10.3389/fmars.2023.1161451
60. The Climate Response to Emissions Reductions Due to COVID‐19: Initial Results From CovidMIP C. Jones et al. 10.1029/2020GL091883
61. Southern Ocean anthropogenic carbon sink constrained by sea surface salinity J. Terhaar et al. 10.1126/sciadv.abd5964
62. Southern Ocean phytoplankton under climate change: a shifting balance of bottom-up and top-down control T. Xue et al. 10.5194/bg-21-2473-2024
63. Global Surface Ocean Acidification Indicators From 1750 to 2100 L. Jiang et al. 10.1029/2022MS003563
64. Deep Ocean Circulation Governs Sedimentary CaCO3 Accumulation in the Northeast Pacific Ocean J. Xia et al. 10.1029/2022JC018922
65. Evaluating the physical and biogeochemical state of the global ocean component of UKESM1 in CMIP6 historical simulations A. Yool et al. 10.5194/gmd-14-3437-2021
66. Climate model projections from the Scenario Model Intercomparison Project (ScenarioMIP) of CMIP6 C. Tebaldi et al. 10.5194/esd-12-253-2021
67. The south–north equatorial asymmetrical distribution of Chlorophyll in El Niño events in the observations and CMIP6 models L. Pan et al. 10.1016/j.ocemod.2023.102203
68. Emit now, mitigate later? Earth system reversibility under overshoots of different magnitudes and durations J. Schwinger et al. 10.5194/esd-13-1641-2022
69. Possibility for strong northern hemisphere high-latitude cooling under negative emissions J. Schwinger et al. 10.1038/s41467-022-28573-5
70. Tracking Improvement in Simulated Marine Biogeochemistry Between CMIP5 and CMIP6 R. Séférian et al. 10.1007/s40641-020-00160-0