Articles | Volume 12, issue 6
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-2571-2019
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-2571-2019
Methods for assessment of models
 | 
28 Jun 2019
Methods for assessment of models |  | 28 Jun 2019

Quantitative stratigraphic analysis in a source-to-sink numerical framework

Xuesong Ding, Tristan Salles, Nicolas Flament, and Patrice Rey

Related authors

Flexural isostatic response of continental-scale deltas to climatically driven sea level changes
Sara Polanco, Mike Blum, Tristan Salles, Bruce C. Frederick, Rebecca Farrington, Xuesong Ding, Ben Mather, Claire Mallard, and Louis Moresi
Earth Surf. Dynam., 12, 301–320, https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-12-301-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-12-301-2024, 2024
Short summary

Related subject area

Climate and Earth system modeling
Quantifying wildfire drivers and predictability in boreal peatlands using a two-step error-correcting machine learning framework in TeFire v1.0
Rongyun Tang, Mingzhou Jin, Jiafu Mao, Daniel M. Ricciuto, Anping Chen, and Yulong Zhang
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 1525–1542, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1525-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1525-2024, 2024
Short summary
Benchmarking GOCART-2G in the Goddard Earth Observing System (GEOS)
Allison B. Collow, Peter R. Colarco, Arlindo M. da Silva, Virginie Buchard, Huisheng Bian, Mian Chin, Sampa Das, Ravi Govindaraju, Dongchul Kim, and Valentina Aquila
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 1443–1468, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1443-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1443-2024, 2024
Short summary
Energy-conserving physics for nonhydrostatic dynamics in mass coordinate models
Oksana Guba, Mark A. Taylor, Peter A. Bosler, Christopher Eldred, and Peter H. Lauritzen
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 1429–1442, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1429-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1429-2024, 2024
Short summary
Evaluation and optimisation of the soil carbon turnover routine in the MONICA model (version 3.3.1)
Konstantin Aiteew, Jarno Rouhiainen, Claas Nendel, and René Dechow
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 1349–1385, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1349-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1349-2024, 2024
Short summary
Assessing the sensitivity of aerosol mass budget and effective radiative forcing to horizontal grid spacing in E3SMv1 using a regional refinement approach
Jianfeng Li, Kai Zhang, Taufiq Hassan, Shixuan Zhang, Po-Lun Ma, Balwinder Singh, Qiyang Yan, and Huilin Huang
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 1327–1347, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1327-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1327-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Abreu, V., Pederson, K., Neal, J., and Bohacs, K.: A simplified guide for sequence stratigraphy: nomenclature, definitions and method, in: William Smith Meeting, 22–23 September 2014, The Geological Society, Burlington House, London, Paper number: 4, 2014. a
Ainsworth, B. R., McArthur, J. B., Lang, S. C., and Vonk, A. J.: Quantitative sequence stratigraphy, AAPG Bull., 102, 1913–1939, 2018. a
Bond, G. C., Kominz, M. A., Steckler, M. S., and Grotzinger, J. P.: Role of thermal subsidence, flexure, and eustasy in the evolution of early Paleozoic passive-margin carbonate platforms, in: Controls on Carbonate Platform and Basin Development, SEPM, Special Publication, 44, 39–61, 1989. a
Braun, J.: The many surface expressions of mantle dynamics, Nat. Geosci., 3, 825–833, 2010. a
Burgess, P. M.: RESEARCH FOCUS: The future of the sequence stratigraphy paradigm: Dealing with a variable third dimension, Geology, 44, 335–336, 2016. a, b
Download
Short summary
This work introduced a quantitative stratigraphic framework within a source-to-sink numerical code, pyBadlands, and evaluated two stratigraphic interpretation techniques. This quantitative framework allowed us to quickly construct the strata formations and automatically produce strata interpretations. We further showed that the accommodation succession method, compared with the trajectory analysis method, provided more reliable interpretations as it is independent of time-dependent processes.