Articles | Volume 12, issue 1
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-131-2019
© Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-131-2019
© Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
The AFWA dust emission scheme for the GOCART aerosol model in WRF-Chem v3.8.1
Sandra L. LeGrand
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center, Hanover, NH, USA
Chris Polashenski
Alaska Projects Office, U.S. Army Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory, Fairbanks, AK, USA
Thayer School of Engineering, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA
Theodore W. Letcher
U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center, Hanover, NH, USA
Glenn A. Creighton
U.S. Air Force 557th Weather Wing, 16th Weather Squadron, Offutt Air Force Base, NE, USA
Steven E. Peckham
U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center, Hanover, NH, USA
Jeffrey D. Cetola
U.S. Air Force, Joint Base Langley–Eustis, VA, USA
Related authors
Sandra L. LeGrand, Theodore W. Letcher, Gregory S. Okin, Nicholas P. Webb, Alex R. Gallagher, Saroj Dhital, Taylor S. Hodgdon, Nancy P. Ziegler, and Michelle L. Michaels
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 1009–1038, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1009-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1009-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Ground cover affects dust emissions by reducing wind flow over the immediate soil surface. This study reviews a method for estimating ground cover effects on wind erosion from satellite-detected terrain shadows. We conducted a case study for a US dust event using the Weather Research and Forecasting with Chemistry (WRF-Chem) model. Adding the shadow-based method for ground cover effects markedly improved simulated results and may lead to better dust modeling outcomes in vegetated drylands.
Ian A. Raphael, Donald K. Perovich, Christopher M. Polashenski, and Robert L. Hawley
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-187, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-187, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Snow plays competing roles in the sea ice cycle by reflecting sunlight during summer (reducing melt) and insulating the ice from the cold atmosphere during winter (reducing growth). Observing where, when, and how much snow accumulates on sea ice is thus central to understanding the Arctic. Here, we describe a new snow depth observation system that is substantially cheaper and lighter than existing tools, and present a study demonstrating its potential to improve snow measurements on sea ice.
Sandra L. LeGrand, Theodore W. Letcher, Gregory S. Okin, Nicholas P. Webb, Alex R. Gallagher, Saroj Dhital, Taylor S. Hodgdon, Nancy P. Ziegler, and Michelle L. Michaels
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 1009–1038, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1009-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1009-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Ground cover affects dust emissions by reducing wind flow over the immediate soil surface. This study reviews a method for estimating ground cover effects on wind erosion from satellite-detected terrain shadows. We conducted a case study for a US dust event using the Weather Research and Forecasting with Chemistry (WRF-Chem) model. Adding the shadow-based method for ground cover effects markedly improved simulated results and may lead to better dust modeling outcomes in vegetated drylands.
Theodore Letcher, Julie Parno, Zoe Courville, Lauren Farnsworth, and Jason Olivier
The Cryosphere, 16, 4343–4361, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-4343-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-4343-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
We present a radiative transfer model that uses ray tracing to determine optical properties from computer-generated 3D renderings of snow resolved at the microscale and to simulate snow spectral reflection and transmission for visible and near-infrared light. We expand ray-tracing techniques applied to sub-1 cm3 snow samples to model an entire snowpack column. The model is able to reproduce known snow surface optical properties, and simulations compare well against field observations.
Océane Hames, Mahdi Jafari, David Nicholas Wagner, Ian Raphael, David Clemens-Sewall, Chris Polashenski, Matthew D. Shupe, Martin Schneebeli, and Michael Lehning
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 6429–6449, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-6429-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-6429-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
This paper presents an Eulerian–Lagrangian snow transport model implemented in the fluid dynamics software OpenFOAM, which we call snowBedFoam 1.0. We apply this model to reproduce snow deposition on a piece of ridged Arctic sea ice, which was produced during the MOSAiC expedition through scan measurements. The model appears to successfully reproduce the enhanced snow accumulation and deposition patterns, although some quantitative uncertainties were shown.
Marika M. Holland, David Clemens-Sewall, Laura Landrum, Bonnie Light, Donald Perovich, Chris Polashenski, Madison Smith, and Melinda Webster
The Cryosphere, 15, 4981–4998, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-4981-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-4981-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
As the most reflective and most insulative natural material, snow has important climate effects. For snow on sea ice, its high reflectivity reduces ice melt. However, its high insulating capacity limits ice growth. These counteracting effects make its net influence on sea ice uncertain. We find that with increasing snow, sea ice in both hemispheres is thicker and more extensive. However, the drivers of this response are different in the two hemispheres due to different climate conditions.
Nicholas C. Wright, Chris M. Polashenski, Scott T. McMichael, and Ross A. Beyer
The Cryosphere, 14, 3523–3536, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-14-3523-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-14-3523-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
This work presents a new dataset of sea ice surface fractions along NASA Operation IceBridge flight tracks created by processing hundreds of thousands of aerial images. These results are then analyzed to investigate the behavior of meltwater on first-year ice in comparison to multiyear ice. We find preliminary evidence that first-year ice frequently has a lower melt pond fraction than adjacent multiyear ice, contrary to established knowledge in the sea ice community.
Aleksey Malinka, Eleonora Zege, Larysa Istomina, Georg Heygster, Gunnar Spreen, Donald Perovich, and Chris Polashenski
The Cryosphere, 12, 1921–1937, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-12-1921-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-12-1921-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
Melt ponds occupy a large part of the Arctic sea ice in summer and strongly affect the radiative budget of the atmosphere–ice–ocean system. The melt pond reflectance is modeled in the framework of the radiative transfer theory and validated with field observations. It improves understanding of melting sea ice and enables better parameterization of the surface in Arctic atmospheric remote sensing (clouds, aerosols, trace gases) and re-evaluating Arctic climatic feedbacks at a new accuracy level.
Nicholas C. Wright and Chris M. Polashenski
The Cryosphere, 12, 1307–1329, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-12-1307-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-12-1307-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
Satellites, planes, and drones capture thousands of images of the Arctic sea ice cover each year. However, few methods exist to reliably and automatically process these images for scientifically usable information. In this paper, we take the next step towards a community standard for analyzing these images by presenting an open-source platform able to accurately classify sea ice imagery into several important surface types.
Kimberly A. Casey, Chris M. Polashenski, Justin Chen, and Marco Tedesco
The Cryosphere, 11, 1781–1795, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-11-1781-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-11-1781-2017, 2017
Short summary
Short summary
We analyzed Greenland Ice Sheet (GrIS) average summer surface reflectance and albedo (2001–2016). MODIS Collection 6 data show a decreased magnitude of change over time due to sensor calibration corrections. Spectral band maps provide insight into GrIS surface processes likely occurring. Correctly measuring albedo and surface reflectance changes over time is crucial to monitoring atmosphere–ice interactions and ice mass balance. The results are applicable to many long-term MODIS studies.
Related subject area
Atmospheric sciences
A Bayesian method for predicting background radiation at environmental monitoring stations in local-scale networks
Inclusion of the ECMWF ecRad radiation scheme (v1.5.0) in the MAR (v3.14), regional evaluation for Belgium, and assessment of surface shortwave spectral fluxes at Uccle
Development of a fast radiative transfer model for ground-based microwave radiometers (ARMS-gb v1.0): validation and comparison to RTTOV-gb
Indian Institute of Tropical Meteorology (IITM) High-Resolution Global Forecast Model version 1: an attempt to resolve monsoon prediction deadlock
Cell-tracking-based framework for assessing nowcasting model skill in reproducing growth and decay of convective rainfall
NeuralMie (v1.0): an aerosol optics emulator
Simulation performance of planetary boundary layer schemes in WRF v4.3.1 for near-surface wind over the western Sichuan Basin: a single-site assessment
FootNet v1.0: development of a machine learning emulator of atmospheric transport
Updates and evaluation of NOAA's online-coupled air quality model version 7 (AQMv7) within the Unified Forecast System
Quantifying the analysis uncertainty for nowcasting application
Improving the ensemble square root filter (EnSRF) in the Community Inversion Framework: a case study with ICON-ART 2024.01
The MESSy DWARF (based on MESSy v2.55.2)
An enhanced emission module for the PALM model system 23.10 with application for PM10 emission from urban domestic heating
Identifying lightning processes in ERA5 soundings with deep learning
Sensitivity of predicted ultrafine particle size distributions in Europe to different nucleation rate parameterizations using PMCAMx-UF v2.2
Explaining neural networks for detection of tropical cyclones and atmospheric rivers in gridded atmospheric simulation data
Accurate space-based NOx emission estimates with the flux divergence approach require fine-scale model information on local oxidation chemistry and profile shapes
Exploring a high-level programming model for the NWP domain using ECMWF microphysics schemes
Quantifying uncertainties in satellite NO2 superobservations for data assimilation and model evaluation
ML-AMPSIT: Machine Learning-based Automated Multi-method Parameter Sensitivity and Importance analysis Tool
Coupling the urban canopy model TEB (SURFEXv9.0) with the radiation model SPARTACUS-Urbanv0.6.1 for more realistic urban radiative exchange calculation
Forecasting contrail climate forcing for flight planning and air traffic management applications: the CocipGrid model in pycontrails 0.51.0
Simulation of the heat mitigation potential of unsealing measures in cities by parameterizing grass grid pavers for urban microclimate modelling with ENVI-met (V5)
AI-NAOS: an AI-based nonspherical aerosol optical scheme for the chemical weather model GRAPES_Meso5.1/CUACE
Orbital-Radar v1.0.0: a tool to transform suborbital radar observations to synthetic EarthCARE cloud radar data
The Modular and Integrated Data Assimilation System at Environment and Climate Change Canada (MIDAS v3.9.1)
Modeling of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) from global to regional scales: model development (IAP-AACM_PAH v1.0) and investigation of health risks in 2013 and 2018 in China
LIMA (v2.0): A full two-moment cloud microphysical scheme for the mesoscale non-hydrostatic model Meso-NH v5-6
SLUCM+BEM (v1.0): a simple parameterisation for dynamic anthropogenic heat and electricity consumption in WRF-Urban (v4.3.2)
NAQPMS-PDAF v2.0: a novel hybrid nonlinear data assimilation system for improved simulation of PM2.5 chemical components
Source-specific bias correction of US background and anthropogenic ozone modeled in CMAQ
Observational operator for fair model evaluation with ground NO2 measurements
Valid time shifting ensemble Kalman filter (VTS-EnKF) for dust storm forecasting
The third Met Office Unified Model-JULES Regional Atmosphere and Land Configuration, RAL3
An updated parameterization of the unstable atmospheric surface layer in the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) modeling system
The impact of cloud microphysics and ice nucleation on Southern Ocean clouds assessed with single-column modeling and instrument simulators
An updated aerosol simulation in the Community Earth System Model (v2.1.3): dust and marine aerosol emissions and secondary organic aerosol formation
Exploring ship track spreading rates with a physics-informed Langevin particle parameterization
Do data-driven models beat numerical models in forecasting weather extremes? A comparison of IFS HRES, Pangu-Weather, and GraphCast
Development of the MPAS-CMAQ coupled system (V1.0) for multiscale global air quality modeling
UA-ICON with NWP physics package (version: ua-icon-2.1): mean state and variability of the middle atmosphere
Assessment of object-based indices to identify convective organization
Diagnosis of winter precipitation types using Spectral Bin Model (SBM): Comparison of five methods using ICE-POP 2018 field experiment data
The Global Forest Fire Emissions Prediction System version 1.0
Sensitivity Studies of Four‐Dimensional Local Ensemble Transform Kalman Filter Coupled With WRF-Chem Version 3.9.1 for Improving Particulate Matter Simulation Accuracy
NEIVAv1.0: Next-generation Emissions InVentory expansion of Akagi et al. (2011) version 1.0
A Novel Method for Quantifying the Contribution of Regional Transport to PM2.5 in Beijing (2013–2020): Combining Machine Learning with Concentration-Weighted Trajectory Analysis
FLEXPART version 11: improved accuracy, efficiency, and flexibility
Low-level jets in the North and Baltic Seas: Mesoscale Model Sensitivity and Climatology
Challenges of high-fidelity air quality modeling in urban environments – PALM sensitivity study during stable conditions
Jens Peter Karolus Wenceslaus Frankemölle, Johan Camps, Pieter De Meutter, and Johan Meyers
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 1989–2003, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1989-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1989-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
To detect anomalous radioactivity in the environment, it is paramount that we understand the natural background level. In this work, we propose a statistical model to describe the most likely background level and the associated uncertainty in a network of dose rate detectors. We train, verify, and validate the model using real environmental data. Using the model, we show that we can correctly predict the background level in a subset of the detector network during a known
anomalous event.
Jean-François Grailet, Robin J. Hogan, Nicolas Ghilain, David Bolsée, Xavier Fettweis, and Marilaure Grégoire
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 1965–1988, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1965-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1965-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
The MAR (Modèle Régional Atmosphérique) is a regional climate model used for weather forecasting and studying the climate over various regions. This paper presents an update of MAR thanks to which it can precisely decompose solar radiation, in particular in the UV (ultraviolet) and photosynthesis ranges, both being critical to human health and ecosystems. As a first application of this new capability, this paper presents a method for predicting UV indices with MAR.
Yi-Ning Shi, Jun Yang, Wei Han, Lujie Han, Jiajia Mao, Wanlin Kan, and Fuzhong Weng
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 1947–1964, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1947-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1947-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Direct assimilation of observations from ground-based microwave radiometers (GMRs) holds significant potential for improving forecast accuracy. Radiative transfer models (RTMs) play a crucial role in direct data assimilation. In this study, we introduce a new RTM, the Advanced Radiative Transfer Modeling System – Ground-Based (ARMS-gb), designed to simulate brightness temperatures observed by GMRs along with their Jacobians. Several enhancements have been incorporated to achieve higher accuracy.
R. Phani Murali Krishna, Siddharth Kumar, A. Gopinathan Prajeesh, Peter Bechtold, Nils Wedi, Kumar Roy, Malay Ganai, B. Revanth Reddy, Snehlata Tirkey, Tanmoy Goswami, Radhika Kanase, Sahadat Sarkar, Medha Deshpande, and Parthasarathi Mukhopadhyay
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 1879–1894, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1879-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1879-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
The High-Resolution Global Forecast Model (HGFM) is an advanced iteration of the operational Global Forecast System (GFS) model. HGFM can produce forecasts at a spatial scale of ~6 km in tropics. It demonstrates improved accuracy in short- to medium-range weather prediction over the Indian region, with notable success in predicting extreme events. Further, the model will be entrusted to operational forecasting agencies after validation and testing.
Jenna Ritvanen, Seppo Pulkkinen, Dmitri Moisseev, and Daniele Nerini
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 1851–1878, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1851-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1851-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Nowcasting models struggle with the rapid evolution of heavy rain, and common verification methods are unable to describe how accurately the models predict the growth and decay of heavy rain. We propose a framework to assess model performance. In the framework, convective cells are identified and tracked in the forecasts and observations, and the model skill is then evaluated by comparing differences between forecast and observed cells. We demonstrate the framework with four open-source models.
Andrew Geiss and Po-Lun Ma
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 1809–1827, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1809-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1809-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Particles in the Earth's atmosphere strongly impact the planet's energy budget, and atmosphere simulations require accurate representation of their interaction with light. This work introduces two approaches to represent light scattering by small particles. The first is a scattering simulator based on Mie theory implemented in Python. The second is a neural network emulator that is more accurate than existing methods and is fast enough to be used in climate and weather simulations.
Qin Wang, Bo Zeng, Gong Chen, and Yaoting Li
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 1769–1784, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1769-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1769-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
This study evaluates the performance of four planetary boundary layer (PBL) schemes in near-surface wind fields over the Sichuan Basin, China. Using 112 sensitivity experiments with the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model and focusing on 28 wind events, it is found that wind direction was less sensitive to the PBL schemes. The quasi-normal scale elimination (QNSE) scheme captured temporal variations best, while the Mellor–Yamada–Janjić (MYJ) scheme had the least error in wind speed.
Tai-Long He, Nikhil Dadheech, Tammy M. Thompson, and Alexander J. Turner
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 1661–1671, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1661-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1661-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
It is computationally expensive to infer greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions using atmospheric observations. This is partly due to the detailed model used to represent atmospheric transport. We demonstrate how a machine learning (ML) model can be used to simulate high-resolution atmospheric transport. This type of ML model will help estimate GHG emissions using dense observations, which are becoming increasingly common with the proliferation of urban monitoring networks and geostationary satellites.
Wei Li, Beiming Tang, Patrick C. Campbell, Youhua Tang, Barry Baker, Zachary Moon, Daniel Tong, Jianping Huang, Kai Wang, Ivanka Stajner, and Raffaele Montuoro
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 1635–1660, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1635-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1635-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
The study describes the updates of NOAA's current UFS-AQMv7 air quality forecast model by incorporating the latest scientific and structural changes in CMAQv5.4. An evaluation during the summer of 2023 shows that the updated model overall improves the simulation of MDA8 O3 by reducing the bias by 8%–12% in the contiguous US. PM2.5 predictions have mixed results due to wildfire, highlighting the need for future refinements.
Yanwei Zhu, Aitor Atencia, Markus Dabernig, and Yong Wang
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 1545–1559, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1545-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1545-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Most works have delved into convective weather nowcasting, and only a few works have discussed the nowcasting uncertainty for variables at the surface level. Hence, we proposed a method to estimate uncertainty. Generating appropriate noises associated with the characteristic of the error in analysis can simulate the uncertainty of nowcasting. This method can contribute to the estimation of near–surface analysis uncertainty in both nowcasting applications and ensemble nowcasting development.
Joël Thanwerdas, Antoine Berchet, Lionel Constantin, Aki Tsuruta, Michael Steiner, Friedemann Reum, Stephan Henne, and Dominik Brunner
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 1505–1544, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1505-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1505-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
The Community Inversion Framework (CIF) brings together methods for estimating greenhouse gas fluxes from atmospheric observations. The initial ensemble method implemented in CIF was found to be incomplete and could hardly be compared to other ensemble methods employed in the inversion community. In this paper, we present and evaluate a new implementation of the ensemble mode, building upon the initial developments.
Astrid Kerkweg, Timo Kirfel, Duong H. Do, Sabine Griessbach, Patrick Jöckel, and Domenico Taraborrelli
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 1265–1286, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1265-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1265-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Normally, the Modular Earth Submodel System (MESSy) is linked to complete dynamic models to create chemical climate models. However, the modular concept of MESSy and the newly developed DWARF component presented here make it possible to create simplified models that contain only one or a few process descriptions. This is very useful for technical optimisation, such as porting to GPUs, and can be used to create less complex models, such as a chemical box model.
Edward C. Chan, Ilona J. Jäkel, Basit Khan, Martijn Schaap, Timothy M. Butler, Renate Forkel, and Sabine Banzhaf
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 1119–1139, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1119-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1119-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
An enhanced emission module has been developed for the PALM model system, improving flexibility and scalability of emission source representation across different sectors. A model for parametrized domestic emissions has also been included, for which an idealized model run is conducted for particulate matter (PM10). The results show that, in addition to individual sources and diurnal variations in energy consumption, vertical transport and urban topology play a role in concentration distribution.
Gregor Ehrensperger, Thorsten Simon, Georg J. Mayr, and Tobias Hell
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 1141–1153, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1141-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1141-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
As lightning is a brief and localized event, it is not explicitly resolved in atmospheric models. Instead, expert-based auxiliary descriptions are used to assess it. This study explores how AI can improve our understanding of lightning without relying on traditional expert knowledge. We reveal that AI independently identified the key factors known to experts as essential for lightning in the Alps region. This shows how knowledge discovery could be sped up in areas with limited expert knowledge.
David Patoulias, Kalliopi Florou, and Spyros N. Pandis
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 1103–1118, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1103-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1103-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
The effect of the assumed atmospheric nucleation mechanism on particle number concentrations and size distribution was investigated. Two quite different mechanisms involving sulfuric acid and ammonia or a biogenic organic vapor gave quite similar results which were consistent with measurements at 26 measurement stations across Europe. The number of larger particles that serve as cloud condensation nuclei showed little sensitivity to the assumed nucleation mechanism.
Tim Radke, Susanne Fuchs, Christian Wilms, Iuliia Polkova, and Marc Rautenhaus
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 1017–1039, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1017-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1017-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
In our study, we built upon previous work to investigate the patterns artificial intelligence (AI) learns to detect atmospheric features like tropical cyclones (TCs) and atmospheric rivers (ARs). As primary objective, we adopt a method to explain the AI used and investigate the plausibility of learned patterns. We find that plausible patterns are learned for both TCs and ARs. Hence, the chosen method is very useful for gaining confidence in the AI-based detection of atmospheric features.
Felipe Cifuentes, Henk Eskes, Enrico Dammers, Charlotte Bryan, and Folkert Boersma
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 621–649, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-621-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-621-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We tested the capability of the flux divergence approach (FDA) to reproduce known NOx emissions using synthetic NO2 satellite column retrievals from high-resolution model simulations. The FDA accurately reproduced NOx emissions when column observations were limited to the boundary layer and when the variability of the NO2 lifetime, the NOx : NO2 ratio, and NO2 profile shapes were correctly modeled. This introduces strong model dependency, reducing the simplicity of the original FDA formulation.
Stefano Ubbiali, Christian Kühnlein, Christoph Schär, Linda Schlemmer, Thomas C. Schulthess, Michael Staneker, and Heini Wernli
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 529–546, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-529-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-529-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We explore a high-level programming model for porting numerical weather prediction (NWP) model codes to graphics processing units (GPUs). We present a Python rewrite with the domain-specific library GT4Py (GridTools for Python) of two renowned cloud microphysics schemes and the associated tangent-linear and adjoint algorithms. We find excellent portability, competitive GPU performance, robust execution on diverse computing architectures, and enhanced code maintainability and user productivity.
Pieter Rijsdijk, Henk Eskes, Arlene Dingemans, K. Folkert Boersma, Takashi Sekiya, Kazuyuki Miyazaki, and Sander Houweling
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 483–509, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-483-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-483-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Clustering high-resolution satellite observations into superobservations improves model validation and data assimilation applications. In our paper, we derive quantitative uncertainties for satellite NO2 column observations based on knowledge of the retrievals, including a detailed analysis of spatial error correlations and representativity errors. The superobservations and uncertainty estimates are tested in a global chemical data assimilation system and are found to improve the forecasts.
Dario Di Santo, Cenlin He, Fei Chen, and Lorenzo Giovannini
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 433–459, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-433-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-433-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
This paper presents the Machine Learning-based Automated Multi-method Parameter Sensitivity and Importance analysis Tool (ML-AMPSIT), a computationally efficient tool that uses machine learning algorithms for sensitivity analysis in atmospheric models. It is tested with the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model coupled with the Noah-Multiparameterization (Noah-MP) land surface model to investigate sea breeze circulation sensitivity to vegetation-related parameters.
Robert Schoetter, Robin James Hogan, Cyril Caliot, and Valéry Masson
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 405–431, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-405-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-405-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Radiation is relevant to the atmospheric impact on people and infrastructure in cities as it can influence the urban heat island, building energy consumption, and human thermal comfort. A new urban radiation model, assuming a more realistic form of urban morphology, is coupled to the urban climate model Town Energy Balance (TEB). The new TEB is evaluated with a reference radiation model for a variety of urban morphologies, and an improvement in the simulated radiative observables is found.
Zebediah Engberg, Roger Teoh, Tristan Abbott, Thomas Dean, Marc E. J. Stettler, and Marc L. Shapiro
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 253–286, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-253-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-253-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Contrails forming in some atmospheric conditions may persist and become strongly warming cirrus, while in other conditions may be neutral or cooling. We develop a contrail forecast model to predict contrail climate forcing for any arbitrary point in space and time and explore integration into flight planning and air traffic management. This approach enables contrail interventions to target high-probability high-climate-impact regions and reduce unintended consequences of contrail management.
Nils Eingrüber, Alina Domm, Wolfgang Korres, and Karl Schneider
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 141–160, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-141-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-141-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Climate change adaptation measures like unsealings can reduce urban heat stress. As grass grid pavers have never been parameterized for microclimate model simulations with ENVI-met, a new parameterization was developed based on field measurements. To analyse the cooling potential, scenario analyses were performed for a densely developed area in Cologne. Statistically significant average cooling effects of up to −11.1 K were found for surface temperature and up to −2.9 K for 1 m air temperature.
Xuan Wang, Lei Bi, Hong Wang, Yaqiang Wang, Wei Han, Xueshun Shen, and Xiaoye Zhang
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 117–139, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-117-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-117-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
The Artificial-Intelligence-based Nonspherical Aerosol Optical Scheme (AI-NAOS) was developed to improve the estimation of the aerosol direct radiation effect and was coupled online with a chemical weather model. The AI-NAOS scheme considers black carbon as fractal aggregates and soil dust as super-spheroids, encapsulated with hygroscopic aerosols. Real-case simulations emphasize the necessity of accurately representing nonspherical and inhomogeneous aerosols in chemical weather models.
Lukas Pfitzenmaier, Pavlos Kollias, Nils Risse, Imke Schirmacher, Bernat Puigdomenech Treserras, and Katia Lamer
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 101–115, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-101-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-101-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
The Python tool Orbital-Radar transfers suborbital radar data (ground-based, airborne, and forward-simulated numerical weather prediction model) into synthetic spaceborne cloud profiling radar data, mimicking platform-specific instrument characteristics, e.g. EarthCARE or CloudSat. The tool's novelty lies in simulating characteristic errors and instrument noise. Thus, existing data sets are transferred into synthetic observations and can be used for satellite calibration–validation studies.
Mark Buehner, Jean-Francois Caron, Ervig Lapalme, Alain Caya, Ping Du, Yves Rochon, Sergey Skachko, Maziar Bani Shahabadi, Sylvain Heilliette, Martin Deshaies-Jacques, Weiguang Chang, and Michael Sitwell
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 1–18, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
The Modular and Integrated Data Assimilation System (MIDAS) software is described. The flexible design of MIDAS enables both deterministic and ensemble prediction applications for the atmosphere and several other Earth system components. It is currently used for all main operational weather prediction systems in Canada and also for sea ice and sea surface temperature analysis. The use of MIDAS for multiple Earth system components will facilitate future research on coupled data assimilation.
Zichen Wu, Xueshun Chen, Zifa Wang, Huansheng Chen, Zhe Wang, Qing Mu, Lin Wu, Wending Wang, Xiao Tang, Jie Li, Ying Li, Qizhong Wu, Yang Wang, Zhiyin Zou, and Zijian Jiang
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 8885–8907, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8885-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8885-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We developed a model to simulate polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) from global to regional scales. The model can reproduce PAH distribution well. The concentration of BaP (indicator species for PAHs) could exceed the target values of 1 ng m-3 over some areas (e.g., in central Europe, India, and eastern China). The change in BaP is lower than that in PM2.5 from 2013 to 2018. China still faces significant potential health risks posed by BaP although the Action Plan has been implemented.
Marie Taufour, Jean-Pierre Pinty, Christelle Barthe, Benoît Vié, and Chien Wang
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 8773–8798, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8773-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8773-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We have developed a complete two-moment version of the LIMA (Liquid Ice Multiple Aerosols) microphysics scheme. We have focused on collection processes, where the hydrometeor number transfer is often estimated in proportion to the mass transfer. The impact of these parameterizations on a convective system and the prospects for more realistic estimates of secondary parameters (reflectivity, hydrometeor size) are shown in a first test on an idealized case.
Yuya Takane, Yukihiro Kikegawa, Ko Nakajima, and Hiroyuki Kusaka
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 8639–8664, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8639-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8639-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
A new parameterisation for dynamic anthropogenic heat and electricity consumption is described. The model reproduced the temporal variation in and spatial distributions of electricity consumption and temperature well in summer and winter. The partial air conditioning was the most critical factor, significantly affecting the value of anthropogenic heat emission.
Hongyi Li, Ting Yang, Lars Nerger, Dawei Zhang, Di Zhang, Guigang Tang, Haibo Wang, Yele Sun, Pingqing Fu, Hang Su, and Zifa Wang
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 8495–8519, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8495-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8495-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
To accurately characterize the spatiotemporal distribution of particulate matter <2.5 µm chemical components, we developed the Nested Air Quality Prediction Model System with the Parallel Data Assimilation Framework (NAQPMS-PDAF) v2.0 for chemical components with non-Gaussian and nonlinear properties. NAQPMS-PDAF v2.0 has better computing efficiency, excels when used with a small ensemble size, and can significantly improve the simulation performance of chemical components.
T. Nash Skipper, Christian Hogrefe, Barron H. Henderson, Rohit Mathur, Kristen M. Foley, and Armistead G. Russell
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 8373–8397, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8373-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8373-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Chemical transport model simulations are combined with ozone observations to estimate the bias in ozone attributable to US anthropogenic sources and individual sources of US background ozone: natural sources, non-US anthropogenic sources, and stratospheric ozone. Results indicate a positive bias correlated with US anthropogenic emissions during summer in the eastern US and a negative bias correlated with stratospheric ozone during spring.
Li Fang, Jianbing Jin, Arjo Segers, Ke Li, Ji Xia, Wei Han, Baojie Li, Hai Xiang Lin, Lei Zhu, Song Liu, and Hong Liao
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 8267–8282, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8267-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8267-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Model evaluations against ground observations are usually unfair. The former simulates mean status over coarse grids and the latter the surrounding atmosphere. To solve this, we proposed the new land-use-based representative (LUBR) operator that considers intra-grid variance. The LUBR operator is validated to provide insights that align with satellite measurements. The results highlight the importance of considering fine-scale urban–rural differences when comparing models and observation.
Mijie Pang, Jianbing Jin, Arjo Segers, Huiya Jiang, Wei Han, Batjargal Buyantogtokh, Ji Xia, Li Fang, Jiandong Li, Hai Xiang Lin, and Hong Liao
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 8223–8242, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8223-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8223-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
The ensemble Kalman filter (EnKF) improves dust storm forecasts but faces challenges with position errors. The valid time shifting EnKF (VTS-EnKF) addresses this by adjusting for position errors, enhancing accuracy in forecasting dust storms, as proven in tests on 2021 events, even with smaller ensembles and time intervals.
Mike Bush, David L. A. Flack, Huw W. Lewis, Sylvia I. Bohnenstengel, Chris J. Short, Charmaine Franklin, Adrian P. Lock, Martin Best, Paul Field, Anne McCabe, Kwinten Van Weverberg, Segolene Berthou, Ian Boutle, Jennifer K. Brooke, Seb Cole, Shaun Cooper, Gareth Dow, John Edwards, Anke Finnenkoetter, Kalli Furtado, Kate Halladay, Kirsty Hanley, Margaret A. Hendry, Adrian Hill, Aravindakshan Jayakumar, Richard W. Jones, Humphrey Lean, Joshua C. K. Lee, Andy Malcolm, Marion Mittermaier, Saji Mohandas, Stuart Moore, Cyril Morcrette, Rachel North, Aurore Porson, Susan Rennie, Nigel Roberts, Belinda Roux, Claudio Sanchez, Chun-Hsu Su, Simon Tucker, Simon Vosper, David Walters, James Warner, Stuart Webster, Mark Weeks, Jonathan Wilkinson, Michael Whitall, Keith D. Williams, and Hugh Zhang
Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2024-201, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2024-201, 2024
Revised manuscript accepted for GMD
Short summary
Short summary
RAL configurations define settings for the Unified Model atmosphere and Joint UK Land Environment Simulator. The third version of the Regional Atmosphere and Land (RAL3) science configuration for kilometre and sub-km scale modelling represents a major advance compared to previous versions (RAL2) by delivering a common science definition for applications in tropical and mid-latitude regions. RAL3 has more realistic precipitation distributions and improved representation of clouds and visibility.
Prabhakar Namdev, Maithili Sharan, Piyush Srivastava, and Saroj Kanta Mishra
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 8093–8114, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8093-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8093-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Inadequate representation of surface–atmosphere interaction processes is a major source of uncertainty in numerical weather prediction models. Here, an effort has been made to improve the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model version 4.2.2 by introducing a unique theoretical framework under convective conditions. In addition, to enhance the potential applicability of the WRF modeling system, various commonly used similarity functions under convective conditions have also been installed.
Andrew Gettelman, Richard Forbes, Roger Marchand, Chih-Chieh Chen, and Mark Fielding
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 8069–8092, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8069-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8069-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Supercooled liquid clouds (liquid clouds colder than 0°C) are common at higher latitudes (especially over the Southern Ocean) and are critical for constraining climate projections. We compare a single-column version of a weather model to observations with two different cloud schemes and find that both the dynamical environment and atmospheric aerosols are important for reproducing observations.
Yujuan Wang, Peng Zhang, Jie Li, Yaman Liu, Yanxu Zhang, Jiawei Li, and Zhiwei Han
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 7995–8021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7995-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7995-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
This study updates the CESM's aerosol schemes, focusing on dust, marine aerosol emissions, and secondary organic aerosol (SOA) . Dust emission modifications make deflation areas more continuous, improving results in North America and the sub-Arctic. Humidity correction to sea-salt emissions has a minor effect. Introducing marine organic aerosol emissions, coupled with ocean biogeochemical processes, and adding aqueous reactions for SOA formation advance the CESM's aerosol modelling results.
Lucas A. McMichael, Michael J. Schmidt, Robert Wood, Peter N. Blossey, and Lekha Patel
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 7867–7888, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7867-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7867-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Marine cloud brightening (MCB) is a climate intervention technique to potentially cool the climate. Climate models used to gauge regional climate impacts associated with MCB often assume large areas of the ocean are uniformly perturbed. However, a more realistic representation of MCB application would require information about how an injected particle plume spreads. This work aims to develop such a plume-spreading model.
Leonardo Olivetti and Gabriele Messori
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 7915–7962, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7915-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7915-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Data-driven models are becoming a viable alternative to physics-based models for weather forecasting up to 15 d into the future. However, it is unclear whether they are as reliable as physics-based models when forecasting weather extremes. We evaluate their performance in forecasting near-surface cold, hot, and windy extremes globally. We find that data-driven models can compete with physics-based models and that the choice of the best model mainly depends on the region and type of extreme.
David C. Wong, Jeff Willison, Jonathan E. Pleim, Golam Sarwar, James Beidler, Russ Bullock, Jerold A. Herwehe, Rob Gilliam, Daiwen Kang, Christian Hogrefe, George Pouliot, and Hosein Foroutan
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 7855–7866, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7855-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7855-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
This work describe how we linked the meteorological Model for Prediction Across Scales – Atmosphere (MPAS-A) with the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) air quality model to form a coupled modelling system. This could be used to study air quality or climate and air quality interaction at a global scale. This new model scales well in high-performance computing environments and performs well with respect to ground surface networks in terms of ozone and PM2.5.
Markus Kunze, Christoph Zülicke, Tarique Adnan Siddiqui, Claudia Christine Stephan, Yosuke Yamazaki, Claudia Stolle, Sebastian Borchert, and Hauke Schmidt
Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2024-191, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2024-191, 2024
Revised manuscript accepted for GMD
Short summary
Short summary
We present the Icosahedral Nonhydrostatic (ICON) general circulation model with upper atmosphere extension with the physics package for numerical weather prediction (UA-ICON(NWP)). The parameters for the gravity wave parameterizations were optimized, and realistic modelling of the thermal and dynamic state of the mesopause regions was achieved. UA-ICON(NWP) now shows a realistic frequency of major sudden stratospheric warmings and well-represented solar tides in temperature.
Giulio Mandorli and Claudia J. Stubenrauch
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 7795–7813, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7795-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7795-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
In recent years, several studies focused their attention on the disposition of convection. Lots of methods, called indices, have been developed to quantify the amount of convection clustering. These indices are evaluated in this study by defining criteria that must be satisfied and then evaluating the indices against these standards. None of the indices meet all criteria, with some only partially meeting them.
Wonbae Bang, Jacob Carlin, Kwonil Kim, Alexander Ryzhkov, Guosheng Liu, and Gyuwon Lee
Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2024-179, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2024-179, 2024
Revised manuscript accepted for GMD
Short summary
Short summary
Microphysics model-based diagnosis such as the spectral bin model (SBM) recently has been attempted to diagnose winter precipitation types. In this study, the accuracy of SBM-based precipitation type diagnosis is compared with other traditional methods. SBM have relatively higher accuracy about snow and wetsnow events whereas lower accuracy about rain event. When microphysics scheme in the SBM was optimized for the corresponding region, accuracy about rain events was improved.
Kerry Anderson, Jack Chen, Peter Englefield, Debora Griffin, Paul A. Makar, and Dan Thompson
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 7713–7749, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7713-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7713-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
The Global Forest Fire Emissions Prediction System (GFFEPS) is a model that predicts smoke and carbon emissions from wildland fires. The model calculates emissions from the ground up based on satellite-detected fires, modelled weather and fire characteristics. Unlike other global models, GFFEPS uses daily weather conditions to capture changing burning conditions on a day-to-day basis. GFFEPS produced lower carbon emissions due to the changing weather not captured by the other models.
Jianyu Lin, Tie Dai, Lifang Sheng, Weihang Zhang, Shangfei Hai, and Yawen Kong
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3321, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3321, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
The effectiveness of assimilation system and its sensitivity to ensemble member size and length of assimilation window have been investigated. This study advances our understanding about the selection of basic parameters in the four-dimension local ensemble transform Kalman filter assimilation system and the performance of ensemble simulation in a particulate matter polluted environment.
Samiha Binte Shahid, Forrest G. Lacey, Christine Wiedinmyer, Robert J. Yokelson, and Kelley C. Barsanti
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 7679–7711, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7679-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7679-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
The Next-generation Emissions InVentory expansion of Akagi (NEIVA) v.1.0 is a comprehensive biomass burning emissions database that allows integration of new data and flexible querying. Data are stored in connected datasets, including recommended averages of ~1500 constituents for 14 globally relevant fire types. Individual compounds were mapped to common model species to allow better attribution of emissions in modeling studies that predict the effects of fires on air quality and climate.
Kang Hu, Hong Liao, Dantong Liu, Jianbing Jin, Lei Chen, Siyuan Li, Yangzhou Wu, Changhao Wu, Shitong Zhao, Xiaotong Jiang, Ping Tian, Kai Bi, Ye Wang, and Delong Zhao
Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2024-157, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2024-157, 2024
Revised manuscript accepted for GMD
Short summary
Short summary
This study combines Machine Learning with Concentration-Weighted Trajectory Analysis to quantify regional transport PM2.5. From 2013–2020, local emissions dominated Beijing's pollution events. The Air Pollution Prevention and Control Action Plan reduced regional transport pollution, but the eastern region showed the smallest decrease. Beijing should prioritize local emission reduction while considering the east region's contributions in future strategies.
Lucie Bakels, Daria Tatsii, Anne Tipka, Rona Thompson, Marina Dütsch, Michael Blaschek, Petra Seibert, Katharina Baier, Silvia Bucci, Massimo Cassiani, Sabine Eckhardt, Christine Groot Zwaaftink, Stephan Henne, Pirmin Kaufmann, Vincent Lechner, Christian Maurer, Marie D. Mulder, Ignacio Pisso, Andreas Plach, Rakesh Subramanian, Martin Vojta, and Andreas Stohl
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 7595–7627, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7595-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7595-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Computer models are essential for improving our understanding of how gases and particles move in the atmosphere. We present an update of the atmospheric transport model FLEXPART. FLEXPART 11 is more accurate due to a reduced number of interpolations and a new scheme for wet deposition. It can simulate non-spherical aerosols and includes linear chemical reactions. It is parallelised using OpenMP and includes new user options. A new user manual details how to use FLEXPART 11.
Bjarke Tobias Eisensøe Olsen, Andrea Noemi Hahmann, Nicolás González Alonso-de-Linaje, Mark Žagar, and Martin Dörenkämper
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3123, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3123, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Low-level jets (LLJs) are strong winds in the lower atmosphere, important for wind energy as turbines get taller. This study compares a weather model (WRF) with real data across five North and Baltic Sea sites. Adjusting the model improved accuracy over the widely-used ERA5. In key offshore regions, LLJs occur 10–15 % of the time and significantly boost wind power, especially in spring and summer, contributing up to 30 % of total capacity in some areas.
Jaroslav Resler, Petra Bauerová, Michal Belda, Martin Bureš, Kryštof Eben, Vladimír Fuka, Jan Geletič, Radek Jareš, Jan Karel, Josef Keder, Pavel Krč, William Patiño, Jelena Radović, Hynek Řezníček, Matthias Sühring, Adriana Šindelářová, and Ondřej Vlček
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 7513–7537, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7513-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7513-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Detailed modeling of urban air quality in stable conditions is a challenge. We show the unprecedented sensitivity of a large eddy simulation (LES) model to meteorological boundary conditions and model parameters in an urban environment under stable conditions. We demonstrate the crucial role of boundary conditions for the comparability of results with observations. The study reveals a strong sensitivity of the results to model parameters and model numerical instabilities during such conditions.
Cited articles
Alfaro, S. C., Gaudichet, A., Gomes, L., and Maillé, M.: Mineral aerosol
production by wind erosion: aerosol particle sizes and binding energies,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 25, 991–994, https://doi.org/10.1029/98GL00502,
1998. a
Al-Hemoud, A., Al-Sudairawi, M., Neelamanai, S., Naseeb, A., and Behbehani,
W.: Socioeconomic effect of dust storms in Kuwait, Arab. J. Geosci., 10,
18, doi:10.1007/s12517-016-2816-9, 2017. a
Alizadeh Choobari, O., Zawar-Reza, P., and Sturman, A.: Low level jet
intensification by mineral dust aerosols, Ann. Geophys., 31, 625–632,
https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-31-625-2013, 2013. a
Barnard, J. C., Fast, J. D., Paredes-Miranda, G., Arnott, W. P., and Laskin,
A.: Technical Note: Evaluation of the WRF-Chem “Aerosol Chemical to Aerosol
Optical Properties” Module using data from the MILAGRO campaign, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 10, 7325–7340, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-7325-2010, 2010. a
Barnum, B. H., Winstead, N. S., Wesely, J., Hakola, A., Colarco, P. R., Toon,
O. B., Ginoux, P., Brooks, G., Hasselbarth, L., and Toth, B.: Forecasting
dust storms using the CARMA-Dust Model and MM5 weather data, Environ. Model.
Softw., 19, 129–140, https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-8152(03)00115-4, 2004. a, b
Beljaars, A. C. M.: The parameterization of surface fluxes in large-scale
models under free convection, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 121, 255–270,
https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49712152203, 1994. a
Bian, H., Tie, X., Cao, J., Ying, Z., Han, S., and Xue, Y.: Analysis of a
severe dust storm event over China: Application of the WRF-Dust model,
Aerosol Air Qual. Res., 11, 419–428,
https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2011.04.0053, 2011. a
Boucher, O., Randall, D., Artaxo, P., Bretherton, C., Feingold, G., Forster,
P., Kerminen, V. M., Kondo, Y., Liao, H., Lohmann, U., and Rasch, P.: Clouds
and aerosols, in: Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis.
Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, edited by: Stocker, T. F., Qin,
D., Plattner, G.-K., Tignor, M., Allen, S. K., Boschung, J., Nauels, A., Xia,
Y., Bex, V., and Midgley, P. M., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge,
United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, 571–657, 2013. a
Bullard, J. E., McTainsh, G. H., and Pudmenzky, C.: Factors affecting the
nature and rate of dust production from natural dune sands, Sedimentology,
54, 169–182, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3091.2006.00827.x, 2007. a
Chappell, A., Warren, A., O'Donoghue, A., Robinson, A., Thomas, A., and
Bristow, C.: The implications for dust emission modeling of spatial and
vertical variations in horizontal dust flux and particle size in the
Bodélé Depression, Northern Chad, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 113,
D04214, https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD009032, 2008. a
Chen, S., Zhao, C., Qian, Y., Leung, L. R., Huang, J., Huang, Z., Bi, J.,
Zhang, W., Shi, J., Yang, L., and Li, D.: Regional modeling of dust mass
balance and radiative forcing over East Asia using WRF-Chem, Aeolian Res.,
15, 15–30, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aeolia.2014.02.001, 2014. a
Chepil, W. S.: Dynamics of wind erosion: I. Nature of movement of soil by
wind, Soil Sci., 60, 305–320, 1945. a
Chin, M., Savoie, D. L., Huebert, B. J., Bandy, A. R., Thornton, D. C.,
Bates, T. S., Quinn, P. K., Saltzman, E. S., and De Bruyn, W. J.: Atmospheric
sulfur cycle simulated in the global model GOCART: Comparison with field
observations and regional budgets, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 105,
24689–24712, https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JD900385, 2000. a, b
Colarco, P., da Silva, A., Chin, M., and Diehl, T.: Online simulations of
global aerosol distributions in the NASA GEOS-4 model and comparisons to
satellite and ground-based aerosol optical depth, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.
115, D14207, https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD012820, 2010. a
Colarco, P. R., Toon, O. B., and Holben, B. N.: Saharan dust transport to the
Caribbean during PRIDE: 1. Influence of dust sources and removal mechanisms
on the timing and magnitude of downwind aerosol optical depth events from
simulations of in situ and remote sensing observations, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 108, 8589,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD002658, 2003a. a, b, c, d, e
Colarco, P. R., Toon, O. B., Reid, J. S., Livingston, J. M., Russell, P. B.,
Redemann, J., Schmid, B., Maring, H. B., Savoie, D., Welton, E. J., and
Campbell, J. R.: Saharan dust transport to the Caribbean during PRIDE: 2.
Transport, vertical profiles, and deposition in simulations of in situ and
remote sensing observations, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 108,
8590, https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD002659, 2003b. a
Cremades, P. G., Fernández, R. P., Alllende, D. G., Mulena, G. C., and
Puliafito, S. E.: High resolution satellite derived erodibility factors for
WRF/Chem windblown dust simulations in Argentina, Atmósfera, 30, 11–25,
https://doi.org/10.20937/atm.2017.30.01.02, 2017. a
Darmenova, K., Sokolik, I. N., Shao, Y., Marticorena, B., and Bergametti, G.:
Development of a physically based dust emission module within the Weather
Research and Forecasting (WRF) model: Assessment of dust emission
parameterizations and input parameters for source regions in Central and East
Asia, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 114, D14201, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD011236, 2009. a, b, c, d, e
Defries, R. S. and Townshend, J. R. G.: Global land cover characterization
from satellite data: from research to operational implementation?, Global
Ecol. Biogeogr., 8, 367–379,
https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2699.1999.00139.x, 1999. a
De Longueville, F., Hountondji, Y.-C., Henry, S., and Ozer, P.: What do we
know about effects of desert dust on air quality and human health in West
Africa compared to other regions?, Sci. Total Environ., 409, 1–8,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.09.025, 2010. a
DeMott, P. J., Prenni, A. J., Liu, X., Kreidenweis, S. M., Petters, M. D.,
Twohy, C. H., Richardson, M. S., Eidhammer, T., and Rogers, D. C.: Predicting
global atmospheric ice nuclei distributions and their impacts on climate,
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 107, 11217–11222,
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0910818107, 2010. a
Dipu, S., Prabha, T. V., Pandithurai, G., Dudhia, J., Pfister, G., Rajesh,
K., and Goswami, B. N.: Impact of elevated aerosol layer on the cloud
macrophysical properties prior to monsoon onset, Atmos. Environ., 70,
454–467, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.12.036, 2013. a
Fast, J. D., Gustafson Jr., W. I., Easter, R. C., Zaveri, R. A., Barnard, J.
C., Chapman, E. G., Grell, G. A., and Peckham, S. E.: Evolution of ozone,
particulates, and aerosol direct forcing in an urban area using a new
fully-coupled meteorology, chemistry, and aerosol model, J. Geophys. Res.,
111, D21305, https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006721, 2006. a, b
Flaounas, E., Kotroni, V., Lagouvardos, K., Klose, M., Flamant, C., and
Giannaros, T. M.: Assessing atmospheric dust modelling performance of
WRF-Chem over the semi-arid and arid regions around the Mediterranean, Atmos.
Chem. Phys. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2016-307, 2016. a
Fountoukis, C., Ackermann, L., Ayoub, M. A., Gladich, I., Hoehn, R. D., and
Skillern, A.: Impact of atmospheric dust emission schemes on dust production
and concentration over the Arabian Peninsula, Model. Earth Syst. Environ.,
2, 115, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-016-0181-z, 2016. a
Freitas, S. R., Longo, K. M., Alonso, M. F., Pirre, M., Marecal, V., Grell,
G., Stockler, R., Mello, R. F., and Sánchez Gácita, M.: PREP-CHEM-SRC
– 1.0: a preprocessor of trace gas and aerosol emission fields for
regional and global atmospheric chemistry models, Geosci. Model Dev., 4,
419–433, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-4-419-2011, 2011. a
Gillette, D. A.: Production of dust that may be carried great distances, in:
Desert Dust: Origin, Characteristics, and Effect on Man, edited by:
Pewe, T. L., Spec. Pap. Geol. Soc. Am., 86, 11–26, 1981. a
Ginoux, P., Chin, M., Tegen, I., Prospero, J. M., Holben, B., Dubovik, O.,
and Lin, S. J.: Sources and distributions of dust aerosols simulated with the
GOCART model. J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 106, 20255–20273,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JD000053, 2001. a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j, k, l, m, n, o, p, q, r, s
Ginoux, P., Prospero, J. M., Torres, O., and Chin, M.: Long-term simulation
of global dust distribution with the GOCART model: correlation with North
Atlantic Oscillation, Environ. Modell. Softw., 19, 113–128,
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-8152(03)00114-2, 2004. a
Gong, S. L., Zhang, X. Y., Zhao, T. L., McKendry, I. G., Jaffe, D. A., and
Lu, N. M.: Characterization of soil dust aerosol in China and its transport
and distribution during 2001 ACE-Asia: 2. Model simulation and validation, J.
Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 108, 4262,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD002633, 2003.
Goudie, A. S. and Middleton, N. J.: Desert Dust in the Global System,
Springer, Berlin, 2006. a
Huang, J., Wang, T., Wang, W., Li, Z., and Yan, H.: Climate effects of dust
aerosols over East Asian arid and semiarid regions, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.,
119, 11398–11416, https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD021796, 2014. a
Hunt, E., Adams-Selin, R. Jones, S. L., and Creighton G.: Using a modified
Fécan soil moisture calculation to predict dust emissions over semi-arid
and arid regions, paper presented at the 15th Annual WRF Users Workshop,
National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO, June 2014,
available at: http://www2.mmm.ucar.edu/wrf/users/workshops/WS2014/ppts/5B.4.pdf
(last access: May 2018), 2014. a
Iacono, M. J., Delamere, J. S., Mlawer, E. J., Shephard, M. W., Clough, S.
A., and Collins, W. D.: Radiative forcing by long-lived greenhouse gases:
Calculations with the AER radiative transfer models, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.,
113, D13103, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD009944, 2008. a
In, H. J. and Park, S. U.: A simulation of long-range transport of Yellow
Sand observed in April 1998 in Korea, Atmos. Environ., 36, 4173–4187,
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(02)00361-8, 2002. a
Iversen, J. D. and White, B. R.: Saltation threshold on Earth, Mars and
Venus, Sedimentology, 29, 111–119,
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3091.1982.tb01713.x, 1982. a
Jish Prakash, P., Stenchikov, G., Kalenderski, S., Osipov, S., and Bangalath,
H.: The impact of dust storms on the Arabian Peninsula and the Red Sea,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 199–222, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-199-2015,
2015. a
Kain, J. S.: The Kain-Fritsch convective parameterization: an update, J.
Appl. Meteorol., 43, 170–181, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(2004)043<0170:TKCPAU>2.0.CO;2, 2004. a
Kalenderski, S., Stenchikov, G. L., and Zhao, C.: Modeling a typical
winter-time dust event over the Arabian Peninsula and the Red Sea, Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 13, 1999–2013, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-1999-2013,
2013. a
Kalenderski, S. and Stenchikov, G.: High-resolution regional modeling of
summertime transport and impact of African dust over the Red Sea and Arabian
Peninsula, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 121, 6435–6458,
https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD024480, 2016. a
Klose, M. and Shao, Y.: Stochastic parameterization of dust emission and
application to convective atmospheric conditions, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12,
7309–7320, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-7309-2012, 2012. a
Klose, M. and Shao, Y.: Large-eddy simulation of turbulent dust emission,
Aeolian Res., 8, 49–58, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aeolia.2012.10.010, 2013. a
Klose, M., Shao, Y., Li, X., Zhang, H., Ishizuka, M., Mikami, M., and Leys,
J. F.: Further development of a parameterization for convective turbulent dust
emission and evaluation based on field observations, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.,
119, 10441–10457, https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD021688, 2014. a
Kok, J. F., Parteli, E. J., Michaels, T. I., and Karam, D. B.: The physics of
wind-blown sand and dust, Rep. Prog. Phys., 75, 106901,
https://doi.org/10.1088/0034-4885/75/10/106901, 2012. a
Kumar, R., Barth, M. C., Pfister, G. G., Naja, M., and Brasseur, G. P.:
WRF-Chem simulations of a typical pre-monsoon dust storm in northern India:
influences on aerosol optical properties and radiation budget, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 14, 2431–2446, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-2431-2014, 2014. a
Letcher, T. W. and LeGrand, S. L.: A comparison of simulated dust produced by
three dust-emission schemes in WRF-Chem, ERDC/CRREL TR-18-13, U.S. Army
Engineer Research and Development Center, Hanover, New Hampshire, USA, 2018. a
Liu, M., Westphal, D. L., Wang, S., Shimizu, A., Sugimoto, N., Zhou, J., and
Chen, Y.: A high-resolution numerical study of the Asian dust storms of April
2001, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 108, 8653,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD003178, 2003. a
Liu, M., Westphal, D. L., Walker, A. L., Holt, T. R., Richardson, K. A., and
Miller, S. D.: COAMPS real-time dust storm forecasting during Operation Iraqi
Freedom, Weather Forecast., 22, 192–206, https://doi.org/10.1175/WAF971.1,
2007. a
Liu, Z., Liu, Q., Lin, H.-C., Schwartz, C. S., Lee, Y.-H., and Wang, T.:
Three?dimensional variational assimilation of MODIS aerosol optical depth:
Implementation and application to a dust storm over East Asia, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 116, D23206,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD016159, 2011. a
Lu, H. and Shao, Y.: A new model for dust emission by saltation bombardment,
J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 104, 16827–16842,
https://doi.org/10.1029/1999JD900169, 1999. a
Lu, S., da Silva, A. M., Chin, M., Wang, J., Moorthi, S., Juang, H., Chuang,
H.-Y., Tang, Y., Jones, L., Iredell, M., and McQueen, J. T.: The NEMS GFS
aerosol component; NCEP's global aerosol forecast system, NCEP Office Note
472, 2013. a
Lyapustin, A. and Wang, Y.: MCD19A2 MODIS/Terra+Aqua Land Aerosol Optical
Depth Daily L2G Global 1km SIN Grid V006, distributed by NASA EOSDIS Land
Processes DAAC, https://doi.org/10.5067/MODIS/MCD19A2.006, 2018. a
Mahowald, N., Albani, S., Kok, J. F., Engelstaeder, S., Scanza, R., Ward, D.
S., and Flanner M. G.: The size distribution of desert dust aerosols and its
impact on the Earth system, Aeolian Res., 15, 53–71,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aeolia.2013.09.002, 2014. a
Mahowald, N. M., Baker, A. R., Bergametti, G., Brooks, N., Duce, R. A.,
Jickells, T. D., Kubilay, N., Prospero, J. M., and Tegen, I.: Atmospheric
global dust cycle and iron inputs to the ocean, Global Biogeochem. Cy.,
19, GB4025, https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GB002402, 2005. a
Mahowald, N. M., Kloster, S., Engelstaedter, S., Moore, J. K., Mukhopadhyay,
S., McConnell, J. R., Albani, S., Doney, S. C., Bhattacharya, A., Curran, M.
A. J., Flanner, M. G., Hoffman, F. M., Lawrence, D. M., Lindsay, K.,
Mayewski, P. A., Neff, J., Rothenberg, D., Thomas, E., Thornton, P. E., and
Zender, C. S.: Observed 20th century desert dust variability: impact on
climate and biogeochemistry, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 10875–10893,
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-10875-2010, 2010. a
Marticorena, B. and Bergametti, G.: Modeling the atmospheric dust cycle: 1.
Design of a soil-derived dust emission scheme, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.,
100, 16415–16430, https://doi.org/10.1029/95JD00690, 1995. a
McDonald, E. V. and Caldwell, T. G.: Geochemical characteristics of Iraqi dust
and soil samples and related impacts to weapon malfunctions, in: Military
Geography and Geology: History and Technology, edited by: Nathanail, C. P.,
Abrahart, R. J., and Bradshaw, R. P., Land Quality Press, Nottingham, 258–265,
2008. a
Middleton, N. J.: Desert dust hazards: A global review, Aeolian Res., 24,
53–63, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aeolia.2016.12.001, 2017. a
Mitchell, K.: The community Noah land surface model (LSM), User's Guide,
available at:
ftp://ftp.emc.ncep.noaa.gov/mmb/gcp/ldas/noahlsm/ver_2.7.1
(last access: May 2018), 2005. a
Nabavi, S. O., Haimberger, L., and Samimi, C.: Sensitivity of WRF-chem
predictions to dust source function specification in West Asia, Aeolian Res.,
24, 115–131, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aeolia.2016.12.005, 2017. a
Nakanishi, M. and Niino, H.: An improved Mellor-Yamada level-3 model: Its
numerical stability and application to a regional prediction of advection
fog, Bound.-Layer Meteor., 119, 397–407,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-005-9030-8, 2006. a
Nickovic, S., Kallos, G., Papadopoulos, A., and Kakaliagou, O.: A model for
prediction of desert dust cycle in the atmosphere, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.,
106, 18113–18129, https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JD900794, 2001. a
NOAA/NCEP (National Centers for Environmental Prediction/National Weather
Service/NOAA/U.S. Department of Commerce): NCEP FNL Operational Model Global
Tropospheric Analyses, continuing from July 1999, Research data archive at
the National Center for Atmospheric Research, Computational and Information
Systems Laboratory, Boulder, CO,
https://doi.org/10.5065/D6M043C6 (last access: July 2017), 2000. a
Okin, G. S., Bullard, J. E., Reynolds, R. L., Ballantine, J. A. C.,
Schepanski, K., Todd, M. C., Belnap, J., Baddock, M. C., Gill, T. E., and
Miller, M. E.: Dust: Small-scale processes with global consequences. Eos,
Trans. Amer. Geophys. Union, 92, 241–242,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2011EO290001, 2011. a
Owen, P. R.: Saltation of uniform grains in air, J. Fluid Mech., 20,
225–242, 1964. a
Park, S. H., Gong, S. L., Zhao, T. L., Vet, R. J., Bouchet, V. S., Gong, W.,
Makar, P. A., Moran, M. D., Stroud, C., and Zhang, J.: Simulation of
entrainment and transport of dust particles within North America in April
2001 (“Red Dust Episode”), J. Geophys. Res., 112, D20209,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD008443, 2007. a
Peters-Lidard, C. D., Kemp, E. M., Matsui, T., Santanello Jr., J. A., Kumar,
S. V., Jacob, J. P., Clune, T., Tao, W.-K., Chin, M., Hou, A., Case, J. L.,
Kim, D., Kim, K.-M., Lau, W., Liu, Y., Shi, J., Starr, D., Tan, Q., Tao, Z.,
Zaitchik, B. F., Zavodsky, B., Zhang, S. Q., and Zupanski, M.: Integrated
modeling of aerosol, cloud, precipitation and land processes at
satellite-resolved scales, Environ. Model. Softw., 67, 149–159,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2015.01.007, 2015. a
Raupach, M.: Drag and drag partition on rough surfaces, Bound.-Lay. Meteor.,
60, 375–395, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00155203, 1992. a
Ravi, S., D'odorico, P., Breshears, D. D., Field, J. P., Goudie, A. S.,
Huxman, T. E., Li, J., Okin, G. S., Swap, R. J., Thomas, A. D., Van Pelt, S.,
Whicker, J. J., and Zobeck, T.: Aeolian processes and the biosphere, Rev.
Geophys., 49, RG3001, https://doi.org/10.1029/2010RG000328, 2011. a
Reynolds, C. A., Jackson, T. J., and Rawls, W. J.: Estimating soil
water-holding capacities by linking the Food and Agriculture Organization
soil map of the world with global pedon databases and continuous pedotransfer
functions, Water Resour. Res., 36, 3653–3662,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2000WR900130, 2000. a, b, c
Rizza, U., Anabor, V., Mangia, C., Miglietta, M. M., Degrazia, G. A., and
Passerini, G.: WRF-Chem simulation of a saharan dust outbreak over the
mediterranean regions, Ciência e Natura, 38, 330–336,
https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X20249, 2016. a
Rushing, J. F., Harrison, J. A., and Tingle, J., S.: Evaluation of
application methods and products for mitigating dust for
lines-of-communication and base camp operations, ERDC/GSL TR-05-9, U.S. Army
Engineer Research and Development Center, Waterways Experiment Station,
Vicksburg, Mississippi, USA, 2005. a
Saha, S., Moorthi, S., Pan, H.-L., Wu, X., Wang, J., Nadiga, S., Tripp, P.,
Kistler, R., Woollen, J., Behringer, D., Liu, H., Stokes, D., Grumbine, R.,
Gayno, G., Wang, J., Hou, Y.-T., Chuang, H., Juang, H.-M. H., Sela, J.,
Iredell, M., Treadon, R., Kleist, D., Van Delst., P., Keyser, D., Derber, J.,
Ek., M., Meng, J., Wei., H., Yang, R., Lord, S., van den Dool, H., Kumar, A.,
Wang, W., Long, C., Chelliah, M., Xue, Y., Huang, B., Schemm, J.-K.,
Ebisuzaki, W., Lin, R., Xie, P., Chen, M., Zhou, S., Higgins, W., Zou, C.-Z.,
Liu, Q., Chen, Y., Han, Y., Cucurull, L., Reynolds., R. W., Rutledge, G., and
Goldberg, M.: The NCEP climate forecast system reanalysis, B. Am.
Meteorol. Soc., 91, 1015–1058, https://doi.org/10.1175/2010BAMS3001.1, 2010. a
Shao, Y. P.: Physics and Modelling of Wind Erosion, Springer, Heidelberg,
2008. a
Shepherd, G., Terradellas, E., Baklanov, A., Kang, U., Sprigg, W., Nickovic,
S., Boloorani, A. D., Al-Dousari, A., Basart, S., Benedetti, A., and Sealy,
A.: Global assessment of sand and dust storms, United Nations Environment
Programme, Nairobi, 2016. a
Shinn, E. A., Smith, G. W., Prospero, J. M., Betzer, P., Hayes, M. L.,
Garrison, V., and Barber, R. T.: African dust and the demise of Caribbean
coral reefs, Geophys. Res. Lett., 27, 3029–3032,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2000GL011599, 2000. a
Sinclair, S. N. and Jones, S. L.: Subjective mapping of dust emission sources
by using MODIS imagery: Reproducibility assessment, ERDC/CRREL TR-17-8, U.S.
Army Engineer Research and Development Center, Hanover, New Hampshire, USA,
2017. a
Skamarock, W. C., Klemp, J. B., Dudhia, J., Gill, D. O., Barker, D. M., Duda,
M. G., Huang, X.-Y., Wang, W., and Powers, J. G.: A description of the
Advanced Research WRF Version 3, NCAR technical note, Mesoscale and
Microscale Meteorology Division, National Center for Atmospheric Research,
Boulder, Colorado, USA, 2008. a
Skiles, S. M., Painter, T. H., Belnap, J., Holland, L., Reynolds, R. L.,
Goldstein, H. L., and Lin, J.: Regional variability in dust-on-snow processes
and impacts in the Upper Colorado River Basin, Hydrol. Process., 29,
5397–5413, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.10569, 2015. a
Sprigg, W. A., Nickovic, S., Galgiani, J. N., Pejanovic, G., Petkovic, S.,
Vujadinovic, M., Vukovic, A., Dacic, M., DiBiase, S., Prasad, A., and
El-Askary, H.: Regional dust storm modeling for health services: the case of
valley fever, Aeolian Res., 14, 53–73,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aeolia.2014.03.001, 2014. a, b
Su, L. and Fung, J. C. H.: Sensitivities of WRF-Chem to dust emission schemes
and land surface properties in simulating dust cycles during springtime over
East Asia, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 120, 11215–11230,
https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD023446, 2015. a
Tanaka, T. Y. and Chiba, M.: Global simulation of dust aerosol with a
chemical transport model, MASINGAR, J. Meteor. Soc. Japan, 83, 255–278,
https://doi.org/10.2151/jmsj.83A.255, 2005. a
Teixeira, J. C., Carvalho, A. C., Tuccella, P., Curci, G., and Rocha, A.:
WRF-chem sensitivity to vertical resolution during a saharan dust event,
Phys. Chem. Earth, Parts A/B/C, 94, 188–195,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pce.2015.04.002, 2016. a
Tewari, M., Chen, F., Wang, W., Dudhia, J., LeMone, M. A., Mitchell, K., Ek,
M., Gayno, G., Wegiel, J., and Cuenca, R. H.: Implementation and verification
of the unified NOAH land surface model, 20th Conference on Weather Analysis
and Forecasting/16th Conference on Numerical Weather Prediction, Seattle, WA,
American Meteorological Society, 10–15 January, 2004. a
Thompson, G., Field, P. R., Rasmussen, R. M., and Hall, W. D.: Explicit
forecasts of winter precipitation using an improved bulk microphysics scheme.
Part II: Implementation of a new snow parameterization, Mon. Weather Rev.,
136, 5095–5115, https://doi.org/10.1175/2008MWR2387.1, 2008. a
Uzan, L., Egert, S., and Alpert, P.: Ceilometer evaluation of the eastern
Mediterranean summer boundary layer height – first study of two Israeli
sites, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 9, 4387–4398,
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-4387-2016, 2016. a
Wang, F., Zhao, X., Gerlein-Safdi, C., Mu, Y., Wang, D., and Lu, Q.: Global
sources, emissions, transport and deposition of dust and sand and their
effects on the climate and environment: a review, Front. Environ. Sci. Eng.,
11, 13,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-017-0904-z, 2017. a
Wang, K., Zhang, Y., Yahya, K., Wu, S. Y., and Grell, G.: Implementation and
initial application of new chemistry-aerosol options in WRF/Chem for
simulating secondary organic aerosols and aerosol indirect effects for
regional air quality, Atmos. Environ., 115, 716–732,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.12.007, 2015. a
Wang, W., Bruyère, C., Duda, M., Dudhia, J., Gill, D., Michael, K., Keene,
K., Chen, M., Lin, H.-C., Michalakes, J., Rizvi, S., Zhang, X., Berner, J.,
Soyoung, H., and Fossell, K.: Guide for the Advanced Research WRF (ARW)
Modeling System Version 3.9, NCAR technical note, Mesoscale and Microscale
Meteorology Division, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder,
Colorado, USA, 2017. a
Wang, Z., Ueda, H., and Huang, M., Y.: A deflation module for use in modeling
long-range transport of yellow sand over East Asia, J. Geophys. Res., 105,
26947–26959, https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JD900370, 2000. a
Webb, N. P., Chappell, A., Strong, C. L., Marx, S. K., and McTainsh, G. H.:
The significance of carbon-enriched dust for global carbon accounting, Global
Change Biol., 18, 3275–3278,
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2012.02780.x, 2012. a
Winker, D. M., Vaughan, M. A., Omar, A., Hu, Y., Powell, K. A., Liu, Z.,
Hunt, W. H., and Young, S. A.: Overview of the CALIPSO mission and CALIOP
data processing algorithms, J. Atmos. Ocean. Technol., 26, 2310–2323,
https://doi.org/10.1175/2009JTECHA1281.1, 2009. a
Woodward, S.: Modeling the atmospheric life cycle and radiative impact of
mineral dust in the Hadley Centre climate model, J. Geophys. Res., 106,
18155–18166, https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JD900795, 2001. a
Young, S. A. and Vaughan, M. A.: The retrieval of profiles of particulate
extinction from Cloud–Aerosol Lidar and Infrared Pathfinder Satellite
Observations (CALIPSO) data: Algorithm Description. J. Atmos. Ocean.
Technol., 26, 1105–1119, https://doi.org/10.1175/2008JTECHA1221.1, 2009. a
Zender, C. S.: Mineral Dust Entrainment and Deposition (DEAD) Model:
Description and 1990s dust climatology, J. Geophys. Res., 108, 4416,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD002775, 2003. a
Zhang, Y., Liu, Y., Kucera, P. A., Alharbi, B. H., Pan, L., and Ghulam, A.:
Dust modeling over Saudi Arabia using WRF-Chem: March 2009 severe dust case,
Atmos. Environ., 119, 118–130,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.08.032, 2015. a
Zhao, C., Liu, X., Leung, L. R., Johnson, B., McFarlane, S. A., Gustafson
Jr., W. I., Fast, J. D., and Easter, R.: The spatial distribution of mineral
dust and its shortwave radiative forcing over North Africa: modeling
sensitivities to dust emissions and aerosol size treatments, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 10, 8821–8838, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-8821-2010, 2010. a
Zhao, C., Liu, X., Ruby Leung, L., and Hagos, S.: Radiative impact of mineral
dust on monsoon precipitation variability over West Africa, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 11, 1879-1893, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-1879-2011, 2011. a
Zhao, C., Chen, S., Leung, L. R., Qian, Y., Kok, J. F., Zaveri, R. A., and
Huang, J.: Uncertainty in modeling dust mass balance and radiative forcing
from size parameterization, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 10733–10753,
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-10733-2013, 2013. a
Zhao, T. L., Gong, S. L., Zhang, X. Y., Abdel-Mawgoud, A., and Shao, Y. P.:
An assessment of dust emission schemes in modeling east Asian dust storms, J.
Geophys. Res., 111, D05S90, https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD005746, 2006. a
Short summary
This paper reviews the history, code, and performance of the three dust emission schemes embedded in the WRF-Chem model, including the GOCART, AFWA, and UoC dust emission schemes, and provides the first full documentation of the AFWA scheme. A simulation case study is provided to explore differences in model output. Results highlight the relative strengths of each scheme, indicate reasons for disagreement, and demonstrate the need for improved terrain characterization in dust emission models.
This paper reviews the history, code, and performance of the three dust emission schemes...