Authors did not fully address the Referee's comments, and hence the revised manuscript cannot go to the next round of evaluation without corrections.

### Major issues ###
(a) In your address for the item (6) from the Referee#2
I could not find any definition of root-mean-square in the revised manuscript.

(b) In your address for the item (8) from the Referee#2
I could not find any revision on this comment.

(c) In your address for the item (9) from the Referee#2
Here, the referee mentioned figure 2 (figure 3 in the revised manuscript). Authors have to carefully read letters.


### Typos ###
Taking this opportunity, please correct typos in your letter to referees.

(a) In your address for the item (3) from the Referee#1
Wrong: (P11L13-14)
Correct: (P11L3-4)

(b) In your address for the item (4) from the Referee#1
Wrong: (Fig 1)
Correct: (Fig 5)

(c) In your address for the item (4) from the Referee#1
Wrong: (Fig 2)
Correct: (Fig 6)

(d) In your address for the item (6) from the Referee#2
Wrong: (P9L9-10)
Correct: (P10L23-24)

(e) In your address for the item (8) from the Referee#2
Wrong: (Fig 3)
Correct: (Fig 2)

I confirmed that authors addressed all of comments from referees.
Now I can encourage publishing this manuscript in the GMD.